Printer Friendly

Zen and the art of briefing.

I listened in stunned amazement as a young JO briefed the mission objectives: "Protect the good guys, kill the bad guys, win the war, and kiss the girls."

Where was I? In the theater watching a film from World War II? The event involved unit-level training between large-force exercises during Cope Thunder in Alaska. This was the young ECMO's first chance at briefing a section since he departed the FRS. We had an extensive debrief afterward--all the more grueling for our lieutenant junior grade because the event was eventually cancelled for weather.

This particular brief on solidified my theory that a flight never can be of higher quality than the brief. All the essential information to the mission must be communicated clearly during the brief, or the mission is doomed in the chocks. Have we all muddled through missions where everyone walked out of the mass brief scratching their heads? Absolutely. Should aid this be "ops normal"? Absolutely not.

Two examples illustrate the extreme boundaries of this theory: the single-aircraft, unit-level-training sortie and the multiplane, multiservice, multinational aluminum cloud over the beach.

Basic Unit-Level Training From "Home Plate"

From an ORM perspective, this type of hop has the potential to be the most dangerous because of complacency. Having said that, basic training possibly can recover from a shoddy brief. Do I recommend this briefing technique? Obviously not, but one can recover somewhat in a mission where everyone is very familiar with all of the mission aspects.

Let's use a single EA-6B, SEAD mission, out of NAS Whidbey as an example. All the aircrew are familiar with getting in and out of NASWI. They can spout HARM timelines in their sleep and just about have the FCC-jammer-deconfliction frequencies memorized. How hard can this be? Here's a graphical depiction:

Brief. Fairly low quality. Whether driven by complacency or myriad other reasons, this crew was not "wowed" by their briefer before they walked.

Brief to walk. The decline in quality here is attributable to confusion and unanswered questions from the brief. The "fog of war" rolls in.

Takeoff to mission. "Wow, I guess we should have looked at the NOTAMS more closely ... I've never flown that departure before ... and what were the altitudes in the MOA again?"

Mission to RTB. Fortunately, our crew is very proficient here. They pick up some quality point by executing the mission very well. Unfortunately, this spike results from experience, not preparation.

RTB to approach. "Wow! Center sure was testy today. We didn't really try to exit from the FLIP point, but they knew we were in there. The ILS is down? I didn't know that."

Approach to debrief. "Quiet hours for the next 10 minutes? I guess we'll go to the penalty box until we can shoot the approach."

Debrief. On a hop such as this, the steepest positive slope occurs during the debrief. The mission never had a chance, but, all hands can learn from their mistakes and should prepare more thoroughly for the next mission.

Going "Downtown" With a Large Strike Package

While a unit-level-training sortie might survive a poor brief, any formula that includes a poor brief can be deadly in combat. At the very least, the briefer's professional reputation will be marred, and aircrew will return to the debrief shaking their heads, saying, "I'll never do that again."

The graphic that follows depicts a poorly briefed, complex-strike mission:

Brief to walk. Again, we see the "fog of war" settling in, with one exception: This time, it is not merely a euphemism. These crews are walking to war.

Walk to LSP. "What LSP?" shouted the handler 30 minutes before launch. The same scenario was being played out at an expeditionary airfield hundreds of miles away. Planning applies to the brief, as well as all facets of the mission. External agencies are especially crucial. Not everyone has a seat in CVIC.

LSP to weather. As the lead penetrated deck after deck of clouds following the launch, he thought, "Maybe I shouldn't have cut off the weather guesser, but I was running late in my brief ..."

Weather to tanking. Tanking? What could possibly go wrong with tanking? "It figures," the strike lead thought, "today, of all days, two KC-135s decide to break. I did kind of blow through the slide. I hope the crews were paying attention--not that it would have mattered much. I didn't have a lot of time to spend on the plan last night ..."

Tanking to threat. "AWACS, whaddya mean those guys are 70 miles from their orbit point? Didn't your crew get the change I sent off of the carrier on SIPRNET?"

Threat to mission. "A pop up, say what?" The strike lead then remembered he'd failed to press for the MOB refresh before the brief. If only all of those kneeboard cards had come out of the print shop sooner.

Mission to debrief. Everyone came home this time, but the target will have to be restruck. The strike lead was lucky the next milestone on this graphic was not CSAR.

Debrief. After a lengthy debrief with CAG and his CO that night, the strike lead reflected on the entire mission. His CO kept going back to the quality of the brief. The air wing shouldn't have to launch again for the same targets--it will now.

Whether in combat afar or in training at home, every successful mission begins with a solid, professional brief. Your mission never will be better than you brief. On those rough days, your mission quality can get quite a spike from an honest, quality debrief. Keep it solid on both ends of the graph. That is the mark of a professional.

Cdr. Papadakis is the commanding officer of VAQ-133.
COPYRIGHT 2002 U.S. Naval Safety Center
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Papadakis, R.P.
Publication:Approach
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Dec 1, 2002
Words:952
Previous Article:Telephoto NVGs.
Next Article:Brownshoes in action commix: "the kind real aviators like". (Classic).
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters