Printer Friendly

Veterans' Benefits: Quality Assurance for Disability Claims and Appeals Processing Can Be Further Improved.

GAO-02-806 August 16, 2002

For fiscal year 2002, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) will pay $25 billion in cash disability benefits to 3.3 million disabled veterans and their families. Veterans who are dissatisfied with VA's 57 regional offices' decisions may file appeals with VA's Board of Veteran's Appeals. In about half of such appeals, the Board has either granted the benefits denied or returned the cases to regional offices for rework. Additionally, VA reported an accuracy rate of less than 70 percent for regional office disability decisions when it tested a new quality assurance program in fiscal year 1998. When the Board itself denies benefits, veterans may appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. In over half of the appeals, the Court has either granted the benefits denied by the Board or returned the decisions to the Board for rework. In fiscal year 1998, the Board of Veteran's Appeals established a quantitative evaluation program to score its decision-making accuracy and collect data to improve decision-making. The accuracy measure used by the Board understates its true accuracy rate because the calculations include certain deficiencies, such as errors in a written decision's format, which would not result in either a reversal or a remand by the Court. VA does not assess the consistency of decision-making across the regional office and Board disability adjudicators, even though VA acknowledges that in many cases adjudicators of equal competence could review the same evidence but render different decisions. Even though available evidence indicates that variations in decision-making occur across all levels of VA adjudication, VA does not conduct systematic assessments to determine the degree of variations that occurs for specific impairments and to provide a basis for determining ways to reduce such variations.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Stonehenge International
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2002 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:General Accounting Office Reports & Testimony
Date:Sep 1, 2002
Words:293
Previous Article:Skilled Nursing Facilities: Providers Have Responded to Medicare Payment System By Changing Practices.
Next Article:Social Security Administration: Revision to the Government Pension Offset Exemption Should Be Reconsidered.


Related Articles
Social Security Disability: Efforts to Improve Claims Process Have Fallen Short and Further Action is Needed.
VA Benefits: Fundamental Changes to VA's Disability Criteria Need Careful Consideration.
Veterans' Benefits: Further Changes in VBA's Field Office Structure Could Help Improve Disability Claims Processing.
Social Security Administration: Agency Is Positioning Itself to Implement Its New Disability Determination Process, but Key Facets Are Still in...
A matter of choice.
Veterans' Benefits: Improved Operational Controls and Management Data Would Enhance VBA's Disability Reevaluation Process.
Veterans' Disability Benefits: Claims Processing Challenges Persist, while VA Continues to Take Steps to Address Them.
Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission report a good start.
Judicial review: a question of balance.
Veteran's widow wins 16-year battle for benefits.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters