Printer Friendly

Goebbels and Ginsburg give their endorsement.

A friend recently opined to me about his increasing frustration with those who are unable to distinguish between politics and religion, particularly those for whom politics is their religion. Actually, this describes statists of all stripes, I think. People either want to use the power of the state to abscond with the property of others in order to complete The Lord's work," or they justify the state's trampling of individual rights in the name of "the greater good." Joseph Goebbels of Germany's Third Reich once proclaimed, "My party is my church and I believe I serve the Lord best if I do His will, and liberate my oppressed people from the fetters of slavery. That is my gospel.... I am only the instrument that God uses to sing His song. I am only the vessel that nature smilingly fills with new wine."

The supremacy of the state and the individual's role in feeding this parasitic institution are unapologetically clear in the writings of men like Goebbels, while more subtle, but no less fascistic musings and thoughts surround us today. For instance, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg maintains, "Frankly I had thought that, at the time Roe [v. Wade, 1973] was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of." Actually, that is not very subtle at all, is it?

While the German fascists claimed to hate the socialists, Austrian-born economist and philosopher Friedrich von Hayek's Road to Serfdom shook everyone who read it by the collar, pointing to the central planning that characterized both of these economic and political systems. Ginsburg's quote indicates that she sees herself as someone who knows who should be born and who should not, perhaps who should be allowed to stay alive and who should not.

What does any of this have to do with U.S. health care? Lawrence Huntoon writes in the August issue of AAPS News: "According to an article in The Wall Street Journal, insurance companies are paying oncologists $350 per patient per month for strict adherence to treatment protocols--which are geared to cost containment. It is very predictable. ObamaCare forces physicians into accountable care organizations (ACOs), and then strict cost-containment protocols are implemented. In the realm of cancer care, these are death panels." Combining health care with government invariably results in the individual's interests versus the state's interests scenario playing out. Guess who historically has won this battle? Once the "state" is paying for health care, it determines what health care will be paid for--even what qualifies as meeting the definition of health care. After all, "public" resources are distributed by popular vote and that is not good news for the sick minority.

That the Federal government is mandating the collection of virtually everyone's health information and data should be of great concern to anyone who has followed any history of what governments typically do with information. It desires this information in order to use it--to ration.

Those same folks who claim to want all of this data for our own good and mandate vaccinations ostensibly to prevent the spread of communicable diseases are the same ones who just brought the Ebola virus into Georgia. Doesn't square, does it?

G. Keith Smith is founder of The Surgery Center of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, where he serves as medical director, CEO, and managing partner.
COPYRIGHT 2014 Society for the Advancement of Education
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:ObamaCare; Joseph Goebbels and Ruth Bader Ginsburg; health care issues in the United States
Author:Smith, G. Keith
Publication:USA Today (Magazine)
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Oct 1, 2014
Words:565
Previous Article:The benefits of folic acid before pregnancy.
Next Article:Cure for most lethal gynecologic cancer?
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters