Printer Friendly

WHY WE HAD TO FIGHT AGAINST SCHEME.

Byline: ELAINE MOTION Civil liberties lawyer for appeal team

THIS is a highly significant and extremely unusual judgment. Successful challenges to legislation are very rare.

The action was brought as there was a public interest issue with a real strength of feeling about the potential impact of the scheme across Scottish society.

That meant it was right to take the case all the way to the Supreme Court.

In layman's terms, the Supreme Court has said the Scottish Government has overstepped the line drawn by Article 8 of the ECHR to protect and respect private and family life.

The Supreme Court has decided that the information-sharing details of the named person scheme were lacking in the necessary precision to give protection against arbitrary interference. That was incompatible with Article 8.

CAPTION(S):

CONCERN Motion

COPYRIGHT 2016 Scottish Daily Record & Sunday
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2016 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Daily Record (Glasgow, Scotland)
Date:Jul 29, 2016
Words:134
Previous Article:NAMED AND TAMED; CAMPAIGNERS HAIL DECISION Scots Government have 42 days to save their flagship child protection policy after Supreme Court rules it...
Next Article:THE BLUES BOTHERS; Guilty of drugs deal because she believed it was Valium BEHIND BARS WOMAN CAUGHT WITH LEGAL PILLS.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters