What is a fishbone gasket?
Gaskets are an important factor in plant safety. This is especially true for the industries moving lots of fluid, such as the oil and gas sector, chemical plants, paper mills and power plants. Similarly, pipelines flow volatile chemicals and hot pressurized steam with fluids passes at millions of connecting points, including flanges, valves seats, heat exchangers and reactor covers. Companies need reliable ways to seal--companies need gaskets.
Ideally, a good gasket should be both strong and elastic; yet in practice, it's difficult to balance one quality with the other. In over 90% of high-temperature and high-pressure applications, plant engineers face two primary options: the spiral-wound gasket and the camprofile gasket. What's wrong with those options? Why do we need a new design? The short answer is that though great inventions in their time, both are old designs that have difficulty maintaining strength and flexibility at the same time.
Invented in 1912, the spiral-wound gasket was comprised of metal strips spiraled with sealing elements in between. A spiral-wound gasket has obvious advanges compared to a single material gasket as it combines the strength of metal with the sealing capacity with the nonmetallic material. Yet, maintenance personnel soon found it was not 100% reliable.
Welded at the inner ends, the spirals sometimes unwound. The result? Metal strips were sucked into the pipeline system and leakage occurred at the flange, both posing a threat to plant safety and reliability. There can be several causes of "unwinding" including over-torquing, pressure surges or even a change in temperature. Not surprisingly, plants need a better design, something more reliable under extreme conditions--something stronger.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
A major improvement came 60 years later Invented in 1976, the camprofile gasket consists of a metal skeleton, with each side grooved and covered with non-metallic sealing materials. By converting the spiral strips to a unitary metal structure, a camprofile gasket gains strength and will not unwind. Unfortunately, it loses elasticity and is rigid, resulting in poor recovery.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
There have been several specialty designs --all together they account for less than 10% of the niche market, and none of them qualifies as an improvement for general use. For example, the jacketed gasket and ring joint gasket both rely solely on metal-to-metal contact for sealing, resulting in poor performance. Another example, the corrugated gasket, stamped from wave-shape steel with non-metallic sealing material on either side, is almost perfect: strong, flexible, un-crushable and non-damaging to flange surfaces.
Still, it has one critical, limiting problem: its thickness is different from all other gaskets. For a corrugated gasket to retain elasticity the metal wave has to be thin; but once it's thin, its thickness deviates from most original flange design requirements. In theory, changing to a thinner gasket should not be a problem, but rather an advantage (though this would take another article to explain); nonetheless, most maintenance engineers are still concerned.
That's why we came up with a new design --the fishbone gasket. Developed by AIGI Environmental Inc. (formerly known as Environmental Gasket Company), the fishbone gasket is internationally patented. As the name suggested, this design consists of at least three parts: a fishbone-shape unitary metal skeleton, multiple concentric bevel ribs facing toward the fluid, and the non-metallic sealing materials, such as graphite or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) on the upper and lower sides of the gasket.
[FIGURE 3-4 OMITTED]
You can specify an option with or without a centering ring. Either way, you are able to interchange it with old gasket designs, such as the spiral wound gaskets and camprofile gaskets with the same outside diameter (OD), onside diameter (ID) and thickness.
The most obvious advantage of a fishbone gasket is that it incorporates the elasticity concept from a spiral-wound design and the strength concept from a camprofile design. Is it merely a hybrid of old types? No, the fishbone gasket is much more than that. It has distinctive features.
First, notice all the bevel ribs are facing the fluid, including the inner ribs. The gasket will self-energize under the system's fluid pressure, which will push the edge of the inner ribs to open against the flange, resulting in an initial seal. The higher the pressure, the tighter the seal.
While camprofile gaskets do not have this feature, whether the spiral-wound gasket self-energizes is arguable. A spiral-wound gasket without an inner ring will self-energize, but this gasket bears the highest risk of unwinding, leading to metal strips being sucked into the fluid system. That's why most spiral-wound gaskets require inner-ring reinforcement as specified by API and the new ASME standards. When an inner ring is added, it immediately loses most of this self-energizing capability.
Notice the ribs are crescent shaped. At the crescent top, the ribs contact the surface, not at an angle, but flat so no more damage can be caused to the flange. At the crescent bottom, the root is strong and resilient. In comparison, the spiral-wound gasket's metal strip is compressed at a 450 angle toward the flange. With even stronger and sharper teeth biting into the surfaces, camprofile gaskets cause the worst damage to flange surfaces. Many of the flanges damaged in this way are extremely expensive to replace.
Logical isn't it? And test results bear this out.
Leakage Test--ENVIRONMENTAL Fishbone[TM] Gasket vs. spiral wound vs. camprofile
Test parameters (ASTM F37) gasket stress 30MPa/4351 psi | nitrogen pressure 4 Mpa/580 psi
Test Report# MF-130933 & MF-130935
Test Item Style I Camprofile Spiral- Fishbone 8mm width, Wound Gasket 3.2mm Gasket 8mm width, thickness 8mm width, 3.5mm 3.5mm Thick thickness Leakage rate (1x [10.sup.-3] 0.02 0.2 0.6 [cm.sup.3]/s)
[FIGURE 5 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 6 OMITTED]
[FIGURE 7 OMITTED]
In summary, the fishbone gasket has the following advantages over previous designs:
* Strength and flexibility are balanced
* Inter-changeability exists with standard gaskets
* Flanges are not damaged
* Materials never unwind.
To plant engineers, do I recommend replacing all gaskets with this new design? Probably not. At least not at first. But you can start replacing gaskets in areas causing the greatest problems. Ask yourself these questions: Where do I frequently need maintenance (retorquing flanges, replacing failed gaskets, large equipment gasket failures)? Where do I see a crushed gasket? Where do I find spiral-wound gaskets that are unwound? Where do I want to protect expensive flanges from scratching?
"It makes sense, but why do I have to change to a better gasket?" someone may ask. "When will a gasket design finally be good enough?"
Fair enough, but that question is directly related to some other questions: How safe must your plant be to be safe enough? Is a 1% chance of a blowout acceptable to you? Probably not. Then how about 0.1%? Will that be OK?
So you see my point--there is no definite number as a goal. The goal is to drive your plant reliability to the extreme and to reduce your leakage rate to the lowest possible level with reasonable cost and the best technology available.
By Justin Zhao, Fishbone Patent Inventor, AIGI Environmental Inc., Nanjing, China
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Tech Notes: Product Development|
|Publication:||Pipeline & Gas Journal|
|Date:||Sep 1, 2014|
|Previous Article:||EDF/google earth outreach map gas leaks under city streets.|
|Next Article:||ALMA provides smarter gas pipeline aerial survey.|