Printer Friendly

Work interruptions and the female-male earnings gap.

Differences in labor force attachment, or the extent of work interruptions, are often cited as one of the main reasons women earn less than men. However, a recent study by the Bureau of the Census reports that work interruptions explain only a small part of the earnings disparity between men and women. According to the report, if women had the same experience, interruptions, and education as men, the earnings gap would be reduced by only 14.6 percent.

The report is based on data from the 1979 Income Survey Development Program, which covered persons ages 21 to 64 who had ever worked. Participants were surveyed at 3-month intervals during a year and a half beginning in February 1979. The survey measured the extent of work interruptions by sex, race and Hispanic origin, years of school completed, occupations, and age and marital status. Surveyed persons were asked if they had ever been away from work for 6 months or longer because of inability to find work, caring for home or family, or illness or disability.

Sex and race. About 72 percent of the women surveyed had worked interruptions, compared with about 26 percent of the men. Approximately 65 percent of the women and 2 percent of the men responded that they were "caring for home or family." "Inability to find work" was reported by 14 percent of the women with interruptions and about 17 percent of the men. There was no significant difference in the proportions of women and men with disability or illness interruptions.

Black women had fewer work interruptions than white and Hispanic-origin women, but were more likely to have interruptions due to illness. White and Hispanic-origin women were more likely to interrupt work because of family responsibilities; 67 percent of the white women and 62 percent of the Hispanic-origin women, compared with 44 percent of the black women. The labor force interruption rates for white and Hispanic-origin women were generally the same, except twice as many Hispanic-origin women cited "inability to find work."

Overall, black men had higher interruption rates than white men. About 35 percent of the black men had interruptions due to an inability to find work, compared with 15 percent of the white men. The proportions for Hispanic-origin men were similar to those of white men.

Educational attainment. Higher educational attainment was related to fewer work interruptions. Specifically, the proportion of persons with work interruptions because of inability to find work decreased as the educational level increased. For example, 25 percent of the men who did not graduate from high school experienced such work interruptions, compared with only 8 percent of those who graduated from college. (For women, the rates were 22 and 9 percent, respectively.) About two-thirds of women with less than a college education had work interruptions due to family responsibilities, compared with about half of those who graduated from college.

Occupation. Among women in white-collar occupations, those who were in professional, technical, or kindred fields were less likely to have interruptions due to family or home care than those who were in sales or clerical jobs. However, for each occupational group, women were more likely than men to have work interruptions. Among professional, technical, and managerial workers, the interruption rate was 6 percent for women, compared with 15 percent for men.

Age and marital status. About 43 percent of women ages 21 to 29 had work interruptions due to family reasons compared with about 73 percent of women age 30 and over. Comparable figures for men were about 1.5 percent for those ages 21 to 29 and about 1.6 percent for those 30 and over. The interruption rates due to illness or disability were highest among women ages 45 to 64 (16 percent), and lowest for those under age 30 (4 percent). The proportions of disability interruptions among men were generally similar to those of women.

The interruption rate for women ages 21 to 29 who had never married was 21 percent for those without children and 44 percent for those with children. For never-married women ages 30 to 44, the rates ranged from 33 percent for those without children to 47 percent for those with children. For women who were presently married or had been married at some time, the rates were 33 percent for those without children and 81 percent for those with children.

The report, "Lifetime Work Experience and Its Effect on Earnings: Retrospective Data From the 1979 Income Survey Development Program," U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, Series p--23, No. 136, is for sale ($1.75) by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.
COPYRIGHT 1985 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1985 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Monthly Labor Review
Date:Feb 1, 1985
Previous Article:Women and minorities: their proportions grow in the professional work force.
Next Article:ILO labor yearbook: some international comparisons.

Related Articles
Comparable worth: how do we know it will work?
Post-school investment and wage differentials: some further evidence.
Male female disparity in starting pay.
Racial earnings disparities and family structure.
Insights into gender discrimination in employment compensation through the use of classification models.
Kevin Rowan column.
Gender discrimination on pay in health service.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters