Jenkins, Philip. The Great and Holy War: How World War 1 Became a Religious Crusade. New York: HarperOne, 2014. 438pp. $29.95
The roots of today's sectarian-fueled conflicts lie in the First World War. By igniting "a global religious revolution," the "Great War" redrew the world's religious map both figuratively and literally. Modern Islam, characterized as "assertive, self-confident, and aggressively sectarian," is a direct result, but so too are the spread of charismatic Christianity in Africa, an invigorated Zionism that led to the eventual creation of the modern state of Israel, and even the "efflorescence of esoteric and mystical ideas that we often summarize as New Age." So argues Philip Jenkins. Like other recent authors, Jenkins claims that the Great War in effect "created our reality." This book, however, is noteworthy for placing the war's political, social, and cultural elements, and effects, within an explicitly religious context.
Jenkins, distinguished professor of history and member of the Institute for the Study of Religion at Baylor University, has written an ambitious and highly readable book. Synthesizing military, cultural, and religious history and drawing principally from a vast body of secondary literature, the book is admirable in its reach even when it exceeds the author's grasp.
By focusing on the religious dimensions and consequences of the war, this book fills a historiographical gap, one in which wartime religion is commonly regarded as "irrelevant ... window dressing" with "each side cynically appropriat[ing] God to its own narrow nationalist causes." Instead, Jenkins takes seriously the decidedly religious worldview that informed the war's belligerents. While there were national and religious disparities (for example, where Orthodox Russians cast the war in traditional "crusade" language, British rhetoric emphasized a "war for Christian civilization"), a common religious vocabulary of sacrifice, holy war, divine mission/mandate, crusade, and cosmic battle, marked by both apocalyptic fears and millenarian hopes, was widely shared across national and faith-group boundaries.
In Jenkins's view, it was these war-fueled expectations and the ensuing wartime cataclysm that fundamentally shaped the postwar world. A more secularized Europe was a reaction to wartime religious excesses, even as that same "rhetoric of the holy war and holy nation" coupled with apocalyptic ideas to "metastasize" into "Fascism, Nazism, and racial extermination." So too was the Russian Revolution a religious civil war, the Bolshevik cause as messianic and millenarian in vision as it was antireligious in doctrine. Anti-imperial and anticolonial movements in Africa and elsewhere were also parts of this postwar "worldwide millenarian upsurge." Similarly, the war led to a proliferation of "charismatic, fundamentalist, [and] traditionalist forms of faith" within Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Moreover, the defeat and geographical division of the Ottoman Empire created not only the modern Middle East but also, according to Jenkins, modern Islam. The loss of a geopolitical center and the caliphate resulted in a "postwar search for new sources of authority [that] led to the creation or revival of virtually all the Islamic movements that we know in the modern world."
Like many of the book's broadest claims, this last one falls a little short. Still, Jenkins's book is important and timely. The Great War might not have been a "war of religion" per se, but Jenkins shows how for its participants it was certainly religious. Most of all, Jenkins reminds us, as sectarian fighting continues over national boundaries drawn following that century-old war, of the continued relevance of religion's global effects.
Naval War College
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||The Great and Holy War: How World War 1 Became a Religious Crusade|
|Publication:||Naval War College Review|
|Article Type:||Book review|
|Date:||Jan 1, 2015|
|Previous Article:||A strategy has to be able to work to be masterful.|
|Next Article:||Manicom, James. Bridging Troubled Waters: China, Japan, and Maritime Order in the East China Sea.|