Printer Friendly

Will curbing PACs hurt black reps?

To many Americans, the clamor about campaign finance reform is a no-brainer. They believe too many politicians receive too much money from too many single- or narrow-issue political action committees (PACs). The result: Constituents complain that legislators are unduly influenced to do a PAC's bidding, rather than protect constituent interests.

For many Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) members, campaign finance reform is no casual matter, and PACs are viewed as boons not banes. In fact, some CBC members fear restrictive financing rules will undermine their efforts to be re-elected. As Eva Clayton (D-N.C.), president of the Democratic Frehman Class notes, "Candidates in the poorest districts often accept money outside the area. This is particularly true when the candidate is not affluent and receives the bulk of his or her individual contributions from people who give $200 or less."

The issue is particularly delicate because most House and Senate members rely on PAC contributions to replenish financial "war chests" depleted during the election cycle. For funding anything from media air time to campaign paraphernalia, money is an essential part of a successful campaign. Moreover, because incumbents stand to lose it stringent restrictions on PAC contributions are enacted, finance reform has become one of the most contentions issues facing Congress.

President Bill Clinton has pledged to sign the campaign finance reform bill vetoed by his predecessor, thereby sending Capitl Hill a signal that his Administration is serious about reform. Congress has been listening.

Logically, the battle against restrictions should be waged by PAC-reliant minority candidates who need outside money to offset their district's scarce resources. CBC members fear proposals reducing the amount of PAC contributions will hinder their ability to fend of challenges in upcoming elections. Yet, those who may be most affectd by the bill, such as CBC and other minority caucus members, have barely squawked over reform initiatives.

Considering that most members of Congress support campaign finance reform in principle, a resistant CBC may fear press and public criticism if its members oppose campaign reform.

John Lewis (D-Ga.) believes that although the costs of the current campaign system are too high, PACs are vital to minority candidates. He views PAC contributions as a necessary "pooling" of resources in the African-American community that keeps minority candidates in the game. Arguing that PACs were created for political reform, Lewis likens attempts to limit them to attempt to restrict free speech. He says the Constitution guarantees a candidate the right "to speak through dollars" under the First Amendment. Ronald V. Dellums (D-Calif.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, is an ardent supporter of campaign finance reform. He says taking "money out of the political enterprise is important for the perception of [a] lack of conflict of interst in the political process."

Dellums can afford to say that. In 1992, the Federal Election Commission reportd he received $854,478 in total contributions and $78,434 primarily from political action committees.

But, not every CBC member feels the way Dellums does. Floyd H. Flake (D-N.Y.)--who received $81,517 in individual contributions and $142,490 from PACs--is skeptical of reform. He says the issue is a GOP ploy to level the playing field in "white-on-white" elections where suburban and rural Democrats often have a financial edge over their Republican opponent. "The real issue is that Republicans do not feel they get a fair shake," Flake argues.
COPYRIGHT 1993 Earl G. Graves Publishing Co., Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1993, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:impact of new political action committee financing rules on African American congressmen
Author:Berry, Sharon
Publication:Black Enterprise
Date:Sep 1, 1993
Words:563
Previous Article:Going solo.
Next Article:Eyes on the prize.
Topics:


Related Articles
The Hiroshima hustle; yet another way to fleece campaign contributors.
Nice PAC you've got here ... a pity if anything should happen to it.
Honest Graft: Big Money and the American Political Process.
The Keating 535; Charles Keating did us a favor: he showed us how to clean up American campaigns.
More black power in Congress.
Rushing to Judgement: Bobby Rush has traded his activist past for a seat in Congress.
Texas Religious Right Allies Accused Of Campaign Violations.
PACs and your business: why you should take an interest in political fundraising.
Trouble with DeLay: while the indictment of Rep. Tom DeLay may be a partisan "witch hunt," the former House Majority Leader has a lot to answer for.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters