Printer Friendly


SUMMARY--Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a highly prevalent disorder among renal transplant recipients. Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) has been associated with several ED risk factors but only recently directly linked to ED. We conducted a study to investigate whether vitamin D serum levels were associated with the presence and severity of ED in 40 male patients that underwent deceased donor kidney transplantation (TX) from 2001 to 2013. Blood samples were collected on two seasonally distinct occasions and 25(OH)D concentration was assessed by radioimmunoassay. A 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) was used for ED evaluation and group stratification. We found comparable rates of ED (75%) and VDD (42.5%-62.5%) as in previously published studies. Serum levels of 25(OH)D did not differ between patients with and those without ED on both measurements (p=0.656 and p=0.914, respectively), or when comparing different ED severity groups. Duration of renal replacement therapy before TX and graft duration until analysis were longer in patients with ED (p=0.022 and p=0.05, respectively), but with the results being nonsignificant on logistic regression. In conclusion, we found no association of 25(OH)D concentration with the presence and severity of ED in renal transplant recipients. So far, there are no similar published data.

Key words: Vitamin D deficiency; Erectile dysfunction; Endothelium, vascular; Renal insufficiency, chronic; Kidney transplantation; Croatia


Erectile dysfunction (ED) is defined as persistent inability of a man to achieve and/or maintain penile erection sufficient for sexual activity. It is a highly prevalent disorder worldwide, with the reported prevalence of 69.2% of men, varying according to different methodological approaches in the published studies, and increasing with age (1-3). ED was historically considered a benign condition, however, not only does it impair the quality of life but also carries an increased risk of impending cardiovascular disease (CVD) (4) because of the common pathological mechanism of endothelial dysfunction (END).

Vitamin D has recently been shown to have a wide variety of extraskeletal effects, with pathways linked to cancer, autoimmune disorders and CVD. By changing the expression of 200 to 2000 genes that have vitamin D response elements, these effects include inhibition of angiogenesis and cellular proliferation, stimulation of apoptosis and terminal differentiation (5). A randomized, double-blind study (6) has revealed that vitamin D supplementation indeed changed the expression of genes linked to CVD, which have been associated with vitamin D deficiency (VDD). VDD is defined as serum circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration below 20 ng/mL, vitamin D insufficiency as 25(OH)D of 21-29 ng/mL, and sufficiency above 30 ng/mL (7).

Vitamin D deficiency has previously been associated with several ED risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM) and atherosclerosis, which all cause endothelial impairment of penile vasculature, as well as with some nonvascular disorders linked both to ED and VDD (8). One recent study (9) found a direct link between the presence of ED and VDD.

The prevalence of ED in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is reported to be about 80% (10), which is higher than in general population. Albeit the etiology of ED is usually multifactorial, there are numerous CKD specific factors that predispose these patients to ED, including hormonal abnormalities, END, comorbidities, polypragmasy, and depression. There are no recent or conclusive data on VDD and ED in CKD population, but a report (11) from 1977 implied that treatment with vitamin D supplements reduced ED severity in dialysis patients. In a setting after renal transplantation (TX), erectile function seems to improve compared to pre-transplant dialysis period (10), although ED remains frequent companion of renal transplant recipients. There are recent efforts in focusing not only on patient and graft survival but also on the life quality after renal TX, where ED plays an important role (12).

Since data on VDD and ED in CKD population are sparse, in this study we set to determine vitamin D status of renal transplant recipients on two seasonally distinct measurements and to investigate whether vitamin D serum levels are associated with the presence and severity of ED. To our knowledge, there are no similar data published so far.

Patients and Methods

The study was conducted at the Department of Urology and Department of Dialysis, Osijek University Hospital Center, where transplant recipients have their regular checkup. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Osijek University Hospital Center, in accordance with the 2000 Declaration of Helsinki and 2008 Declaration of Istanbul. After having obtained their written informed consent, 40 male patients having undergone deceased donor kidney TX from 2001 to 2013 were enrolled in the study. Patient characteristics were obtained by an in-house questionnaire, while clinical data were collected from patient charts and medical records. Blood samples were collected from cubital vein on two seasonally distinct occasions: first sample in summer 2013 (June through August) and second sample in winter 2013/2014 (December through April), with body height and weight measurements taken during physical examination on both occasions.

Assessment of vitamin D serum concentration was performed with DIAsource radioimmunoassay and immunoradiometric assay kit was used for parathyroid hormone (PTH) measurement (DIAsource Immuno-Assays S.A., Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium), following the manufacturer's instructions.

A simplified 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) was used as a diagnostic tool for ED evaluation (13) and to further divide study subjects into different ED categories. According to the IIEF-5 score, the patients were categorized as no ED (ED 0; score 22-25), ED 1 (score 17-21), ED 2 (score 12-16), ED 3 (score 8-11) and ED 4 group (score [less than or equal to]7). The groups were then compared according to serum levels of 25(OH)D, complete blood count, hemoglobin, PTH, fasting blood glucose, creatinine, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), cholesterol and triglycerides per body mass index (BMI), duration of renal replacement therapy (RRT) before TX, and kidney graft duration until analysis.

Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS statistical program (version 15.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data were reported as median (range from minimum to maximum), unless noted otherwise. Difference between two independent samples was calculated with Mann-Whitney test, and among more than two independent samples with Kruskal-Wallis test, while Mann-Whitney test was used for post-hoc analysis. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for related samples and Fisher exact test for categorical data. Correlations were assessed using Kendall's [tau]-B coefficient and multivariate analysis with Hosmer-Lemeshow test. A two-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Demographic characteristics of 40 study participants having undergone kidney TX from June 2001 to May 2013 are shown in Table 1. Glomerulonephritis was the primary cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in most of the subjects and 90% of the patients were first-time kidney transplant recipients. As expected, 77.5% of the patients were taking three or more drugs besides immunosuppressants, while seven patients received vitamin D supplements.

When stratified according to the IIEF-5 score, ten patients had no ED (ED 0), 20 patients were classified as ED 1, seven patients as ED 2, and three patients as ED 4; there were no ED 3 patients. Median age of all patients was 52 (range 29-66) years, with no significant between-group difference (p=0.32). On the first (summer) measurement of 25(OH)D, 42.5% of patients had VDD, 30% were vitamin D insufficient, and 27.5% had sufficient levels of 25(OH)D. On the second measurement (winter), 62.5% had VDD, 17.5% had insufficiency, and only 20% of patients were vitamin D sufficient. The levels of 25(OH)D did not differ between the two measurements (p=0.737). There was no statistically significant between-group difference as compared according to serum levels of 25(OH)D, PTH, hemoglobin, fasting blood glucose, creatinine, hs-CRP, cholesterol, triglycerides, BMI, duration of RRT before TX, and graft duration until analysis.

Then we compared the studied variables between patients without ED and those with any degree of ED (Table 2). Serum levels of 25(OH)D and other serum parameters analyzed yielded no statistically significant differences either. However, duration of RRT before TX and graft duration until analysis were shorter in ED 0 group (p=0.022 and p=0.05, respectively). Logistic regression analysis of the two mentioned parameters plus age at the time of the study (p=0.083 in univariate analysis) revealed no between-group difference (p=0.152, p=0.479 and p=0.334, respectively).

When stratifying study subjects according to 25(OH)D cutoff of 20 ng/mL (Table 3), there was no difference in the IIEF-5 score, duration of RRT before TX and graft duration until analysis on either measurement. However, the first (summer) measurement showed lower HDL cholesterol, red blood cell and hemoglobin concentrations in VDD group (p=0.007, p=0.013 and p=0.009, respectively). VDD group had lower HDL cholesterol on second (winter) measurement (p=0.016) again and higher PTH levels compared to non-VDD group (p=0.009). Logistic regression for the first measurement HDL, hemoglobin and serum glucose (p=0.097 in univariate analysis) and for the second measurement HDL, hemoglobin (p=0.065 in univariate analysis) and PTH revealed the parameters to pose no significant risk (p=0.06, p=0.075, p=0.141, p=0.094, p=0.363 and p=0.059, respectively). Oral vitamin D supplementation therapy had no impact on the distribution of 25(OH)D levels between the groups (p=0.463 and p=0.326 for the first and second measurement, respectively).


In the current study, we measured serum 25(OH)D concentration on two occasions in renal transplant recipients and found no association of vitamin D status with the presence and severity of ED. Along with the recent abundant evidence for extraskeletal effects of vitamin D, there has been an increasing number of papers stressing its role in CVD, autoimmune and chronic inflammatory disorders, as well as in cancer. A review by Hossein-Nezhad and Holick (5) emphasizes that a great deal of numerous vitamin D affected genes have a role in different tumor pathways, cellular cycle regulation and immuno-inflammatory modulation.

Vitamin D deficiency has already been linked to classic CVD risk factors, such as inflammation in vascular endothelium, DM and hypertension, which all are shared ED risk factors causing END (8). Recently, it was demonstrated that a significant proportion of ED patients had VDD, again with END as a plausible underlying pathologic mechanism (9). CKD, an independent risk factor for CVD, with its concomitant metabolic diseases and END is a particularly good setting for ED to occur (10), a finding supported by observational studies. In addition, CKD patients are predisposed to ED because of hormonal abnormalities, anemia and usage of multiple drugs such as beta blockers and some diuretics, which can worsen the erectile function. Furthermore, even after successful kidney TX, where improvement of erectile function is expected (14), there are vascular factors to be taken into consideration that may have an impact on postoperative ED occurrence. End-to-end arterial anastomosis with the internal iliac artery has previously been shown to reduce cavernosal arterial flow (15), but recently similar effect was also found for end-to-side external iliac artery anastomosis (16).

Vitamin D deficiency in CKD population has been extensively studied but never linked to ED. There are numerous reports of high VDD prevalence among kidney transplant recipients (17-19), but the high-level evidence for its exact impact on major outcomes (glomerular filtration rate, acute rejection, chronic allograft nephropathy, proteinuria and graft loss) is still lacking, although a systematic review is underway (20). Apart from traditional VDD risk factors (5) (age, race, female gender, geographic latitude, altitude, time of day, winter season, air pollution, and obesity) and preventive reduced sun exposure in transplant recipients, there is also evidence that 25(OH)D levels are inversely associated with the usage of calcineurin inhibitors as immunosuppressants (17). In a recent study, Yildirim et al. (21) found significantly lower vitamin D levels in renal transplant recipients with END compared to patients with normal endothelial function, and conclude that VDD is associated with END in that population. To our knowledge, the only reference to VDD impact on ED in CKD patients is found in an article published in 1977, reporting on improvement of erectile function in dialysis patients after treatment with vitamin D supplements (11).

In our study, we found similar rates of VDD as in previously published studies (17-19). On the summer and winter measurements of 25(OH)D, VDD was present in 42.5% and 62.5% of patients, insufficiency in 30% and 17.5%, while 27.5% and 20% of patients were vitamin D sufficient. As expected, the finding of a higher percent of VDD in winter season was due to seasonal variations in cutaneous production of vitamin D. The Croatia's geographic latitude is between 42[degrees] i 46[degrees] north of the equator, where there is little if any vitamin D produced in skin during winter months, regardless of the amount of sun exposure (5,22). However, the distribution of 25(OH)D levels did not differ between the two measurements (summer median of 22.05 ng/mL versus winter median of 19.05 ng/mL; p=0.737). This could be explained by general sun avoiding in kidney transplant patients, according to their nephrologist recommendation or vitamin D supplementation in some of them. The finding of lower red blood cell and hemoglobin concentrations in VDD patients is in line with the published data on VDD association with anemia in CKD patients. Although the exact mechanism is unknown, VDD may impair erythropoiesis via immune activation within the bone marrow (23).

Out of 40 study patients, only 10 (25%) had no ED (ED 0 group), 20 patients had mild (ED 1) and seven patients mild to moderate ED (ED 2), while three patients had severe ED (ED 4 group). The high presence of ED among our renal transplant recipients is in line with earlier reports of 42% to 78% prevalence in this population (12,24-27). The levels of 25(OH)D and PTH, as well as other study parameters on both measurements did not differ among ED groups. We then compared ED 0 and other ED categories (Table 2) and found no difference in 25(OH)D levels between patients with and without ED. Time on RRT before TX and graft duration until analysis were significantly shorter in non-ED group, but on logistic regression the results proved to be nonsignificant. The association of both shorter RRT time before TX and recently performed TX with better erectile function could be explained by less time on pre-transplant dialysis and better renal function in the early postoperative months.

On stratifying study patients according to 25(OH) D cutoff of 20 ng/mL, we found the distribution of IIEF-5 score to be similar and again nonsignificant for both measurements, which recapitulated our finding of no vitamin D status linkage to ED in the current study. The explanation for this could be based on the multifactorial ED etiology in a population already predisposed to ED, so that pinpointing VDD as an exclusive ED cause is somewhat improbable. Also, radioimmunoassay was a method used for 25(OH)D measurement and with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), which is the gold standard for evaluating 25(OH)D status (5) but currently unavailable to us, reassessment with a larger number of study subjects is needed. As our research was a cross-sectional observational study, future interventional studies with vitamin D supplementation could presumably shed more light on its impact on ED occurrence and severity.

In conclusion, we found no association between vitamin D serum concentration and the presence and severity of ED in renal transplant recipients. To date, there are no similar published data linking VDD and ED in CKD and renal transplant populations. High rates of VDD and ED found in this population should not be considered as a quality-of-life matter only because of the possible and/or proven effects on patient general health via END and CVD.


(1.) Akkus E, Kadioglu A, Esen A, Doran S, Ergen A, Anafarta K, et al. Prevalence and correlates of erectile dysfunction in Turkey: a population-based study. Eur Urol. 2002;41:298-304,

(2.) Chew KK, Earle CM, Stuckey BG, Jamrozik K, Keogh EJ. Erectile dysfunction in general medicine practice: prevalence and clinical correlates. Int J Impot Res. 2000;12:41-5.

(3.) Feldman HA, Goldstein I, Hatzichristou DG, Krane RJ, McKinlay JB. Impotence and its medical and psychosocial correlates: results of the Massachusetts Male Aging Study. J Urol. 1994;151:54-61.

(4.) Dong JY, Zhang YH, Qin LQ. Erectile dysfunction and risk of cardiovascular disease: meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1378-85,

(5.) Hossein-Nezhad A, Holick MF. Vitamin D for health: a global perspective. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88:720-55,

(6.) Hossein-Nezhad A, Spira A, Holick MF. Influence of vitamin D status and vitamin D3 supplementation on genome wide expression of white blood cells: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. PLoS One. 2013;8:e58725,

(7.) Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:1911-30,

(8.) Sorenson M, Grant WB. Does vitamin D deficiency contribute to erectile dysfunction? Dermatoendocrinology. 2012;4:128-36,

(9.) Barassi A, Pezzilli R, Colpi GM, Corsi Romanelli MM, Melzi d'Eril GV. Vitamin D and erectile dysfunction. J Sex Med. 2014;11:2792-800,

(10.) Suzuki E, Nishimatsu H, Oba S, Takahashi M, Homma Y. Chronic kidney disease and erectile dysfunction. World J Nephrol. 2014;3:220-9,

(11.) Massry SG, Goldstein DA, Procci WR, Kletzky OA. Impotence in patients with uremia: a possible role for parathyroid hormone. Nephron. 1977;19:305-10.

(12.) Wang WG, Li P, Wang YS, Wang G, Wang YT, Zhou HL. The effect of erectile dysfunction on quality of life in male kidney transplant recipients. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30:361-5.

(13.) Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Pena BM. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999;11:31926,

(14.) Nassir A. Sexual function in male patients undergoing treatment for renal failure: a prospective view. J Sex Med. 2009;6:3407-14,

(15.) El-Bahnasawy MS, El-Assmy A, Dawood A, Abobieh E, Dein BA, El-Din AB, et al. Effect of the use of internal iliac artery for renal transplantation on penile vascularity and erectile function: a prospective study. J Urol. 2004;172:2335-9,

(16.) Gontero P, Oderda M, Filippini C, Fontana F, Lazzarich E, Stratta P, et al. Does kidney transplantation onto the external iliac artery affect the haemodynamic parameters of the cavernosal arteries? Asian J Androl. 2012;14:621-5,

(17.) Filipov JJ, Zlatkov BK, Dimitrov EP, Svinarov D. Relationship between vitamin D status and immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplant recipients. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2015; 29:331-5,

(18.) Aggarwal M, Sahoo SP, Bhandari HS, Kriplani J, Mithal A. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in post renal transplant patients. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2012;16:274-6,

(19.) Stavroulopoulos A, Cassidy MJ, Porter CJ, Hosking DJ, Roe SD. Vitamin D status in renal transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2007;7:2546-52,

(20.) Hesketh CC, Knoll GA, Molnar AO, Tsampalieros A, Zimmerman DL. Vitamin D and kidney transplant outcomes: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2014;3:64,

(21.) Yildirim T, Yilmaz R, Altindal M, Turkmen E, Arici M, Altun B, et al. Endothelial dysfunction in renal transplant recipients: role of vitamin D and fibroblast growth factor-23. Transplant Proc. 2015;47:343-7,

(22.) Laktasic-Zerjavic N, Korsic M, Crncevic-Orlic Z, Anic B. Vitamin D: vitamin from the past and hormone of the future. Lijec Vjesn. 2011;133:194-204. (in Croatian)

(23.) Santoro D, Caccamo D, Lucisano S, Buemi M, Sebekova K, Teta D, et al. Interplay of vitamin D, erythropoiesis, and the rennin-angiotensin system. Biomed Res Int.2015;2015:145828,

(24.) Espinoza R, Gracida C, Cancino J, Ibarra A. Prevalence of erectile dysfunction in kidney transplant recipients. Transplant Proc. 2006;38:916-7,

(25.) Teng LC, Wang CX, Chen L. Improved erectile function and sex hormone profiles in male Chinese recipients of kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2011;25:265-9,

(26.) Mekki MO, E1 Hassan KA, El Mahdi EM, Haroun HH, Mohammed MA, Khamis KH, et al. Prevalence and associated risk factors of male erectile dysfunction among patients on hemodialysis and kidney transplant recipients: a cross-sectional survey from Sudan. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2013;24:500-6,

(27.) Lasaponara F, Paradiso M, Milan MG, Morabito F, Sedigh O, Graziano ME, et al. Erectile dysfunction after kidney transplantation: our 22 years of experience. Transplant Proc. 2004;36: 502-4,



B. Sudarevic, I. Begic, D. Simunovic, H. Kuvezdic, V. Seric i L. Zibar

Erektilna disfunkcija (ED) je poremecaj visoke ucestalosti u bolesnika nakon transplantacije bubrega. Defi cijencija vitamina D (VDD) je vec ranije povezana s nekoliko rizicnih cimbenika za ED, ali je tek nedavno dovedena u izravnu vezu s ED. U predmetnom smo istrazivanju ispitali je li serumska vrijednost vitamina D povezana s prisutnoscu i jacinom izrazenosti ED u 40 muskih ispitanika u kojih je kadavericna transplantacija bubrega (TX) ucinjena od 2001. do 2013. godine. Serumsko uzorkovanje je ucinjeno u dva sezonski razlicita razdoblja, uz mjerenje koncentracije vitamina D radioimuno testom. Upitnik International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) koristen je za stratifi kaciju bolesnika s obzirom na jacinu ED. Pronasli smo usporedivu ucestalost ED (75%) i VDD (42,5%-62,5%) kao u dosad objavljenim istrazivanjima. Ni u jednom mjerenju nije utvrdena razlika u serumskim vrijednostima 25(OH)D izmedu ispitanika s ED i bez nje (p=0,656 i p=0,914), kao ni medu ispitanicima s razlicito izrazenom ED. Trajanje bubrezne nadomjesne terapije (RRT) prije TX i "trajanje" transplantata do analize bilo je duze za ispitanike s ED (p=0,022 odnosno p=0,05), no samo u univarijatnoj analizi. Zakljucno, nismo pro nasli povezanost izmedu serumske razine 25(OH)D i prisutnosti te jacine izrazenosti ED. Prema nasim spoznajama, dosad nema slicnih objavljenih rezultata za navedenu populaciju bolesnika.

Kljucne rijeci: Vitamin D, nedostatak; Erektilna disfunkcija; Endotel, vaskularni; Bubrezna insufi cijencija, kronicna; Bubreg, transplantacija; Hrvatska

Bojan Sudarevic (1,2), Ivana Begic (3,4), Dalibor Simunovic (1,2), Hrvoje Kuvezdic (1,2), Vatroslav Seric (5,2) and Lada Zibar (3,6)

(1) Department of Urology, Osijek University Hospital Center; (2) School of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek; (3) Department of Dialysis, Clinical Department of Internal Medicine, Osijek University Hospital Center; (4) Department of Physiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek; (5) Department of Clinical Laboratory Diagnosis, Osijek University Hospital Center; (6) Department of Pathophysiology, School of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia

Correspondence to: Assoc. Prof. Lada Zibar, MD, PhD, Department of Dialysis, Clinical Department of Internal Medicine, Osijek University Hospital Center, Josipa Huttlera 4, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia


Received July 14, 2016, accepted October 31, 2016
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of study population (N=40)

                              n (%)

Primary cause of ESRD
Glomerulonephritis            19 (47.5)
Interstitial nephritis         8 (20)
DM                             6 (15)
ADPKD                          5 (12.5)
Arterial hypertension          2 (5)
Immunosuppressive therapy
TAC-based                     20 (50)
CsA-based                     13 (32.5)
mTOR-inhibitor-based           7 (17.5)
TX No.
1st                           36 (90)
2nd                            2 (5)
3rd                            2 (5)
DM                             8 (20)
Angina pectoris/AMI            4 (10)
PAD                            4 (10)
CVI                            0 (0)
Antihypertensives             34 (85)
Statins                       26 (65)
Beta blockers                 25 (62.5)
ACE inhibitors/ARBs           23 (57.5)
Loop diuretics                10 (25)
Vitamin D supplements          7 (17.5)
Erythropoietin                 5 (12.5)
Bisphosphonates                4 (10)

ESRD = end-stage renal disease; ADPKD = autosomal dominant polycystic
kidney disease; TAC = tacrolimus; CsA = cyclosporin; mTOR = mammalian
target of rapamycin; TX = renal transplantation; DM = diabetes
mellitus; AMI = acute myocardial infarction; PAD = peripheral arterial
disease; CVI = cerebrovascular insult; ACE = angiotensin-converting
enzyme; ARBs = angiotensin receptor blockers

Table 2. Comparison of non-ED (ED 0) versus patients with any degree of
ED (both summer and winter measurements)

                  ED 0                    ED 1-4                p-value

n                  10                      30
Age (years)        47.5 (30-61)            54 (29-66)            0.083
IIEF-5 score       24.5 (22-25)            17 (5-21)            <0.001
RRT before         21 (9-95)               47.5 (8-108)          0.022
TX (months)
Graft duration     20.5 (5-81)             35.5 (1-145)          0.05
until analysis
BMI                25.45 (22.7-31.1) (A)   25.15 (21.5-37.8)     0.701
                   26.35 (22.7-31.1)       25.85 (22.2-36.1)     0.914
25(OH)D (ng/mL)    20.99 (6.22-59.62)      22.42 (6.03-67.3)     0.656
                   17.88 (12.1-64.17)      19.86 (3.4-42.3)      0.914
Hgb (g/L)         139.5 (103-151)         129 (88-169)           0.246
                  140.5 (m-165)           135 (80-164)           0.656
Blood glucose       5.7 (4.8-7.2)           5.4 (3.7-19.7)       0.548
(mmol/L)            5.45 (5-6.2)            5.35 (4.8-10.4)      0.678
Creatinine        150 (110-314)           128 (80-483)           0.548
([micro]mol/L)    135 (102-223)           127.5 (88-469)         0.842
hs-CRP (mg/L)       1.45 (0.21-9.77)        2.22 (0.21-27.84)    0.548
                    2.395 (0.41-13.62)      1.665 (0.18-68.62)   0.286
Cholesterol         4.94 (3.6-7.8)          5.305 (2.6-8.1)      0.522
(mmol/L)            5.365 (3.3-7.9)         5.53 (2.6-8.5)       0.862
HDL (mmol/L)        1.18 (0.9-1.6)          1.15 (0.8-2.6)       0.935
                    1.275 (0.9-1.5)         1.235 (0.8-2.7)      0.528
LDL (mmol/L)        3.2 (2.1-5.5)           3.56 (1.5-5.6)       0.706
                    3.605 (1.6-5.7)         4.205 (1.6-5.9)     >0.99
Triglycerides       2 (1.1-6.3)             1.88 (0.7-7.3)       0.544
(mmol/L)            2.185 (1.3-3.8)         1.63 (0.9-7)         0.140
PTH (pg/mL)       120 (33.9-442)          103.1 (35.9-894)       0.469
                  117.85 (39.6-200)        60.3 (13.6-735)       0.469

All data reported as median (range from minimum to maximum); p
calculated using Mann-Whitney test; (A) upper value indicates summer
and lower value winter measurement; ED = erectile dysfunction; IIEF-5 =
International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire; RRT = renal
replacement therapy; TX = renal transplantation; BMI = body mass index;
Hgb = hemoglobin; hs-CRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HDL =
high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; PTH =
parathyroid hormone

Table 3. Comparison of 25(OH)D deficient versus non-deficient patients
(both summer and winter measurements)

                  Summer measurement
25(OH)D           >20 ng/mL            <20 ng/mL             p

n                  23                   17
Age (years)        52 (29-66)           54 (30-66)           0.426
IIEF-5 score       19 (7-25)            18 (5-25)            0.711
RRT before TX      48 (8-105)           29 (9-108)           0.194
Graft duration     33 (1-145)           22 (4-106)           0.298
BMI                25 (22.5-33.4)       25.8 (21.5-37.8)     0.345
25(OH)D (ng/mL)    29.49 (20.71-67.3)    9.11 (6.03-20.27)  <0.001
RBC                 4.9 (3.44-6.19)      4.11 (3.26- 5.04)   0.013
Hgb (g/L)         139 (98-169)         118 (88-150)          0.009
Blood glucose       5.3 (3.7-7.2)        5.8 (4.8-19.7)      0.097
hs-CRP (mg/L)       2.13 (0.22-27.84)    1.51 (0.21-17.06)   0.795
Cholesterol         5.305 (2.9-8.1)      4.94 (2.6-7.8)      0.380
HDL (mmol/L)        1.39 (0.8-2.6)       1.09 (0.8-1.5)      0.007
LDL (mmol/L)        3.56 (2-5.6)         3.25 (1.5-5.5)      0.865
Triglycerides       1.675 (0.7-7.3)      2.13 (0.8-6.3)      0.149
PTH (pg/mL)       109 (36.5-379)       113 (33.9-894)        0.924

                  Winter measurement
25(OH)D           >20 ng/mL           <20 ng/mL             p

n                  15                  25
Age (years)        54 (31-64)          49 (29-66)           0.401
IIEF-5 score       18 (7-24)           19 (5-25)            0.280
RRT before TX      46 (8-103)          44 (9-108)           0.748
Graft duration     28 (1-145)          34 (4-137)           0.716
BMI                26.2 (22.2-34)      25.7 (22.6-36.1)     0.791
25(OH)D (ng/mL)    35 (21.35-64.17)    16.2 (3.4-20.3)     <0.001
RBC                 5 (4.17-6.71)       4.65 (2.89-6.2)     0.083
Hgb (g/L)         143 (115-151)       133 (80-165)          0.065
Blood glucose       5.6 (4.8-10.4)      5.4 (4.8-7.9)       0.433
hs-CRP (mg/L)       2.81 (0.71-9.78)    1.85 (0.18-68.62)   0.356
Cholesterol         5.66 (3.8-8.5)      5.335 (2.6-7.9)     0.212
HDL (mmol/L)        1.45 (0.9-2.7)      1.16 (0.8-1.9)      0.016
LDL (mmol/L)        3.82 (2.4-5.9)      3.65 (1.6-5.7)      0.557
Triglycerides       1.42 (0.9-3.6)      2.02 (1.1-7)        0.209
PTH (pg/mL)        43 (13.6-162)      126 (21-735)          0.009

All data reported as median (range from minimum to maximum); p
calculated using Mann-Whitney test; IIEF-5 = International Index of
Erectile Function questionnaire; RRT = renal replacement therapy; TX =
renal transplantation; BMI = body mass index; RBC = red blood cell; Hgb
= hemoglobin; hs-CRP = high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HDL =
high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; PTH =
parathyroid hormone
COPYRIGHT 2017 Klinicki bolnicki centar Sestre milosrdnice
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2017 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Original Scientific Paper
Author:Sudarevic, Bojan; Begic, Ivana; Simunovic, Dalibor; Kuvezdic, Hrvoje; Seric, Vatroslav; Zibar, Lada
Publication:Acta Clinica Croatica
Article Type:Obituary
Geographic Code:4EXCR
Date:Jun 1, 2017
Previous Article:On notable books in our history.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters