Printer Friendly

Winning ugly.

The term winning ugly is popular in the sports world to describe a performance that wasn't the best, but resulted in victory. I have a strong feeling that this year's presidential campaign is going to redefine what we consider winning ugly.

But I'm hoping that among all the garbage we are going to be subjected to, there will actually be an attempt to define just what the U.S. policy is on trade. This is long overdue.

It seems evident that certain trade practices are not beneficial to everyone, and yet there are no real programs of assistance to those affected, outside of the standard benefits.

Some trade policies are attempts to get targeted voters to vote a certain way. Some are implemented because a certain group didn't vote the right way. Depending on the trading partner, we may either overlook mandates of a treaty or become extremely diligent in enforcement. This shouldn't be.

Each one of us has been affected by the country's trade policy, and most of us have a rudimentary under standing of the goals. It's the means to achieving these goals that has caused the confusion: mostly because our elected officials are confused.

It appears this presidential election is going to bring trade policy to center stage, which brings the opportunity to get your voice heard. Those running for federal positions will not be able to dodge discussions on trade.

Individually, you can make sure your elected officials know your stance on NAFTA, the WTO, favored nation treaties, tariffs, protectionism or the myriad of other trade issues. Like Kevin Ott of the Rubber Manufacturers Association wrote in our January issue, if you own a business, now is the time to buttonhole your office-seeking officials to let them know your stance. Invite them for a photo-op and plant tour: they want the exposure, then talk to them.

Without a doubt, there is going to be a lot of ugly in this election. The task at hand is trying to influence policy before the election so that it isn't ugly afterward.
COPYRIGHT 2004 Lippincott & Peto, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Editorial
Author:Smith, Don R.
Publication:Rubber World
Date:Mar 1, 2004
Words:343
Previous Article:Compression molding.
Next Article:ExxonMobil starts up LA metallocene plant expansion.


Related Articles
Black cartoonists missing from pages.
UO season now substance over style.
Barbara Mantz Drake.
The Register-Guard garners 23 awards in ONPA contest.
Ugly ad.
Milestones, awards, educational opportunities.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters