Printer Friendly

Weinberg angle derivation from discrete subgroups of SU(2) and all that.

1 Introduction

The weak mixing angle [[theta].sub.W], or Weinberg angle, in the successful theory called the Standard Model (SM) of leptons and quarks is considered traditionally as an unfixed parameter of the Weinberg-Salam theory of the electroweak interaction. Its value of ~30[degrees] is currently determined empirically.

I provide the only first principles derivation of the Weinberg angle as a further application of the discrete symmetry subgroups of SU(2) that I used for the first principles derivation of the mixing angles for the neutrino mixing matrix PMNS [1] in 2013 and of the CKM quark mixing matrix [2] in 2014. An important reminder here is that these derivations are all done within the realm of the SM and no alternative theoretical framework beyond the SM is required.

2 Brief review of neutrino mixing angle derivation

The electroweak component of the SM is based upon the local gauge group SU[(2).sub.L], x U[(1).sub.Y] acting on the two SU(2) weak isospin flavor states [+ or -] 1/2 in each lepton family and each quark family. Its chiral action, i.e., involving LH doublets and RH singlets, is dictated by the mathematics of quaternions acting on quaternions, verified by the empirically determined maximum parity violation. Consequently, instead of using SU(2) generators acting on SU(2) weak isospin states, one can equivalently use the group of unit quaternions defined by q = a + bi + cj + dk, for a, b, c, d real and [i.sup.2] = [j.sup.2] = [k.sup.2] = ijk = -1. The three familiar Pauli SU(2) generators [[sigma].sub.x], [[sigma].sub.y], [[sigma].sub.z], when multiplied by i, become the three generators k, j, i, respectively, for this unit quaternion group.

In a series of articles [3-5] I assigned three discrete (i.e., finite) quaternion subgroups (i.e., SU(2) subgroups), specifically 2T, 2O, 2I, to the three lepton families, one to each family ([v.sub.e], e), ([v.sub.[mu]], [mu]), ([v.sub.[tau]], [tau]). These three groups permeate all areas of mathematics and have many alternative labelings, such as [3,3,2], [4,3,2], [5,3,2], respectively. Each of these three subgroups has three generators, [R.sub.s] = [iU.sub.s] (s = 1,2,3), two of which match the two SU(2) generators, [U.sub.1] = j and U3 = i, but the third generator [U.sub.2] for each subgroup is not k [6]. This difference between the third generators and k is the true source [1] of the neutrino mixing angles. All three families must act together to equal the third SU(2) generator k.

The three generators [U.sub.2] are given in Table 1, with [phi] = ([square root of 5] + 1)/2, the golden ratio. The three generators must add to make the generator k, so there are three equations for three unknown factors. The arccosines of these three normalized factors determine the quaternion angles 105.337[degrees], 36.755[degrees], and 122.459[degrees]. Quaternion angles are double angle rotations, so one uses their half-values for rotations in [R.sup.3], as assumed for the PMNS matrix. Then subtract one from the other to produce the three neutrino mixing angles [[theta].sub.12] = 34.29[degrees], [[theta].sub.23] = -42.85[degrees], and [[theta].sub.13] = -8.56[degrees]. These calculated angles match their empirical values [[theta].sub.12] = [+ or -] 34.47[degrees], [[theta].sub.23] = [+ or -] (38.39[degrees]- 45.81[degrees]), and [[theta].sub.13] = [+ or -]8.5[degrees] extremely well.

Thus, the three mixing angles originate from the three [U.sub.2] generators acting together to become the k generator of SU(2). Note that I assume the charged lepton mixing matrix is the identity. Therefore, any discrepancy between these derived angles and the empirical angles could be an indication that the charged lepton mixing matrix has off-diagonal terms.

The quark mixing matrix CKM is worked out the same way [2] by using four discrete rotational groups in [R.sup.4], [3,3,3], [4,3,3], [3,4,3], [5,3,3], the [5,3,3] being equivalent to 2I x 2I. The mismatch of the third generators again requires the linear superposition of these four quark groups. The 3 x 3 CKM matrix is a submatrix of a 4 x 4 matrix. However, the mismatch of 3 lepton families to 4 quark families indicates a triangle anomaly problem resolved favorably in a later section by applying the results of this section.

3 Derivation of the Weinberg angle

The four electroweak generators of the SM local gauge group SU[(2).sub.L] x U[(1).sub.Y] are typically labeled [W.sup.+], [W.sup.0], [W.sup.-], and [B.sup.0], but they can be defined equivalently as the quaternion generators i, j, k and b. But we do not require the full SU(2) to act upon the flavor states [+ or -] 1/2 for discrete rotations in the unitary plane [C.sup.2] because the lepton and quark families represent specific discrete binary rotational symmetry subgroups of SU(2). That is, we require just a discrete subgroup of SU[(2).sub.L] x U[(1).sub.Y]. In fact, one might suspect that the 2I subgroup would be able to perform all the discrete symmetry rotations, but 2I omits some of the rotations in 2O. Instead, one finds that 2I x 2I' works, where 2I' provides the "reciprocal" rotations, i.e., the third generator [U.sub.2] of 2I becomes the third generator [U.sub.2] for 2I' by interchanging [phi] and [[phi].sup.-1]:

[U.sub.2] = -[1/2] i - [[phi]/2] j + [[[phi].sup.-1]/2] k, [U'.sub.2] = -[1/2] i - [[[phi].sup.-1]/2] j + [[phi]/2] k. (1)

Consider the three SU(2) generators i, j, k and their three simplest products: i x i = -1, j x j = -1, and k x k = -1. Now compare the three corresponding 2I x 2T discrete generator products: i x i = -1, j x j = -1, and

[U.sub.2] [U'.sub.2] = -0.75 + 0.559i - 0.25 j + 0.25 k, (2)

definitely not equal to -1. The reverse product [U'.sub.2][U.sub.2] just interchanges signs on the i, j, k, terms.

One needs to multiply this product quaternion [U.sub.2][U'.sub.2] by

P = 0.75 + 0.559i - 0.25 j + 0.25 k (3)

to make the result -1. Again, P' has opposite signs for the i, j, k, terms only.

Given any unit quaternion q = cos [theta] + [??] sin [theta], its power can be written as [q.sup.[alpha]] = cos [alpha][theta] + [??] sin [alpha][theta]. Consider P to be a squared quaternion P = cos 2[theta] + [??] sin 2[theta] because we have the product of two quaternions [U.sub.2] and [U'.sub.2],. Therefore, the quaternion square root of P has cos [theta] = [square root of 0.75] = 0.866, rotating the [U.sub.2] (and [U'.sub.2],) in the unitary plane [C.sup.2] by the quaternion angle of 30[degrees] so that each third generator becomes k. Thus the Weinberg angle, i.e., the weak mixing angle,

[[theta].sub.W] = 30[degrees]. (4)

Therefore, the Weinberg angle derives from the mismatch of the third generator of 2I x 2I' to the SU(2) third generator k.

The empirical value of [[theta].sub.W] ranges from 28.1[degrees] to 28.8[degrees], values less than the predicted 30[degrees]. The reason for the discrepancy is unknown (but see [7]), although one can surmise either (1) that in determining the Weinberg angle from the empirical data perhaps some contributions have been left out, or (2) the calculated [[theta].sub.W] is its value at the Planck scale at which the internal symmetry space and spacetime could be discrete instead of continuous.

4 Anomaly cancellation

My introduction of a fourth quark family raises immediate suspicions regarding the cancellation of the triangle anomaly. The traditional cancellation procedure of matching each lepton family with a quark family "generation by generation" does produce the triangle anomaly cancellation by summing the appropriate U[(1).sub.Y], SU[(2).sub.L], and SU[(3).sub.C] generators, producing the "generation" cancellation.

However, we now know that this "generation" conjecture is incorrect, because the derivation of the lepton and quark mixing matrices from the [U.sub.2] generators of the discrete binary subgroups of SU(2) above dictates that the 3 lepton families act as one collective lepton family for SU[(2).sub.L] x U[(1).sub.Y] and that the 4 quark families act as one collective quark family.

We have now created an effective single "generation" with one effective quark family matching one effective lepton family, so there is now the previously heralded "generation cancellation" of the triangle anomalies with the traditional summation of generator eigenvalues [8]. In the SU(3) representations the quark and antiquark contributions cancel. Therefore, there are no SU(3) x SU(3) x U(1), SU(2) x SU(2) x U(1), U(1) x U(1) x U(1), or mixed U(1)-gravitational anomalies remaining.

There was always the suspicion that the traditional "generation" labeling was fortuitous because there was no specific reason for dictating the particular pairings of the lepton families to the quark families within the SM. Now, with the leptons and quarks representing the specific discrete binary rotation groups I have listed, a better understanding of how the families are related within the SM is possible.

5 Summary

The Weinberg angle derives ultimately from the third generator mismatch of specific discrete subgroups of SU(2) with the SU(2) quaternion generator k. The triangle anomaly cancellation occurs because 3 lepton families act collectively to cancel the contribution from 4 quark families acting collectively. Consequently, the SM may be an excellent approximation to the behavior of Nature down to the Planck scale.

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Sciencegems.com for generous support. Submitted on December 17, 2014 / Accepted on December 18, 2014

References

[1.] Potter F. Geometrical Derivation of the Lepton PMNS Matrix Values. Progress in Physics, 2013, v. 9 (3), 29-30.

[2.] Potter F. CKM and PMNS mixing matrices from discrete subgroups of SU(2). Progress in Physics, 2014, v. 10 (1), 1-5.

[3.] Potter F. Our Mathematical Universe: I. How the Monster Group Dictates All of Physics. Progress in Physics, 2011, v. 7 (4), 47-54.

[4.] Potter F. Unification of Interactions in Discrete Spacetime. Progress in Physics, 2006, v. 2 (1), 3-9.

[5.] Potter F. Geometrical Basis for the Standard Model. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 1994, v. 33, 279-305.

[6.] Coxeter H. S.M. Regular Complex Polytopes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1974.

[7.] Faessler M. A. Weinberg Angle and Integer Electric Charges of Quarks. arXiv: 1308.5900.

[8.] Bilal A. Lectures on Anomalies. arXiv: 0802.0634v1.

Franklin Potter

Sciencegems.com, 8642 Marvale Drive, Huntington Beach, CA 92646 USA. E-mail: frank11hb@yahoo.com
Table 1: Lepton Family Quaternion Generators U2

Fam.                   Grp.   Generator

[V.sub.e], e           332    -[1/2] i - [1/2] j +
                              [1/[square root of 2]] k
[v.sub.[mu], [mu]      432    -[1/2] i - [1/[square root of 2]] j
                              + [1/2] k
[v.sub.[tau]], [tau]   532    -[1/2] i - [[phi]/2] j +
                              [[[phi].sup.-1]/2] k

Fam.                   Factor    Angle [degrees]

[V.sub.e], e           -0.2645   105.337
[v.sub.[mu], [mu]      0.8012    36.755
[v.sub.[tau]], [tau]   -0.5367   122.459
COPYRIGHT 2015 Progress in Physics
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2015 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Potter, Franklin
Publication:Progress in Physics
Date:Jan 1, 2015
Words:1928
Previous Article:Mixed ion-electron conductivity and superconductivity in ceramic electrolytes.
Next Article:Can the emdrive be explained by quantised inertia?
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters