Variation of ATM gene expression in peripheral blood cells of sporadic breast carcinomas in Iranian patients.
Several genes are known to predispose women to breast cancer, which is a common disease with a complex etiology. Although mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are recognized as risk factors for inherited breast cancer, somatic mutations in these genes are rare in sporadic breast cancers (1), (2). In principle, a greater proportion of breast cancer cases with in the population could be attributed to genes that are more frequently mutated but which may have a relatively low penetrance with respect to breast cancer (3), (4).
The Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) gene is one candidate for such a susceptibility gene. The ATM a 350-kDa protein serine/threonine kinase, member of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3-kinase)-like family (PIKK) belongs to the core components of DNA-damage response machinery and acts as an intracellular sensor by recognizing double-strand breaks (DSBs). Numerous substrates involved in DNA repair are regulated by ATM protein kinase activity. ATM is the initiator of a signaling cascade that responds to DSB and thought to be master controllers of cell-cycle checkpoint signaling pathways (3), (5), (6).
Mutation of the ATM gene is the underlying cause of the rare autosomal recessive disorder Ataxia Telangiectasia (AT), characterized by clinical manifestations that include progresssive cerebellar ataxia, skin, and ocular telangiectasia, immunological deficiency, neuronal degeneration, extreme cellular sensitivity to ionizing radiation (IR), premature ageing, hypogonadism, growth retardation, and predisposition to cancer. AT, described as a separate disease in 1957, occurs early in childhood with a frequency varying from 1 in 40,000 to 300,000 births in various ethnic groups (7), (8).
The ATM gene was mapped to chromosome 11q22-23 in 1988 (9) and a single AT-mutated gene was identified in 1995 (2). More than 400 disease-causing mutations have been identified in ATM so far and about 70% of them result in premature termination of translation and truncation of the protein. The entire gene spans almost 150 kb of the genomic DNA, consists of 66 exons and is transcribed in a wide range of tissues to an mRNA of approximately 13 kb with a coding sequence of 9168 bp (5).
An estimated 1.4% of the population carries a single ataxia-telangiectasia gene. Epidemiological studies on AT families have shown that AT heterozygotes also have an increased risk of developing cancer, in particular breast cancer, for which female ATM carriers have at least 5-fold increase risk compared with the general population. Seven percent or more of all breast cancer patients are likely to carry a single ataxia-telangiectasia gene. This gene appears to predispose carriers to breast cancer primarily with onset before age 65 or 70 years. Thus, the proportion of ataxia-telangiectasia heterozygotes among women with early breast cancer onset may be substantially greater than 7% (10), (11), but its true magnitude is still uncertain (12).
Normal breast tissue shows a distinct pattern of ATM expression, the protein being found in the ductal epithelial cells but not in the surrounding myoepithelial cells. In contrast, in cases of sclerosing adenosis, a benign breast lesion, ATM is expressed in both the epithelial and myoepithelial cells. This upregulation of ATM expression was associated with proliferation of the myoepithelial cells (13).
Several groups studied large cohorts of sporadic breast cancer patients and agematched controls for nonsense or frame-shift mutations within the ATM gene. Neither group found evidence for a higher incidence of defective ATM alleles in the cancer patient cohort. Furthermore, the correlation between breast cancer and dominant negative forms of ATM arising from defined missense or intronic mutations within the ATM gene remained controversial. It seems that inactivation of the ATM gene by somatic mutations is not a common hallmark of breast cancer (5), (14).
A role for the ATM gene in sporadic breast cancer is supported by many studies that have shown a LOH in the region of the ATM gene. This has been found in 40% of tumors studied. A causative association with the ATM gene has, however, been shown in only a few familial cases of breast cancer (3), (15-17). The epigenetic silencing of ATM expression occurred in locally advanced breast tumors suggesting a link between reduced ATM function and sporadic breast cancer (14).
HER2, Estrogen (ER) and Progesterone (PR) Receptors are currently used in routine patient care of breast cancer (18). Over expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2), a 185-kD receptor occurs in 20 to 30% of invasive breast cancers. In general, tumors with a HER2 gene amplification have decreased overall survival and may respond to targeted therapy (19). ER positive tumors considered as lower penetrance alleles are thought to have characteristics of the luminal cell type and are frequently responsive to endocrine treatment. The PR is a prognostic marker, but the Oxford overview of adjuvant therapy does not support its ability to predict resistance to chemotherapy (20), (21).
Multiple studies evaluated ATM gene expression in breast tissues, but so far, there was no available study on mRNA expression in tissues other than breast to determine a probable constitutional genetic predisposition factor in these patients. However, the expression of ATM gene in peripheral blood lymphocytes was evaluated in some cancers including bladder and lung (22), (23). We aimed to perform a research to measure the ATM mRNA expression in peripheral blood cells in breast cancer patients and also their correlations in different groups.
Materials and Methods
This study was approved by the local ethical committees. For the study, 40 newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed female breast cancer patients from Imam Khomeini hospital (Tehran, Iran) undergoing surgery were recruited between 2010 and 2011. There were no age, ethnicity, and tumor pathology or stage restrictions. Thirty three (83%) samples were invasive ductal carcinoma, 16 (48%) of these tumors were associated with an in situ ductal carcinoma. One sample was exclusively an in situ ductal carcinoma and 6 (15%) samples were other malignant breast tumors. None of the patients was treated with radiotherapy or chemotherapy before surgery. Twenty four control subjects with no prior history of cancer with the same gender for patients were recruited. The general characteristics of cancer patients are listed in table 1.
Table 1. Characteristics of patients with breast cancer Character No. of subjects Percentage TNM stage T0 1 2.5 T1 18 45 T2 14 35 T3 3 7.5 T4 4 10 N1 23 57.5 N2 13 32.5 N3 4 10 ER/PR status ER-positive 30 75 PR-positive 24 60 HER2 Positive 9 22.5 Total 40 100 Mean of age ([+ or -]SD) 48[+ or -]11.5 yr
Blood sample collection
Peripheral blood sample from each participant was collected into EDTA tube before surgery and then transported immediately to the laboratory where the specimens were processed.
RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
Total RNA was isolated from blood cells using the RNX-Plus solution for total RNA isolation (RNX-Plus solution; Cinnagen, CN. RN7713C) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The kit utilizes the phenol chloroform method. Total RNA was eluted with 15 [micro]l DEPC-treated water. One [micro]l RNase inhibitor was added to prevent degradation of RNA (RiboLock[TM] RNase inhibitor; Fermentas Life Sciences). RNA concentration and purity were determined on a UV spectrophotometer by the 260 nm absorbance and 260/280 nm absorbance ratio, respectively. One [micro]g of total RNA per sample was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the cDNA synthesis kit (QuantiTect Reverse Transcriptase kit; Qiagen, CN. 205311) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Quantitative real time PCR
The [2.sup.-[DELTA][DELTA]CT] method was used to calculate relative changes in gene expression determined from real-time quantitative PCR experiments. The probes and primers used for real-time RT--PCR were designed using the Primer Express software (version 2.0; Applied Biosystems) and synthesized by Takapou Zist Co. (Tehran, Iran). To avoid amplification of the contaminating residual genomic DNA, the probe and primer sets for each gene were designed around the junction region of two exons so that they were mRNA-specific. Human [beta] actin gene was used as internal control to normalize input RNA amount, RNA quality and reverse transcription efficiency. The sequences of primers and probes are listed in table 2.
Table 2. Primer and probe sequences used in real-time PCR Gene Forward (F) and reverse Reporter/Quencher Length (R) primers, probes (mer) (P)(5'-3') ATM F: CTC TGA GTG GCA GCT GGA FAM/TAMRA 21 AGA R: TTT AGG CTG GGA TTG TTC 21 GCT P: CAC AGC TGG CAT CCA ACT 29 TCT TGA TCA TT [beta] F: CAG CAG ATG TGG ATC AGC FAM/TAMRA 21 actin AAG R: GCA TTT GCG GTG GAC 18 GAT P: AGG AGT ATG ACG AGT CCG 23 GCC CC
Real-time PCR was performed using the Applied Biosystems 7500 real-time PCR system according to the manufacturer's protocol. Typical amplification mixtures (20 [micro]l) contained the sample DNA (cDNA); 10 [micro]l Taq Man[R] Universal PCR Master Mix (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.; Part No. 4318157, New Jersey USA); forward and reverse primers and probes.
The efficiency of primers was 101.6 and 100.2 for ATM, and [beta] actin, respectively. The thermal cycling conditions consisted of 1 cycle for 10 min at 95[degrees]C to activate the Ampli Taq Gold enzyme, and 45 cycles for 15 sec at 95[degrees]C and for 30 sec at 60[degrees]C. The quantitative PCRs were performed in duplicate for each sample, and the mean was used as the RQ value. The fold change in the ATM gene expression in patients ([2-.sup.[DELTA][DELTA]CT]=RQ) normalized to [beta] actin and relative to the expression at control samples was calculated for each sample where [DELTA] [DELTA]CT = ([C.sub.T,ATM] - [C.sub.T, [beta] actin])Patient - [([C.sub.T,ATM] - [C.sub.T, [beta] actin).sub.Control] (24).
The Independent-Samples t-test or one-way ANOVA test was used, when appropriate to compare quantitative data. For evaluating relative expression of ATM mRNA in patients, REST (relative expression software tool) 2009 V2.0.13 was used. The statistical analysis was performed with the program SPSS 16.0 for windows.
Real-time RT-PCR of ATM mRNA expression in peripheral blood cells of patients showed the RQ mean equal to 1.27 (SD=0.76). The min. and max. was 0.20 and 3.34, respectively. Calculation of patient frequencies in different groups of RQ (Figure 1) revealed that 17.5% had under expression less than two fold decrease and 15% over expression more than two fold increase, but according to REST software there was no up-regulation or down-regulation compare to normal females. No correlation was found between ATM expression and tumor size (p=0.563), lymph node involvement (p=0.847), ER or PR (p=0.235 and p=0.605 respectively), or HER2 status (p=0.295). There was no significant correlation between RQ and different groups of ages, as well. Figure 2 shows amplification plot of some tumor and control samples.
[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]
The ATM protein kinase, encoded by the ATM tumor suppressor gene, is the apex of the repair pathway of DSB, a serious lesion occurring in DNA (5). ATM protects the integrity of the genome at different levels: (1) it mediates arrest of the cell cycle at G1/S, S, and G2/M to prevent the processing of damaged DNA; (2) it activates DNA-repair pathways; and (3) it induces apoptosis if the DNA damage is so detrimental that normal cell function can no longer be rescued (7).
The findings of multiple studies are consistent with the hypothesis that the ATM gene may play an important role in breast cancer development and progression, and also ATM expression is down-regulated in breast cancer tissues (20). Multiple studies revealed that the ATM mRNA level was significantly lower in breast cancer tissue than the adjacent normal tissue from the same patients or breast tissues from patients with benign breast diseases (25), (26). This reduction was observed in breast tumors with or without LOH in the region of the ATM gene, suggesting that genetic events other than gene deletions could result in reduced ATM gene expression (27). However some studies showed that low expression of ATM in breast cancer tissue was related to a high rate of DNA mutation in cancer cells and a progressive cancer phenotype (28).
In some other studies ATM expression levels were the lowest in breast cancer tissue, compared to benign tumor tissue and normal breast tissue specimens (3), (6), (14). Reduced ATM expression was also associated with increased neovascularization in breast cancers, but a cause-effect relationship is yet to be demonstrated (6). Further, Vo et al found a highly significant correlation (p=0.0006) between reduced ATM mRNA abundance, as measured by real-time RT--PCR, and aberrant methylation of the ATM gene promoter. These findings indicate that epigenetic silencing of ATM expression occurs in locally advanced breast tumors, and establish a link at the molecular level between reduced ATM function and sporadic breast malignancy (14). But Luo et al have shown that in lymphocytes expressing ATM, the promoter region is completely demethylated. However, they were unable to correlate the methylation status and the variable ATM protein expression (5), (29).
These results indicate that ATM down-regulation might be important at different levels and by different mechanisms in mammary carcinogenesis and that it may significantly contribute to the pathogenesis of breast carcinomas. Although, the results of Kovalev et al experiment do not support a suppressor role for ATM in the development of sporadic breast cancer (30).
ATM has more expression in higher grades of astrocytoma tumors (28), but in breast cancer patients high level of ATM expression in breast cancer tissue was linked to improved survival (25). ATM expression is a complex process, which is influenced by several reasons including DNA damage, accelerated protein degradation, mRNA instability, hyperphosphorylation of effectors proteins in the protein synthesis machinery (23).
Our results show no up- or down-regulation of ATM mRNA in peripheral blood cells in breast cancer patients, but in some other cancers reduced expression was seen. Jianlin et al evaluated the ATM protein expression levels of lung cancer patients in peripheral blood lymphocytes, and displayed that the ATM protein expression levels of lung cancer patients were significantly lower than that of controls (23). Among bladder cancer subjects the expressions of ATM was significantly lower in cases than in controls (p=0.04). A few studies showed that mRNA expression level of DNA repair or methylation-related gene in peripheral blood lymphocytes is associated with altered cancer risk. For example, reduced expression of mismatch repair genes and nucleotide excision repair genes confers significantly increased risk for head and neck cancer (22). However, our data correlate with Ye et al (2007) that no significant association was observed between ATM expression level and TNM stage (25).
ATM under expression was more observed in triple-negative breast tumors ER(-), PR(-) and HER2(-) (31). Furthermore, in another study the non-BRCA1/2 tumors with reduced ATM expression were more often ER negative, and PR negative (32), whereas according to our findings ATM expression in peripheral blood cells show no correlation in ER/PR status.
As shown in figure 1, 17.5% of patients had under expression of ATM mRNA less than two fold relative to control. The importance of this reduction should be evaluated in complementary studies that compare ATM expression in breast tissue and peripheral blood cells simultaneously.
[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]
This study was financially supported by the Research Department of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. The authors would like to thank Mrs. Esmaeili for her technical help.
(1.) Welcsh PL, Schubert EL, King MC. Inherited breast cancer: an emerging picture. Clin Genet 1998;54(6):447-458.
(2.) Peto J, Collins N, Barfoot R, Seal S, Warren W, Rahman N, et al. Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations in patients with early-onset breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91(11):943-949.
(3.) Angele S, Treilleux I, Taniere P, Martel-Planche G, Vuillaume M, Bailly C, et al. Abnormal Expression of the ATM and TP53 Genes in sporadic breast carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6(9):3536-3544.
(4.) Lavin M. Role of the ataxia-telangiectasia gene (ATM) in breast cancer. A-T heterozygotes seem to have an increased risk but its size is unknown. BMJ 1998;317(7157):486-487.
(5.) Prokopcova J, Kleibl Z, Banwell CM, Pohlreich P. The role of ATM in breast cancer development. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007;104(2):121-128.
(6.) Cuatrecasas M, Santamaria G, Velasco M, Camacho E, Hernandez L, Sanchez M, et al. ATM gene expression is associated with differentiation and angiogenesis in infiltrating breast carcinomas. Histol Histopathol 2006;21(2):149-156. cancer prognostic factors including the HER2 over expression, p53 mutation, and ER/PR status. BMC Cancer 2009;9:51.
(7.) Feng J, Zou J, Li L, Zhao Y, Liu S. Antisense oligodeoxynucleotides targeting ATM strengthen apoptosis of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma grown in nude mice. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2011;30:43.
(8.) Swift M, Morrell D, Cromartie E, Chamberlin AR, Skolnick MH, Bishop DT. The incidence and gene frequency of ataxia-telangiectasia in the United States. Am J Hum Genet 1986;39(5):573-583.
(9.) Gatti RA, Berkel I, Boder E, Braedt G, Charmley P, Concannon P, et al. Localization of an ataxia-telangiectasia gene to chromosome 11q22-23. Nature 1988;336(6199):577-580.
(10.) Werneke U. Ataxia telangiectasia and risk of breast cancer. Lancet 1997;350(9079):739-740.
(11.) Swift M. Ionizing radiation, breast cancer, and ataxia-telangiectasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86 (21):1571-1572.
(12.) Inskip HM, Kinlen LJ, Taylor AM, Woods CG, Arlett CF. Risk of breast cancer and other cancers in heterozygotes for ataxia-telangiectasia. Br J Cancer 1999;79(7-8):1304-1307.
(13.) Clarke RA, Kairouz R, Watters D, Lavin MF, Kearsley JH, Lee CS. Up-regulation of ATM in sclerosing adenosis of the breast. Mol Pathol 1998;51 (4):224-226.
(14.) Vo QN, Kim WJ, Cvitanovic L, Boudreau DA, Ginzinger DG, Brown KD. The ATM gene is a target for epigenetic silencing in locally advanced breast cancer. Oncogene 2004;23(58):9432-9437.
(15.) Wooster R, Ford D, Mangion J, Ponder BA J, Peto J, Easton DF, et al. Absence of linkage to the ataxia telangiectasia locus in familial breast cancer. Hum Genet 1993;92(1):91-94.
(16.) Chen JD, Birkholtz GG, Lindblom P, Rubio C, Lindblom. The role of ataxia-telangiectasia heterozygotes in familial breast cancer. Cancer Res 1998; 58(7):1376-1379.
(17.) Bay JO, Uhrhammer N, Pernin D, Presneau N, Tchirkov A, Vuillaume M, et al. High incidence of cancer in a family segregating a mutation of the ATM gene: possible role of ATM heterozygosity in cancer. Hum Mutat 1999;14(6):485-492.
(18.) Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Ellis IO. Combinatorial biomarker expression in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;120(2):293-308.
(19.) Ha SA, Lee YS, Shin SM, Kim HK, Kim S, Namkoong H, et al. Oncoprotein HCCR-1 expression in breast cancer is well correlated with known breast
(20.) De Ronde JJ, Hannemann J, Halfwerk H, Mulder L, Straver ME, Vrancken Peeters MJ, et al. Concordance of clinical and molecular breast cancer subtyping in the context of preoperative chemotherapy response. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;119 (1):119-126.
(21.) Tapper W, Hammond V, Gerty S, Ennis S, Simmonds P, Collins A, et al. The influence of genetic variation in 30 selected genes on the clinical characteristics of early onset breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10(6):R108.
(22.) Gu J, Spitz MR, Zhao H, Lin J, Grossman B, Dinney CP, et al. Roles of tumor suppressor and telomere maintenance genes in cancer and aging-an epidemiological study. Carcinogenesis 2005;26 (10):1741-1747.
(23.) Jianlin L, Jiliang H, Lifen J, Wei Z, Zhijian C, Shijie C, et al. Variation of ATM protein expression in response to irradiation of lymphocytes in lung cancer patients and controls. Toxicology 2006;224(1-2):138-146.
(24.) Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 2001;25(4):402-408.
(25.) Ye C, Cai Q, Dai Q, Shu XO, Shin A, Gao YT, et al. Expression patterns of the ATM gene in mammary tissues and their associations with breast cancer survival. Cancer 2007;109(9):1729-1735.
(26.) Waha A, Sturne C, Kessler A, Koch A, Kreyer E, Fimmers R, et al. Expression of the ATM gene is significantly reduced in sporadic breast carcinomas. Int J Cancer 1998;78(3):306-9.
(27.) Kairouz R, Clarke RA, Marr PJ, Watters D, Lavin MF, Kearsley JH, et al. ATM protein synthesis patterns in sporadic breast cancer. Mol Pathol 1999;52 (5):252-256.
(28.) Kheirollahi M, MehrAzin M, Kamalian N, Mehdipour P. Expression of cyclin D2, P53, Rb and ATM cell cycle genes in brain tumors. Med Oncol 2011;28(1):7-14.
(29.) Luo L, Lu FM, Hart S, Foroni L, Rabbani H, Hammarstrom L, et al. Ataxia-telangiectasia and T-cell leukemias: no evidence for somatic ATM mutations in sporadic T-ALL or for hypermethylation of the ATM-NPAT/E14 bidirectional promoter in T-PLL. Cancer Res 1998;58(11):2293-2297.
(30.) Kovalev S, Mateen A, Zaika AI, O'Hea BJ, Moll UM. Lack of defective expression of the ATM gene in sporadic breast cancer tissues and cell lines. Int J Oncol 2000;16(4):825-831.
(31.) Salimi M, Mozdarani H, Majidzadeh K. Expression pattern of ATM and cyclin D1 in ductal carcinoma, normal adjacent and normal breast tissues of Iranian breast cancer patients. Med Oncol 2011 Aug 18. [Epub ahead of print] DOI: 10.1007/s12032-011-0043-5
(32.) Tommiska J, Bartkova J, Heinonen M, Hautala L, Kilpivaara O, Eerola H, et al. The DNA damage signalling kinase ATM is aberrantly reduced or lost in BRCA1/BRCA2-deficient and ER/PR/ERBB2-triple-negative breast cancer. Oncogene 2008;27 (17):2501-2506.
Mohsen Foroughizadeh (1), Hossein Mozdarani (1) *, Keyvan Majidzadeh-A (2), and Ahmad Kaviani (3)
(1.) Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
(2.) Iranian Center for Breast Cancer, Academic Center for Culture, Education and Research (ACECR), Tehran, Iran
(3.) Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
* Corresponding author: Hossein Mozdarani, Ph.D., Department of Medical Genetics, School of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, P.O. Box: 14115-111, Iran
Tel: +98 21 82883830
Fax: +98 21 88006544
Received: 7 Dec 2011
Accepted: 11 Mar 2012
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||Original Article|
|Author:||Foroughizadeh, Mohsen; Mozdarani, Hossein; Majidzadeh-A, Keyvan; Kaviani, Ahmad|
|Publication:||Avicenna Journal of Medical Biotechnology (AJMB)|
|Date:||Apr 1, 2012|
|Previous Article:||Production of pentameric cholera toxin B subunit in Escherichia coli.|
|Next Article:||Association of HLA-DRB1, DQA1 and DQB1 alleles and haplotypes with common variable immunodeficiency in Iranian patients.|