Printer Friendly

What about NYC's existing housing stock?

What about NYC's existing housing stock?

It seems the city just can't see the forest for the trees. Take, for example, the apparent inability of New York City to understand there are a million privately-owned affordable rental apartments whose preservation should be priority budgetary and policy items.

Of course, funds for them are not in the city's budget, and rather than their preservation being a goal of public policy, it's their destruction that the rent laws, tax laws and other laws and regulations appear to be seeking.

The great pool of affordable apartments here is the forest that the city can't see.

The city not only should help owners of these properties obtain adequate income to operate their apartment buildings, but it should provide timely and adequate incentives to encourage owners to maintain them. I strongly believe that if the city is going to spend money on affordable housing, this existing affordable housing stock is where the money should be spent.

But, instead, the city is focusing on the "trees" - the new not for profit apartments that are and will be heavily subsidized to make them affordable. These are important additions to New York's housing stock, but the existing supply of affordable rental apartments is important too and deserves all the financial assistance that the subsidized housing is getting. Why shouldn't indigent tenants occupying apartments in privately owned buildings be entitled to rental subsidies of one sort or another? Landlords should not have to bear the burden of carrying tenants who can't pay rent. Lost to the city is the fact that most investors trying to operate existing rental housing are struggling just to survive.

Meanwhile, the city recently announced that it's going to spend $76 million of federal grant money to build 837 varied types of affordable housing units. It is an important story and it was a lead story in this newspaper. The units will be built by the city's Housing Authority which will use partnership-arrangements with other city agencies and private developers. In addition to the grant money, these units will require other subsidies to make them affordable. What about the million or so units of privately owned regulated housing that could make good use of such subsidies?

The article about the grant program didn't detail the types and amounts of subsidies, but an article in The New York Times discussed subsidies that would be required to make a few hundred new town-house condominiums in the South Bronx affordable. The article came up with an average subsidy of $25,000 an apartment, with a peak of nearly $42,000 per unit.

For this kind of money, the city could get a lot more well-maintained affordable rental units by spending it on the existing housing stock. The city should not allow the existing affordable housing stock to go down the tube, lost to the in rem process.

The fact is the city has become the owner of last resort of one out of every seven rental buildings, having foreclosed on properties unable to pay taxes. Despite the fact that city-owned buildings pay no realty taxes or debt service and are immune from many burdens facing the private sector, the in rem buildings are operating at losses. It was reported last summer that some $60 million in rent produced by the city's $280 million annual investment in city-owned apartments doesn't cover operating costs - taxes make up the difference.

However, not only is the city requiring taxpayers to help it carry its in rem housing stock, and not only isn't the city providing financial aid to private owners, but its tax and regulatory policies make it difficult for owners to maintain their properties.

Real estate and other taxes, are at historical highs and drain funds from private owners, funds that otherwise could be available to improve operating systems and for ongoing maintenance. Several years ago, the practice of assessing buildings at 69 percent of sales price was implemented. The resulting higher taxes, for the most part, consumed any return that existed. They also helped make co-op and condo conversions unaffordable.

Water and sewer taxes are soaring in many instances under a new metering system that the city is implementing. When metered water charges are double and triple what they had been, we can only conclude that they are thinly disguised taxes.

The same can be said for fines that are imposed on owners. A range of fines, penalties and use charges were increased last year to such an extent that these, too, are a form of taxation. Why must fines always be levied at the top of the scale? Especially, when the owner may have little control over the violation. Sanitation Code regulations require owners to keep a large strip of sidewalk free of debris, but they can't stop passers-by from littering. Meanwhile, the city beefed up the number of inspectors and the result has been a flood of summonses and heavy fines.

Owners who install new operating systems to maintain their properties consistently find that the major capital rent increases to which they are entitled under the rent laws become stuck in the pipeline. Even, worse, because of a recent New York State Supreme Court decision - Bryant Avenue Tenant Association vs. Koch - there is confusion as to how the major capital increase is calculated: Should it become part of the legal rent or should it be a surcharge? The difference may be substantial. Until the issue is resolved, MCI increases may be held up by trial courts, as well as by bureaucratic obstacles in the Department of Housing and Community Renewal.

But, there are more impediments to the private operation of affordable housing in the city: succession rights have been so expanded that apartment occupancy is now controlled by tenants; unable to pay rent and unwilling to go to shelters, families are doubling and tripling up without paying additional rent while adding to operating costs; the 20-year occupancy rule makes it impossible for an owner to recapture an apartment occupied by a tenant for 20 years or more; and required administrative filings and red tape have created a nightmare of paperwork for owners.

Add to these inequities the fact that Housing Court has become a grossly inefficient, pro-tenant court, unfairly permitting tenants not to pay rent and denying or delaying rental increases. These judges continue to not sign warrants, but, at the same time, they permit frivolous show-cause orders from tenants that delay trials.

For many owners, its a "heads you win, tails we lose" situation, with the city condoning or ignoring flagrant tenant abuses, while cracking down excessively on the owners.

But the city should recognize that private owners are operating the bulk of the affordable housing stock here, and can use all the help they can get.

Here are some of the ways the city can help: *Rent laws must be taken out of the hands of the politicians who can not legislate fairly in this area and still get re-elected *These laws should be phased out - we have more than the requisite 5 percent vacancy rate in the city *Low-income tenants living in private rental apartments should be entitled to rent subsidies when they need it *Implement a tenant means test in regulated apartments *Create a municipal housing corporation to help provide funds for owners who need to finance improvements *Tell Housing Court judges it is not their job to protect tenants, but to dispense justice to both landlords and tenants

These are some of the key steps that must be taken if the city wants to assure the future of its affordable housing stock.

The BRAB, Ruben Klein President, is the largest owner-industry organization in the Bronx. BRAB represents more than 1,000 owners of 2,000 buildings housing over 150,000 residents. It offers members a full range of services, including labor negotiations and representation, informative seminars and periodic newsletters. Over the years, BRAB has participated with other city organizations in bringing and defending all necessary lawsuits.
COPYRIGHT 1992 Hagedorn Publication
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 1992, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:The Owner's Voice
Author:Klein, Ruben
Publication:Real Estate Weekly
Date:Jan 8, 1992
Words:1333
Previous Article:Chase provides $5M to build 51 housing units.
Next Article:Reasons for guarded optimism in NJ market.
Topics:


Related Articles
Affordable housing getting a big boost.
NYC rental market improves with stronger economy.
Levine Builders hits Harlem home run.
City's housing, retail programs are recognized by HUD.
Housing code violation info available on internet.
City seeking developers for HUD properties.
City completes $14.8M middle income Harlem coop.
HDC to pay for South Bronx building rehabilitation.
New owners to invest $52m improving Brooklyn complex.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2016 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters