Printer Friendly

When wars collide: war on drugs vs. war on terror.

As DEMOCRACY attempts to take root in Afghanistan, the poppy crop is doing so with greater alacrity. Opium cultivation was up a staggering two-thirds in 2004 over the previous year, according to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, with only inclement weather and disease keeping the increase in the actual harvest down to 17 percent.

The Pentagon has been reluctant to have soldiers act as drug cops, but there are signs that Maj. Gen. Eric Olson's statement last summer that "at this point in time, U.S. troops will not be involved in counterdrug or counternarcotics operations" may not be the final word. It has become "absolutely clear," Lt. Gen. Lance Smith told reporters at a December 15 Defense Department briefing, that "everything that we've done in Afghanistan would be for naught if we allowed the narcotraffickers and everybody else to take over. And so it is clear that we have a role to play."

In a December New York Times op-ed piece, then-Finance Minister Ashraf Ghani observed that many Afghan farmers see a drug war as more threatening than the drug trade. Ghani warned against allowing Afghanistan to become another Colombia, where "brutal military campaigns against drug-cultivating communities have devastated local economies, setting off violence, which in turn has led to further repression."

It could be even worse than that. The U.N. values the opium economy at about $2.8 billion, or more than half the gross domestic product from legal activities. If the U.S. shows an intransigent commitment to eliminating the only livelihood of many farmers in Afghanistan, the source of more than 80 percent of the world's opium, it will likely strengthen rather than sunder the link between the narcotics traffic and anti-American terror.
COPYRIGHT 2005 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Citing
Author:Sanchez, Julian
Publication:Reason
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Apr 1, 2005
Words:291
Previous Article:Private screening: airports opt out.
Next Article:Let freedom sing: Iran's mystery diva.
Topics:


Related Articles
A Sane Drug Policy.
A no-win war without end? By embracing state sponsors of terrorism like Russia and China, our leaders ensure that the "war on terror" will never end...
Hedin, Robert, ed. Old Glory; American war poems from the Revolutionary War to the war on terror.
An obsession the world doesn't share: many countries see the war on terror as a U.S.-imposed distraction from critical issues such as poverty, crime,...
'Spy' in Los Pinos.
The fog of war: how can we tell if we're winning the War on Terror?
National Guard tries to rehab its drug war mission.
Administration resents "swift" kick: after the press reported that a secret operation following the money trails to terrorists was including...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |