Verdict: not disabled. (Upfront Update).
The Supreme Court, in effect, answered no in the case of Ella Williams, an assembly-line worker with carpal tunnel syndrome ("Making the Supreme Decision," 10/1/01). The decision said that to qualify as disabled, and to be protected by the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), a person must have substantial limitations both on and off the job. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said, "Household chores, bathing, and brushing one's teeth are among the types of manual tasks of central importance to people's daily lives" and should have been considered when a lower court ruled she was disabled. Williams still took care of her hygiene, cooking, and some housework.
Stephen Bokat of the National Chamber Litigation Center called the decision a victory for employers: "The Court understood that the ADA was not meant to create a loophole for people with routine limitations or minor injuries."
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Supreme Court decision in carpal tunnel syndrome sufferer Ella Williams|
|Publication:||New York Times Upfront|
|Article Type:||Brief Article|
|Date:||Feb 11, 2002|
|Previous Article:||Early decisions. (College).|
|Next Article:||Virtually dead. (Circuits).|