Printer Friendly

Variacion intra e inter anual en una pradera de pastos marinos en la costa caribena de Costa Rica: 2009-2015.

Intra- and inter-annual variation in a seagrass meadow on the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica: 2009-2015

Seagrasses are among the most productive and important coastal ecosystems in the tropics (Duarte, Borum, Short, & Walker, 2008; Nielsen-Munoz, & Cortes, 2008). Seagrass meadows support a highly diverse community and remove nutrients (Duarte et al., 2008). They are important in food webs, as nurseries for crustaceans, finfishes and shellfishes, and they have an important role in the filtration of contaminants (Short & Coles, 2001; Short, Carruthers, Denninson, & Waycott, 2007). Seagrasses can be considered biological indicators of marine ecosystem health and water quality, especially in the vicinity of a nutrient source (Govers, Lamers, Bouma, Brouwer, & van Katwijk, 2014). Unfortunately, seagrasses have been decreasing due to human activity such as tourism, eutrophication and the growing contamination by industries, agriculture endeavors and coastal urban developments (Govers et al., 2014; Waycott et al., 2009; Orth et al., 2006). The reduction in coastal water clarity because of nutrient loading and increased sediment loads is a concerning cause of seagrass loss globally (Waycott et al., 2009; Duarte et al., 2008; Orth et al., 2006).

The Caribbean coast of Costa Rica has well developed seagrasses beds, especially in Cahuita National Park (CNP) and in Gandoca-Manzanillo National Wildlife Refuge (GMNWR) (Cortes, 2016). In both locations Thalassia testudinum is the dominant species mixed in with Syringodium filiforme (Krupp, Cortes, & Wolff, 2009; Fonseca, Nielsen, & Cortes, 2007; Paynter, Cortes, & Engels, 2001), as in most locations in the Greater Caribbean (van Tussenbroek et al., 2014; van Tussenbroek, Barba, Wong, van Dijk, & Waycott, 2010).

The Caribbean Coastal Marine Productivity Program (CARICOMP) was a collaborative international program established to monitor mangrove forests, seagrass meadows and coral reefs in the Greater Caribbean. The focus of the program was to study productivity, structure and function of these ecosystems over extended time periods (CARICOMP, 2001). Within the CARICOMP program, 52 seagrass stations at 22 sites were monitored from 1993 to 2007, and in some cases up to 2012. A recent synthesis of those sites showed wide variation in seagrass productivity and biomass across the Caribbean, unfortunately, CARICOMP seagrass monitoring is now scarce, with many monitoring efforts ending in 2007 (van Tussenbroek et al., 2014).

In Costa Rica, coral reefs and seagrass ecosystems have been continually monitored in Cahuita, and the mangrove forest in Gandoca-Manzanillo since 1999. Previously, Cortes et al. (2010) summarized the data from 1999 to 2008 to determine trends in the marine ecosystems in the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica. Fonseca et al. (2007) analyzed the monitoring data at the seagrass beds in Cahuita in the 1999 to 2005 time period.

This study analyzes the CARICOMP seagrass monitoring data in Cahuita, Costa Rica, for the 2009-2015 time period in order to assess potential variations over time in the seagrass meadows at this location. We hypothesize that seagrass biomass, productivity, turnover rate, density and leaf area index, and environmental parameters such as water clarity, salinity, temperature and rainfall, remained stable within this time period, with seasonal variation within years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Site description: The seagrass bed monitoring site is known as Perezoso (9[degrees]44"13" N-82[degrees]48 '24" W), off the Perezoso Creek, Cahuita National Park (CNP), Limon, on the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica. The seagrass monitoring location is at less than 1m depth and is dominated by T testudinum, with interspersed S. filiforme (Cortes et al., 2010; Fonseca et al., 2007). Tides are mixed, predominantly diurnal, and range between 30 to 50 cm (Lizano, 2006). In the region, there are two rainy seasons: from November to March, and from June to August (Cortes et al., 2010). Mean annual rainfall during the monitoring period (2009-2015) was 2 764.6 [+ or -] (213.7 S.E.) mm, and mean annual temperature 25.7 [+ or -] (0.1 S.E.) [degrees]C (IMN, 2016).

Methodology: The Caribbean Coastal Marine Productivity Program methodology was used (CARICOMP, 2001). This protocol was created to compare monitoring results among coastal ecosystems of the Greater Caribbean (Cortes et al., 2010). A permanent station to monitor seagrasses was established in 1999 at Perezoso, CNP. The amount and frequency of field trips during this time period varied among years due to weather and economic constraints (Table 1).

Total seagrass biomass was determined by collecting six core samples randomly from the seagrass bed per field trip using a PVC corer 40 cm long by 15 cm in diameter. In the laboratory, samples were frozen until they could be processed. Biomass samples were separated into the components: short shoots, rhizomes, roots, leaves, flowers, fruits and dead below ground material. Each component was dried at 60 [degrees]C for at least 72 hr until they reached a constant weight.

To measure productivity, all T. testudinum shoots were marked with a needle in six 10 x 20 cm quadrants (CARICOMP, 1997). Between eight and 15 days after marked, all shoots from each quadrat were extracted from the seagrass bed and transported to the laboratory. In the laboratory, samples were frozen until they could be processed. Leaves were measured and separated into three fractions: new leaves, new leaf since marking, and old standing crop. Separated fractions were decalcified in 10% hydrochloric acid, rinsed and dried at 60[degrees]C for at least 72 hr until they reached a constant weight. Shoot density was calculated from these six small quadrats. Turnover rate (% [day.sup.-1]) was obtained from productivity data, dividing the daily productivity between the standing crop. Five shoots were collected from the meadow and width and length were measured for each leaf using a hand-held ruler, leaf area was subsequently calculated for each shoot. Five replicates of LAI (leaf [m.sup.2] surface [m.sup.-2]) per sample were calculated using the same density per sample.

Water temperature was measured every 30 min with in situ Hobo[R] Temp continuous recorders. To determine water clarity, four horizontal Secchi disk measurements were taken in the study site on each field outing. For each sampling date, three measurements of salinity from subsurface seawater collected at the site were carried out with a hand refractometer in the laboratory.

Statistical analysis: Linear mixed-effect models fitted with maximum likelihood to test inter-annual and intra-annual variations on the seagrass parameters (biomass, productivity, turnover rate, density, leaf area and LAI) were carried out in R (R Development Core Team, 2012). Kruskal-Wallis tests for equal medians were used to determine if environmental parameters varied significantly among the years of the study period. Spearman tests were used to analyze correlations between sea-grass parameters and environmental measures obtained from the National Meteorological Institute (IMN) database (precipitation and air temperature), and direct measurements in seawater (temperature, salinity, water clarity). For Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman tests the PAST statistical program was used (Hammer, Harper, & Ryan 2001).

RESULTS

Biomass, productivity, turnover rate, density and leaf area: Mean biomass (n = 27) was 1 255.4 [+ or -] 146.2 [gm.sup.-2] and ranged from 834.2 [gm.sup.-2] in March 2015 to 1 654.4 [gm.sup.-2] in January 2013 (Fig. 1). There were no significant differences in biomass among years (F = 1.81, d.f. = 151, P [greater than or equal to] 0.05), nevertheless, there were significant differences among sampling months (F = 2.64, d.f. = 151, P < 0.05). Above (AG) and below (BG) ground biomass ratio for T. testudinum was 0.86. Flowers and fruits of T testudinum were found in the meadow between March and May.

Mean S. filiforme biomass (n = 19) was 27.3 [+ or -] 33.9 [gm.sup.-2] and ranged from 0.2 [gm.sup.-2] in February 2012 to 109.9 [gm.sup.-2] in September 2012. There were no significant differences in S. filiforme biomass among years (F = 1.81, d.f. = 115, P [greater than or equal to] 0.05), or months (F = 0.79, d.f. = 115, P [greater than or equal to] 0.05). AG and BG biomass ratio of S. filiforme was 0.86.

Mean productivity (n = 23) ranged from 0.5 [gm.sup.-2][d.sup.-1] in July 2009 to 3.0 [gm.sup.-2][d.sup.-1] in February 2011. Total mean productivity was 1.5 [+ or -] 0.7 [gm.sup.-2][d.sup.-1] (Fig. 2). Productivity was significantly different among years (F = 9.05, d.f. = 112, P < 0.05), and sampling months (F = 4.08, d.f. = 112, P < 0.05).

Mean turnover rate (n = 23) was 4.3 [+ or -] 1.3%[d.sup.-1], with a minimum in March 2015 (2.3 %[d.sup.-1]) and maximum in June 2011 (8.1%[d.sup.-1]) (Fig. 3). There were significant differences in the turnover rates among years (F = 10.10, d.f. = 112, P < 0.05) and months (F = 6.08, g.l. = 112, P < 0.05).

Mean density (n = 24) was 1 088.4 [+ or -] 318.5 shoots [m.sup.-2], with minimum density in June 2011 (491.7 shoots [m.sup.-2]) and maximum in October 2014 (1 810 shoots [m.sup.-2]) (Fig. 4). There were significant differences in density among years (F = 8.46, d.f. = 112, P < 0.05) and months (F = 6.07, d.f. = 112, P < 0.05).

From 2009 to 2015, mean leaf length of the second youngest leaf was 7.4 [+ or -] 0.4 cm, mean width 0.8 [+ or -] 0.1 cm, and mean leaf area (n = 21) 4.9 [+ or -] 2.3 [cm.sup.2]. Mean Leaf Area Index (n = 21) (LAI) was 1.9 [+ or -] 0.8 [m.sup.2] leaf [m.sup.-2]. There were significant differences in LAI among years (F = 2.81, d.f. = 89, P < 0.05) and months (F = 4.79, d.f. = 89, P < 0.05) (Table 2).

Macroalgae were commonly observed associated with the seagrass bed at CNP, mainly Halimeda, Dictyota, Caulerpa, Sargassum, and Padina. Marks of the gastropod, Smaragdia viridis (B. van Tussenbroek, personal communication, 2016) were present on some T. testudinum leaves.

Water temperature, salinity, and clarity: Mean water temperature (n = 1 926) was 28.8 [+ or -] 0.1 [degrees]C, and ranged from 26.3 [degrees]C in February 2009 to 30.2 [degrees]C in September 2010 (Table 3). Mean salinity (n = 117) was 31.7 [+ or -] 3.3 PSU and ranged from 20.2 PSU in April 2015 to 36.4 PSU in May 2012. Mean Secchi disk (n = 179) was 3.2 [+ or -] 2.2 m and ranged from 0.3 m in January 2009 to 8.1 m in April 2015 (Table 2). There were no significant variations in mean values of water temperature and Secchi disk (Kruskal-Wallis, P [greater than or equal to] 0.05) during the study period, while there were significant differences among mean salinity values (Kruskal-Wallis, P < 0.05). Salinity was lowest during October 2014 and April 2015, and highest during September 2012 and August 2013 (Table 3).

The environmental parameters measured in situ for the period 2009-2015, salinity, Secchi (water clarity), and temperature, did not exhibit a significant correlation with any of the seagrass measurements (Table 4). Most of the seagrass parameters were negatively correlated with precipitation (Table 4). Density of T. testudinum (Spearman, r = 0.14) and biomass of S. filiforme (Spearman, r = 0.14) were the only two seagrass parameters that did not have a strong correlation with precipitation.

DISCUSSION

There were no significant differences in biomass among years in the 2009 to 2015 time period revealing biomass stability in the seagrass meadows at Cahuita National Park (CNP), Caribbean coast of Costa Rica. This stability follows a period of a decreasing tendency in T testudinum biomass in Cahuita from 1999 to 2006; which was attributed to an increase of the maximum water temperature at the site of approximately 10[degrees]C and to differences of 14.3 [degrees]C between maximal (39.6 [degrees]C) and minimal water temperature (25.3 [degrees]C) (Fonseca et al., 2007). Water temperature and light regime, determined by latitude, are considered to be good predictors for community biomass in the Greater Caribbean (Van Tussenbroek et al., 2014). Nonetheless, from 2009 to 2015 the variance between minimum and maximum temperature at Cahuita was 4.9 [degrees]C, much smaller than from 1999 to 2006.

Mean biomass in the 2009-2015 monitoring period increased compared to Fonseca et al. (2007) and Cortes et al. (2010). Mean biomass of T testudinum between 2009 and 2015 in CNP was also higher than the mean biomass reported for this species in Tobago from 1992 to 2002 (Juman, 2005) and Mexico from 1993 to 2005 (Rodriguez-Martinez et al., 2010). Lopez-Calderon, Guzman, Jacome, & Barnes (2013) found a mean biomass from 1999 to 2010 of 1 481 gDWm-2 for T testudinum and an increase of this biomass with time, in Bocas del Toro (Table 5). Contrary to Fonseca et al. (2007), Lopez-Calderon et al. (2013) attributes biomass increase to an increase in water temperature and nutrient availability.

There was no discernable pattern of seasonal variability in seagrass biomass, despite there being clear variations among sampled months. Fonseca et al. (2007) did not find any seasonal differences in the biomass of T. testudinum. No seasonal biomass patterns were found either for the biomass in a study of T. testudinum at the CARICOMP site of Bocas del Toro (Lopez-Calderon et al., 2013). Martinez-Daranas, Cabrera, & Pinas-Amargos (2009) in Cuba and Rodriguez-Martinez et al. (2010) in Mexico, found lower values of biomass during winter months, and they associated these low values to a lower production of tissues induced by low temperatures, variations in solar cycle, as well as a reduction of photosynthesis activity during winter. The variations among months in the 2009-2015 monitoring period do not reveal any clear seasonal pattern, since high and low peaks were reached during the rainy season.

At the Cahuita CARICOMP monitoring location mean productivity of T. testudinum during 2009-2015 was lower than the 1999-2008 time period (Cortes et al., 2010; Fonseca et al., 2007; Paynter et al., 2001). During the 2005-2006 period, Gandoca-Manzanillo National Wildlife Refuge (GMNWR) in the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica, had higher productivity than in this study (Krupp et al., 2009) (Table 5). However, in the compilation done by van Tussenbroek et al. (2014), leaf productivity at Costa Rica sites was higher than at many CARICOMP sites.

Productivity of T. testudinum in CNP seems to be one of the lowest in the Caribbean region during recent periods. For example, in Bocas del Toro, Panama, mean productivity for T testudinum between 2000-2010 was 1.7 [gm.sup.-2][d.sup.-1] (Lopez-Calderon et al., 2013), while in 1999 it was 1.8 [gm.sup.-2][d.sup.-1] (Guzman, Barnes, Lovelock & Feller, 2005). Between 1998 and 1999 mean productivity ranged from 3.0 to 5.0 [gm.sup.-2][d.sup.-1] at two sites of Bon Accord, Tobago (Juman, 2005). In Nuevitas Bay, Cuba, mean productivity was 2.1 [gm.sup.-2][d.sup.-1] between 2000 and 2001 (Martinez-Daranas et al., 2009). In Colombia, Chegue Bay, mean productivity of T. testudinum was 2.5 [gm.sup.-2][d.sup.-1] (Rodriguez-Ramirez et al., 2010). Only in Puerto Morelos, Mexico, was productivity close or lower to our results, with a mean value between 1.5 and 0.9 [gm.sup.-2][d.sup.-1] (Rodriguez-Martinez et al., 2010) (Table 5). However, van Tussenbroek et al. (2014) found that leaf productivity at Costa Rica sites (2.08 and 2.94 [gm.sup.-2][d.sup.-1]) was higher than at many other CARICOMP sites.

Turnover rates also appear to be quite low compared to previous studies at CNP. In the 2009-2015 monitoring period a turnover rate of 4.3%[d.sup.-1] was obtained, while in the 1999-2008 period turnover rates of 4.4%[d.sup.-1] and 5.5%[d.sup.-1] were obtained for the same meadow at CNP (Cortes et al., 2010; Fonseca et al., 2007). However, Paynter et al. (2001) obtained a lower turnover rate (3.7%[d.sup.-1]) between March and April 1999 in CNP. On the other hand, mean turnover rate reported in this study is higher or similar than the ones reported for GMNWR in Costa Rica, Tobago, and Panama (Krupp et al., 2009; Juman, 2005; Lopez-Calderon et al., 2013) (Table 5). Fonseca et al. (2007) suggested that turnover rates are higher in seagrasses beds that are subject to a large discharge of terrestrial nutrients. According with the compilation done by van Tussenbroek et al. (2014), turnover rates for Costa Rica sites (4.4 and 5.5% [d.sup.-1]) were higher than at many other CARICOMP sites.

In the 2009-2015 period, productivity and turnover rate of T. testudinum presented significant intra-annual differences and among years; nevertheless, this was not explained by seawater parameters (salinity, temperature, Secchi). In CNP, Fonseca et al. (2007) and Cortes et al. (2010) found a high correlation between productivity of T. testudinum and seawater temperature. However, in GMNWR there was no relation between salinity and seawater temperature and productivity of T. testudinum (Krupp et al., 2009).

In Mexico and Tobago respectively, there was a high productivity during the dry season and low productivity during the wet season (Rodriguez-Martinez et al., 2010; Juman, 2005). Van Tussenbroek et al. (2014) found seasonal differences in leaf productivity only in seagrass beds above latitude 16[degrees]48' N, and confirmed a high growth season from March to August and a low-growth season between September and February, but, since Costa Rica is below this latitude, marked seasonal differences are not expected. A significant production and turnover rate peak was observed during July 1999 in CNP (Fonseca et al., 2007). However, the highest productivity found in this study was during February 2011 and January 2013; and the lowest during July 2009, October 2009 and March 2015; for turnover rate, the lowest mean values were found during October 2009, March and May 2015. These results seem to have no clear seasonal patterns for productivity and turnover rate in CNP sea-grasses. In accordance to this, it is important to highlight that T testudinum production, leaf area, biomass and turnover rate were negatively correlated with precipitation, and 2009 was an ENOS year that particularly intensified during July and October 2009 (IMN, 2009). The period 2014-2015 also presented an ENOS event of high intensity (IMN, 2015).

Thalassia testudinum shoot density between 2009 and 2015 was similar to previous time periods in CNP (Cortes et al., 2010; Fonseca et al., 2007; Paynter et al., 2001). At the same time, mean shoot density in CNP is generally higher than the mean shoot density reported for other countries like Colombia, (Rodriguez-Ramirez et al., 2010), Mexico (Rodriguez-Martinez et al., 2010) and Cuba (Martinez-Daranas et al., 2009) (Table 5). Van Tussenbroek et al. (2014) already determined seagrass shoot density in Costa Rica (934.5 and 1078.2 shoots/[m.sup.2]) as one of the highest among CARICOMP sites. Mean density showed inter-annual and intra-annual variations, with increasing peaks in February 2010 and October 2014, and decreasing peaks in October 2009 and June 2011. In Nuevitas Bay, Cuba, Martinez-Daranas et al. (2009) recorded higher density values during spring and summer; however, in Mexico, T. testudinum's density remained constant throughout the monitoring period (Rodriguez-Martinez et al., 2010).

Mean Leaf Area diminished considerably in the study period (2009-2015) compared to 1999-2000 (Fonseca et al., 2007), but it was higher than between 2000-2008 (Cortes et al., 2010). Conversely, LAI between 2009 and 2015 was higher than in 1999-2000 and 1999-2008 periods (Fonseca et al., 2007; Cortes et al., 2010). This could be explained because leaves of T. testudinum are now shorter and narrower than in 2000 for the same seagrass bed but, on the other hand, there is more leaf area per [m.sup.2] than in 2000, which is due to a density increase. Van Tussenbroek et al. (2010) defined a mean leaf length for T. testudinum between 10 and 80 cm, being much longer than what we found in Cahuita. There are two reasons that could help explain this pattern, one could be due to an increase in herbivory of T. testudinum (Valentine & Duffy, 2006), or an increase of epibiotia living on the leaves (Borowitzka, Lavery, & van Keulen, 2007). Another explanation could be the clonal recruitment of new seagrass shoots, since new leaves are smaller, and density increases where small leaves appear (Krupp et al., 2009), however, it is very unlikely that the whole seagrass bed consisted of juvenile shoots.

On the other hand, LAI for T. testudinum in CNP was lower than LAI found for another bed in the Caribbean of Costa Rica (Krupp et al., 2009), Panama (Lopez-Calderon et al., 2013) and Colombia (Rodriguez-Ramirez et al., 2010) (Table 5). Rodriguez-Ramirez et al. (2010) argued that a low LAI indicates a greater number of new leaves in a developing community or a decrease in length and width of leaves because of stress caused by unfavorable environmental factors.

The higher and lower values of mean productivity and mean biomass were obtained during the same sampling months. The higher mean values for both parameters occurred during January 2013. On the other hand, one of the lowest values reached for mean productivity and mean biomass was during March 2015, when an intense ENOS occurred (IMN, 2015). In Cahuita, between 2003 and 2006, average T. testudinum below ground biomass was more than double the above ground biomass (Nielsen-Munoz & Cortes, 2008). This was attributed to a necessity of nutrient absorption and anchorage to a carbonate fragment substrate. However, below ground biomass of T. testudinum was similar throughout 2009-2015, and close to 50% (46.1-57.4%) of the total mean biomass. And it agrees with an increase in total mean biomass of T. testudinum in this study, because total biomass of seagrasses is expected to increase with the increase of nutrient input if they are nutrient limited (van Tussenbroek et al., 2014). The higher values of mean biomass and above-ground biomass proportion, and a lower mean productivity compared to previous observations, suggest that T. testudinum in CNP may have been under the influence of increasing nutrient input in the 2009-2015 monitoring period.

The flowering and fruit observations of T. testudinum at CNP match with others in the region, where flowers are observed between March and May (van Tussenbroek, 1994; van Tussenbroek et al., 2010). However, Nielsen-Munoz & Cortes (2008) reported flowering for T. testudinum between April and June, and a fruiting period between May and August in the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica. On the other hand, according to what we found in our samples, in the Caribbean region the parrotfish, S. viridis, are closely associated to T. testudinum, and has a trophic dependence on this seagrass (Rueda & Salas, 2007).

In CNP, most seagrass parameters were negatively correlated with rainfall. High levels of precipitation and therefore increased freshwater runoff from Perezoso creek could lead to decreased water clarity and decreased salinity. Nevertheless, water clarity (Secchi depth) did not decrease during the study period, and Secchi depth and salinity were not strongly correlated with any T. testudinum parameter. When comparing three sites in CNP, it has been observed that the higher productivity and biomass of T. testudinum is given at intermediate environmental conditions, such as sediment size (coarse or fine sand), temperature (25[degrees]C) and salinity (37 ppm) (Paynter et al., 2001). Based on the results of this study, precipitation seems to be an important factor influencing T. testudinum parameters in CNP, shedding light on the importance of external environmental agents acting on this ecosystem.

In the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica the largest seagrass beds are located in marine protected areas, where anthropogenic influence is low, trawling, fisheries, marinas, and excessive snorkeling tourism occur far away from the seagrasses beds. But human activities in the watersheds, such as monoculture plantations and pollutant discharges, could affect these ecosystems, as seen in the coral reef (Cortes & Risk, 1985; Cortes et al., 2010). Based on this study, CNP appears to offer conditions suitable for seagrass presence with no evidence of seagrass biomass loss during the study period of 2009-2015. However, there are indirect signals that point to a potential nutrient increment in the seagrass bed. To continue protecting this seagrass bed, it is necessary to continue and improve the seagrass monitoring effort, not only in the National Park but in the rest of the country. Also, the watersheds should be monitored because of their potential impact on the coastal and marine environments and seagrass meadows must be included in national conservation policies.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We want to thank Jaime Nivia, Allan Carrillo, Marco Corrales, Michael Fonseca, Viktoria Bogantes, Davis Morera, Oscar Montoya and Cinthya Perez for field and laboratory support. Jeffrey A. Sibaja-Cordero and Marcelo Araya for statistical advice. We thank the personnel of Parque Nacional Cahuita and Area de Conservacion La Amistad-Caribe. This project was funded by the Vicerrectoria de Investigacion of the University of Costa Rica (Project 808-96-298).

REFERENCES

Borowitzka, M. A., Lavery, P S., & van Keulen, M. (2007). Epiphytes on seagrasses Seagrasses. In A. Larkum, R. Orth, & C. Duarte (Eds.), Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation (pp. 441-461). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

CARICOMP. (1997). Variation in ecological parameters of Thalassia testudinum across the CARICOMP network. Proceedings of the 8th International Coral Reef Symposium, Panama, 1, 663-668.

CARICOMP. (2001). Caribbean Coastal Marine Productivity (CARICOMP): METHODS MANUAL. A research and monitoring network of marine laboratories, parks, and reserves. Kingston, Jamaica & Florida, USA.

Cortes, J. (2016). The Caribbean coastal and marine ecosystems. In M. Kappelle (Ed.), Costa Rican Ecosystems (pp. 591-617). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

Cortes, J., & Risk, M. J. (1985). A reef under siltation stress: Cahuita, Costa Rica. Bulletin of Marine Science, 36, 339-356.

Cortes, J., Fonseca, A. C., Nivia-Ruiz, J., Nielsen-Munoz, V., Samper-Villarreal, J., Salas, E., ... Zamora-Trejos, P. (2010). Monitoring coral reefs, seagrasses and mangroves in Costa Rica (CARICOMP). Revista de Biologia Tropical, 58(Supplement 3), 1-22.

Duarte, C. M., Borum, J., Short, F. T., & Walker, D. I. (2008). Seagrass Ecosystems: Their Global Status and Prospects. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Fonseca, A. C., Nielsen, V., & Cortes, J. (2007). Monitoreo de pastos marinos en Perezoso, Cahuita, Costa Rica (sitio CARICOMP). Revista de Biologia Tropical, 55, 55-66.

Govers, L. L., Lamers, L. P.M., Bouma, T. J, de Brouwer, J. H. F., & van Katwijk, M. M. (2014). Eutrophication threatens Caribbean seagrasses--An example from Curacao and Bonaire. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 89, 481-486.

Guzman, H. M., Barnes, P. A. G., Lovelock, C. E., & Feller, I. C. (2005). A site description of the CARICOMP mangrove, Seagrass and coral reef sites in Bocas del Toro, Panama. Caribbean Journal of Science, 41(3), 430-440.

Hammer, O., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 1-9. Retrieved from http://palaeo-electronica. org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm

Instituto Meteorologico Nacional (IMN). (2009). El Nino (ENOS Report No. 24). Retrieved from https://www. imn.ac.cr/web/imn/43

Instituto Meteorologico Nacional (IMN). (2015). Informe 15 (ENOS Report No. 80). Retrieved from https:// www.imn.ac.cr/web/imn/43

Instituto Meteorologico Nacional (IMN). (2016). Rainfall and temperature data for the period 2009-2015, from the meteorology station Gandoca-Manzanillo. San Jose, Costa Rica. National Meteorology Institute of Costa Rica.

Juman, R. (2005). The structure and productivity of the Thalassia testudinum community in Bon Accord Laggon, Tobago. Revista Biologia Tropical, 53(1), 219-227.

Krupp, L. S., Cortes, J., & Wolff, M. (2009). Growth dynamics and state of the seagrass Thalassia testudinum in the Gandoca-Manzanillo National Wildlife Refuge, Caribbean, Costa Rica. Revista de Biologia Tropical, 57(Supplement 1), 187-201.

Lizano, O. G. (2006). Algunas caracteristicas de las mareas en las costa Pacifica y Caribe de Centroamerica. Ciencia y Tecnologia, 24, 51-64.

Lopez-Calderon, J. M., Guzman, H. M., Jacome, G. E., & Barnes, P. A. G. (2013). Decadal increase in seagrass biomass and temperature at the CARICOMP site in Bocas del Toro, Panama. Revista de Biologia Tropical, 61, 1815-1826.

Martinez-Daranas, B., Cabrera, R., & Pina-Amargos, F. (2009). Spatial and seasonal variability of Thalassia testudinum in Nuevitas Bay, Cuba. Revista Marina y Costera, 1, 9-27.

Nielsen-Munoz, V., & Cortes, J. (2008). Abundancia, biomasa y floracion de Thalassia testudinum (Hydrocharitaceae) en el Caribe de Costa Rica. Revista de Biologia Tropical, 56(Supplement 4), 175-189.

Orth, R. J., Carruthers, J. B., Dennison, W. C., Duarte, C. M., Fourqurean, J. W., Heck, K. L. ... Williams, S. L. (2006). A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. Bioscience, 56(12), 987-996.

Paynter, C. K., Cortes, J., & Engels, M. (2001). Biomass, productivity and density of the seagrass Thalassia testudinum at three sites in Cahuita National Park, Costa Rica. Revista de Biologia Tropical, 49(Supplement 2), 265-272.

R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/

Rodriguez-Martinez, R., Ruiz-Renteria, F., van Tussenbroek, B., Barba-Santos, G., Escalante-Mancera, E., Jordan-Garza, G., & Jordan-Dahlgren, G. (2010). Environmental state and tendencies of the Puerto Morelos CARICOMP site, Mexico. Revista Biologia Tropical, 58(Supplement 3), 23-43.

Rodriguez-Ramirez, A., Garzon-Ferreira, J., Batista-Morales, A., Gil, D. L., Gomez-Lopez, D. I., Gomez-Campo, K., Vega-Sequeda, J. (2010). Temporal patterns in coral reef, seagrass and mangrove communities form Chengue Bay CARICOMP site (Colombia): 1993-2008. Revista Biologia Tropical, 58(Supplement 3), 45-62.

Rueda, J. L., & Salas, C. (2007). Trophic dependence of the emerald neritid Smaragdia viridis (Linnaeus, 1758) on two seagrasses from European coast. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 73, 211-214.

Short, F., & Coles, R. (2001). Global seagrass distribution. In F. Short, & R. Coles (Eds.), Global Seagrass Research Methods (pp. 5-31). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.

Short, F. T., Carruthers, T. J. B., Denninson, W. C., & Waycott, M. (2007). Global seagrass distribution and diversity: A bioregional model. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 350, 3-20.

Valentine, J. F., & Duffy, J. E. (2006). The central role of grazing in seagrass ecology. In A. Larkum, R. Orth, & C. Duarte (Eds.), Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation (pp. 463-501). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

van Tussenbroek, B. (1994). Aspects of the reproductive ecology of Thalassia testudium in Puerto Morelos reef lagoon, Mexico. BotanicaMarina, 37, 413-419.

van Tussenbroek, B., Barba, G., Wong, J., van Dijk, K., & Waycott, M. (2010). A Guide to the Tropical Seagrasses of the Western Atlantic. D.F., Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.

van Tussenbroek, B., Cortes, J., Collin, R., Fonseca, A. C., Gayle, P M. H., Guzman, H., ... & Weil, E. (2014). Caribbean-wide, long-term study of seagrass beds reveals local variations, shifts in community structure and occasional collapse. PLoS ONE, 9(3): e90600. D0I:10.1371/journal.pone.0090600

Waycott, M., Duarte, C. M., Carruthers, T. J. B., Orth, R. J., Dennison, W. C., Olyarnik, S., ... Williams, S. L. (2009). Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(30), 12377-12381. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0905620106

Margarita Loria-Naranjo (1), Jimena Samper-Villarreal (1), Marylaura Sandoval-Siles (1, 2) & Jorge Cortes (1, 2)

(1.) Centro de Investigacion en Ciencias del Mar y Limnologia (CIMAR), Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, 11501-2060 San Jose, Costa Rica; maggie.loria@gmail.com, jimena.sampervillarreal@ucr.ac.cr, mary.sandoval20@gmail.com, jorge.cortes@ucr.ac.cr

(2.) Escuela de Biologia, Universidad de Costa Rica

Received 29-IV-2018.

Corrected 29-V-2018.

Accepted 28-VI-2018.

Caption: Fig. 1. Thalassia testudinum mean biomass (gDW[m.sup.-2]) at Perezoso, Cahuita, Costa Rica (N = 169, S.E = 34.1).

Caption: Fig. 2. Thalassia testudinum mean productivity ([gm.sup.-2][d.sup.-1]) at Perezoso, Cahuita National Park, Costa Rica (N = 129, S.E. = 0.08).

Caption: Fig. 3. Thalassia testudinum mean turnover rate (%d-1) at Perezoso, CNP, Costa Rica (N = 129. S.E. = 0.1).

Caption: Fig. 4. Thalassia testudinum mean density (shoots m-2) at Perezoso, CNP, Costa Rica (N = 129, S.E. = 35.2).
TABLE 1 Sampling dates at the seagrass meadow of Perezoso, CNP, Limon,
Costa Rica, during the study period 2009-2015

             2009      2010      2011      2012

January
February    [check]             [check]   [check]
March
April       [check]             [check]
May                   [check]             [check]
June                            [check]
July        [check]   [check]             [check]
August                          [check]
September             [check]             [check]
October     [check]             [check]
November              [check]             [check]
December                        [check]

             2013      2014      2015

January     [check]
February
March                           [check]
April
May                             [check]
June
July
August      [check]
September
October               [check]
November
December

TABLE 2 Leaf Area Index (LAI), mean leaf length, mean leaf width and
leaf area of Thalassia testudinum at Perezoso, CNP, Costa Rica, 2009-
2015

Year      LAI ([m.sup.2]    Mean leaf    Mean leaf     Leaf area
           [cm.sup.-2])    length (cm)   width (cm)   ([cm.sup.2])

2009           1.85           5.86          0.77          3.22
2010           1.79           5.91          0.79          4.46
2011           1.82           6.26          0.83          5.52
2012           2.06           7.20          0.78          5.97
2013           1.55           8.12          0.89          6.90
2014            --             --            --            --
2015           2.32           2.81          0.59          0.18
Average        1.90           6.02          0.78          4.37

TABLE 3 Mean annual, minimum and maximum seawater temperature
([degrees]C), mean salinity and mean Secchi distance at Perezoso,
Cahuita National Park, Costa Rica, 2009-2015

Year   Mean           Mininum        Maximum        Mean       Secchi
       temperature    temperature    temperature    salinity   (m)
       ([degrees]C)   ([degrees]C)   ([degrees]C)   (PSU)

2009   28.65          27.72          29.81          --         3.69
2010   29.03          28.02          30.27          30.62      3.66
2011   28.82          27.79          30.13          31.68      1.98
2012   28.66          27.64          29.97          34.94      2.26
2013   29.00          26.98          31.84          33.80      2.77
2014   28.73          26.82          31.42          25.00      6.12
2015   29.22          27.71          31.72          30.03      4.13

TABLE 4

Correlation analyses between Thalassia testudinum parameters and
Syringodium filiforme biomass with environmental variables (seawater
temperature, salinity, Secchi disk, air temperature and rainfall) at
Cahuita National Park, Costa Rica, 2009-2015

                         Leaf area     Productivity   Turnover rate
                        ([cm.sup.-2])  (g [m.sup.-2]  (% [d.sup.-1])
                                        [d.sup.-1])

                        Seawater parameters

                        r       p      r       p      r       p

Seawater Temp           -0.66   0.33   0.32    0.57   -0.28   0.50
  ([degrees]C)
Salinity (PSU)          0.25    0.76   0.37    0.42   0.03    1
Secchi (m)              -0.41   0.53   -0.41   0.38   -0.43   0.30

                        Environmental parameters

Air Temp ([degrees]C)   0.23    0.65   0.40    0.38   -0.05   0.92
Precipitation (mm)      -0.83   0.03   -0.96   0.00   -0.78   0.05

                          Density        Biomass      S. filiforme
                          (shoots      (g [m.sup.-2])  biomass (g
                         [m.sup.-2])                   [m.sup.-2])

                        r       p      r       p      r       p

Seawater Temp           0.07    0.84   0.32    0.48   -0.61   0.22
  ([degrees]C)
Salinity (PSU)          0.54    0.24   -0.26   0.56   0.60    0.17
Secchi (m)              -0.61   0.14   -0.04   0.90   -0.43   0.36

Air Temp ([degrees]C)   0.61    0.15   0.41    0.58   0.14    0.71
Precipitation (mm)      0.14    0.71   -0.78   0.05   -0.03   1.00

TABLE 5 Summary table of the mean seagrass variables presented in
different CARICOMP studies during different periods. CNP: Cahuita
National Park

Study                              Site

Paynter, Cortes & Engels 2001      Cahuita National Park, Costa
                                     Rica
Guzman et al. 2005                 Bocas del Toro, Panama
Juman 2005                         Bon Accord Laggon, Tobago
Fonseca, Nielsen & Cortes. 2007    Cahuita National Park, Costa
                                     Rica
Mielsen-Mufloz & Cortes. 2008      Cahuita National Park, Costa
                                     Rica
Krupp, Cortes & Wolff. 2009        Gandoca Manzanillo
                                     National Wildlife Refuge,
                                     Costa Rica
Vlartinez-Daranas,                 Nuevitas Bay, Cuba
Cabrera & Pinas-Amargos 2009
Cortes, Fonseca, Ni vi a-Ruiz      Cahuita National Park, Costa
                                     Rica
& Nielsen-Munoz. 2010
Podriguez-Martinez et al. 2010     Puerto Morelos, Mexico
Podriguez-Ramirez et al. 2010      Chengue bay, Colombia
Lopez-Calderon et al. 2013         Bocas del Toro, Panama
This study                         Cahuita National Park, Costa
                                   Rica

Study                                 Biomass       Productivity
                                   (g/[m.sup.2])   (g/[m.sup.2]/d)

Paynter, Cortes & Engels 2001          1057              2.4

Guzman et al. 2005                      560             1.82
Juman 2005                         437.7 - 319.2      3.0 - 5.0
Fonseca, Nielsen & Cortes. 2007        822.8             2.7

Mielsen-Mufloz & Cortes. 2008          696.8

Krupp, Cortes & Wolff. 2009            1 564          1.5 - 2.5

Vlartinez-Daranas,                                      2.08
Cabrera & Pinas-Amargos 2009
Cortes, Fonseca, Ni vi a-Ruiz          978.6             1.6

& Nielsen-Munoz. 2010
Podriguez-Martinez et al. 2010       531 - 699        1.5 - 0.9
Podriguez-Ramirez et al. 2010                            2.5
Lopez-Calderon et al. 2013             1481             1.74
This study                             1255             1.52

Study                              Turnover    Foliar      LAI
                                   rate (%)     area
                                                ([cm.
                                               sup.2])

Paynter, Cortes & Engels 2001        3.69

Guzman et al. 2005                   2.54                 3.72
Juman 2005                         4.2 - 5.6
Fonseca, Nielsen & Cortes. 2007       5.5       9.68      0.92

Mielsen-Mufloz & Cortes. 2008

Krupp, Cortes & Wolff. 2009        3.0 - 3.8             2.1-3.2

Vlartinez-Daranas,
Cabrera & Pinas-Amargos 2009
Cortes, Fonseca, Ni vi a-Ruiz         4.4        2.5       1.4

& Nielsen-Munoz. 2010
Podriguez-Martinez et al. 2010
Podriguez-Ramirez et al. 2010                              4.0
Lopez-Calderon et al. 2013           2.62                 4.65
This study                           4.26       4.86      1.87

Study                                   Density         Period
                                   (shoot/[m.sup.2])

Paynter, Cortes & Engels 2001            1418            1999

Guzman et al. 2005                       17.6            1999
Juman 2005                                             1998-1999
Fonseca, Nielsen & Cortes. 2007          1184          1999-2005

Mielsen-Mufloz & Cortes. 2008                          2003-2006

Krupp, Cortes & Wolff. 2009                            2005-2006

Vlartinez-Daranas,                        617          2001-2002
Cabrera & Pinas-Amargos 2009
Cortes, Fonseca, Ni vi a-Ruiz            1079          1999-2008

& Nielsen-Munoz. 2010
Podriguez-Martinez et al. 2010            731          1993-2005
Podriguez-Ramirez et al. 2010             650          1993-2008
Lopez-Calderon et al. 2013                             1999-2010
This study                               1197          2009-2015
COPYRIGHT 2018 Universidad de Costa Rica
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2018 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Loria-Naranjo, Margarita; Samper-Villarreal, Jimena; Sandoval-Siles, Marylaura; Cortes, Jorge
Publication:Revista de Biologia Tropical
Date:Sep 1, 2018
Words:6395
Previous Article:Agallas de insectos en Cordoba, Argentina: un caso en el que predominan las agallas caulinares.
Next Article:Sustrato, humedad, temperatura y germinacion de semillas del arbol endemico amenazado.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters