With Castro ailing, what's next for Cuba?
Cuban exiles in Miami were initially in a celebratory mood, but wisely held off major public rejoicing until more could be known. Within Cuba, the fear that comes from a leadership vacuum was apparent. "People are very disoriented," a history professor said in a telephone interview. "Dissidents are worried and fear that at any moment there could be a wave of detentions."
Perhaps lost in all the turmoil is some understanding of the nature of communist states, even one headed by such a long-ruling, iconic figure as Fidel Castro. There is a vast difference between an old-fashioned "banana republic" dictator and a tyrant like Castro. Castro has remained in power because he has vast international support.
Fidel Castro, therefore, and by extension his brother, Raul, remain only so long as they serve some useful purpose to the international powers that sustain them. Tyrannical regimes can be brought down quickly, as former Yugoslav despot Slobodan Milosevic learned the hard way. But the longevity of the Castro regime suggests that Fidel is a shade smarter--a team player--and undoubtedly has taught Raul all that he knows. We would look for no radical changes in Cuba, whatever the outcome of Fidel's health.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Fidel Castro|
|Publication:||The New American|
|Article Type:||Brief article|
|Date:||Aug 21, 2006|
|Previous Article:||Hugo Chavez: friendship tour & arms deals.|
|Next Article:||U.S.-Russian nuclear security initiative.|