Printer Friendly

Water treatment residues may curb phosphorus runoff.

Residue from water treatment plants, often discarded as waste into landfills, may make good soil treatments for preventing phosphorus runoff from farms.

Agricultural Research Service (ARS) soil scientist Jeffrey M. Novak, of the ARS Coastal Plains Soil, Water and Plant Research Center in Florence, South Carolina, is studying an alum-based water treatment residual that increases the capacity of soil to bond phosphorus, a vital plant nutrient.

The studies, done in collaboration with Ray Bryant, research leader at the ARS Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Research Unit in University Park, Pennsylvania, may benefit states along the nation's mid-to-southern-Atlantic seaboard, where sandy soils generally take up and hold less phosphorus than finer-textured soils.

Increased bonding, or adsorption would curb runoff of phosphorus. This nutrient can lower the oxygen content of water bodies and spoil the taste of drinking water. Phosphorus in manure makes agricultural facilities, such as large livestock production operations, potential sources of runoff pollution.

According to Novak, chemically binding phosphorus into water-insoluble complexes using residuals containing iron oxide, aluminum oxide, and hydroxide may become an important management practice. The alum-based water treatment residual this research focuses on has a high phosphorus-binding capacity.

A separate study, conducted on wheat by agronomist Eton Codling at the ARS Animal Manure and Byproducts Laboratory in Beltsville, Maryland, found that the treatment has no negative effect on the absorption of phosphorus by plants once plant roots grow beyond the 6-inch-deep layer the treatment creates in soil.

In lab tests with sandy soil, the treatment increased phosphorus-binding potential four--to fivefold over that of untreated soil. The lab studies will be repeated, and additional research will be done in the field during the next two years. If successful, this use for waste from water treatment processing not only could get rid of the waste, but also would hold phosphorus on the land until a crop uses it.
COPYRIGHT 2004 National Environmental Health Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:EH Update
Publication:Journal of Environmental Health
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Previous Article:Minimizing foodborne illness associated with fresh produce--FDA's proposed 0.
Next Article:European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.

Related Articles
Resuscitating the gulf's dead zone.
P Soup: It's green, but it's not good for you. That benign-looking pond scum signifies a far-reaching shift in the global phosphorus cycle.
Sources of the eutrophication problems associated with toxic algae: An overview. (International Perspectives).
Phosphorus pollution: too much of a good thing.
Passing inspection: a new study examines the effects of wood additives and adhesives for recyclers.
Onsite wastewater systems.
Onsite wastewater systems.
Onsite wastewater systems.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |