Printer Friendly

Who says body painting and lingerie parties aren't divine? Property tax exemptions should apply to all churches (or better yet, none).

The religious right ought to be up in arms over a recent government assault on the free exercise of religion in Florida.

In March officials in Panama City Beach stripped away the property tax exemption of a popular church, simply because it took an innovative approach--though one firmly rooted in history--to experience the divine.

The church is called "The Life Center: A Spiritual Community" and has been conducting a religious service called "Amnesia: The Tabernacle." Instead of disrupting worshippers' prayers with repeated demands for cash, as other churches do, The Life Center simply charged a twenty-dollar "donation" at the door. Once inside, believers were given the opportunity to participate in something called "Anything But Clothes," naked body painting, and "a pajama and lingerie party hosted by the sexiest ladies on the beach." The church's interior decor was designed to promote the same worship theme, with t-shirts displaying oral sex and wall posters proclaiming: "I hate being sober."

The property is owned by Rev. Markus Q. Bishop, former pastor of the Faith Christian Family Church, a megachurch with a ten-thousand-square-foot, five-bedroom, six-bath mansion to house him. Property tax assessors conducted a vendetta for years against the tax exemption for this "parsonage," but Rev. Bishop won every challenge.

In a 2013 television interview, Rev. Bishop described his spiritual journey:

   I guess right off the bat, it would
   be difficult, in a sound bite, to
   explain my spiritual path ... I had
   certainly complied with and conformed
   with a lot of things in my
   beliefs that just didn't resonate
   with me. And so I decided after a
   lot of difficult things that occurred
   in my life--some people would
   call them a crash and burn, I look
   at them as an awakening because
   they made me really go and look
   within ... It's not about what label
   you wear. It's not about what title
   you carry. It's about what's really
   going on inside you. I am a follower
   of Jesus. I am a practicer
   [sic] of Buddhism. I am a student
   of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. I am
   a student of a course in miracles.
   And more than anything, I am
   passionate about a path of truth
   and reality that manifests itself in
   love and peace."


Is there really anything non-religious about that? Nevertheless, the city tax assessor claims to know what religion is and isn't, and he has no use for love and peace. "A bottle club, charging twenty dollars at the door and selling obscene T-shirts is not being used as a church," he said. "A God-fearing, God-honoring church in January does not sponsor this type of debauchery in March." The police chief agreed: "I've been in a lot of nightclubs and I've been in a lot of churches. That isn't a church." Panama City Beach indeed knows a lot about religion: its voting center at the last election was a (more traditional) church with a sign out front that said: "Vote biblically."

So what makes The Life Center a non-church and "Amnesia" a nonreligious service? Loud music? Singing? Dancing in the aisles? Sex? If those activities make something a non-church, there are an awful lot of tax-exempt non-churches out there. Rev. Bishop has been winning fights against the tax assessor for years. If he fights this persecution, as I hope he will, it will be fascinating to hear him weave his amalgam of the teachings of Jesus, the Buddha, and the Maharishi Yogi into a "personal journey" culminating with the sexiest ladies on the beach.

Surely he will cite the Hobby Lobby case, in which Justice Samuel Alito defined religion as whatever a believer says it is: "[I]t is not for us to say that their religious beliefs are mistaken or insubstantial. Instead, our 'narrow function ... in this context is to determine whether the line drawn reflects 'an honest conviction.'" Who are we to question the honesty of Rev. Bishop's conviction that he hates being sober?

The weight of history is on Rev. Bishop's side. Sir James Frazer, in his classic The Golden Bough, writes at some length of the sexual practices of pre-Christian churches. For example,

   At Heliopolis or Baalbec in Syria,
   famous for the imposing grandeur
   of its ruined temples, the
   custom of the country required
   that every maiden should prostitute
   herself to a stranger at the
   temple of Astarte, and matrons
   as well as maids testified their
   devotion to the goddess in the
   same manner ... In Phoenician
   temples women prostituted
   themselves for hire in the service
   of religion, believing that
   by this conduct they propitiated
   the goddess and won her favor.


Frazer goes on to quote from the apocryphal Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs: "It was a law of the Amorites, that she who was about to marry should sit in fornication seven days by the gate."

If such rituals were religious then, why aren't they religious now? If the use of otherwise illegal hallucinogenic drugs and the ritual sacrifice of innocent animals are protected as religion, then what's so shocking about naked body painting? Do we really want police chiefs and tax assessors deciding what's religious and what isn't?

So Rev. Bishop should win this case, even though it's doubtful that hypocrites like the Becket Fund will step forward to defend him. For those of us who think that the kinds of activities "Amnesia: The Tabernacle" is promoting don't merit special tax privileges, the solution is simple: just abolish the religious property tax exemption altogether, and let churches pay their fair share for police and fire protection like the rest of us.

Luis Granados is the director of Humanist Press, the publishing house of the American Humanist Association, and the author of Damned Good Company: Twenty Rebels Who Bucked the God Experts. He writes the Rules Are for Schmucks column for TheHumanist.com.
COPYRIGHT 2015 American Humanist Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Up Front
Author:Granados, Luis
Publication:The Humanist
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2015
Words:964
Previous Article:Perspectives on "Paris Perspectives".
Next Article:Apocalypse when?
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters