Printer Friendly

What they're saying ... we asked four people--a small business owner, a member of our Board of Directors, a state legislator and a news media representative--to comment on the SBT issue.

Leslie Murphy

Group Managing Partner

Plante & Moran

Member, Chamber

Board of Directors

Now that the SBT is officially repealed effective for periods after 2007, the Michigan legislature and the Governor's administration should work quickly, but carefully, to design and enact a Michigan business tax system that will encourage new or expanded economic development in the state. Unnecessary delays should be avoided since the uncertainty of a new tax regime may be an even greater hindrance to economic development than the real or perceived hindrance caused by the SBT.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Jennifer Kerr, RN

President and CEO

Diversified Health

Care Management Consultants

I agree that the SBT should be replaced, and that businesses currently exempted from the SBT should continue to be exempt at the present level. However, businesses required to pay a tax should be based on some measure of profitability so that businesses that do not make a profit do not have to pay the tax. My hope is that the new Michigan Business Tax Reform Package approved by the lawmakers and supported by Michigan businesses is a tax package that is simple and easily understood by the business community. For example, the Detroit Regional Chamber's recommendation is to eliminate the SBT and replace it with a Business License Tax. The Chamber says it is a form of a gross receipts tax, which is similar to the proposed plan presented by the Michigan Chamber of Commerce and the Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce. If this is the case, why not use the same terminology, so it won't be viewed as a modified version of the current SBT?

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Amy Lane

Capitol Correspondent

Crain's Detroit Business

Michigan politicians face no small challenge in replacing the $1.9 billion single-business tax. And in addition to the SBT, discussions are centering on Michigan's $1.8 billion personal-property tax. The intricacies of how each tax affects differing business sectors, state and local governments and other constituencies, foreshadows the complex, high-stakes job Michigan faces in overhauling its business-tax structure. Beyond business-community proposals, other plans would:

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

* Enact no specific business tax to replace the SBT and eliminate at least the personal-property tax and Michigan's income tax, but raise the rate of Michigan's sales tax and extend it to some services.

* Give businesses the choice of paying a business-activity tax based on gross receipts, minus purchases from other firms; or a profits tax. Action rests with a joint legislative committee, which faces a Dec. 1 deadline, set by House and Senate leaders, to recommend a business-tax replacement plan. As of mid-October, there was no unanimity that deadline would be met.

Rep. Chris Ward

R-Brighton

Majority Floor Leader

Michigan House of Representatives

The SBT is a bad tax. It's bad for Michigan's economy, and it has needed to go for a long time. I applaud the Detroit Regional Chamber for all its efforts to repeal this dreaded tax. I have legislation sponsored after the Detroit Regional Chamber's replacement plan, because I believe that we can do better. This is an important time, and we now are given the opportunity to restructure the tax environment in a way that is good for Michigan's business community and its citizens. We need to act quickly but judiciously.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]
COPYRIGHT 2006 Detroit Regional Chamber
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:VOTE4BIZ
Publication:Detroiter
Date:Nov 1, 2006
Words:542
Previous Article:On guard for you in Lansing: with the SBT on its way to well-deserved oblivion, the Detroit Regional Chamber proposes a fair and simple SBT that...
Next Article:Business must help solve the health-care crisis: can the Massachusetts model work in Michigan?
Topics:


Related Articles
The old statehouse, she ain't what she used to be.
The battle over term limits: concluding that term limits were bad for the state, Idaho lawmakers this session repealed a term limits law passed by...
Constituent communication in cyberland: using the internet to communicate with constituents can be very effective.
Homeland democracy: speaking up for the legislature: at the center of representative democracy is the need for legislatures to define and communicate...
I blog, you blog, we all blog: state lawmakers are beginning to see the advantages of having a blog to record their views on issues and their...
How to create a great bill draft: follow these suggestions and get the bill you want.
Prime time democracy: a growing number of public affairs networks demystify democracy.
Beating them to the punch (line): there is no shortage of satire in the media these days. Who's the target? More and more it's legislators. What you...
Lifers with a twist: like the Energizer Bunny, some dedicated legislators just want to keep serving.
Flooding Congress with email: advocates fear communications cut-off with lawmakers.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters