Printer Friendly

Writer thankful for understanding.

I would like to thank Ruth DeSouza for her letter, Experiences of migrant mothers, (Kai Tiaki Nursing New Zealand, December/January 2006/ 2007, p3) in response to my article Respecting breastfeeding choices, (Kai Tiaki Nursing New Zealand, October 2006, p23) and providing recent supporting research. It was pleasing to know she fully comprehended the intent of my article, which was quite simply to provide compassion, understanding and to allow women choices in the 21st century.

However, I feel Gabi England, in her letter, Rooming-in promotes breast feeding, and the Hawke's Bay Lactation group, in its letter, Erroneous presumptions in article, failed to recognise this, but rather deviated from the focus, while still making for some interesting reading.

I believe giving choices is not "erroneous", "presumptuous" or "outdated", as stated in the letter from the Hawke's Bay lactation group, but a practice that is modern in its concept and has replaced the outdated authoritarianism of yesteryear when medical staff "knew better" than the women they served.

Wendy Hicks, RN, RM, Hawke's Boy
COPYRIGHT 2007 New Zealand Nurses' Organisation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:LETTERS: TELL US WHAT YOU THINK
Author:Hicks, Wendy
Publication:Kai Tiaki: Nursing New Zealand
Article Type:Letter to the editor
Date:Feb 1, 2007
Words:171
Previous Article:Letters highlight breastfeeding conflicts.
Next Article:Concerns about council audit process.


Related Articles
"Eudora darling": a college student peeks inside letters written to a Mississippi legend.
Many fight a lonely battle: let's keep real voices, original writing, and unique perspectives in our letters.
An e-mail conversation: how to deal with letter-planters; let's try the Town Square rule for determining legitimate letters.
How to reject a letter writer.
Turf or astroturf? A look at the scope of the "canned letter" phenomenon.
WE NEED TEENS: APPLY FOR THE 2007-08 TEAM.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters