Printer Friendly



An Intention Media release of a Masterskaya production. Produced by Saida Medvedeva, Vasili Anisimov, Sergey Shumakov. Executive producers, Alex Shtainke, Eva Brandt, Alfiya Idle, Zhang Jian Jun, Elena Tzan, Karen Kazaryan.

Directed by Anastasiya Popova. Written by Mikhail Vaiger, Marina Dainovetz in collaboration with Andrey Medvedev, Vsevolod Lisovsky from an idea by Saida Medvedeva. Camera (color), Oleg Kirichenko; editors, Jason Henderson, Tatyana Miganova, Nataliya Perkul; music, Dzhivan Gasparyan, Lyudmila Volkova. Reviewed on DVD, Los Angeles, April 15, 2008. Running time: 87 MIN.

With: Kurt Wuthridge, Vlail Kaznacheyev, Masaru Emoto, Leonid Izvekov, Alois Gruber.

(English dialogue)

Water pollution is the subject of docu "Water," yet Exxon Valdez merits nary a mention. The culprit here, rather, is "spiritual" water pollution, a dubious notion defined by a procession of scientists, researchers, clerics and alternative medicine specialists of widely varying believability (and speaking diverse languages rendered in English v.o.). Handsomely shot and briskly edited, Russian-produced docu presents a slippery compound of science, New Age mysticism and complete nonsense that, if the appetite for "The Secret" and "What the Bleep Do We Know!?" is any indication, could notch healthy niche numbers on homevid after token theatrical release, which began April 18 in Los Angeles.


Film begins by discussing some of water's more unique chemical properties: While the formula H20 remains constant, the clusters that individual water molecules form are extremely mutable and responsive to outside stimuli. From this relatively solid footing, the film then argues that water is vulnerable to destructive external influences--including insults, loud music and negative thoughts--that can sap its essence. (Apparently water has both a high surface tension and a remarkably thin skin.) While it never quite reaches Jack T. Ripper levels of absurdity, "Water" nonetheless drowns out its science with hazy spirituality and utterly preposterous claims. In the end, it all smells fishy.

COPYRIGHT 2008 Penske Business Media, LLC
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Barker, Andrew
Article Type:Movie review
Date:Apr 21, 2008
Previous Article:Anamorph.
Next Article:A Dog's Dream.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters