Printer Friendly

Water vapor adsorption capacity of thermally fluorinated carbon molecular sieves for C[O.sub.2] capture.

1. Introduction

Carbon dioxide (C[O.sub.2]) emission which is responsible for more than 60% of global warming has received worldwide concern. One-third of global C[O.sub.2] emissions result from human activities, especially from fossil fuel electric power plants [1]. Many technologies are being developed to reduce the C[O.sub.2] emissions from the resulting flue gas of power generation. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has recently been the subject of significant research and has been regarded as a promising way to mitigate and control C[O.sub.2] emissions [2]. Generally, polymeric adsorbents, zeolites, silica gels, activated carbons, and molecular sieves have been extensively used as selective adsorbents because of their controllable pore structures and surface properties, which can be used to selectively capture C[O.sub.2] [3, 4]. Among these adsorbents, molecular sieves have the ability to selectively absorb specific components of gaseous mixtures because of their porous structures, which consist of relatively uniform pores that are several angstroms (A) or nanometers (nm) in diameter. Carbon molecular sieves (CMSs) possess narrow and specific pore size distributions (PSDs) contrary to other conventional absorbents. "The unique pore size distribution imparts CMSs with remarkable selectivity in molecular separations" [5]. In addition, CMSs are more shape-selective for planar molecules than other molecular sieves and are stable at high temperatures [6].

The elimination of water vapor with C[O.sub.2] has recently received considerable amounts of attention because of promising application in air reparation, gas separation, environmental protection, and purification [7-9]. Accurate models for characterizing water adsorption are required to enhance water removal processes. Numerous studies are being conducted to investigate the water vapor adsorption process which has various advantages, such as low operating costs and high selectivity on adsorbents [10-12]. Moreover, used adsorbents are easy to regenerate and possess high adsorption capacities and separation rates [3]. The adsorption kinetics of molecules is dependent on the size, shape, and electrical properties of the adsorbate. These adsorbate properties induce specific interactions with the adsorbent [13,14].

Various treatments, such as oxidation, amination, and fluorination, can be used to modify carbon surfaces to improve the adsorption of C[O.sub.2] and water vapor [15-20]. Of these surface treatments, the direct fluorination method under a gas phase reaction has received a substantial attention because of its potential for uniform modification, short reaction time, low cost, and efficiency [21]. Fluorination causes defects, changes surface properties, and increases the total number of basic sites with varying degrees of basicity on carbon materials [22-25]. Furthermore, the nature of surface carbons can be adjusted by direct fluorination, regardless of whether they are hydrophilic or hydrophobic [26].

In this work, the surfaces of CMSs were modified by thermal fluorination, which can be conducted via a simple procedure under a gas phase reaction. Thermal fluorination altered the surface properties and pore structures of the CMSs and exhibited significant effects on the water vapor adsorption capacity. A mechanism is also proposed for the improved water vapor adsorption capacity of CMSs after the thermal fluorination treatment.

2. Experimental

2.1. Preparation of Thermal Fluorinated CMSs. The surfaces of CMSs (CMS FB610, CarboTech AC GmbH, Germany) were treated using a fluorination apparatus consisting of a SUS304 reactor, a vacuum pump, a nickel boat, and a buffer tank connected to gas cylinders. The samples were loaded into the reactor in a nickel boat and were degassed at 100[degrees]C for 2h to remove moisture. Fluorine gas ([F.sub.2]; 99.8%, Messer Grieheim GmbH) and nitrogen gas ([N.sub.2]; 99.999%) were used during the fluorination process. Fluorination was performed at 0.1 MPa for 30 min using a [F.sub.2] :[N.sub.2] gas volume ratio of 1: 9. The thermal fluorination treatment was performed at 100, 200, 300, and 400[degrees]C. After fluorination, the treated samples were degassed to remove the unreacted gases. Additional details regarding the fluorination procedure can be found in earlier works [27-29]. The as-received and treated CMSs were labeled PC (pristine CMSs), 100FC, 200FC, 300FC, and 400FC according to the temperature conditions.

2.2. Characterization of the Samples. X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) were obtained using a MultiLab 2000 spectrometer (Thermo Electron Corporation, UK) to identify the elements present in the samples. Aluminum K[alpha] (1485.6 eV) radiation was used as the X-ray source, and an anode voltage of 14.9 keV, a filament current of 4.6 A, and an emission current of a 20 mA were applied. All samples were treated at [10.sup.-12] MPa to remove impurities. Survey spectra were obtained at a pass energy of 50 eV in increments of 0.5 eV. The pore characteristics of the samples were evaluated by determining the physical adsorption of C[O.sub.2] in an ASAP 2020 (Micromeritics Ins. Corp.) at 0[degrees]C. The pore characteristics of the CMSs were investigated using C[O.sub.2] (3.3 A) gas, because the CMSs have extremely small pore sizes (the diameter of [N.sub.2] is 3.8 A). The pore size distributions (PSDs) of the CMSs were calculated using density functional theory (DFT) with the DFT Plus software supplied by Micromeritics 30, 31].

2.3. Water Vapor Adsorption/Desorption of the Prepared CMSs. To investigate the water vapor adsorption characteristics of the CMSs, dynamic vapor sorption (DVS) analyses at.% means atomic percent of each atom. were conducted using a compact and economical DVS system (DVS Int.). The prepared CMSs were dried at 150[degrees]C for 1 h to remove moisture. The DVS analysis was performed at 25[degrees]C for 1200 min. The relative humidity ranged from 0 to 98%.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Thermal Fluorination on the Chemical Composition of CMSs. The functional groups introduced onto the surfaces of the CMSs were identified after examining the C1s and F1s XPS peaks after thermal fluorination, and the results are provided in Table 1 and Figure 1. As shown in Figure 1, the XPS survey graphs of pristine CMSs and thermally fluorinated CMSs displayed a distinct carbon peak at 284.5 eV. Fluorine and oxygen peaks were also observed at 687.7 and 531.0 eV, respectively, in the spectra of the fluorinated CMSs. The atomic ratio of each element on the surface of the CMSs is listed in Table 1. The carbon content of the samples decreased remarkably by approximately 28%, and an increase in the fluorine content was observed after thermal fluorination. However, the fluorine content of 400FC was lower than that of 100FC, 200FC, and 300FC. This phenomenon is attributed to the effects of defluorination at high temperature. The loss of fluorine was initiated between 200 and 300[degrees]C, and defluorination was mostly completed by 400[degrees]C [32, 33]. Based on these results, the fluorine contents of 200FC and 300FC gradually increased to 25.56% and 28.27%, respectively. However, the fluorine contents of 400FC decreased to 20.26%, which is less than that of the contents of 100FC due to the occurrence of defluorination at high temperatures.

To investigate the changes in the functional groups on the surfaces of the thermally fluorinated CMSs, the C1s peaks were deconvoluted to several pseudo-Voigt functions (sums of the Gaussian-Lorentzian function) using a peak analysis program obtained from Unipress Co., USA. The pseudo-Voigt function is given by [34]


where F(E) is the peak intensity at energy E, H is the peak height, [E.sub.0] is the peak center, FWHM is the full width at half-maximum, and S is the shape function, which is related to the symmetry and to the Gaussian-Lorentzian mixing ratio. The assignments and peak parameters of the different C1s components are provided in Table 2. The semi-covalent (C(5)) bonds of the thermally fluorinated CMSs increased compared to pristine CMSs. A detailed explanation is presented in Section 4 using the water vapor adsorption capacity results. In addition, values of C-C; [sp.sup.2] (C(1)) bonds in 400FC were higher than those in 100FC, 200FC, and 300FC, because fluorine can be removed by high-temperature fluorination and the [pi]-electron systems can be significantly recovered through heat treatment [35-37].

3.2. Effect of Thermal Fluorination on the Pore Characteristics of CMSs. The pore characteristics of the thermally fluorinated CMSs were investigated, and the results are shown in Table 3. The total pore volumes of the thermally fluorinated CMSs increased due to fluorination via heat treatment, whereas the total pore volume of 400FC slightly decreased. As mentioned in Section 3.1, this result occurred due to defluorination at high temperatures. In addition, the area in the CMSs pores >10.83 [Angstrom] decreased after thermal fluorination, which was accompanied by an increase in the total volume. Therefore, the destruction of pores via thermal fluorination is responsible for the increase in the pore area.

Figures 2 and 3 present the PSDs of the CMSs calculated using DFT. The pore volumes of <5 [Angstrom] of 100FC and 200FC were greater than those of the CMSs. The pore volumes of >10 [Angstrom] of 300FC and 400FC were also greater than those of the CMSs. Theporevolumes of <6 [Angstrom] of 400FC were recovered. As shown in Figure 3, the volumes of the pores in the thermally fluorinated CMSs (especially those with diameters <8 [Angstrom]) were greater than those of the untreated CMSs.

3.3. Water Vapor Adsorption Behavior of Prepared Samples. Figure 4 presents the water vapor adsorption capacities of the prepared samples. The adsorption capacities increased considerably following fluorination with heat treatment, and the following trend in mass change was observed: PC < 300FC, 400FC < 200FC < 100FC. These following trends were caused by the semicovalent (C(5)) bonds contents and the total carbon adsorbents areas. In the C-F bonds of F species, the ionic and semi-covalent C-F bond lengths (3.0 and 1.7 [Angstrom]) were both larger than the usual covalent C-F bond length (1.41 [Angstrom]). The larger dipoles of the ionic or semicovalent C-F bond provide greater polarity than that of the covalent C-F bond [38]. Bismarck et al. reported that the surface polarity of fluorinated carbon materials decreases CF bonding varying from ionic to semi-ionic to covalent [39]. Therefore, thermally fluorinated CMSs with comparatively large semi-covalent C-F group were expected to exhibit improved water adsorption capacities. In addition, more water vapor can be adsorbed as the micropore volumes of the carbon adsorbents increase [40]. In the present study, the total pore volume and area increased due to the thermal fluorination. The water vapor adsorption capacity was altered according to the change in the total pore area. Therefore, the specific surface area of the CMSs has a more prominent effect on their water vapor adsorption capacity compared to introducing the fluorine functional groups on their surfaces through thermal fluorination.

4. Conclusion

Surface-modified CMSs were prepared via thermal fluorination at various temperatures (100, 200, 300, and 400[degrees]C) to investigate their water vapor adsorption properties. The improved water vapor adsorption capacity of the thermally fluorinated CMSs was due to the effects of the fluorination process on the specific surface area and semi-covalent bonds on the CMS surfaces. The specific surface areas of the CMSs have a more prominent effect on their water vapor adsorption capacity when compared to introducing fluorine functional groups on their surfaces through thermal fluorination.


[1] P. Freund and W. G. Ormerod, "Progress toward storage of carbon dioxide," Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. S199-S204,1997

[2] G. Li, P Xiao, P A. Webley, J. Zhang, and R. Singh, "Competition of C[O.sub.2]/[H.sub.2]O in adsorption based C[O.sub.2] capture," Energy Procedia, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1123-1130, 2009.

[3] S. Sjostrom and H. Krutka, "Evaluation of solid sorbents as a retrofit technology for C[O.sub.2] capture," Fuel, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 1298-1306, 2010.

[4] S. Sircar T. C. Golden, and M. B. Rao, "Activated carbon for gas separation and storage," Carbon, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 1996.

[5] J. P Lukaszewicz and K. Zielinski, "Durability and narrow pore size distribution (PSD) of carbons fabricated from Salix viminalis wood," Chemical and Process Engineering, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 195-201, 2011.

[6] P L. Walker, L. G. Austin, and S. P Nandi, Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA, 1966.

[7] C. Nedez, J.-P Boitiaux, C. J. Cameron, and B. Didillon, "Optimization of the textural characteristics of an alumina to capture contaminants in natural gas," Langmuir, vol. 12, no. 16, pp. 3927-3931, 1996.

[8] Y. Wang and M. D. LeVan, "Adsorption equilibrium of carbon dioxide and water vapor on zeolites 5a and 13X and silica gel: pure components," Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 2839-2844, 2009.

[9] S. S. Kim, S. M. Lee, and S. C. Hong, "A study on the reaction characteristics of C[O.sub.2] decomposition using iron oxides," Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 860-864, 2012.

[10] R. Desai, M. Hussain, and D. M. Ruthven, "Adsorption of water vapour on activated alumina. I--equilibrium behavior," The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 699-706, 1992.

[11] K. Kotoh, M. Enoeda, T. Matsui, and M. Nishikawa, "A multilayer model for adsorption of water on activated alumina in relation to adsorption potential," Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 355-360, 1993.

[12] A. Serbezov, "Adsorption equilibrium of water vapor on F-200 activated alumina," Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 421-425, 2003.

[13] C. R. Reid and K. M. Thomas, "Adsorption of gases on a carbon molecular sieve used for air separation: linear adsorptives as probes for kinetic selectivity," Langmuir, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 3206-3218, 1999.

[14] M. M. A. Freitas and J. L. Figueiredo, "Preparation of carbon molecular sieves for gas separations by modification of the pore sizes of activated carbons," Fuel, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 1-6, 2001.

[15] M. G. Plaza, K. J. Thurecht, C. Pevida et al., "Influence of oxidation upon the C[O.sub.2] capture performance of a phenolicresin-derived carbon," Fuel Processing Technology, vol. 110, pp. 53-60, 2013.

[16] M. S. Shafeeyan, W. M. A. Wan Daud, A. Houshmand, and A. Arami-Niya, "The application of response surface methodology to optimize the amination of activated carbon for the preparation of carbon dioxide adsorbents," Fuel, vol. 94, pp. 465-472, 2012.

[17] H. Touhara and F. Okino, "Property control of carbon materials by fluorination," Carbon, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 241-267, 2000.

[18] Y.-S. Lee, "Syntheses and properties of fluorinated carbon materials," Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 392-403, 2007.

[19] A. Tressaud, E. Durand, and C. Labrugere, "Surface modification of several carbon-based materials: comparison between CF4 rf plasma and direct [F.sub.2]-gas fluorination routes," Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, vol. 125, no. 11, pp. 1639-1648, 2004.

[20] Y.-S. Lee and B.-K. Lee, "Surface properties of oxyfluorinated PAN-based carbon fibers," Carbon, vol. 40, no. 13, pp. 2461-2468, 2002.

[21] Y. S. Lee, Y. H. Kim, J. S. Hong, J. K. Suh, and G. J. Cho, "The adsorption properties of surface modified activated carbon fibers for hydrogen storages," Catalysis Today, vol. 120, no. 3-4, pp. 420-425, 2007

[22] F. Chamssedine, K. Guerin, M. Dubois et al., "Fluorination of single walled carbon nanotubes at low temperature: towards the reversible fluorine storage into carbon nanotubes," Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, vol. 132, no. 12, pp. 1072-1078, 2011.

[23] G. Wu, X. Wang, B. Chen et al., "Fluorine-modified mesoporous Mg-Al mixed oxides: Mild and stable base catalysts for Omethylation of phenol with dimethyl carbonate," Applied Catalysis A, vol. 329, pp. 106-111, 2007.

[24] B. M. Choudary, M. Lakshmi Kantam, V. Neeraja, K. Koteswara Rao, F. Figueras, and L. Delmotte, "Layered double hydroxide fluoride: a novel solid base catalyst for C-C bond formation," Green Chemistry, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 257-260, 2001.

[25] H. Zhou, G. L. Zhuo, and X. Z. Jiang, "Heck reaction catalyzed by Pd supported on LDH-F hydrotalcite," Journal of Molecular Catalysis A, vol. 248, no. 1-2, pp. 26-31, 2006.

[26] Y. S. Lee, Y. H. Kim, J. S. Hong, J. K. Suh, and G. J. Cho, "The adsorption properties of surface modified activated carbon fibers for hydrogen storages," Catalysis Today, vol. 120, no. 3-4, pp. 420-425, 2007

[27] J. S. Im, S.-J. Park, and Y.-S. Lee, "The metal-carbon-fluorine system for improving hydrogen storage by using metal and fluorine with different levels of electronegativity," International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1423-1428, 2009.

[28] S. M. Yun, J. W. Kim, M. J. Jung, Y. C. Nho, P. H. Kang, and Y. S. Lee, "An XPS study of oxyfluorinated multiwalled carbon nano tubes," Carbon Letters, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 292-298, 2007.

[29] M.-J. Jung, J. W. Kim, J. S. Im, S.-J. Park, and Y.-S. Lee, "Nitrogen and hydrogen adsorption of activated carbon fibers modified by fluorination," Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 410-414, 2009.

[30] J. Jagiello and D. Tolles, Fundamentals of Adsorption, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1998, Edited by: F. Meunier.

[31] P. Tarazona, U. Marini Bettolo Marconi, and R. Evans, "Phase equilibria of fluid interfaces and confined fluids," Molecular Physics, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 573-595, 1987.

[32] Y. Hattori, N. Noguchi, F Okino et al., "Defluorination-enhanced hydrogen adsorptivity of activated carbon fibers," Carbon, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1391-1395, 2007

[33] P. E. Pehrsson, W. Zhao, J. W. Baldwin et al., "Thermal fluorination and annealing of single-wall carbon nanotubes," Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 107, no. 24, pp. 5690-5695, 2003.

[34] Z. Wu, J. Li, D. Timmer, K. Lozano, and S. Bose, "Study of processing variables on the electrical resistivity of conductive adhesives," International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 488-494, 2009.

[35] K. Takai, H. Sato, T. Enoki et al., "Effect of fluorination on nano-sized [pi]-electron systems," Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 175-185, 2001.

[36] Z. Gu, H. Peng, R. H. Hauge, R. E. Smalley, and J. L. Margrave, "Cutting single-wall carbon nanotubes through fluorination," Nano Letters, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 1009-1013, 2002.

[37] W. Zhao, C. Song, B. Zheng, J. Liu, and T. Viswanathan, "Thermal recovery behavior of fluorinated single-walled carbon nanotubes," Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 293-296, 2002.

[38] T. Nakajima, Fluorine-Carbon and Fluoride-Carbon Materials, Chemistry, Physics, and Applications, CRC Press, New York, NY, USA, 2004.

[39] A. Bismarck, R. Tahhan, J. Springer et al., "Influence of fluorination on the properties of carbon fibres," Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 127-134, 1997

[40] G. Li, K. Kaneko, S. Ozeki et al., "Water rejective nature of fluorinated microporous carbon fibers," Langmuir, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 716-717, 1995.

Jin-Young Jung, (1) Hye-Ryeon Yu, (1) Se Jin In, (2) Young Chul Choi, (3) and Young-Seak Lee (1)

(1) Department of Applied Chemistry and Biological Engineering, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 305-764, Republic of Korea

(2) Department of Fire and Disaster Protection Engineering, Woosong University, Daejeon 300-718, Republic of Korea

(3) CNT Team, Hanwha Chemical Corporation, Incheon 403-030, Republic of Korea

Correspondence should be addressed to Young Chul Choi; and Young-Seak Lee;

Received 13 August 2013; Accepted 23 August 2013

Academic Editor: Yun Suk Huh

Table 1: XPS parameters of fluorinated CMS and PC.

Sample   Elemental content (at.%)

         C1s      O1s     F1s     F/C (%)

PC       90.69    9.31    --      --
100FC    67.68    8.16    24.16   0.36
200FC    65.73    8.71    25.56   0.39
300FC    63.99    7.74    28.27   0.44
400FC    72.38    7.36    20.26   0.28

Table 2: Assignments and peak parameters of the different
C1s components.

Component      Assignment       Binding
                               energy (eV)    PC

C(1)        C-C ([sp.sup.2])      284.5      70.24
C(2)        C-C ([sp.sup.3])      285.4      18.13
C(3)              C-O             286.4      7.49
C(4)              C=O             287.4      4.14
C(5)        Semicovalent C-F      288.8        0
C(6)              C-F             290.5        0

            Concentration (%) of each sample
            100FC    200FC    300FC    400FC

C(1)        36.48    34.79    35.36    52.91
C(2)        18.82    19.29    20.23    18.95
C(3)        12.48    13.73    13.30    10.12
C(4)        12.31    11.82    10.01     6.48
C(5)        15.56    15.79    16.07     9.20
C(6)         4.35     4.91     5.03     2.34

Table 3: Changes in the pore characteristics of the treated CMSs
according to fluorination temperature.

Sample                 PC     100FC    200FC    300FC    400FC

Total pore volume    0.1008   0.1016   0.1083   0.1143   0.1117

Specific surface     433.66   459.95   455.89   439.46   438.55
area ([m.sup.2]/g)
COPYRIGHT 2013 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research Article
Author:Jung, Jin-Young; Yu, Hye-Ryeon; In, Se Jin; Choi, Young Chul; Lee, Young-Seak
Publication:Journal of Nanomaterials
Date:Jan 1, 2013
Previous Article:Dielectric properties of PE/clay nanocomposites.
Next Article:Mathematical simulation of temperature profiles within microwave heated wood made for wood-based nanocomposites.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters