Printer Friendly

Women, land-struggles and globalization: an international perspective.

Introduction: Women Keep the World Alive

Until not long ago, issues relating to land and land struggles would have failed to generate much interest among most North Americans, unless they were farmers or descendants of the American Indians for whom the importance of land as the foundation of life is still paramount, culturally at least.

For the rest of the population, land issues seemed to have receded into a vanishing past, as in the aftermath of massive urbanization drives, land no longer appeared the fundamental means of reproduction, and new technologies claimed to provide the power, self-reliance, and creativity that people once associated with agriculture.

This has been a great loss, if only because this amnesia has led to the creation of a world where the most basic questions about our existence--where our food comes from, whether it nourishes us or, instead, it poisons our bodies--remain unanswered and often unasked. This indifference to land among urban dwellers is coming to an end, however. Concern for the genetic engineering of agricultural crops and the ecological impact of the destruction of the tropical forests, together with the example offered by the struggles of indigenous people, like the Zapatistas who have risen up in arms to oppose land privatization, have created a new awareness in Europe and North America about the importance of the "land question," not long ago still identified as a "Third World" issue. (1)

There has also been a conceptual shift, in the last 20 years, concerning our understanding of the relation between land and capitalism. This shift has been promoted by Maria Mies and the circle of activist-scholars who have worked with her (cf., Mies 1986; Bennholdt-Thomsen and Mies 1999; Bennholdt-Thomsen, Faraclas, and von Werlhof 2001; Mies and Shiva 1993). They have shown us that land is not a largely irrelevant "factor of production" in modern capitalism. Land is the material basis for women's subsistence work, which has been the main source of "food security" for billions of people across the planet. Mies sees in this subsistence work also the paradigm of a new social perspective, providing a realistic alternative to capitalist globalization.

It is against this political and conceptual background that I look at the struggles that women are making worldwide not only to re-appropriate land, but also to boost subsistence farming, and a non-commercial use of natural resources. I argue that these efforts are extremely important not only because, thanks to them, billions of people are able to survive, but also because they point in the direction of the changes that we have to make if we are to regain control over the means of production and construct a society where reproducing ourselves neither comes at the expense of other people nor presents a threat to the continuation of life on the planet.

Women and Land: A Historical Perspective

It is an undisputed fact, but one difficult to measure, that, in rural as well as urban areas, women are the subsistence farmers of the planet. That is, women produce the bulk of the food that is consumed by their families (immediate or extended) or sold at the local markets for consumption, especially in Africa and Asia where most of the world population lives.

Subsistence farming is difficult to measure because, for the most part, it is unwaged work and often is not done on a formal farm. Moreover, many of the women who do it do not describe it as work. This parallels another well-known economic fact: the number of houseworkers and the value of their work are hard to measure. Given the capitalist bias in favor of production for the market, housework is not counted as work, it is not included in the GNP, and is still not considered by many as "real work." Thus, a working class housewife who does not have a waged job but takes care of three children and a husband might write on a questionnaire that she "does not work."

International agencies such as the Food and Agriculture Association (FAO), the International Labor Organization (ILO), and the United Nations have often ignored the difficulties presented by the measurement of subsistence work. But they have recognized that much depends on what definition is used. The UN has noted, for instance that:
   In Bangladesh, [the] labour force participation of women was 10
   percent according to the Labour Force Survey of 1985/86. But when,
   in 1989, the Labour Force Survey included in the questionnaire
   specific activities such as threshing, food-processing and
   poultry-rearing the economic activity rate went up to 63 percent.
   (UN 1995: 114) (2)


It is not easy, then, to precisely assess, on the basis of the statistics available, how many people, and women in particular, are involved in subsistence farming; but it is clear that it is a substantial number. In the case of sub-Saharan Africa, for example, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO 2002), "women produce up to 80 percent of all the basic foodstuffs for household consumption and for sale." Given that the population of sub-Saharan Africa is about three-quarters of a billion people, with a large percentage of them children, this means that more than a hundred million African women must be subsistence farmers. (3) Indeed, as the feminist slogan goes: "women hold up more than half the sky."

We should recognize that the persistence and prevalence of subsistence farming is an astounding fact considering that from its beginning capitalist development has been premised on the separation of agricultural producers, women in particular, from the land. Indeed, it can only be explained on the basis of a tremendous struggle that women have made to resist the commercialization of agriculture.

Evidence for this struggle is found throughout the history of colonization, from the Andes to Africa. In response to land expropriation by the Spaniards (assisted by local chiefs), women in Mexico and Peru in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries ran to the mountains, rallied the population to resist the foreign invaders, and became the staunchest defenders of the old cultures and religions, which were centered on the worship of nature-gods (Federici forthcoming; Silverblatt 1987). Later, in the nineteenth century, in Africa and Asia, women defended the traditional female farming systems from the systematic attempts that the European colonialists made to dismantle them and to redefine agricultural work as a male job.

As Ester Boserup (among others) has shown, with reference to West Africa, not only did colonial officers, missionaries, and later agricultural developers impose commercial crops at the expense of food production; but also, though African women did most of the farming, they excluded them from the study of modern farming systems and technical assistance. They invariably privileged men with regard to land assignment, even when absent from their homes (Boserup 1970: 53-5, 59-60). Thus, in addition to eroding women's "traditional" rights as participants in communal land systems and independent cultivators, colonialists and developers alike introduced new divisions between women and men. They imposed a new sexual division of labor, based upon women's subordination to men and their confinement to unpaid household labor, which, in the colonialists' schemes, included unpaid cooperation with their husbands in the cultivation of cash-crops.

Women, however, did not accept this deterioration in their social position without protest. In colonial Africa, for instance, whenever they feared that the government might sell their land or appropriate their crops, they revolted. Exemplary was the protest women mounted against the colonial authorities in Kedjom Keku and Kedjom Ketinguh (northwestern, then British, Cameroon) in 1958. Angered by rumors claiming that the government was going to put their land up for sale, 7,000 women repeatedly marched to Bamenda, the provincial capital at the time, and in their longest stay camped for two weeks outside the British colonial administrative buildings, "singing loudly and making their rumbustious presence felt" (Diduk 1989: 339-40).

In the same region, women fought against the destruction of their subsistence farms by foraging cattle owned by either members of the local male elite or nomadic Fulani to whom the colonial authorities had granted seasonal pasturage rights expecting to collect a herd tax. In this case too, the women's boisterous protest defeated the plan, forcing the authorities to sanction the offending pasturalists. As Susan Diduk writes:
   In the protests women perceived themselves as fighting for the
   survival and subsistence needs of family and kin. Their agricultural
   labour was and continues to be indispensable to daily food
   production. Kedjom men also emphasise the importance of these roles
   in the past and present. Today they are frequently heard to say,
   "Don't women suffer for farming and for carrying children for nine
   months? Yes, they do good for the country." (Diduk 1989: 343) (4)


There were many similar struggles, in the 1940s and 1950s, throughout Africa, by women resisting the introduction of cash crops, to which the most fertile lands were being allocated, and the extra work it imposed on them, which took them away from their subsistence farming. How productive women's subsistence farming continued to be, from the viewpoint of the survival of the colonized communities, can be seen from the contribution it made to the anti-colonial struggle and specifically to the maintenance of liberation fighters in the bush (e.g. in Algeria, Kenya, and Mozambique) (Davidson 1981: 76-8, 96-8, 170). Similarly, in the post-independence period, women fought against being recruited in agricultural development projects as unpaid "helpers" of their husbands. The best example of this is the intense struggle they made in the Senegambia against cooperation in the commercial cultivation of rice crops, which came at the expense of their subsistence food production (Carney and Watts 1991).

It is because of these struggles--which are now recognized as the main reason for the failure of agricultural development projects through the 1960s and 1970s (Moser 1993)--that a sizable subsistence sector has survived in many regions of the world, despite the commitment of pre- and post-independence governments to "economic development" along capitalist lines, and to this day women continue to be the world's main subsistence farmers.

The determination of millions of women in Africa, Asia, and the Americas to not abandon subsistence farming must be emphasized to counter the tendency, even among radical social scientists, to interpret its survival as primarily a function of international capitalism's need to cheapen the cost of the reproduction of the work-force and/or to "liberate" male workers for the cultivation of cash crops and other types of waged work.

Claude Meillassoux (1981), a major Marxist proponent of this theory, has argued that female subsistence-oriented production, or the "domestic economy" as he calls it, has served to ensure a supply of cheap workers for the capitalist sector at home and abroad and, as such, it has subsidized capitalist accumulation. As his argument goes, thanks to the work of the "village" the laborers who migrated to Paris or Johannesburg provided a "free" commodity for the capitalist who hired them; since s/he neither had to pay for their upbringing nor had to continue to support them with unemployment benefits when s/he no longer needed their work.

From this perspective, women's labor in subsistence farming would be a bonus for governments, companies, and development agencies, enabling them to more effectively exploit wage labor and obtain a constant transfer of wealth from the rural to the urban areas, in effect degrading the quality of female farmers' lives (Meillassoux 1981: 110-11). To his credit, Meillassoux acknowledges the efforts made by international agencies and governments to "underdevelop" the subsistence sector. He sees the constant draining of its resources, and recognizes the precarious nature of this form of labor-reproduction, anticipating that it may soon undergo a decisive crisis. (5) But overall, he too has failed to see the struggle underlining the survival of subsistence work, and its continuing importance--despite the attack waged upon it--from the viewpoint of the community's capacity to resist the encroachment of capitalist relations.

As for liberal economists--their view of "subsistence work" completely degrades it to the level of "uneconomic," "unproductive" activity (in the same way as liberal economics refuses to see women's unpaid domestic labor in the home as work). Thus, liberal economists, even when appearing to take a feminist stand, propose as an alternative "income generating projects," the universal remedy to poverty and presumably the key to women's emancipation in the neoliberal agenda. (6)

What these different perspectives ignore is the strategic importance that access to land has had for women and their communities, despite the ability of companies and government to use it at times for their own ends. An analogy can be made here with the situation that prevailed in some islands of the Caribbean (for example, Jamaica) during slavery, when plantation owners gave the slaves plots of land ("provision grounds") to cultivate for their own support. The owners took this measure to save on their food imports and reduce the cost of reproducing their workers. But this strategy had advantages for the slaves as well, giving them a higher degree of mobility and independence such that--according to some historians--even before emancipation, in some islands, a proto-peasantry had formed with a remarkable degree of freedom of movement and already deriving some income from the sale of its own products (Bush 1990; Morrissey 1989). (7)

Extending this analogy to illustrate the post-colonial capitalist use of subsistence labor we can say that subsistence agriculture has been an important means of support for billions of workers, giving wage laborers the possibility to contract better conditions of work and survive labor strikes and political protests, so that in several countries the wage sector has acquired an importance disproportionate to its small numerical size (Federici 1992). (8)

The "village"--a metaphor for subsistence farming in a communal setting--has also been a crucial site for women's struggle, providing a base from which to reclaim the wealth the state and capital was removing from it. It is a struggle that has taken many forms, often as much directed against men as against government, but always strengthened by the fact that women had direct access to land and, in this manner, could support themselves and their children and gain some extra cash through the sale of their surplus product. Thus, even after they became urbanized, women continued to cultivate any patch of land they could gain access to in order to feed their families and to maintain a certain degree of autonomy from the market (Bryceson 1993: 105-17).

To what extent the village has been a source of power for female and male workers across the former colonial world can be measured by the radical attack that, since the early 1980s through the 1990s, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and the World Trade Organization (WTO) have waged against it under the guise of Structural Adjustment and "globalization." (9)

The World Bank has made the destruction of subsistence agriculture and the promotion of land commercialization the centerpiece of its ubiquitous structural adjustment programs (Caffentzis 1995; Faraclas 2001; Federici 1992; Turner and Brownhill 2001a). In the late 1980s and 1990s, not only has land been fenced off, but also "cheap" (because subsidized) imported food from Europe and North America has flooded the now liberalized economies of Africa and Asia (which are forbidden to subsidize their farmers), further displacing women farmers from the local markets. Meanwhile, large tracts of once communal land have been taken over by agribusiness companies and devoted to cultivation for export. Finally, war and famine have terrorized millions into flight from their homelands.

What has followed has been a major reproduction crisis of a type and proportion not seen even in the colonial period. For example, in regions famous for their agricultural productivity, such as southern Nigeria, an adequate diet is now scarce or too expensive to be within reach of the average person who, in the wake of the implementation of structural adjustment programs, has to simultaneously contend with price hikes, frozen wages, devalued currency, widespread unemployment, and cuts in social services. (10)

Here is where the importance of women's struggles for land stands out. As I argue, women have been the main buffer for the world proletariat against starvation under the World Bank's neoliberal regime. They have been the main opponents of the neoliberal demand that "market prices" determine who should live and who should die, and they are the ones who have provided a practical model for the reproduction of life in a non-capitalist way.

Struggles for Subsistence and Against "Globalization" in Africa, Asia, and the Americas

Faced with a renewed drive toward land privatization, the extension of cash crops, and the rise in food prices in the age of globalization, women have resorted to many strategies pitting them against the most powerful institutions on the planet.

The primary strategy women have adopted to defend their communities from the impact of economic adjustment and dependence on the global market has been (again) the expansion of subsistence farming also in the urban centers.

Exemplary is the case of Guinea Bissau studied by Galli and Funk (1995) which shows that, since the early 1980s, women have planted small gardens with vegetables, cassava, and fruit trees around most houses in the capital city of Bissau and other towns; and in time of scarcity they have preferred to forfeit the earnings they might have made selling their produce to ensure their families would not go without food. (11) Still with reference to Africa, this picture is confirmed by Christa Wichterich who speaks of women subsistence farming and urban gardening as "cooking pot economics." She too notes that in the 1990s, it was revived in many Africa's cities; the urban farmers being mostly women from the lower class:
   There were onions and papaya trees, instead of flower-borders, in
   front of the housing estates of underpaid civil servants in
   Dar-es-Salaam; chickens and banana plants in the backyards of
   Lusaka; vegetables on the wide central reservations of the arterial
   roads of Kampala, and especially of Kinshasa, where the food supply
   system had largely collapsed ... In [Kenyan] towns [too] ... green
   roadside strips, front gardens and wasteland sites were immediately
   occupied with maize, plants, sukum wiki, the most popular type of
   cabbage. (Wichterich 2000: 73)


To expand food production, however, women have had to battle to expand their access to land, which the international agencies' drives to privatize land and commercialize agriculture have further jeopardized.

This may be the reason why, in the case of Guinea Bissau, many women have chosen to remain in the rural area, while most of the men have migrated, with the result that there has been a "feminization of the rural areas, with many villages now consisting of women farming alone or in women's coops" (Galli and Funk 1995: 23).

Regaining or expanding land for subsistence farming has been one of the main battles also for rural women in Bangladesh, leading to the formation of the Landless Women Association that has been carrying on land occupations since 1992. During this period, the Association has managed to settle 50,000 families, often confronting landowners in pitched battles. According to Shamsun Nahar Khan Doli, a leader of the Association to whom I owe this report, many occupations are on "chars," low-lying islands formed by soil deposits in the middle of a river. (12) Such new lands should be allocated to landless farmers, according to Bangladeshi law, but because of the growing commercial value of land, big landowners have increasingly seized them. Women are now organizing to stop them, defending themselves with brooms, spears of bamboo, and even knives. Women have also set up alarm systems, to gather other women when boats with the landowners or their goons approach, and push the attackers off or stop them from landing.

Similar land struggles are being fought in South America. In Paraguay, for example, the Peasant Women's Commission (CMC) was formed in 1985 in alliance with the Paraguayan Peasant's Movement (MCP) to demand land distribution (Fisher 1993: 86). As Jo Fischer points out, the CMC was the first peasant women's movement that went into the streets in support of its demands, and incorporated in its program women's concerns, also condemning "their double oppression, both as peasants and as women" (p. 87).

The turning point for the CMC came when the government granted large tracts of land to the peasant movement in the forests close to the Brazilian border. The women took these grants as an opportunity to organize a model community joining together to collectively farm their strips of land. As Geraldina, an early founder of CMC pointed out:
   We work all the time, more now than ever before, but we've also
   changed the way we work. We're experimenting with communal work to
   see if it gives us more time for other things. It also gives us a
   chance to share our experiences and worries. This is a very
   different way of living for us. Before, we didn't even know our
   neighbors. (Fisher 1993: 98)


Women's land struggles have included the defense of communities threatened by commercial housing projects constructed in the name of "urban development." "Housing" has often involved the loss of "land" for food production historically. An example is the struggle of women in the Kawaala neighborhood of Kampala (Uganda) where the World Bank, in conjunction with the Kampala City Council (KCC), in 1992-3, sponsored a large housing project that would destroy much subsistence farm land around or near people's homes. Not surprisingly, it was women who most strenuously organized against it, through the formation of an Abataka (Residents) Committee, eventually forcing the Bank to withdraw from the project. According to one of the women leaders:
   While men were shying away, women were able to say anything in
   public meetings in front of government officials. Women were more
   vocal because they were directly affected. It is very hard for women
   to stand without any means of income ... most of these women are
   people who basically support their children and without any income
   and food they cannot do it ... You come and take their peace and
   income and they are going to fight, not because they want to, but
   because they have been oppressed and suppressed. (Tripp 2000: 183)


Aili Mari Tripp points out that the situation in the Kawaala neighborhood is far from unique. (13) Similar struggles have been reported from different parts of Africa and Asia, where peasant women's organizations have opposed the development of industrial zones threatening to displace them and their families and contaminate the environment.

Industrial or commercial housing development often clashes, today, with women's subsistence farming, in a context in which more and more women even in urban centers are gardening (in Kampala women grow 45 percent of the food for their families). It is important to add that in defending land from assault by commercial interests and affirming the principle that "land and life are not for sale," women again, as in the past against colonial invasion, are defending their peoples' history and their culture. In the case of Kawaala, the majority of residents on the disputed land had been living there for generations and had buried their kin there--for many in Uganda the ultimate evidence of land ownership. Tripp's reflections on this land struggle are pertinent to my thesis:
   Stepping back from the events of the conflict, it becomes evident
   that the residents, especially the women involved, were trying to
   institutionalize some new norms for community mobilization, not just
   in Kawaala but more widely in providing a model for other community
   projects. They had a vision of a more collaborative effort that took
   the needs of women, widows, children, and the elderly as a starting
   point and recognized their dependence on the land for survival.
   (Tripp 2000: 194)


Two more developments need to be mentioned in conjunction with women's defense of subsistence production. First, there has been the formation of regional systems of self-sufficiency aiming to guarantee "food security" and maintain an economy based on solidarity and the refusal of competition. The most impressive example in this respect comes from India where women formed the National Alliance for Women's Food Rights, a national movement made of 35 women's groups. One of the main efforts of the Alliance has been the campaign in defense of the mustard seed economy that is crucial for many rural and urban women in India. A subsistence crop, the seed has been threatened by the attempts of multinational corporations based in the United States to impose genetically-engineered soybeans as a source of cooking oil. (14) In response, the Alliance has built "direct producer-consumer alliances" to "defend the livelihood of farmers and the diverse cultural choices of consumers," as stated by Vandana Shiva (2000), one of the leaders of the movement. In her words: "we protest soybean imports and call for a ban on the import of genetically-engineered soybean products. As the women from the slums of Delhi sing, 'Sarson Bachao, Soya Bhagaa,' or, 'Save the Mustard, Dump the Soya'" (Shiva 2000).

Second, across the world, women have been leading the struggle to prevent commercial logging and save or rebuild forests, which are the foundation of people's subsistence economies, providing nourishment as well as fuel, medicine, and communal relations. Forests, Shiva writes, echoing testimonies coming from every part of the planet, are "the highest expression of earth's fertility and productivity" (Shiva 1989: 56). Thus, when forests come under assault it is a death sentence for the tribal people who live in them, especially the woman. Therefore, women do everything to stop the loggers. Shiva often cites, in this context, the Chikpo movement--a movement of women, in Garhwal, in the foothills of the Himalaya who, beginning in the early 1970s, embrace the trees destined to fall and put their bodies between them and the saws when the loggers come (Shiva 1989).

While women in Garhwal have mobilized to prevent forests from being cut down, in villages of Northern Thailand they have protested the Eucalyptus plantations forcibly planted on their expropriated farms by a Japanese papermaking company with the support of the Thai military government (Matsui 1996: 88-90). In Africa, an important initiative has been the "Green Belt Movement," which under the leadership of Wangari Maathai is committed to planting a green belt around the major cities and, since 1977, has planted tens of millions of trees to prevent deforestation, soil loss, desertification, and fuel-wood scarcity (Maathai 1993).

But the most striking struggle for the survival of the forests is taking place in the Niger Delta, where the mangrove tree swamps are being threatened by oil production. Opposition to it has mounted for 20 years, beginning in Ogharefe, in 1984, when several thousand women from the area laid siege to Pan Ocean's Production Station demanding compensation for the destruction of the water, trees, and land. To show their determination, the women also threatened to disrobe should their demands be frustrated--a threat they put in action when the company's director arrived, so that he found himself surrounded by thousands of naked women, a serious curse in the eyes of the Niger Delta communities, which convinced him at the time to accept the reparation claims (Turner and Oshare 1994: 140-1).

The struggle over land has also grown since the 1970s in the most unlikely place--New York City--in the form of an urban gardening movement. It began with the initiative of a women-led group called the "Green Guerrillas," who began cleaning up vacant lots in the Lower East Side. By the 1990s, 850 urban gardens had developed in the city and dozens of community coalitions had formed, such as the Greening of Harlem Coalition that was begun by a group of women who wanted "to reconnect with the earth and give children an alternative to the streets." Now it counts more than 21 organizations and 30 garden projects (Wilson and Weinberg 1999: 36).

It is important to note here that the gardens have been not only a source of vegetables and flowers, but have served community-building and have been a stepping stone for other community struggles (like squatting and homesteading). Because of this work, the women came under attack during Mayor Giuliani's regime, and for some years now one of the main challenges this movement has faced has been stopping the bulldozers. Over last decade, 100 gardens have been lost to "development," more than 40 have been slated for bulldozing, and the prospects for the future seem gloomy (Wilson and Weinberg 1999: 61). Since his appointment, in fact, the new mayor of New York City, Michael Bloomberg, like his predecessor, has declared war on these gardens.

The Importance of the Struggle

As we have seen, in cities across the world at least a quarter of the people depend on food produced by women's subsistence labor. In Africa, for example, a quarter of the people living in towns say they could not survive without subsistence food production. This is confirmed by the UN Population Fund which claims that "some two hundred million city dwellers are growing food, providing about one billion people with at least part of their food supply" (UN 2001). When we consider that the bulk of the food subsistence producers are women we can see why the men of Kedjom, Cameroon would say, "yes, women subsistence farmers do good for humanity." Thanks to them, the billions of people, rural and urban, who earn one or two dollars a day do not go under, even in time of economic crisis.

Equally important, women's subsistence production counters the trend by agribusiness to reduce cropland--one of the causes of high food prices and starvation--while ensuring control over the quality of food and protecting consumers against manipulation of crops and poisoning by pesticides. Further, women subsistence production represents a safe way of farming, a crucial consideration at a time when the effects of pesticides on agricultural crops is causing high rates of mortality and disease among peasants across the world, starting with women (see, for example, Settimi et al. 1999). Thus, subsistence farming gives women an essential means of control over their health and the health and lives of their families (Bennholdt-Thomsen and Mies 1999).

Most important, we can also see that subsistence production is contributing to a non-competitive, solidarity-centered mode of life that is crucial for the building of a new society. It is the seed of what Veronika Bennholdt-Thomsen and Maria Mies call the "other" economy which "puts life and everything necessary to produce and maintain life on this planet at the centre of economic and social activity and not the never-ending accumulation of dead money" (Bennholdt-Thomsen and Mies 1999: 5).

NOTES

(1.) Many in the feminist movement have been as blind to the work of the woman subsistence farmer as the liberal economists, with the exception of the work of Maria Mies and Vandana Shiva (e.g. Mies and Shiva 1993).

(2.) In 1988, the ILO defined subsistence workers in agriculture and fishing as those who "provide food, shelter and a minimum of cash income for themselves and their households" (UN 1995: 114)--a fuzzy definition depending on which notion of "minimum cash income" and "provision" one uses. Moreover, its operative meaning is derived from intentions, e.g. the subsistence workers' lack of "market orientation," and deficiencies they experience, such as having no access to formal credit and advanced technology.

(3.) The social and economic impact of colonialism varied greatly, depending (in part) on the duration of direct colonial control. We may even interpret the present differences in women's participation in subsistence and cash-crop agriculture as a measure of the extent of colonial appropriation of land. Using the UN-ILO labor force participation statistics, and remembering the measurement problem concerning subsistence farming, we see that sub-Saharan Africa has the highest percentage of the female labor force in agriculture (75 percent); while in Southern Asia it is 55 percent; South-East Asia, 42 percent; and East Asia, 35 percent. By contrast, South and Central America have low women's participation rates in agriculture similar to those found in "developed" regions like Europe between 7 and 10 percent. That is, the participation rates roughly correlate with the duration of formal colonialism in the regions.

(4.) On the struggles of women farmers in western Cameroon in the 1950s, see also Margaret Snyder and Mary Tadesse who write:
   Women continued to persist in their economic activities during
   colonial times, despite the formidable odds they faced. One example
   is the way they mobilized to form corn mill societies in western
   Cameroun in the 1950s. Over time 200 such societies were formed with
   a total membership of 18,000. They used grinding wills that were
   owned in common, fenced their fields, and constructed water storage
   units and co-operative stores ... In other words, for generations
   women established some form of collective actions to increase group
   productivity, to fill-in socio-economic gaps wherever the colonial
   administration failed, or to protest policies that deprived them of
   the resources to provide for their families. (Snyder and Tadesse
   1995: 23)


(5.) The crisis consists in the fact that if the domestic economy becomes too unproductive, it then fails to reproduce the immigrant worker, but if it becomes too productive, it drives up the costs of labor, as the worker in this case can avoid wage labor.

(6.) Exemplary here is Caroline Moser, a "World Bank feminist" who executes a very sophisticated analysis of the work of women and whose approach to women is, in her terms, "emancipatory." After presenting a careful analysis of the many theoretical approaches to women's labor (Marxist included), the case studies she examines are two "income generating" projects and a "food for work" scheme (Moser 1993: 235-8).

(7.) However, as soon as the price of sugar on the world market went up, the plantation owner cut the time allotted to the slave for cultivation of their provision grounds.

(8.) See, e.g. what Michael Chege (1987: 250) writes of African wage workers and the land: " ... most African laborers maintain a foothold in the country side; the existence of labor totally alienated from land ownership is yet to happen." One of the consequences of this "lack of alienation" is that the African worker can rely on a material basis of solidarity (especially the provision of food) from the village whenever s/he decides to strike.

(9.) The attack waged by the World Bank through Structural Adjustment falsifies Meillassoux's claim that the domestic economy is functional to capitalism, but verifies his prediction that a "final" crisis of capitalism looms because of its inability to preserve and control the domestic economy (Meillassoux 1981: 141).

(10.) Witness the dramatic decline in the "real wage" and the increase in the rate of poverty in Nigeria. Once considered a "middle income" country, Nigeria now has 70 percent of its population living on less than one U.S. dollar a day, and 90 percent on less than two U.S. dollars a day (cf., UN Development Program statistics from its website).

(11.) In Bissau, women planted rice during the rainy season in plots on the peripheries of town. During the dry season more enterprising women try to get access to nearby plots in order to plant irrigated vegetables not only for domestic consumption but for sale (Galli and Funk 1995: 20).

(12.) This report is based on an oral testimony at the Prague "Countersummit" of 2000.

(13.) Tripp concludes that " ... the Kawaala struggle is in many ways a microcosm of some of the changes that are occurring in Uganda" (Tripp 2000: 194). Similar struggles have been waged throughout the Third World, where peasant women's organizations have opposed the development of industrial zones threatening to displace them and their families and contaminate the environment.

(14.) This attempt was given a boost in 1998 when the mustard seed cooking oil locally produced and distributed was mysteriously found to be adulterated to such a point that 41 people died after consuming it. The government then banned its production and sale. The National Alliance responded by taking the case to court and calling on producers and consumers not to co-operate with the government's ban (Shiva 2000: 54).

REFERENCES

BENJAMIN, Medea, ed. 1987. Don't be Afraid Gringo: A Honduran Woman Speaks from the Heart." The Story of Elvia Alvarado. New York: HarperPerennial.

BENNHOLDT-THOMSEN, Veronika and Maria Mies 1999. The Subsistence Perspective: Beyond the Globalised Economy. London: Zed Books.

BENNHOLDT-THOMSEN, Veronika, Nicholas Faraclas, and Claudia von Werlhof, eds 2001. There is an Alternative." Subsistence and Worldwide Resistance to Corporate Globalization. London: Zed Books.

BOSERUP, Ester 1970. Women's Role in Economic Development. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd.

BRYCESON, Deborah Fahy 1993. Liberalizing Tanzania's Food Trade. Private and Public Faces of Urban Marketing Policy. 1930-1988. London: Zed Books.

BUSH, Barbara 1990. Slave Women in Caribbean Society, 1650-1838. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

CAFFENTZIS, George 1995. "The Fundamental Implications of the Debt Crisis for Social Reproduction in Africa." In Paying the Price: Women and the Politics of International Economic Strategy, edited by M. Dalla Costa and G.F. Dana Costa. London: Zed Books.

CARNEY, Judith and Watts, Michael 1991. "Disciplining Women? Rice, Mechanization, and the Evolution of Mandinka Gender Relations in Senegambia." Signs 16(4): 651-81.

CHEGE, Michael 1987. "The State and Labour in Kenya." In Popular Struggles for Democracy in Africa, edited by Peter Anyang' Nyong'o. London: Zed Books.

DAVIDSON, Basil 1981. The People's Cause: A History of Guerillas in Africa. London: Longman.

DIDUK, Susan 1989. "Women's Agricultural Production and Political Action in the Cameroon Grassfields." Africa 59(3): 338--55.

FAO 2002. Gender and Agriculture. Retrieved March 18, 2002. Available at (http://www. fao.org/Gender/agrib4-e.htm).

FARACLAS, Nicholas 2001. "Melanesia, the Banks, and the BINGOs: Real Alternatives are Everywhere (Except in the Consultants' Briefcases)." In There is an Alternative: Subsistence and Worldwide Resistance to Corporate Globalization, edited by Veronika Bennholdt-Thomsen, Nicholas Faraclas, and Claudia von Wedhof. London: Zed Books.

FEDERICI, Silvia 1992. "The Debt Crisis, Africa, and the New Enclosures." In Midnight Oil: Work, Energy, War, 1973-1992, edited by Midnight Notes. New York: Autonomedia.

FEDERICI, Silvia 1999. "Reproduction and Feminist Struggle in the New International Division of Labor." In Women, Development and Labor of Reproduction. Struggles and Movements, edited by M. Dalla Costa and G.F. Dalla Costa. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.

FEDERICI, Silvia forthcoming. Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body, and Primitive Accumulation. Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia.

FISHER, Jo 1993. Out of the Shadows: Women, Resistance and Politics in South America. London: Latin American Bureau.

GALLI, Rosemary and Ursula Frank 1995. "Structural Adjustment and Gender in Guinea Bissau." In Women Pay the Price: Structural Adjustment in Africa and the Caribbean, edited by Gloria T. Emeagwali. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.

MAATHAI, Wangari 1993. "Kenya's Green Belt Movement." In Africa, Fifth Edition, edited by F. Jeffress Ramsay. Guilford, CT: The Dushkin Publishing Group. MATSUI, Yayori 1996. Women in the New Asia: From Pain to Power. London: Zed Books.

MEILLASSOUX, Claude 1981. Maidens, Meal and Money: Capitalism and the Domestic Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

MIES, Maria 1986. Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour. London: Zed Books.

MIES, Maria and Vandana Shiva 1993. Ecofeminism. London: Zed Books.

MORRISEY, Marietta 1989. Slave Women in the New World. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.

MOSER, Caroline O.N. 1993. Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and Training. London: Routledge.

SCOTT, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

SETTIMI, L. et al. 1999. "Cancer Risk Among Female Agricultural Workers: A MultiCenter Case-Control Study." American Journal of Industrial Medicine 36: 13541.

SHIVA, Vandana 1989. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. London: Zed Books.

SHIVA, Vandana 2000. Stolen Harvest: Hijacking of the Global Food Supply. Boston: South End Press.

SILVERBLATT, Irene 1987. Moon, Sun, and Witches: Gender Ideologies and Class in Inca and Colonial Peru. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

SNYDER, Margaret and Mary Tadesse 1995. African Women and Development." A History. London: Zed Books.

TRIPP, Aili Mari 2000. Women and Politics in Uganda. Oxford: James Currey.

TURNER, Terisa E. and Leigh S. Brownhill, eds 2001a. Gender, Feminism and the Civil Commons. A Special Issue of Canadian Journal of Development Studies. Volume XXII, edited by Terisa E. Turner and Leigh S. Brownhill.

TURNER, Terisa E. and Leigh S. Brownhill, 2001b. "African Jubilee: Mau Mau Resurgence and the Fight for Fertility in Kenya, 1986-2001." In Gender, Feminism and the Civil Commons. A Special Issue of the Canadian Journal of Development Studies Volume XXII, edited by Terisa E. Turner and Leigh S. Brownhill, pp. 1037-88.

TURNER, Terisa E. and M.O. Oshare 1994. "Women's Uprisings Against the Nigerian Oil Industry." In Arise! Ye Mighty People!: Gender, Class and Race in Popular Struggles, edited by Terisa Turner. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.

UNITED NATIONS 1995. The World's Women 1995: Trends and Statistics. New York: UN.

UNITED NATIONS POPULATION FUND 2001. State of the World Population 2001. New York: UN.

WICHTERICH, Christa 2000. The Globalized Woman: Reports from a Future of Inequality. London: Zed Books.

WILSON, Peter Lamborn and Bill Weinberg 1999. Avantgardening. Ecological Struggles in the City and the World. New York: Autonomedia.

Silvia Federici *

* Associate Professor, Hofstra University, USA.

Silvia Federici is Associate Professor at Hofstra University and a co-ordinator of the Committee for Academic Freedom in Africa. Her recent publications include: Caliban and the Witch Women, the Body, and Primitive Accumulation (Autonomedia, 2003) and A Thousand Flowers: Social Struggles Against Structural Adjustment in African Universities (Africa World Press, 2000) which is coedited with George C. Caffentzis and Ousseina Alidou.

Address: New College, Hofstra University, Hemstead, New York 11549, USA. (dinavalli@aol.com)
COPYRIGHT 2004 Sage Publications, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Federici, Silvia
Publication:Journal of Asian and African Studies
Geographic Code:0BANK
Date:Jan 1, 2004
Words:6917
Previous Article:Globalization and Africa's regional and local responses.
Next Article:Why women are at war with Chevron: Nigerian subsistence struggles against the international oil industry.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters