Printer Friendly

Welcoming a new mine safety approach.


In March, the National Mining Association (NMA) announced a new initiative to improve safety performance using a systems approach. The initiative consists of a pledge and 20 modules that companies who sign on need to work through, and provides a timetable, ending in December 2015, for completing them.

Initially, the aim is to achieve zero fatalities and a 50 percent cut in injuries over the next five years (0:50:5). Although the initiative currently is voluntary, commitments have already been received from 28 big coal and metal/non-metal member companies.

Little Notice

Did you notice how little publicity this noble endeavor received in the national media? The Wall Street Journal and National Public Radio carried the story, but beyond them coverage was slim. Perhaps the media believes CORESafety, as the initiative is called, is window dressing. That's too bad because, as a result, the public is missing out on a big story. This effort is serious and will make a difference.

MSHA was asked to comment and it obliged. The agency lauded NMA, but then quickly turned its statement into an advocacy piece for more authority. It was as though MSHA viewed NMA's initiative as a political ploy. MSHA's perspective seems to be that CORESafety is NMA's attempt to convince Congress that, because the mining industry is taking ownership of safety, lawmakers need not bother writing more mine reform legislation. Yet, ever since the Upper Big Branch (UBB) Mine disaster, taking responsibility for safety is the very thing MSHA Chief Joe Main has been saying mine operators should be doing since MSHA can't be at every mine all the time.

Truth is NMA's approach represents a radical, yet welcome, departure from how mine safety has been practiced in this country. Here's another truth: unlike the enforcement model that MSHA exercises so vigorously, a systems approach holds the potential to get us to zero fatalities. MSHA, which should wholeheartedly jump on this bandwagon, instead asks Congress to prescribe more power pills. The agency best be careful lest CORESafety renders MSHA irrelevant.

FBI Training

The media did give extensive coverage to MSHA's announcement that 75 of its special investigators were receiving two weeks of training, some by none other than the Federal Bureau of Investigation. MSHA and the FBI, now there's a unique linkage, one I really hadn't made until Mark Kuhar, Rock Products' editor, pointed it out to me. The G-men have done many good deeds over the years, and still do, but they've also famously stepped over the line now and then. This awareness makes the instruction they're giving MSHA a trifle unsettling.

Part of the training is to teach investigators how to ask questions during interviews. Recall that the NIOSH independent panel charged with evaluating MSHA's review of its performance at UBB faulted agency accident investigators for asking leading questions and being unfocused at times in their interrogations. Had MSHA investigators questions been more expansive, they just might have gained additional valuable insight into what went on at UBB.

They could take a lesson about direct questioning from Circuit Court Judge Irene Berger. During a plea hearing in her court in March, former UBB Superintendent Gary May admitted to receiving advance notice of MSHA inspections. Berger then asked May point-blank, "Who did you act with in committing these acts?" Her intent was to get at any and all people involved, including any government operatives. May told her that MSHA inspectors told mine officials "they'd he back tomorrow or where they were going." If so, MSHA inspectors also violated the law prohibiting advance notice. It will be interesting to see what prosecutors do with that revelation.

Advance Notice

The other thing about advance notice is that MSHA has suspected it has been going on for years at some mines, according to agency investigators. Keeping hazards off examination books operators are required to maintain is another chronic problem that first surfaced after an explosion in Alabama more than a decade ago.

Since at least 2006, when a deadly fire erupted at Massey's Alma No. 1 Mine, safety at Massey mines has been suspect. But MSHA didn't lower the boom on the company until UBB went boom. Why not?

The late Sen. Robert Byrd said after UBB that the accident meant MSHA had much to answer for. We agree. But the likelihood we'll get those answers diminishes with each passing day.

MSHA Releases First Quarter Fatality Update

The U.S. Department of Labor's Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) released a first-quarter summary of mining deaths across the country. Ten miners died in work-related accidents at the nation's mines during the first three months of 2012.

Six coal mining deaths occurred in the following categories: exploding vessels under pressure, drowning, handling materials, rib fall, machinery and electrical. An uncharacteristic trend identified over the quarter is that five of these fatalities--three of them involving mine supervisors--occurred on five consecutive weekends.

Four mining deaths in the metal/nonmetal industry occurred from accidents involving powered haulage, a fall from an elevated walkway and, in two separate incidents, fall of material. That is one fewer than 2011's first-quarter total of five.

"Fatalities are preventable," said Joseph A. Main, assistant secretary of labor for mine safety and health. "Many mines operate every shift of every day, year in and year out, without a fatality or a lost-time injury."

Main noted that fatalities can be prevented by using effective safety and health management programs in the workplace. "Workplace examinations for hazards--pre-shift and on-shift, every shift--can identify and eliminate hazards that kill and injure miners," he said. "Providing effective and appropriate training will ensure that miners recognize and understand hazards and how to control or eliminate them."

MSHA has taken a number of actions to identify mines with health and safety problems, and has initiated several outreach and enforcement initiatives, including "Rules to Live By," a fatality prevention program highlighting safety and health standards most frequently cited during fatal accident investigations. The agency also circulated an accident-prevention alert to the mining industry in the wake of four consecutive weekends of mine fatalities. The following weekend, a fifth fatality occurred.

Randy K. Logsdon, CMSP, is manager of safety for Intrepid Potash New Mexico operations. He has practiced safety on both the coal and metal/nonmetal side of mining for more than 30 years. Randy is a Certified Mine Safety Professional. He can be reached at

James Sharpe holds a master's degree in environmental health sciences and is certified in the comprehensive practice of industrial hygiene, health and safety. He can be reached at

Ellen Smith is the owner of Legal Publication Services, publisher of Mine Safety & Health News, She has been covering mining issues since 1987 and has won 31 journalism awards for her reporting, including the 2040 Magnum Opus Award for Outstanding Achievement in Custom Media. Ellen can be reached at 585-721-3211, or at
COPYRIGHT 2012 Mining Media, Inc
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2012 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Sharpe, James
Publication:Rock Products
Date:May 1, 2012
Previous Article:State DOTs use new technologies to reduce, reuse and recycle.
Next Article:What's outside the box?

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters