Printer Friendly

Wisconsin's environmental public health tracking network: information systems design for childhood cancer surveillance.

In this article we describe the development of an information system for environmental childhood cancer surveillance. The Wisconsin Cancer Registry annually receives more than 25,000 incident case reports. Approximately 269 cases per year involve children. Over time, there has been considerable community interest in understanding the role the environment plays as a cause of these cancer cases. Wisconsin's Public Health Information Network (WI-PHIN) is a robust web portal integrating both Health Alert Network and National Electronic Disease Surveillance System components. WI-PHIN is the information technology platform for all public health surveillance programs. Functions include the secure, automated exchange of cancer case data between public health-based and hospital-based cancer registrars; web-based supplemental data entry for environmental exposure confirmation and hypothesis testing; automated data analysis, visualization, and exposure-outcome record linkage; directories of public health and clinical personnel for role-based access control of sensitive surveillance information; public health information dissemination and alerting; and information technology security and critical infrastructure protection. For hypothesis generation, cancer case data are sent electronically to WI-PHIN and populate the integrated data repository. Environmental data are linked and the exposure-disease relationships are explored using statistical tools for ecologic exposure risk assessment. For hypothesis testing, case-control interviews collect exposure histories, including parental employment and residential histories. This information technology approach can thus serve as the basis for building a comprehensive system to assess environmental cancer etiology. Key words: childhood cancer, environment, exposures, informatics, information systems, public health, surveillance, tracking. Environ Health Perspect 112:1434-1439 (2004). doi:10.1289/ehp.7150 available via http://dx.doi.org/[Online 3 August 2004]

**********

Even though the environment is known to play an important role in human health, no comprehensive, integrated, state or national system exists to track the countless hazards, exposures, and ensuing health effects that could be due to environmental factors [Environmental Public Health Tracking Network (EPHTN) 2004]. For example, when environment is broadly defined to include occupational exposures, environmental pollution, and ionizing and ultraviolet radiation, 9% of cancer deaths have been attributed to known environmental causes (Harvard Report on Cancer Prevention 1996). And yet, what ultimately is known may be extremely limited precisely because a comprehensive, ongoing environmental health tracking system linking hazards and exposures to health effects does

not exist.

In response to this challenge, the EPHTN program was established to develop a comprehensive environmental public health surveillance system. The program involves
 the ongoing collection, integration, analysis,
 interpretation, and dissemination of data on
 environmental hazards; exposures to those hazards; and
 related health effects. The goal of tracking is to
 provide information that can be used to plan,
 apply, and evaluate actions to prevent and control
 environmentally related diseases. (EPHTN 2004)


Public health depends heavily upon information science. Increasingly, modern public health practice requires advanced, networked, computer-assisted technology to process a wide variety of information assets that monitor disease, analyze and detect risks, provide decision support, alert and communicate with those who need to know, continuously educate and train, support and manage public health response, and measure effectiveness. This recognition has brought about the specification and development of the Public Health Information Network (PHIN) by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and its public health partners (e.g., state and local public health agencies and professional associations, for example, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Association of Public Health Laboratories, National Association of County and City Health Officials).

It has been estimated that environmental pollutants are responsible for a substantial attributable fraction of certain childhood diseases and their associated health care costs (Landrigan et al. 2002). The attendant environmental causes for childhood lead poisoning, asthma, cancer, and developmental disabilities alone may account for as much as $64.8 billion or 2.8% of total U.S. health care costs annually (Landrigan et al. 2002). The environmental attributable fraction for childhood cancer is estimated at 5% (range, 2-10%), and annual health care costs are estimated at $333 million (Landrigan et al. 2002).

Indeed, studies of childhood cancer have discovered a number of biologically plausible environmental associations (Zahm and Devesa 1995), including hazardous air pollutants and leukemia (Reynolds et al. 2003), leukemia and pesticide use (Reynolds et al. 2002), leukemia and electric and magnetic fields (Brain et al. 2003), leukemia and ionizing radiation (Axelson et al. 2002), nervous system cancers and parental pesticide exposures (Feychting et al. 2001), and road traffic (benzene exposures) and leukemia (Crosignani et al. 2004).

In Wisconsin an estimated 25,800 new cases of cancer are expected to have occurred in 2003 (American Cancer Society 2004). Approximately 269 will occur in children. Presently, the environmental contribution and etiology of these cases are unknown. Over the years, many of these childhood cancer cases have been the source of numerous requests for labor-intensive, systematic environmental cancer cluster investigations and assessments (Fiore et al. 1990). However, because of the many intrinsic limitations of the "self-selected" cluster analytic approach (Rothman 1990), our experience has resulted in little, if any, insight into the potential causes, environmental or otherwise.

The maturation of networked information systems holds the promise of automating much of public health practice (Yasnoff 2001). By automating practice with advanced information technology, comprehensive surveillance and tracking systems may be created that have the statistical power and considerable information depth needed to understand the operation of complex disease causal factors. To this end, an information technology platform is described that is in development to support environmental public health tracking in Wisconsin. One application of effort is illustrated using cancer registry data.

Materials and Methods

Information technology development. A number of stakeholder committees were established to guide Wisconsin's PHIN (WI-PHIN) development and establish functional system requirements. Members included public health staff from the Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services, the University of Wisconsin [university information technology staff (UW-DoIT)], WiscNet (networking provider), University of Wisconsin Medical School, and Wisconsin State Laboratory of Hygiene); other state agencies; local public health services; hospitals, the health insurance industry; and the Wisconsin business community.

The "Wisconsin Idea," used to develop the state's PHIN, involves rapid, state-of-the-art technology transfer from the university to government, businesses, and all citizens of the state and nation (Stark 1995). The WI-PHIN program is a 21st century embodiment of the idea, providing cutting-edge information technology services through research and development. UW-DoIT provides the information systems research, development, technical support, and hosting for WI-PHIN.

Wisconsin has combined its financial support from several categorical funding sources to develop a secure, web-based WI-PHIN portal to respond to bioterrorism and all other public health threats. Funding resources have included bioterrorism public health preparedness funding, National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS)-NEDSS Base System (NBS) deployment, Wisconsin Maternal and Child Health Program, audiometric newborn screening, environmental public health tracking, among others.

Nationally, the PHIN has nine architectural functional specifications to guide development. NEDSS (2001) also specifies standards for database structure and electronic surveillance systems. Using the PHIN specifications as a guide (CDC 2002), EPHTN program area module (PAM) architectural requirements were developed for the childhood cancer tracking system. Together, the following attributes were applied to the design of the WI-PHIN portal: The EPHTN PAM must include the secure, automated exchange of cancer case data between public health-based and hospital-based cancer registrars; web-based supplemental data entry for environmental exposure confirmation and hypothesis testing; automated data analysis, visualization, and exposure-outcome record linkage; directories of public health and clinical personnel for role-based access control (RBAC) to sensitive surveillance information; public health information dissemination and alerting; and information technology security.

Surveillance example: hypothesis generation. Available data systems were inventoried and included systems describing hazards, exposures, health outcomes, and populations at risk. Sources of data included statewide health and environmental monitoring information and nationally available environmental and demographic data sets. Each system was qualitatively evaluated for its ability to be linked with other systems and for its coverage (years, geographic completeness, etc.). These systems would be contained in an integrated data repository (IDR) and linked through common attributes such as time and geographic location. System specifications required the support of two surveillance tracks hypothesis generation and hypothesis testing--to provide a more complete view of environmental, disease risk. Under the first track (hypothesis generation), cancer case data are sent electronically to WI-PHIN to populate the IDR, and basic surveillance/descriptive analyses are performed. Environmental data are then linked, and exposure-disease relationships are modeled using statistical and geographic information system (GIS) tools for ecologic exposure risk assessment. In the second track (hypothesis testing), case follow-back interviews are conducted using secure web-based data entry forms to obtain person-level exposure histories, including parental employment and residential histories, on cases and controls.

Childhood cancer data were obtained from the Wisconsin Cancer Registry for 1990 through 2000 (the most recent available year) (Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services 2004). Cases were selected where individuals were younger than 20 years of age at diagnosis. Case frequencies were arrayed by cause, and age-adjusted rates were plotted by county for the most frequent cancer types.

Known exposure-disease relationships were ascertained by performing searches of the National Library of Medicine's PubMed (2004) database along with Internet searches. A work group was established to review findings and determine the web-based interview structure that would obtain risk-confirming and hypothesis-testing person-level exposure data on cases and controls.

To begin work on hypothesis generation, initial ecologic risk assessments were performed by correlating county air pollution exposure estimates (Technology Transfer Network 2002) with county age-adjusted cancer rates. Age-adjusted rates were constructed using the direct method and the 2000 census standard million population (U.S. Census Bureau 2004). A nonparametric correlation was then calculated between the ranks of county air pollutants and the rank of age-adjusted cancer rate.

Results

Information technology. Substantial progress has been made on the secure WI-PHIN portal since its start in 1999. Since its inception, > $7 million has been expended by combining public health information technology funding sources. Table 1 illustrates the information technology function requirements and Wisconsin's progress toward achieving them. Figure 1 provides a conceptual diagram of portal information flows and services.

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

The WI-PHIN has the capability to perform automated data exchange, use electronic clinical data for event detection, and use the web for secure data entry for case follow-up. An online survey capability was created that can support web-based manual entry for case reporting. Storage capacity for laboratory results is established, as is case management capability. Specific case management rules continue to be refined with the integration of PAM business requirements. SAS (version 8.2; SAS, Inc., Cary, NC) has been integrated into the portal for automating statistical analyses and visualization, and GIS services (using Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc., Redlands, CA, products) continue to be developed. A directory of personnel has been established containing more than 2,400 registered WI-PHIN users from more than 900 agencies (state and local public health agencies, hospitals, local emergency response agencies, clinics, etc.). The directory contains user contact information (e.g., E-mail, phone, fax, pager, cell phone) along with other attributes (public health role, occupation, agency affiliation, professional skills/competencies/certifications, volunteer for emergency response, etc.). Users can create personal groups from the directory and synchronize entries to their personal digital assistants (PDAs).

A considerable alerting and information dissemination capability has been developed. A commercial call-tree service (simultaneous phone, fax, pager, E-mail for public health emergencies and other alerts) has been integrated into the portal. Scenarios are being developed that contact appropriate responders to specific public health emergencies. In addition, the web portal has public and private topic areas and threaded discussion forums that are associated with public health programs such as environmental tracking. Users may bookmark topic areas and receive E-mail updates (digests) when new content is added to their subscribed content areas. All users can easily add content to the portal (text, web links, upload documents, streaming media) and add events to the calendar. Calendar entries can be synchronized to a PDA. Distance training and streaming media services are available within the portal. These features have been used to create on-line courses to train public health staff throughout the state on public health topics (e.g., bioterrorism) and on portal features and use techniques.

Advanced security controls are a part of the portal design. Users must register with the State of Wisconsin Web Access Management System and obtain a login ID and password to access the system. Users then reach the web site with an encrypted secure socket layer (SSL) connection. RBAC determines enduser access to surveillance programs such as the NBS (infectious disease reporting), SPHERE (Secure Public Health Electronic Record of the Wisconsin Maternal and Child Health Program), WE-TRAC (Wisconsin Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Referral and Coordination System), and the EPHTN childhood cancer pilot.

Hardware is also protected. Servers have redundant firewalls, virus scanning, continuous external port scanning and probing, and intrusion detection appliances. The system is continually backed up, and continuity of operations is assured through site mirroring planning and procedural implementation. Administrative security policies cover appropriate conduct and use documents, access auditing and logging, and on-line training.

Hypothesis generation example: benzene and leukemia. Table 2 displays the environmental, population, and health outcome data systems that are under evaluation for inclusion and linkage in the EPHTN IDR. Wisconsin childhood cancer cases are displayed in Table 3. A total of 2,960 cases were selected. Leukemia, lymphatic, and brain cancers accounted for 51% of the cases. These were selected for rate analysis, plotting, literature review, and follow-back to assess environmental contributions. More than 1,000 articles/sources were obtained, and environmental exposure history development continues (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry 2004) for web-based data entry.

A preliminary hypothesis-generating assessment was made with some of the currently available data. These data consisted of the Wisconsin Cancer Registry (Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services 2004), National Air Toxics Assessment data for 1996 (Technology Transfer Network 2002), and census county population estimates. Age-adjusted county cancer rates were correlated to each of the pollutants. Estimated inhalation concentrations for benzene are depicted by county in Figure 2. Figure 3 plots the age-adjusted leukemia incidence by county. Correlating the two revealed a significant rank correlation between exposure and disease (R = 0.31, p < 0.01). Indeed, benzene appears repeatedly in the literature as a potential cause of leukemia.

[FIGURES 2-3 OMITTED]

Discussion

The PHIN information technology functions provide a clear implementation plan to automate public health practice. Automation will be a tremendous benefit to the public health system, improving efficiency, coordination, assurance, response, and evaluation. However, substantial resources are necessary to accomplish this. An EPHTN program meeting the PHIN requirements is only possible by combining multiple funding sources that support public health information technology. Wisconsin has done this and has made substantial progress in its development of WI-PHIN and EPHTN, but much work remains. Continued federal funding and support from other sources will be necessary if the many ambitious PHIN goals are to be achieved.

Wisconsin's EPHTN childhood cancer pilot PAM has established a PHIN-compatible framework to track the environmental causes of disease. Two mechanisms are specified--hypothesis generating and hypothesis testing. Hypothesis generation occurs through the linking of environmental exposure databases (by time and place) with health outcome and population data. Ecologic risks can be generated that suggest avenues for further investigation. When a subset of the available data was used, a population-level rank correlation was found between estimated human inhalation benzene exposures and childhood leukemia risk, corroborating previous findings. However, the "ecologic fallacy" is the chief limitation of this approach: There can be underlying heterogeneity of exposure levels and covariates within the group or area assigned its population-level fixed value (Rothman and Greenland 1998). Hypothesis testing provides a solution to this by creating a web-based follow-back form to capture individual, person-level exposure histories on cases and controls. Known risks can be assessed on the questionnaire, and hypothesized causes can be tested in the case-control framework. These results can then be used to construct environmental attributable fractions for case incidence.

But both of these approaches are limited in that neither obtains biologic or environmental markers of actual exposures or individual susceptibility. In addition, pre-existing exposure monitoring data may be further limited because much of the available information is collected for regulatory purposes. These environmental monitoring systems have not been designed to substantially support environmental health tracking systems. Reliable and valid laboratory measures of environmental exposures, cancer risk, and individual susceptibility (i.e., gene-environment interactions) are needed, and they would considerably increase our understanding of the environment's contribution to childhood cancer (Grufferman 1998). Although this detailed environmental monitoring activity is outside of the project scope largely because of funding, the EPHTN PAM is positioned to integrate these kinds of measures because it can accept laboratory result messaging.

Through the Wisconsin Idea, the WI-PHIN program has developed innovative information technology solutions that can serve as an implementation model for others. Best practices and lessons learned are emerging as the WI-PHIN develops its pilot program for environmental childhood cancer tracking. This experience will be shared with other states seeking to better understand the relationship between childhood cancer and the environment using advanced information technology. This approach can then serve as the foundation building toward a comprehensive system to assess environmental cancer etiology while extending the method to tracking other environmental exposure and disease relationships.
Table 1. PHIN information technology functional standards and
Wisconsin implementation status.

PHIN IT function
specification PHIN standard implementation (a)

1. Automated data Establish ebXML-compliant SOAP web service via an
 exchange HTTPS connection after appropriate authentication;
 encrypted messages use industry standard ebXML
 format and include standardized HL7, version 2.3;
 HL7, version 3.0; X12; and LDIF message content.

2. Electronic Data received via ebXML messaging identified in
 clinical data: function 1 above stored using NEDSS logical data
 event detection model specification of the HL7 Reference
 Information Model and extensions. This allows
 standards-based interaction with commercial
 products for reporting, statistical analysis,
 geographic mapping, and automated outbreak
 detection algorithms, as well as the processing of
 queued data from and for electronic messages; the
 data repository should implement common database
 technology (e.g., Sybase, Oracle, or SOL Server)
 running on servers using Windows NT/2000/XP,
 LINUX, or UNIX and supporting ODBC, ANSI standard
 SOL, and JDBC access.

3. Web: manual Secure browser-based data entry for data input and
 data entry results other reporting from and to primary care
 clinical care sites and sources; develop web
 browser-based data systems using open-platform
 web servers supporting generic web browsers (HTML
 3.0+/Java)

4. Laboratory Data stored in HI-7-compatible data formats;
 result coding of request and results messages with the
 information LOINC and SNOMED vocabularies, information
 messaging using function 1.

5. Case management Using functions 1-4 above, cases should be
 "linked" and traceable from detection via
 electronic sources of clinical data or manual
 entry of case data, and through confirmation
 via laboratory result reporting.

6. Analysis and Commercial reporting systems integrated using ODBC
 visualization and JDBC data access; security and access control
 applied for remote access using SSL and
 certificate- or token-based authentication with
 appropriate authentication and authorization.

7. Personnel Directories present an LDAP version 3.0 standard-
 directories based service allowing data access and sharing
 across multiple computer systems and appropriate
 organizational boundaries; directory information
 transfer and sharing supports standard message
 format (LDIF); data fields use X.500 standards for
 field type and length.

8. Information Receive, manage, and disseminate alerts,
 dissemination protocols, procedures, and other information for
 and alerting dissemination to public health workers, primary
 care physicians, public health laboratories, and
 other partners; ability to "push" information via
 messages and allow participants to "pull"
 information via the browsing of secure web sites,
 support of interactive communication sites for
 threaded discussion capabilities.

9. IT Security Meet/exceed HIPAA requirements; client and server
 X.509 digital certificates or comparable strong
 authentication methodology for access, establish
 RBAC protocols and effective administrative
 policies; employ desktop/server virus scanning,
 intrusion detection, network vulnerability
 analysis, security policy monitoring, regular
 penetration testing, and active threat
 intelligence; ensure continuity of operations
 through planning and procedure implementation.

PHIN IT function
specification WI-PHIN status

1. Automated data Web service capability established; test
 exchange deployment with several laboratories.

2. Electronic Data repository established using Oracle 9i;
 clinical data: messaging of laboratory data in pilot/
 event detection production, hospital tumor registries
 contacted for case messaging, pilot
 volunteers identified.

3. Web: manual Function established; system operates on
 data entry Sun Solaris using Weblogic application server;
 capability will be used to obtain supplemental
 risk and exposure history data.

4. Laboratory Storage capability established; vocabulary
 result capability in development.
 information

5. Case management Capability established; PAM-specific
 business rules in development for linkage
 and tracking.

6. Analysis and SAS product integrated, ESRI GIS capability
 visualization in development; SSL and RBAC established.

7. Personnel Capability established, directory contains
 directories contact information and roles of > 2,400
 registered PHIN users from > 900
 organizations.

8. Information Capability established; call-tree alerting
 dissemination system integrated (voice technologies), public
 and alerting and private topic areas, threaded discussion
 forums established; push digest subscriptions
 available from bookmarked topic areas,
 directing appropriate content to audience.

9. IT Security Capability established, including RBAC,
 administrative policies, auditing, and training,
 ongoing virus scanning, intrusion detection,
 threat intelligence, continuity of operations;
 independent validation and verification in
 development, client digital certificates in
 exploratory phase.

Abbreviations: ANSI, American National Standards Institute, ebXML,
Electronic Business using eXtensible Markup Language; ESRI,
Environmental Systems Research Institute; HIPAA, Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (1996); HL7, Health Level 7; HTTP,
Hypertext Transfer Protocol; IT, information technology; JDBC, JAVA
Database Connectivity; LDAP, Lightweight Directory Access Protocol;
LDIF, Lightweight Data Interchange Format; LOINC, Logical Observation
Identifiers; ODBC, Open Database Connectivity; SNOMED, Systemized
Nomenclature of Medicine; SOAP, Simple Object Access Protocol; SOL,
Structured Query Language.

(a) From CDC (2002).

Table 2. Wisconsin EPHTN data inventory.

Abbreviation Data set Scope

AEI Air Emissions Inventory State

BRRTS Bureau of Remediation and Redevelopment State
 Tracking System

Census Census National

DWS Drinking Water System State

GEMS Groundwater Environmental Monitoring State
 System

GLAT Great Lakes Air Toxic Emissions Inventory Regional

GEN Groundwater Retrieval Network State

NATA National Air Toxics Assessment National

NEI National Emissions Inventory National

PEI Periodic Emissions Inventory State

RR GIS Registry Remediation and Redevelopment GIS Registry State

SHWIMS Solid and Hazardous Waste Information State
 Management System

SWAP Source Water Assessment Plan Database State

TRI Toxics Release Inventory National

WCR Wisconsin Cancer Registry State

WI Hosp Wisconsin Hospital Discharge State

WMOR Wisconsin Mortality State

Abbreviation Description

AEI Emissions from mobile sources

BRRTS Database of environmental contamination sites
 including spills, leaking underground storage
 tanks, state-response sites, and federal Superfund
 sites

Census Decennial population counts, age, gender, race,
 census tract, county, ZIP code

DWS Drinking-water quality in Wisconsin public wells

GEMS Environmental monitoring data for Wisconsin
 landfills, including landfill gas, groundwater, and
 other sample types

GLAT Airborne toxic pollutant emissions affecting air and
 water quality in eight Great Lakes states

GEN Groundwater quality in Wisconsin private, public,
 and monitoring wells

NATA Estimates of 33 air toxics (a subset of 32 air
 toxics on the Clean Air Act's list of 188 air
 toxics, plus diesel particulate matter) (U.S. EPA
 1993)

NEI Hazardous and criteria air pollutants

PEI Annual emissions of criterion air pollutants and
 some noncriterion pollutants

RR GIS Registry Sites closed with residual water or soil
 contamination

SHWIMS Sitings for waste management facilities

SWAP Assessment of possible contamination sources within
 a specified distance from a drinking water well

TRI Toxic chemical releases and other waste management
 activities for specific industry groups and federal
 facilities

WCR Cancer incidence by age, gender, race, county, ZIP
 code, histology, cytology, staging

WI Hosp Hospitalizations by age, gender, race, county, ZIP
 code, cause

WMOR Mortality by age, gender, race, county, cause

Table 3. Wisconsin Cancer Registry 1990-2000: childhood cancer cases
frequency by cause (chil-dren < 20 years of age).

Cause Frequency (%)

Leukemia 672 (22.7)
Lymphatic cancers 428 (14.5)
Brain cancer 413 (14.0)
Cervical cancer 283 (9.6)
Bone cancer 174 (5.9)
Soft tissue cancer 151 (5.1)
Kidney and other urinary cancer 126 (4.3)
Thyroid cancer 91 (3.1)
Skin cancer/melanoma and 88 (3.0)
 other reportable
Other endocrine gland cancer 74 (2.5)
Testicular cancer 66 (2.2)
Eye cancer 59 (2.0)
Ovarian cancer 58 (2.0)
Other central nervous system 47 (1.6)
 cancer
All other cancers/unknown cancers 42 (l.4)
Oral cancer 33 (1.1)
Peritoneal cancer 27 (0.9)
Liver cancer 24 (0.8)
Nasalcancer 15 (0.5)
Colorectal cancer 14 (0.5)
Other respiratory/thoracic cancer 14 (0.5)
Bladder cancer 13 (0.4)
Bronchus and lung cancer 11 (0.4)
Other female genital cancer 11 (0.4)
Prostate cancer 7 (0.2)
Small intestine cancer 3 (0.1)
Breast cancer 3 (0.1)
Uterine cancer 3 (0.1)
Other leukemias 3 (0.1)
Stomach cancer 2 (0.1)
Pancreatic cancer 2 (0.1)
Laryngeal cancer 1 (0.0)
Pleural cancer 1 (0.0)
Other male genital cancer 1 (0.0)

Total 2,960 (100.0)


REFERENCES

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. 2004. Case Studies in Environmental Medicine. Taking An Exposure History. Atlanta, GA:Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Available: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ HEC/CSEM/exphistory/exphist_form.html [accessed 27 February 2004].

American Cancer Society. 2004. Wisconsin Cancer Facts and Figures 2003-2004. Pewaukee, WI:American Cancer Society. Available: http://www.acs.org [accessed 24 February 2004].

Axelson O, Fredrikson M, Akerblom G, Hardell L. 2002. Leukemia in childhood and adolescence and exposure to ionizing radiation in homes built from uranium-containing alum shale concrete. Epidemiology 13:146-150.

Brain JD, Kavet R, McCormick BL, Poole C, Silverman LB, Smith TJ, et al. 2003. Childhood leukemia: electric and magnetic fields as possible risk factors. Environ Health Perspect 111:962-970.

CDC. 2002. Public Health Information Network Functions and Specifications. Version 1.2. Atlanta, GA:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available: http://www. cdc.gov/phin/architecture/index.htm [accessed 24 February 2004].

Crosignani P, Tittarelli A, Borgini A, Cedazzi T, Rovelli A, Porro E, et al. 2094. Childhood leukemia and road traffic: a population-based case-control study. Int J Cancer 108:596-599.

EPHTN (Environmental Public Health Tracking Network). 2004. Environmental Public Health Tracking Program:Atlanta, GA:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/tracking/program.htm [accessed 24 February 2004].

Feychting M, Plato N, Nise G, Ahlbom A. 2001. Paternal occupational exposures and childhood cancer. Environ Health Perspect 109:193-196.

Fiore BJ, Hanrahan LP, Anderson HA. 1990. State health department response to disease cluster reports: a protocol for investigation. Am J Epidemiol 132:S14-S22.

Grufferman S. 1998. Methodologic approaches to studying environmental factors in childhood cancer. Environ Health Perspect 106(suppl 3):881-886.

Harvard Report on Cancer Prevention. 1996. Causes of human cancer, Vol 1. Cancer Causes Control 7(suppl 1):S3-59.

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. 1996. Public Law 104-191. Available: http://aspe.hhs.gov/ admnsimp/pl104191.htm [accessed 11 August 2004].

Landrigan PJ, Schechter CB, Lipton JM, Fahs MC, Schwartz J. 2002. Environmental pollutants and disease in American children: estimates of morbidity, mortality, and costs for lead poisoning, asthma, cancer, and developmental disabilities. Environ Health Perspect 110:721-728.

NEDSS. 2001. National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS): a standards-based approach to connect public health and clinical medicine. J Public Health Manag Pract 7:43-50.

PubMed. 2004. Digital Archive of Medical and Life Sciences Journal Literature. Bethesda, MD:National Library of Medicine. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/ query.fcgi [accessed 24 February 2004].

Reynolds P, Von Behren J, Gunier RB, Goldberg DE, Hertz A, Harnly ME. 2002. Childhood cancer and agricultural pesticide use: an ecologic study in California. Environ Health Perspect 110:319-324.

Reynolds P, Von Behren J, Gunier RB, Goldberg DE, Hertz A, Smith DF. 2093. Childhood cancer incidence rates and hazardous air pollutants in California: an exploratory analysis. Environ Health Perspect 111:663-668.

Rothman KJ. 1990. A sobering start for the cluster busters' conference. Am J Epidemiol 132:S6-S13.

Rothman KJ, Greenland S. 1998. Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia:Lippincott-Raven.

Stark J. 1995. The Wisconsin Idea: The University's Service to the State. State of Wisconsin Blue Book 1995-1996. Wisconsin Legislative Reference Bureau. Madison, WI:Wisconsin Department of Administration, 99-192.

Technology Transfer Network. 2002. National Air Toxics Assessment. Baltimore, MD:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/nata/ index.html [accessed 24 February 2904].

U.S. Census Bureau. 2004. Census 2004. Bridged-Race Intercensal Population Estimates for July 1, 1990-July 1, 1999, by Year, County, Single-Year of Age, Hispanic Origin, and Sex. Washington, DC:U.S. Census Bureau. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/dvs/popbridge/ datadoc.htm#inter5 [accessed 24 February 2004].

U.S. EPA. 1993. The Plain English Guide to the Clean Air Act. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Available:http://www.epa.gov/air/oaqps/peg_caa/ pegcaain.html [accessed 11 August 2004].

Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services. 2004. Wisconsin Cancer Reporting System. Available: http:// dhfs.wisconsin.gov/wcrs/operate.htm [accessed 11 August 2004].

Yasnoff WA. 2001. The promise of public health informatics. J Public Health Manag Pract 7:iv-v.

Zahm SH, Devesa SS. 1995. Childhood cancer: overview of incidence trends and environmental carcinogens. Environ Health Perspect 103(suppl 6):177-184.

Lawrence P. Hanrahan, (1) Henry A. Anderson, (1) Brian Busby, (2) Marni Bekkedal, (1) Thomas Sieger, (1) Laura Stephenson, (1) Lynda Knobeloch, (1) Mark Werner, (1) Pamela Imm, (1) and Joseph Olson (1)

(1) Division of Public Health, Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; (2) E-Commerce, University of Wisconsin Division of Information Technology, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

This article is part of the mini-monograph "National Environmental Public Health Tracking," which is sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Address correspondence to L.P. Hanrahan, Bureau of Health Information and Policy, Division of Public Health, Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services, Room 372, 1 West Wilson St., Madison, WI 53702 USA. Telephone: (608) 267-7173. Fax: (608) 267-4853. E-mail: hanralp@dhfs.state.wi.us

This work was funded by CDC through the Wisconsin Environmental Public Health Tracking Program (grant U50/CCU522439-01).

This article was supported by an environmental public health tracking cooperative agreement from CDC. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of CDC.

The authors declare they have no competing financial interests.

Received 1 April 2004; accepted 3 August 2004.
COPYRIGHT 2004 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Public Health Tracking / Mini-Monograph
Author:Olson, Joseph
Publication:Environmental Health Perspectives
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Oct 1, 2004
Words:5064
Previous Article:Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) for exposure tracking: experiences from Washington State.
Next Article:Statistical methods for linking health, exposure, and hazards.
Topics:


Related Articles
Cooperative partnership and conference give NEHA's counterterrorism efforts a national profile. (NEHA News).
Childhood cancer incidence rates and hazardous air pollutants in California: an exploratory analysis. (Children's Health).
Can lessons from public health disease surveillance be applied to environmental public health tracking?
Developing a comprehensive pesticide health effects tracking system for an urban setting: New York City's approach.
Measuring up: examining the need to establish state-based biomonitoring programs.
Integrated assessment of environment and health: America's children and the environment.
Integrating research, surveillance, and practice in environmental public health tracking.
The use of biomonitoring data in exposure and human health risk assessments.
Environmental Health Impacts of concentrated animal feeding operations: Anticipating Hazards--Searching for Solutions.
An update on cancer cluster activities at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters