Printer Friendly

We believe what's interesting.

In 1954, Linus Pauling won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. In 1962, he won again: but this time the Nobel Peace Prize. This second prize wasn't for chemistry, it was

for opposing the spread of nuclear weapons. ButPauling would always be known as the man who won two Nobel Prizes.

In 1970, Pauling wrote a book called Vitamin C And The Common Cold. It advocated mega-doses of vitamin C as a way of preventing colds. It became a worldwide bestseller. If the man who won two Nobel Prizes said it, it must be true. It launched the craze for vitamin C. Vitamin C in drinks, cereals, desserts, snacks, even in cosmetics; vitamin C became a marketing dream. Mention your product contained vitamin C and it was sure to sell. It must be true: double Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling said it was. The only problem was, it wasn't.

Other scientists thought Pauling's results needed checking. So they checked and found them to be less than rigorous. In fact, scientists worldwide did their own tests on vitamin C. In 1972, 800 volunteers were tested. Mega-doses of vitamin C were found to make no

difference. In 1974, 3,000 volunteers were tested. Mega-doses of vitamin C were found to make no difference. In 1975, 500 volunteers were tested. Again, no difference. In 1977, 44 pairs of identical twins were tested: one twin with vitamin C, one without. Again, no difference. In 1981, 95 pairs of identical twins were tested.

No difference. In 1979, 500 US Marines were tested. No difference. In 2001, 400 Australian volunteers were tested over a period of a year-and-a-half. No difference.

According to the entire worldwide scientific community, it was conclusive. Vitamin C made no difference to either colds or flu. But none of that interested the public. None of the evidence affected the public's desire for vitamin C. Because none of the people doing those tests were as famous as the man who'd won two Nobel Prizes. The simple fact that he'd recommended it outweighed any evidence. Because the evidence was dull by comparison. The evidence wasn't so interesting, so it wasn't newsworthy.

Big, boring scientific institutions versus the man who won two Nobel Prizes. Linus Pauling was a much better story. In fact, Pauling caught the public's imagination so much, he was able to open his own scientific institution. The largest corporate donor was the pharmaceutical company Hoffmann-La Roche. The makers of most of the world's vitamin C.

[c] Motivate Publishing. All rights reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. ( ).

COPYRIGHT 2016 SyndiGate Media Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Campaign Middle East
Date:Feb 21, 2016
Previous Article:The fuTure of planning.
Next Article:Are newsstands the future of MENA print?

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters