Printer Friendly

Whole-Exome Sequencing-Based Mutational Profiling of Hepatitis B Virus-Related Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

1. Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality in China [1]. In the meantime, its incidence tends to increase over the past decade [2]. In 2012, GLOBOCAN reported around 782,500 new cases of liver cancer [2]. Although massive advances in treatments for viral hepatitis and updated means to diagnose and treat liver tumours were achieved in the recent years, the prognosis of this malignancy remains to be dismal [3, 4]. With the incidence rate approximating the death rate, most of the HCC patients die of this lethal disease [5].

A multistep process of sequential genetic changes is a core driving force behind the development and progression of cancer [6]. In this era of novel high-throughput genome and exome sequencing technologies, it is feasible to explore cancer genomes at a high resolution and catalogue each gene mutation in a given human cancer. Recent sequencing studies of exomes and genomes in multiple HCC cohorts have identified numerous novel molecular alternations of various aetiologies, including recurrent mutations in the genes of TP53, ARID2, ARID1A, CTNNB1, AXIN1, RPS6KA3, and IRF2 [7-10], and major pathways that are commonly altered, such as the chromatin remodelling and Wnt/beta-catenin pathways [7, 9]. However, HCC-associated somatic mutations vary extensively among individuals and even within a single tumour. Because of this dramatic diversity, no clear genetic signatures have been identified to stratify mutations, and pharmaceutical endeavours investigating new targeting strategies against HCC have encountered enormous challenges [11]. The only FDA-approved drug to treat advanced HCC, Sorafenib, merely prolongs patients' lifespans by an average of 2.8 months and is accompanied by a series of side effects [12]. Therefore, additional efforts to characterize the molecular pathogenesis of this malignancy are still imperative.

With Over 240 million people chronically infected worldwide [3], hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the most significant factor underlying the development of HCC, which accounts for more than 3/5 of all cases of liver cancer in the developing countries and a little less than 1/4 of cases in the developed countries [13]. Various risk factors for HCC may affect the mutation profile of the corresponding cancer genome [14]. In addition, targeting early steps in the development of cancer limits the genetic variety that develops over time. Based on the above considerations, we performed a whole-exome sequencing study on 5 paired early-stage HCC (eHCC) with HBV infection and peripheral blood samples. This study is designed to decipher the genetic changes involved in HCC tumorigenesis and progression and to advance the development of therapeutic strategies and early diagnosis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients and Samples. Five paired HCC specimens and peripheral blood samples were collected at the Liver Cancer Institute of Zhongshan Hospital (Fudan University, Shanghai, China) from patients receiving curative resection, and the samples were immediately frozen at -80[degrees]C, followed by pathological examination and confirmed to be HCC by experienced pathologists. These patients received no prior therapies, such as transarterial chemoembolization or radiofrequency ablation. Zhongshan Hospital Ethics Committee approved this study, and each patient signed informed consent following institutional review board protocols.

2.2. Whole-Exome Capture, Sequencing, and Mutation Analysis. Using a DNeasy tissue kit (Qiagen), paired tumour/normal genomic DNA from 5 patients were extracted and randomly sonicated to generate 150-200 bp products. After end repair with 3A overhang and NimbleGen linker adaptation, the AMPure XP bead-purified DNA fragments were subjected to LM-PCR. In accordance with the manufacturer's protocol, the prepared DNA libraries were hybridized to Agilent SureSelectXT Human All Exon kit to capture the target exome. After another round of LM PCR, a minimum of 80-fold enrichment was confirmed by qPCR for all of the captured sequences. The exonic DNA library was then sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq2000 platform. We aligned the sequenced reads to the human reference genome (GRCh37/hg 19) from the UCSC Genome Browser by Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA, version 0.6.2) software and removed the PCR duplicates by SAMtools software. To detect potential variants, we employed the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) to perform consensus calling, and the discovery pipeline is detailed in Figure S1. The somatic variants from each paired sample were justified by the following criteria: (1) phred-scaled consensus scores > 20 and mapping qualities > 30; (2) variant reads > 10% of the total reads; and (3) number of variant reads [greater than or equal to] 5 and total reads [greater than or equal to] 10. We removed common polymorphisms by comparison to dbSNP135 and the 1000 Genomes Project database (http://www.1000genomes.org), as well as synonymous mutations and variants found in normal exomes. The Integrated Genomics Viewer (IGV) software was used to examine all the candidate mutations, and the selected SNVs were confirmed by PCR-based Sanger sequencing in each tumour tissue and paired blood sample. The mutational signatures of each tumour were extracted by the application of deconstruct-Sigs, as described before [15].

2.3. Gene Function Analysis. The identified genes with SNVs were further input into Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID; http:// david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov) v6.7 using GO to reveal the molecular function denoted in the gene profile. Simultaneously, these genes were input into the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) to analyze the pathway associated [16]. The cut-off P value of 0.05 is recommended.

3. Results

3.1. Landscape of Somatic Mutations in HBV-Related eHCC. To obtain insight into the genetic basis of HBV-related eHCC, exome sequencing was performed on paired tumour and peripheral blood DNA from 5 HCC patients (BCLC stage A, 1 tumour nodule, diameter [less than or equal to] 3 cm; Table 1). The mean sequence coverage depth of targeted exonic regions reached 80.7-fold (ranging from 68.3-fold to 92.2-fold), and the median depth was 63.4-fold (ranging from 54-fold to 73-fold). Over 95% of the targeted exome gained coverage of at least one read (Table S1). Somatic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions and deletions (indels) were predicted using algorithms described in Figure S1. Briefly, to remove common germline variants, we removed candidate mutations that already existed in dbSNP135 or in the 1000 Genomes Project dataset, and tumour-specific mutations were confirmed by comparing the tumour data with those of matched peripheral blood samples. On the whole, we identified 736 potential protein-altering somatic mutations within 708 genes, with 614 missense mutations, 43 nonsense mutations, and 79 small indels (Table S2 and S3); this pattern is analogous to the distribution found in solid tumours [17]. The number of somatic mutations per tumour ranged from 52 to 308 (Figure 1(a)), which was comparable to values reported in previous studies [7-9].

Notably, a predominance of T:A>A:T transversions with a strong transcriptional strand bias was identified, which affected 4 out of 5 individuals in our cohort (Figure 1(b)). In case 5, the mutation rate of this transversion reached 63.2% among all mutation types. After using the deconstruct-Sigs method to extract the exact signatures underlying these SNVs of each tumour sample, the signature 22, as documented in Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (http://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic/signatures), consisting of dominated T:A>A:T transversions, was found over-represented in 4 out of 5 HBV-related eHCC and when all the SNVs were pooled together (Figure S2). Additionally, an overrepresentation of transversions over transitions (rate, 3.11) was found, in agreement with the results of previous HCC sequencing studies [9, 10].

To better understand the potential underlying mechanisms implicated in HBV-related eHCC, we performed GO (Gene Ontology) and pathway analysis based on the identified SNVs (Table S4 and S5) and found that pathways associated with extracellular matrix- (ECM-) receptor interaction (P = 1.91.E - 04, false discovery rate [FDR] =0.04), focal adhesion (P = 2.49E - 03, FDR = 0.19), and amoebiasis (P = 3.05E 03, FDR = 0.19) were the top 3 significantly enriched pathways and that cell adhesion (P = 1.17E - 06, FDR = 0.00), axon guidance (P = 1.43E - 05, FDR = 0.01), and regulation of pH (P = 2.48E - 04, FDR = 0.13) were the top 3 significantly enriched biological processes (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)).

3.2. Candidate Somatic Mutations Revealed by Exome Sequencing. In total, 8 genes, including MUC16, UNC79, USH2A, DNAH17, PTPN13, TENM4, PCLO, and PDE1C, were found to be mutated in at least 2 HCC samples (Table 2); 17 candidate somatic mutations located on these genes were further confirmed via PCR-based Sanger sequencing (Figure 2, Table S6). Each mutation was heterozygous, leading to sequence changes of the corresponding amino acid in the encoded protein.

4. Discussion

Cancer is a disease of the genome [18]. Genetic alterations, which confer selective growth advantages, sequentially accumulate during tumorigenesis due to various factors and mechanisms. Although recent exome and genome sequencing studies have examined large collections of HCC cases and refined the mutational landscape, our knowledge of the driving mutations and related signaling pathways involved in the tumorigenesis and progression of this malignancy is still far from complete, which precludes the use of genetic testing to categorize patients and target therapy.

Mutational signatures differ vastly among cancers [17]. Various carcinogens may also affect somatic substitution patterns in HCCs, and the mutation spectrum identified could indicate the specific pattern of mutagenesis occurring in tumour cells [19]. Through whole-exome sequencing, Huang et al. recently identified dominant G:C>T:A and T:A>A:T transversions in relatively advanced HCCs with portal vein thrombosis [10]. Based on exome sequencing, a predominance of T:A>A:T, but not G:C>T:A, transversions in eHCC was identified. This mutation signature strongly differs from what have been observed in other solid tumours, in which C:G>T:A transitions are the dominant alterations [17].

Remarkably, the discrepancy in the mutation spectra between our study and Huang's suggests that distinct mutational signatures may arise at different stages (e.g., early and advanced stages) of a cancer. T:A->A:T transversions are also well documented in urothelial carcinoma after exposures to aristolochic acid (AA), and often, the signature 22 indicates AA exposure [20]. Though with this signature similarity, AA is not a common cause of HCC, and the dominance of the T:A>A:T transversion was repeatedly discovered in the present study without proof of AA exposure and others [10, 21], which can hardly all be attributed to unexpected AA exposure. Thus, the dominant T:A>A:T transversions could possibly be a distinctive mutational signature of HBV-related eHCCs, yet this assumption must be tested in larger samples of HBV-related eHCCs.

Using mutated genes affected by SNVs in 5 cases, we carried out GO and pathway analysis and identified ECMreceptor interaction, axon guidance, and focal adhesion as significantly mutated pathways and/or biological processes. Notably, axon guidance was identified as both significantly mutated pathway and biological process. 12 mutated genes involved in this pathway affected 4 out of 5 cases in this cohort. The axon guidance genes were originally characterized by their roles in guiding axon pathfinding to its synaptic targets, thereby forming neural connections and wiring the nervous system during embryogenesis [22]. Recent sequencing studies have revealed frequent and diverse somatic mutations in axon guidance genes in various human cancers, including gastric cancer, pancreatic cancer, and liver fluke-associated cholangiocarcinoma, highlighting their involvement in driving malignancies [23-25]. Slit and Roundabout (Robo) are both axon guidance molecules. Compelling evidence reasoned that Slit/Robo signaling inhibited E-cadherin-mediated cell adhesion and induced EMT-like phenotype in colorectal carcinoma [26]. EMT is a complex biological process by which epithelial cells shed their differentiated features (e.g., disrupted intercellular adhesion and loss of cell polarity) and instead assume a mesenchymal phenotype, including capabilities to degrade ECM, enhanced motility/invasiveness, and heightened resistance to apoptosis [27]. Accumulating observations point to its pivotal role in carcinogenesis and cancer-related invasion and metastatic dissemination [28, 29]. In addition, the ECM-receptor interaction and focal adhesion pathways were also associated with EMT. The significantly enriched pathways involved in EMT identified in our eHCC study imply that genetic alterations favouring metastatic progression are acquired at an early stage of HCC development.

Of the 8 frequent mutated genes, 7 (except TENM4) were annotated in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC) and also reported in recent sequencing studies of HCC [9, 30], as well as a variety of cancer types. MUC16 and USH2A were mutated with over 5% frequency in documented tissue samples. Elevated expression of MUC16 has been found in breast cancer and late stage and metastatic sites of pancreatic cancer [31, 32]. Eudy et al. demonstrated that MUC16 inhibits NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity against ovarian cancer cells. Due to its involvement in ECM constitution and cellular adhesion [33], the mutation of USH2A could possibly facilitate the process of EMT. The nonsense mutation (Tyr1758***) in PTPN13 leads to loss of function in accord with the prior study reasoning PTPN13 as a candidate tumour suppressor gene in HCC [34]. These observations may imply that the overlapping mutated genes may harbor driver mutations of this malignancy.

In conclusion, our work documents the mutational profile, affected pathways, a distinct T:A>A:T transversion signature, and frequent mutated genes in HBV-related eHCC, which enriched our understanding of the biology underlying the tumorigenesis of HCC.
Abbreviations

eHCC:     Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma
HBV:      Hepatitis B virus
SNVs:     Single-nucleotide variants
indels:   Small insertions and deletions
EMT:      Epithelial-mesenchymal transition
ECM:      Extracellular matrix.


https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2029315

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors' Contributions

Hao Zhan and Jiahao Jiang contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 81502502 and 81472672), the National Key Sci-Tech Special Project of China (Grant no. 2013ZX10002007005), the Yangfan Project for Young Scientists of Shanghai (Grant no. 15YF1402200), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 81402376).

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1: The bioinformatic Flow chart for identification SNVs and Indels based on Illumina/Solexa sequencing. SNVs, single nucleotide variants; UTR, untranslated regions; dbSNP, single nucleotide polymorphism database; Indels, small insertions and deletions. Table S1: Summary of exome sequence analysis of 5 hepatocellular carcinomas. Table S2: The list of single-nucleotide variants discovered in five cases revealed by whole-exome sequencing. Table S3: The list of small insertions and deletions discovered in five cases revealed by whole-exome sequencing. Table S4: GO analysis of the biological processes of the affected SNVs. Table S5: Pathway analysis of the affected SNVs. Table S6: Primers used to carry out Sanger sequencing of the frequent mutations. Figure S2: The mutational signatures consisting of 96 different mutated trinucleotides identified in each case and all cases together. Signature 22 dominated in 4 out of 5 cases (Supplementary files).

References

[1] W. Chen, R. Zheng, P. D. Baade et al., "Cancer statistics in China, 2015," CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 115-132, 2016.

[2] L. A. Torre, F. Bray, R. L. Siegel, J. Ferlay, J. Lortet-Tieulent, and A. Jemal, "Global cancer statistics, 2012," CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 87-108, 2015.

[3] H. B. El-Serag, "Hepatocellular carcinoma," The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 365, no. 12, pp. 1118-1127, 2011.

[4] A. Forner, J. M. Llovet, and J. Bruix, "Hepatocellular carcinoma," The Lancet, vol. 379, no. 9822, pp. 1245-1255, 2012.

[5] M. Maluccio and A. Covey, "Recent progress in understanding, diagnosing, and treating hepatocellular carcinoma," CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 394-399, 2012.

[6] C. M. Croce, "Oncogenes and cancer," The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 5, pp. 502-511, 2008.

[7] A. Fujimoto, Y. Totoki, T. Abe et al., "Whole-genome sequencing of liver cancers identifies etiological influences on mutation patterns and recurrent mutations in chromatin regulators," Nature Genetics, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 760-764, 2012.

[8] M. Li, H. Zhao, X. Zhang et al., "Inactivating mutations of the chromatin remodeling gene ARID2 in hepatocellular carcinoma," Nature Genetics, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 828-829, 2011.

[9] C. Guichard, G. Amaddeo, S. Imbeaud et al., "Integrated analysis of somatic mutations and focal copy-number changes identifies key genes and pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma," Nature Genetics, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 694-698, 2012.

[10] J. Huang, Q. Deng, Q. Wang et al., "Exome sequencing of hepatitis B virus-associated hepatocellular carcinoma," Nature Genetics, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1117-1121, 2012.

[11] M. Scudellari, "Drug development: try and try again," Nature, vol. 516, no. 7529, pp. S4-S6, 2014.

[12] J. M. Llovet, S. Ricci, V. Mazzaferro et al., "Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma," The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 4, pp. 378-390, 2008.

[13] A. Jemal, F. Bray, M. M. Center, J. Ferlay, E. Ward, and D. Forman, "Global cancer statistics," CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 69-90, 2011.

[14] J. H. Jiang, Y. F. Liu, A. W. Ke et al., "Clinical significance of the ubiquitin ligase UBE3C in hepatocellular carcinoma revealed by exome sequencing," Hepatology, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 2216-2227, 2014.

[15] R. Rosenthal, N. McGranahan, J. Herrero, B. S. Taylor, and C. Swanton, "DeconstructSigs: delineating mutational processes in single tumors distinguishes DNA repair deficiencies and patterns of carcinoma evolution," Genome Biology, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 31, 2016.

[16] W. Huang da, B. T. Sherman, and R. A. Lempicki, "Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources," Nature Protocols, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 44-57, 2008.

[17] C. Greenman, P. Stephens, R. Smith et al., "Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes," Nature, vol. 446, no. 7132, pp. 153-158, 2007.

[18] L. A. Garraway and E. S. Lander, "Lessons from the cancer genome," Cell, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 17-37, 2013.

[19] N. Nishida and M. Kudo, "Recent advancements in comprehensive genetic analyses for human hepatocellular carcinoma," Oncology, vol. 84, Supplement 1, pp. 93-97, 2013.

[20] S. Nik-Zainal, J. E. Kucab, S. Morganella et al., "The genome as a record of environmental exposure," Mutagenesis, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. gev073-gev770, 2015.

[21] S. L. Poon, S. T. Pang, J. R. McPherson et al., "Genome-wide mutational signatures of aristolochic acid and its application as a screening tool," Science Translational Medicine, vol. 5, no. 197, article 197ra01, 2013.

[22] M. Tessier-Lavigne and C. S. Goodman, "The molecular biology of axon guidance," Science, vol. 274, no. 5290, pp. 1123-1133, 1996.

[23] S. S. Wong, K. M. Kim, J. C. Ting et al., "Genomic landscape and genetic heterogeneity in gastric adenocarcinoma revealed by whole-genome sequencing," Nature Communications, vol. 5, p. 5477, 2014.

[24] C. K. Ong, C. Subimerb, C. Pairojkul et al., "Exome sequencing of liver fluke-associated cholangiocarcinoma," Nature Genetics, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 690-693, 2012.

[25] A. V. Biankin, N. Waddell, K. S. Kassahn et al., "Pancreatic cancer genomes reveal aberrations in axon guidance pathway genes," Nature, vol. 491, no. 7424, pp. 399-405, 2012.

[26] W. J. Zhou, Z. H. Geng, S. Chi et al., "Slit-Robo signaling induces malignant transformation through Hakai-mediated E-cadherin degradation during colorectal epithelial cell carcinogenesis," Cell Research, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 609-626, 2011.

[27] K. Polyak and R. A. Weinberg, "Transitions between epithelial and mesenchymal states: acquisition of malignant and stem cell traits," Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 265-273, 2009.

[28] S. A. Mani, W. Guo, M. J. Liao et al., "The epithelialmesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells," Cell, vol. 133, no. 4, pp. 704-715, 2008.

[29] J. Yang and R. A. Weinberg, "Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: at the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis," Developmental Cell, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 818-829, 2008.

[30] Z. Kan, H. Zheng, X. Liu et al., "Whole-genome sequencing identifies recurrent mutations in hepatocellular carcinoma," Genome Research, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1422-1433, 2013.

[31] D. Haridas, S. Chakraborty, M. P. Ponnusamy et al., "Pathobiological implications of MUC16 expression in pancreatic cancer," PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 10, article e26839, 2011.

[32] M. Higashi, N. Yamada, S. Yokoyama et al., "Pathobiological implications of MUC16/CA125 expression in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma-mass forming type," Pathobiology, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 101-106, 2012.

[33] J. D. Eudy, M. D. Weston, S. Yao et al., "Mutation of a gene encoding a protein with extracellular matrix motifs in usher syndrome type IIa," Science, vol. 280, no. 5370, pp. 1753-1757, 1998.

[34] S. H. Yeh, D. C. Wu, C. Y. Tsai et al., "Genetic characterization of fas-associated phosphatase-1 as a putative tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 4q21.3 in hepatocellular carcinoma," Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1097-1108, 2006.

Hao Zhan, (1) Jiahao Jiang, (2) Qiman Sun, (1,3) Aiwu Ke, (1) Jinwu Hu, (1) Zhiqiang Hu, (1) Kai Zhu, (1) Chubin Luo, (1) Ning Ren, (1) Jia Fan, (1,3) Jian Zhou, (1,3) and Xiaowu Huang (1,3)

(1) Liver Cancer Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Cancer Invasion, Ministry of Education, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

(2) Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

(3) Shanghai Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Shanghai, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Xiaowu Huang; huang.xiaowu@zs-hospital.sh.cn

Received 19 June 2017; Revised 9 August 2017; Accepted 13 August 2017; Published 29 November 2017

Academic Editor: Haruhiko Sugimura

Caption: FIGURE 1: Mutational profile of HBV-related eHCC and affected biological processes and pathways. (a) Numbers of each type of variant in 5 cases. (b) Mutational spectra of single-nucleotide variants in 5 cases. (c, d) Significantly enriched biological processes (c) and pathways (d) affected by the SNVs in our HBV-related eHCC cohort.

Caption: FIGURE 2: Recurrent mutations verified by Sanger sequencing. Frequent mutations in 2 cases were verified by Sanger sequencing. Each mutation was heterozygous and led to a change in the amino acid sequence of the encoded protein. None of the mutations reside in the DNA of peripheral lymphocytes. The black arrows indicate the mutation site. N: peripheral lymphocytes. T: HCC sample.
TABLE 1: Clinicopathologic characteristics of 5 hepatocellular
carcinoma patients used for exome sequencing.

Patient ID   Gender   Age   Aetiology     Liver     Edmondson
                                        cirrhosis     grade

Patient 1     Male    45       HBV         Yes         II
Patient 2     Male    52       HBV         Yes         II
Patient 3     Male    42       HBV         No          II
Patient 4     Male    52       HBV         No           I
Patient 5     Male    61       HBV         Yes         II

Patient ID   Adjacent   Vascular   Lymph   Metastasis    Tumour
             invasion   invasion   node                 size (cm)

Patient 1       No         No       No         No       2.8 x 2.8
Patient 2       No         No       No         No        2 x 1.8
Patient 3       No         No       No         No        2 x 1.8
Patient 4       No         No       No         No        2 x 1.8
Patient 5       No         No       No         No       2.2 x 2.2

Patient ID     TNM     BCLC
             stage *   stage

Patient 1      II        A
Patient 2       I        A
Patient 3       I        A
Patient 4       I        A
Patient 5      II        A

* Tumour staging was based on the 7th edition of tumour-node-
metastasis classification of the American Joint Committee on Cancer
Staging Manual. HBV: hepatitis B virus; BCLC: Barcelona clinic liver
cancer.

TABLE 2: Summary of frequent mutations in 8 genes verified by Sanger
sequencing.

Gene        Gene ID       Chromosome (#)   Sample ID   Position

USH2A     NM_206933.2          chr1        Patient 5   216462732
                                           Patient 2   215844382
                                           Patient 5   78381220
TENM4    NM_001098816.2       chr11        Patient 4   78413375
                                           Patient 4   78567209
UNC79     NM_020818.3         chr14        Patient 1   94004491
                                           Patient 2   94053131
DNAH17    NM_173628.3         chr17        Patient 5   76454758
                                           Patient 4   76557998
MUC16     NM_024690.2         chr19        Patient 5    9057619
                                           Patient 2    9077617
PTPN13    NM_080685.2          chr4        Patient 4   87694021
                                           Patient 1   87656828
PCLO      NM_033026.5          chr7        Patient 4   82545516
                                           Patient 1   82532009
PDE1C    NM_001191058.1        chr7        Patient 4   31920370
                                           Patient 2   32109908

Gene     Reference   Mutation     Protein     Mutation   Sanger-seq
           base        base     annotation      type      verified

USH2A        T          A       Lys621 ***    Nonsese       Yes
             T          A       Ile4689Phe    Missense      Yes
             T          A       Tyr2057Phe    Missense      Yes
TENM4        A          T       Val1428Glu    Missense      Yes
             A          T        Phe424Ile    Missense      Yes
UNC79        A          G        Thr250Ala    Missense      Yes
             A          T        Asp793Val    Missense      Yes
DNAH17       A          C       Leu3289Arg    Missense      Yes
             T          A        Tyr545Phe    Missense      Yes
MUC16        A          G       Ser9943Pro    Missense      Yes
             T          A       Met3277Leu    Missense      Yes
PTPN13       T          A       Tyr1758 ***   Nonsese       Yes
             G          C        Glu745Gln    Missense      Yes
PCLO         T          A       Gln3929Leu    Missense      Yes
             T          A       Arg4496Trp    Missense      Yes
PDE1C        C          A        Asp138Tyr    Missense      Yes
             C          T        Gly33Glu     Missense      Yes

(#) Coordinates refer to the human reference genome hg19 release
(Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 37 (GRCh37), Feb. 2009); ***
stop codon.
COPYRIGHT 2017 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Zhan, Hao; Jiang, Jiahao; Sun, Qiman; Ke, Aiwu; Hu, Jinwu; Hu, Zhiqiang; Zhu, Kai; Luo, Chubin; Ren,
Publication:Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:9CHIN
Date:Jan 1, 2017
Words:4054
Previous Article:First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication with Vonoprazan, Clarithromycin, and Metronidazole in Patients Allergic to Penicillin.
Next Article:The Role of Mast Cells in Irritable Bowel Syndrome.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters