Printer Friendly

Vulnerability to extinction runs in evolutionary families.

Byline: ANI

Washington, August 7 (ANI): An analysis of 200 million years of history for marine clams found that vulnerability to extinction runs in evolutionary families, even when the losses result form ongoing, background rates of extinction.

"Biologists have long suspected that the evolutionary history of species and lineages play a big role in determining their vulnerability to extinction, with some branches of the tree of life being more extinction-prone than others," said Kaustuv Roy, a biology professor at the University of California, San Diego, noting that human activities threaten some evolutionary lineages of living vertebrates more than others.

"Now we know that such differential loss is not restricted to extinctions driven by us but is a general feature of the extinction process itself," he added.

The study, by Roy and colleagues Gene Hunt of the Smithsonian Institution and David Jablonski of the University of Chicago, focused on marine bivalves such as clams, oysters, mussels, and scallops, whose tough shells fossilize well to provide a rich record for study.

By analyzing a global database of bivalve fossils stretching from the Jurassic Period to the present, the researchers noted when each genus disappeared and whether their relatives disappeared at the same time.

On average, closely related clusters of clams vanished together more often than expected by chance.

"Both background extinctions, which represent most extinctions in the history of life, and mass extinctions tend to be clumped into particular evolutionary lineages," Jablonski said.

The effect was particularly strong during the mass extinction at the end of the Cretaceous period, when clam lineages with the highest 'background' rates of extinction during more normal times were hardest hit.

Three families with the highest background rates disappeared entirely. Two others, with rates more than twice the median, suffered heavy losses and have not recovered to this day.

"Big extinctions have a filtering effect. They tend to preferentially cull the more vulnerable lineages, leaving the resistant ones to proliferate afterwards," Hunt said.

When extinctions are scattered randomly across the evolutionary tree, the breadth of evolutionary history remains represented among living things, even when many species are lost.

Clumped extinctions do the opposite, disproportionately removing the deeper history.

According to the researchers, the message for conservation is to focus efforts on vulnerable lineages.

To preserve the full spectrum of evolutionary history found among living things today, the most fragile families will need careful protection.

"If you have whole lineages more vulnerable than others, then very soon, even with relatively moderate levels of extinction, you start to lose a lot of evolutionary history," Roy said. (ANI)

Copyright 2009 Asian News International (ANI) - All Rights Reserved.

Provided by an company
COPYRIGHT 2009 Al Bawaba (Middle East) Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2009 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Asian News International
Date:Aug 7, 2009
Previous Article:Oprah Winfrey sued for $1.2 trillion over plagiarism claims.
Next Article:PML-N's UK wing joins Lord Nazir's call to prosecute Musharraf in British courts.

Related Articles
Distinctions between extinctions.
Extinction: equal opportunity in death.
You can run, but you can't hide.
Extinction and health.
Life on the Edge.
Sex evolved as a defence against parasites, suggests article.
New species emerge just as often as they die out.
A large size and a fast bite made some fish go extinct 65 million years ago.
New evidence supports North America as center of origin for all living Marsupials.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters