Printer Friendly

V[O.sub.2] off transient kinetics in extreme intensity swimming.


Oxygen uptake (V[O.sub.2]) kinetics has been analyzed through mathematical modeling of the constant-load exercise onset and offset V[O.sub.2] response. This response profile appears to be of an exponential nature, which could indicate first or second order kinetics operations (DiMenna and Jones, 2009). This analysis has shown that V[O.sub.2] exponentially increases at the onset of moderate exercise with constant power output (on-fast component), reaches a steady state, and rapidly decreases at the offset of moderate exercise (off-fast component) (Kilding et al., 2006; Ozyener et al., 2001; Paterson and Whipp, 1991; Scheuermann et al., 2001). First-order kinetics mandates on/off symmetry, which means that the change in V[O.sub.2] occurring when the contractile activity is ceased must be a mirror image of that which occurred when it was commenced (Rossiter et al., 2005). In the heavy intensity exercise, i.e., at intensities greater than the anaerobic threshold but below the maximal V[O.sub.2], an delayed increase (on-slow component) after the on-fast component is presented (Barstow and Mole, 1991; Barstow et al., 1996; Ozyener et al., 2001; Paterson and Whipp, 1991; Scheuermann et al., 2001), but at the offset only an off-fast component is developed (Ozyener et al., 2001; Scheuermann et al., 2001). At the severe exercise intensity, which is significantly above the anaerobic threshold, and neither V[O.sub.2] nor blood lactate levels can be stabilized (Poole et al., 1988), the on-transient V[O.sub.2] kinetics is reverted to a single-exponential profile (Ozyener et al., 2001), while the off-transient kinetics is retained for a two-component form (Dupond et al., 2010; Ozyener et al., 2001). At the highest intensity--extreme exercise leading to exhaustion before maximal oxygen uptake is attained (DiMenna and Jones, 2009; Hill et al., 2002)--, the V[O.sub.2] on-kinetics response is characterized by the development of an evident fast component, being the slow component phenomenon not developed (Burnley and Jones, 2007; Figueiredo et al., 2011; Whipp, 1994). This area of intensity was recently described (Hill et al., 2002), and, to the best of our knowledge, the V[O.sub.2] off-kinetic profile has never been studied at this particular intensity.

V[O.sub.2] assessment has been carried out mainly in well controlled environments, particularly in exercise laboratories, and the number of studies conducted in field is very scarce (Billat et al., 2002; Fernandes et al., 2008). In fact, the V[O.sub.2] off-transient kinetics is documented in constant-load exercise performed from the moderate to severe intensities. Nevertheless, studies that aim to model the V[O.sub.2] recovery kinetics at extreme intensity exercise were not yet conducted in swimming. In this sense, the purpose of this study is to characterize the V[O.sub.2] off-transient kinetics, examining also the on/off symmetry, during a 200-m front crawl maximal effort performed at extreme intensity. It was hypothesized that an on/off symmetry of the V[O.sub.2] kinetics response would be preserved, although the post-exercise V[O.sub.2] did not match the O2 deficit.



Eight highly trained male swimmers volunteered to participate in the study. The participants provided informed written consent before data collection, which was approved by the local ethics committee and was performed according to the declaration of Helsinki. Their mean performance for long course 200-m freestyle was 109.3 [+ or -] 2.0 s, corresponding to 90.3 [+ or -] 3.2% of the 2009 world record for this event. This sample included a finalist and five participants at the European Championships. Individual and mean ([+ or -] SD) values for subjects' main physical and performance characteristics were: age (21.8 [+ or -] 2.4 years), height (184.5 [+ or -] 6.2 cm), body mass (76.1 [+ or -] 6.5 kg), fat mass (10.4 [+ or -] 1.7%) and lean body mass (62.4 [+ or -] 4.4%).

Data collection

In an indoor 25-m swimming pool, with a water temperature of 27[degrees]C, each swimmer performed a 200-m front crawl effort at maximal speed. In water starts and open turns, without underwater gliding, were used. Each swimmer performed a 200-m front crawl maximal effort, according to his best individual 200-m performance and his own experiences, and was encouraged to swim at his best effort; therefore, no visual or acoustic pacing was implemented. V[O.sub.2] kinetics was measured using a telemetric portable gas analyzer ([K4b.sup.2], Cosmed, Italy), which was connected to the swimmer by a low hydrodynamic resistance respiratory snorkel and valve system (Keskinen et al., 2003; Rodriguez et al., 2008), and was calibrated before and after each test. Respiratory variables were continuously monitored after the 200-m effort until baseline V[O.sub.2] values were obtained (after approximately 12 min of recovery the assessment was ended). Swimmers were advised to use continuous rhythmical breathing during swimming, turning and in the recovery period. Expired gas concentrations were measured breath-by-breath and averaged every 5 s for a better temporal resolution (Sousa et al., 2010) in order to reduce inter breath fluctuations ("noise"). Peak oxygen uptake (V[O.sub.2peak]) was considered as the highest value of this sampling interval.

Data analysis

The following equation was used to fit V[O.sub.2] kinetics on the on-transient period:


where t is the time, [V.sub.b] is the oxygen uptake at the start of the exercise (mL x [kg.sup.-1] x [min.sup.-1]), [A.sub.on] is the amplitude of the fast component (mL x [kg.sup.-1] x [min.sup.-1]), [TD.sub.on] is the time for the onset of the fast component (s) and [[tau].sub.on] stands for the time constant of the fast component, i.e., the time to reach 63% of the plateau of this phase during which physiological adaptations adjust to meet the increased metabolic demand. The cardiodynamic phase was not taken into consideration due to its amplitude insignificant value. The inexistence of a slow component was confirmed by the rigid intervals method, particularly by the difference between the last V[O.sub.2] measurement of the exercise and the value measured in the final 5 s of the 200-m event adapted from Fernandes et al., 2003; Koppo and Bouckaert, 2002).

For the off-transient period, the individual responses were fitted by using both a single (equation 2) and a double exponential (equation 3) regression models for the entire recovery period, in which the exponential term started at the beginning of the off-transient period modeling ([TD.sub.1off] in the equations):


where t is the time, [] represents the amplitude for the exponential term and the [[tau]] and [] are the associated time constant and time delay. A nonlinear least squares method was implemented in MatLab for the adjustment of these functions to V[O.sub.2] data.

After a visual exploratory inspection of all V[O.sub.2] curves, and for the sake of numerical stability, it was verified that, due to the extreme exercise intensity in which the 200-m held, all swimmers started the recovery period immediately after the 200-m effort. In this sense and assuming that [TD.sub.1off]=0, the off-transient period was modeled according to the restructure equations:



Statistical analysis

For the entire sample, mean and SD computations for descriptive analysis were obtained for all variables and for the entire group of subjects, and were checked for distribution normality with the Shapiro-Wilk test. All statistical procedures were conducted with SPSS 10.05. An F-test was used to compare the single and double exponential regression models best fitting. To compare on- and off-transient parameters Paired sample T-tests were used. Simple linear regression and Pearson's correlation coefficient were computed to indicate the linear relationship between parameters and with swimming time. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.


The F-test (0.28) showed the homogeneity of both models variances, confirmed also by the equality of their mean values (p=0.98), and therefore, the off-transient response was well described by a single exponential function. In fact, this characterization was not improved by using the double exponential model. In this sense, the on- and off-transient periods are symmetrical in shape (mirror image) once they were adequately fitted by single-exponential functions. An example of the oxygen ([O.sub.2]) uptake on and off kinetics curve is shown in Figure 1.

The mean ([+ or -] SD) values for swimming speed ([200.sub.speed]), V[O.sub.2peak], [A.sub.on], [TD.sub.on], [[tau].sub.on] and [] and [[tau]] for the 200-m front crawl effort and recovery period are presented in Table 1.

Significant differences were obtained between the on- and off- V[O.sub.2] kinetic parameters (all for p<0.01), and its amplitude was higher in the recovery period. Complementarily to the above referred data, direct relationships were observed between [[tau]] and [200.sub.speed] (r = 0.77, p = 0.02), [[tau]] and V[O.sub.2peak] (r = 0.76, p = 0.03) and [[tau]] and [A.sub.on] (r = 0.72, p = 0.04) (see Figure 2). No significant correlations were found between V[O.sub.2peak] and the other V[O.sub.2] off-transient parameters ([], r = 0.35, for p > 0.05). The absences of significant relationships were also observed between [[tau].sub.on] and [[tau]] (r = 0.19) and [A.sub.on] and [] (r = 0.5), all with p > 0.05.



The aim of this study was to characterize the V[O.sub.2] off-transient kinetics and to examine the on/off symmetry during a self-imposed 200-m swimming at race pace. We tested the hypothesis that the V[O.sub.2] kinetics response will manifest a symmetric on/off response, even if the post-exercise V[O.sub.2] does not match the [O.sub.2] deficit.

An understanding of the V[O.sub.2] kinetics is considered an important parameter to improve sports training methodology and increase performance in sport (Billat et al., 2001). Furthermore, it was recently suggested that the determinants of exercise tolerance and the limitations to sports performance can be better understood through an appreciation of the physiological significance of the fast and slow components of the dynamic V[O.sub.2] response to exercise (Burnley and Jones, 2007). For a long time, studies regarding [O.sub.2] uptake assessment in swimming were conducted with either Douglas bags (di Prampero et al., 1974; Lavoie and Montpetit, 1986) or mixing chamber gas analyzers (Dal Monte et al., 1994; Demarie et al., 2001). It was only recently that the development of a swimming snorkel suitable for breath-by-breath analysis (Keskinen et al., 2003; Rodriguez et al., 2008) allowed assessing V[O.sub.2] dynamics in swimming pool conditions through direct oxymetry (Fernandes et al., 2003; Rodriguez et al., 2003). Nevertheless, in the [O.sub.2] uptake kinetics related literature, studies that aimed to characterize it in human non-constant load extreme intensity exercises are very scarce. Moreover, among these studies, only Rodriguez and Mader (2003), Rodriguez et al. (2003), and Silva et al. (2006) implemented a swimming effort at intensities similar to our protocol.

Considering the total sample, V[O.sub.2]peak ranged from 60.2 to 81.8 ml x [kg.sup.-1] x [min.sup.-1], which is in accordance with recently reported data obtained in trained male competitive swimmers performing during swimming in pool conditions (Fernandes et al., 2008; Figueiredo et al., 2011; Reis et al., 2010; Rodriguez and Mader, 2003; Rodriguez et al., 2003; Silva et al., 2006).


Symmetry between the on- and off-transient phases: Since symmetry is an essential quality of V[O.sub.2] kinetic dynamics viewed as a first-order reaction kinetics (Rossiter et al., 2005), it was a focus of interest in the present study. The on/off symmetry of the fast components has been observed for the moderate intensity exercise domain performed in cycle ergometer (Paterson and Whipp, 1991; 0zyener et al., 2001; Scheuermann et al., 2001) and treadmill running (Kilding et al., 2006). For the heavy intensity exercise, an asymmetry in the V[O.sub.2] dynamics has been reported, describing an on-fast component and an off-fast and off-slow components at cycle ergometer (0zyener et al., 2001) and knee extensor exercise (Rossiter et al., 2002). This asymmetry was also reported for severe exercise intensity, namely in indoor running (Dupond et al., 2010) and cycle ergometer (Ozyener et al., 2001). In contrast, in the present study the on- and off-transient phases were symmetrical, once they were adequately fitted by a single exponential function, compared to the double exponential one, and no slow component for the V[O.sub.2] response was developed (see Figure 1). Nonetheless the above referred studies, the symmetry observed in the present study can be explained by the implementation of a non-constant load, and to the greater exercise intensity. As expected, we observed only an on-fast component, since the non-constant load at freely-chosen maximal race pace induced an exponential rise in V[O.sub.2] kinetics that unable the development of a V[O.sub.2] slow component; this fact was previously mentioned but only for ergometer exercise (Burnley and Jones, 2007; Whipp, 1994).

On/off kinetic parameters: Although an on/off symmetry in the V[O.sub.2] kinetic response was observed in this extreme intensity exercise lasting 2.7 min on average, differences between the V[O.sub.2] on- and off-transient kinetic parameters were observed. In fact, greater [] and [[tau]] values are reported. This last parameter is a major focus of interest in the V[O.sub.2] kinetic related literature, once it is a determinant factor in V[O.sub.2] dynamics. A longer [[tau]] value, as observed in this study, concur with previous data obtained in the heavy exercise domain (Cleuziou et al., 2004; Yano et al., 2007); however, other studies reported the opposite behavior for the same exercise intensity (Engelen et al., 1996; Ozyener et al., 2001; Scheuermann et al., 2001), as well as for the moderate domain (Patterson and Whipp, 1991). At the severe exercise intensity, Billat et al. (2002) and 0zyener et al. (2001) reported no differences in t regarding on and off fast periods. In addition, the obtained [[tau]] mean value was greater than the results reported in the literature for both moderate (Cleuziou et al., 2004; Kilding et al., 2006; Rossiter et al., 2002; Takayoshi et al., 2003), heavy (Rossiter et al., 2002) and severe intensities (Perrey et al., 2002).

However, as suggest, when we compared our data with studies using a double exponential fitting approach, [[tau]] was shorter comparing to [[tau]] of the slow component during heavy (Cleuziou et al., 2004) and severe intensity exercise (Dupond et al., 2010). As previously stated, the present study reported a symmetry on the on/off V[O.sub.2] kinetic response; however differences between the on- and off- V[O.sub.2] kinetic related parameters were found.

In fact, V[O.sub.2] kinetics is influenced by endurance training, being reported a faster V[O.sub.2] on-kinetics in trained subjects involved both in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies (Casaburi et al., 1987; Koppo et al., 2004; Murias et al., 2010; Phillips et al., 1995). Indeed, training seems to change the muscle fiber-type characteristics, mitochondrial density, oxidative enzyme activity, oxygen availability, capillary density and muscle perfusion (Koppo et al., 2004), existing evident differences between trained and untrained subjects. Although this study did not have the intention to investigate this phenomenon, the mean swimming speed was very high since the onset of the effort, which may induced a faster increase in ATP requirements, and a fast lactate accumulation, once a pattern of type I/II muscle fiber contribution seems to be established without delay (Cunningham et al., 2000). These facts (and being the off-set fast component explained by the restore of [O.sub.2] in blood and in muscle, a significant lactate removal, and by the resynthesis of ATP and PCr) may induce discernible slower responses during the recovery period. Hence, the oxygen debt must be larger than the oxygen deficit, i.e., the post-exercise V[O.sub.2] quantitatively did not match the [O.sub.2] deficit (Yano et al., 2007). In fact, since different pacing strategies were adopted during the maximal 200-m, different V[O.sub.2] on kinetics may occurred, which influenced the V[O.sub.2] response in the recovery period. This is a limitation of the current study comparing to constant pace researches.

Regarding the V[O.sub.2] amplitude, the greater observed [] mean value (comparing to [A.sub.on]) is not in accordance with the results reported for moderate and heavy intensities (Cleuziou et al., 2004), and for the severe intensity exercise (Perrey et al., 2002), that showed no significant differences between the [A.sub.on] and [] mean values. In our study, the greater values of [] may be a result of the extreme exercise intensity in which our study was conducted, different modeling procedures that were used, as also mode of exercise performed. At this exercise intensity, in which highest work rates are observed, the V[O.sub.2] mean value is high even until the end of the effort. Once the [] represents the difference between the V[O.sub.2] at the end of the exercise and the steady state V[O.sub.2], the greater [] mean value seems justified.

Once the [] was assumed to be zero, in result of the sudden and instantaneous diminishing of V[O.sub.2], comparisons with previously reported data obtained for the moderate (Cleuziou et al., 2004) and heavy intensities domains (Billat et al., 2002) are difficult to establish. However, Takayoshi et al. (2003) reported low [] mean values (1, 2 s) for the moderate exercise intensity domain. Moreover, and contrasting the results of the present study, Perrey et al. (2002) found no differences between the [TD.sub.on] and [] mean values at severe intensity.

Relationship between V[O.sub.2] kinetics on/off-transient phases and performance: The observed direct relationship between [[tau]] and [200.sub.speed] evidences that the swimmers who performed a faster 200-m, needed more time to attained a V[O.sub.2] steady state in the off-transient phase; in addition, these swimmers presented greater V[O.sub.2]peak and [A.sub.on] mean values. These facts seem to evidence one more time that the very high swimming speed just after the beginning of the effort led to greater V[O.sub.2]peak and [A.sub.on] mean values, increasing both the need for a higher energy supply and the accumulation of fatigue-related metabolites, slowing the recovery phase. Indeed, the 200-m performance is strongly related to the [[tau]], which seems to be also a good predictor of V[O.sub.2]peak and [A.sub.on]. However, these data should be seen with precaution, once other factors might explain the performance variability in this specific distance.


No slow component for the V[O.sub.2] off-kinetics was developed in the all-out 200-m swims, and the on and off-transient phases were symmetrical once they were adequately fitted by a single-exponential function. However, [] and [[tau]] mean values were greater comparing to the respective on-transients parameters. The V[O.sub.2]peak and [200.sub.speed] mean values positively correlated with [[tau]], as this with [A.sub.on], not being observed any more correlations between any of the studied on/off-transient kinetic parameters. Accepting that the overall understanding of the V[O.sub.2] kinetics implies the address of other research areas, future experiments are welcome to understand the underlying mechanism regarding this V[O.sub.2] dynamic behavior.

Key points

* The V[O.sub.2] slow component was not observed in the recovery period of swimming extreme efforts;

* The on and off transient periods were better fitted by a single exponential function, and so, these effort and recovery periods of swimming extreme efforts are symmetrical;

* The rate of V[O.sub.2] decline during the recovery period may be due to not only the magnitude of oxygen debt but also the V[O.sub.2]peak obtained during the effort period.


This study was supported by grant: PTDC/DES/101224/2008 (FC0MP01-0124-FEDER-009577).

Received: 18 April 2011 / Accepted: 20 July 2011 / Published (online): 01 September 2011


Barstow, T. and Mole, P. (1991) Linear and nonlinear characteristics of oxygen uptake kinetics during heavy exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology 71(6), 2099-2106.

Barstow, T., Jones, A., Nguyen, P. and Casaburi, R. (1996) Influence of muscle fiber type and pedal frequency on oxygen uptake kinetics of heavy exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology 81(4), 1642-1650.

Billat, V., Hamard, L. and Koralsztein, JP. (2002) The influence of exercise duration of the V[O.sub.2]max on the off-transient pulmonary oxygen uptake phase during high intensity running activity. Archives of Physiology and Biochemistry 110(5), 383-392.

Billat, VL. (2001) Interval training for performance: A scientific and empirical practice. Special recommendations for middle and long distance running. Part I: Aerobic interval training. Sports Medicine 31(1), 13-31.

Burnley, M. and Jones, A. (2007) 0xygen uptake kinetics as a determinant of sports performance. European Journal of Sport Science 7(2), 63-79.

Casaburi, R., Storer, TW., Ben-Dov, I. and Wasserman, K. (1987) Effect of endurance training on possible determinants of V[O.sub.2] during heavy exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology 62(1), 199-207.

Cleuziou, C., Perrey, S., Borrani, F., Lecoq, A., Candau, R., Courteix, D. and 0bert, P. (2004) Dynamic responses of oxygen uptake and end of moderate and heavy exercise in trained subjects. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology 29(1), 32-44.

Cleuziou, C., Perrey, S., Lecoq, M., Candau, R., Courteix, D. and Obert, P. (2005) Oxygen uptake kinetics during moderate and heavy intensity exercise in humans: the influence of hypoxia and training status. International Journal of Sports Medicine 26(5), 356-62

Cunningham, D., Croix, D., 0zyener, J. and Whipp, B. (2000) The off transient pulmonary oxygen uptake (V[O.sub.2]) kinetics following attainment of a particular V[O.sub.2] during heavy-intensity exercise in humans. Experimental Physiology 85, 339-347.

Dal Monte, A., Sardelle, F., Alippi, B., Faina, M. and Manetta, A. (1994) Anew respiratory valve system for measuring oxygen uptake during swimming. European Journal of Applied Physiology 69(2), 159-162.

Demarie, S., Sardella, F., Billat, V., Magini, W. and Faina, M. (2001) The V[O.sub.2] slow component in swimming. European Journal of Applied Physiology 84(1-2), 95-99.

DiMenn,a FJ. and Jones, A. (2009) "Linear" versus "Nonlinear" V[O.sub.2] responses to exercise: reshaping traditional beliefs. Journal of Exercise and Science Fitness 7(2), 67-84.

Di Prampero, P.E., Pendergast, D.R., Wilson, D.W. and Rennie, D.W. (1974) Energetics of swimming in man. Journal of Applied Physiology 37(1), 1-5.

Dupond, G., McCall, A., Prieur, F., Millet, G. and Berthoin, S. (2010) Faster oxygen uptake kinetics during recovery is related to better repeated sprinting ability. European Journal of Applied Physiology 110, 627-634.

Engelen, M., Porszasz, J., Riley, M., Wasserman, K., Maehara, K. and Barstow, T. (1996) Effects of hypoxic hypoxica on [O.sub.2] uptake and heart rate kinetics during heavy exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology 81, 2500-2508.

Fernandes, RJ., Cardoso, CS., Soares, SM., Ascensao, A., Colaco, P. and Vilas-Boas, JP. (2003) Time limit and V[O.sub.2] slow component at intensities corresponding to V[O.sub.2]max in swimmers. International Journal of Sports Medicine 24(8), 576-581.

Fernandes, R., Keskinen, K., Colaco, P., Querido, A., Machado, L., Morais, P., Novais, D., Marinho, D. and Vilas Boas, JP. (2008) Time limit at V[O.sub.2]max velocity in elite crawl swimmers. International Journal of Sports Medicine 29, 145-150.

Fernandes, R., Sousa, A., Figueiredo, P., Keskinen, K., Rodriguez, F., Machado, L. and Vilas-Boas, J. (2011) Modeling off-transient oxygen uptake kinetics after maximal 200-m swims, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 43(5), S264.

Figueiredo, P., Zamparo, P., Sousa, A., Vilas Boas, J.P. and Fernandes, R. (2011) An energy balance of the 200 m front crawl race. European Journal of Applied Physiology 111, 767-777.

Hill, D.W., Poole, D.C. and Smith, C. (2002) The relationship between power and the time to achieve V[O.sub.2]max. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 34, 709-714.

Keskinen, K., Rodriguez, 0. and Keskinen, O. (2003) Respiratory snorkel and valve system for breath-by-breath gas analysis in swimming. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sport 13(5), 322-329.

Kilding, A., Winter, EM. and Fish, M. (2006) A comparison of pulmonary oxygen uptake kinetics in Middle- and Long-Distance Runners. International Journal of Sports Medicine 27(5), 419-426

Koga, S., Shiojiri, T. and Kondo, N. (2005) Measuring V[O.sub.2] kinetics: The practicalities. In: Oxygen Uptake Kinetics in Sport, Exercise and Medicine. Eds: Jones, A.M. and Poole, D.C. Routledge, London & New York: 39-61.

Koppo, K. and Bouckaert, J. (2002) The decrease in the V[O.sub.2] slow component induced by prior exercise does not affect the time to exhaustion. International Journal of Sports Medicine 23, 262-267

Koppo. K., Bouckaert, J. and Jones, AM, (2004) Effects of training status and exercise intensity on phase II V[O.sub.2] kinetics. Medicine and Science in Sport and Exercise 36(2), 225-232.

Lavoie, J.M. and Montpetit, R.R. (1986) Applied physiology of swimming. Sports Medicine 3(3), 165-189.

Murias, J.M., Kowalchuck, J.M. and Paterson, D.H. (2010) Speeding of V[O.sub.2] kinetics with endurance training in old and young men is associated with improved matching of local [O.sub.2] delivery to muscle [O.sub.2] oxygenation. Journal of Applied Physiology 108(4), 913-922

Ozyener, F., Rossiter, H., Ward, S. and Whipp, B. (2001) Influence of exercise intensity on the on and off-transient kinetics of pulmonary oxygen uptake in humans. Journal of Physiology 533(3), 891-902.

Paterson, D. and Whipp, B. (1991) Asymmetries of oxygen uptake transients at the on- and offset of heavy exercise in humans. Journal of Physiology 443, 575-586.

Perrey, S., Candau, R., Borrani, F., Millet, G. and Rouillon, J. (2002) Recovery kinetics of oxygen uptake following severe-intensity exercise in runners. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 42(4), 381-388.

Phillips, S.M., Green, H.J., MacDonald, M.J. and Hughson, R.L. (1995) Progressive effect of endurance training on V[O.sub.2] kinetics at the onset of submaximal exercise. Journal of Applied Physiology 79(6), 1914-1920.

Poole, D.C., Ward, S.A., Gardner, G.W. and Whipp, B.J. (1988) Metabolic and respiratory profile of the upper limit for prolonged exercise in man. Ergonomics 31, 1265-1279.

Reis, V., Marinho, D., Policarpo, F., Carneiro, A., Baldari, C. and Silva, A. (2010). Examining the accumulated oxygen deficit method in front crawl swimming. International Journal of Sports Medicine 31(6), 421-427.

Rodriguez, F. and Mader, A. (2003) Energy metabolism during 400m and 100m crawl swimming: computer simulation based on free swimming measurement. In: IX Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming. Eds: Chatard, J.E. Publications de l'Universite de Saint-Etienne: 373-378.

Rodriguez, F.A., Keskinen, K.L., Keskinen, 0.P. and Malvela, M. (2003) Oxygen uptake kinetics during free swimming: a pilot study. In: IX Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming Eds: Chatard, J. E. Publications de l'Universite de Saint-Etienne: 379-384.

Rodriguez, F.A., Keskinen, K.L., Kusch, M. and Hoffmann, U. (2008) Validity of a swimming snorkel for metabolic testing. International Journal of Sports Medicine 29(2), 120-128.

Rodriguez, F.A. (2000) Maximal oxygen uptake and cardiorespiratory response to maximal 400-m free swimming, running and cycling tests in competitive swimmers. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness 40(2), 87-95.

Rossiter, H.B., Howe, F.A. and Ward, S.A. (2005) Intramuscular phosphate and pulmonary V[O.sub.2] kinetics during exercise: implications for control of skeletal muscle oxygen consumption. In: Oxygen Uptake Kinetics in Sport, Exercise and Medicine. Eds: Jones, A.M. and Poole, D.C. Routledge, London & New York: 154-184

Rossiter, H., Ward, S., Kowalchuk, J., Howes, F., Griffiths, J. and Whipp, J. (2002) Dynamic asymmetry of phosphocreatine concentration and [O.sub.2] uptake between the on- and off-transients of moderate and high-intensity exercise in humans. Journal of Physiology 541(3), 991-1002.

Scheuermann, B., Hoelting, B., Noble, M. and Barstow, T. (2001) The slow component of [O.sub.2] uptake is not accompanied by changes in muscle EMG during repeated bouts of heavy exercise in human. Journal of Physiology 531, 245-256.

Short, K. and Sedlock, D. (1997) Excess post exercise oxygen consumption and recovery rate in trained and untrained subjects. Journal of Applied Physiology 83(1), 153-159.

Silva, A., Reis, V., Reis, A., Garrido, N., Moreira, A., and Carneiro, A. (2006) Associations between energy release and performance in a supramaximal effort of 200-m in crawl. Portuguese Journal of Sport Science 6(Suppl.1), 59-60.

Sousa, A., Figueiredo, P., 0liveira, N., Keskinen, K., Vilas-Boas, J.P. and Fernandes, R. (2010). Comparison between V[O.sub.2]peak and V[O.sub.2]max at different time intervals. Open Sport Science Journal 3, 22-24.

Takayohi, Y., Yamamoto, K., Naka, T. and Udo, M. (2003) Cardiac output and oxygen uptake kinetics at the onset and offset of exercise. Journal of Thermal Biology 18(5-6), 609-615.

Whipp, B. (1994) The slow component of [O.sub.2] uptake kinetics during heavy exercise. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 26, 1319-1326.

Yano, T., Yunoki, T., Matsura, R., Arimitsu, R. and Kimura, T. (2007) Excessive 0xygen Uptake during Exercise and Recovery in Heavy Exercise. Physiology Research 56, 721-725.



FCT research assistant. Sport Sciences PhD student. Collaborator of the Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport.


MSc on Sport Sciences.

Research interests

Physiology applied to swimming, swimming training.




FCT research assistant. Sport Sciences PhD student. Collaborator of the Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport.


Graduation on Sport Sciences.

Research interests

Biomechanics and physiology applied to swimming, triathlon training.




Executive Director at Finnish Society of Sport Sciences. Professor, Researcher, Lecturer at University of Jyvaskyla. Degree


Research interests

Physiological evaluation applied to swimming.




Medical Doctor at the Department of Health and Applied Sciences of the University of Barcelona.



Research interests

Physiological evaluation applied to swimming.




Auxiliary Professor at the Porto University. Member of Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport.



Research interests

Mathematical approach applied to swimming.




Full Professor, Head of the Biomechanics Lab at the Porto University. Member of the Scientific Committee of Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport.


PhD on Sport Sciences.

Research interests

Biomechanics, exercise physiology applied to swimming.




Auxiliary Professor, Head of the Swimming Department at the Porto University. Member of Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport.


PhD on Sport Sciences.

Research interests

Swimming biophysical characterization specially centered on the availability and use of energy.


Ana Sousa (1), Pedro Figueiredo (1), Kari L. Keskinen (2), Ferran A. Rodriguez (3), Leandro Machado (1), Joao P. Vilas-Boas (1), Ricardo J. Fernandes (1) [mail]

(1) Centre of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Portugal,

(2) Finnish Society of Sport Sciences, Finland, 3 National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia (INEFC), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

[mail] Ricardo J. Fernandes

Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Rua Placido Costa, 91, 4200, Portugal
Table 1. Individual, mean ([+ or -] SD) values, coefficient of
variation and confidence interval for mean for [200.sub.speed],
V[0.sub.2peak], [A.sub.on], [TD.sub.on] and [[tau].sub.on],
[] and [[tau]] in the 200-m maximal effort and
recovery period.

     Swimmer         [200.sub.speed]      V[O.sub.2peak]
                     (m x [s.sup.-1])   (mL x [kg.sup.-1] x

        #1                 1.40                68.4
        #2                 1.36                60.2
        #3                 1.44                67.4
        #4                 1.42                70.7
        #5                 1.49                81.8
        #6                 1.42                70.1
        #7                 1.42                63.7
        #8                 1.47                69.0

Mean ([+ or -] SD)      1.42 (.04)          69.0 (6.3)
     CV mean              2.81%                9.13%
     CI mean            1.39-1.46            63.7-74.3

     Swimmer             [A.sub.on]        [TD.sub.on]   [[tau].sub.on]
                     (mL x [kg.sup.-1] x       (s)            (s)

        #1                  49.6              10.00           6.21
        #2                  38.6              4.99           12.04
        #3                  44.9              3.98           13.28
        #4                  44.5              4.99            9.31
        #5                  52.0              5.00           12.43
        #6                  45.4              4.99           11.56
        #7                  46.9              4.99            9.17
        #8                  50.2              4.99           13.41

Mean ([+ or -] SD)       46.5 (4.2)        5.49 (1.85)    10.92 (2.49)
     CV mean                9.05%            33.69%          22.84%
     CI mean              43.0-50.0         3.93-7.04      8.84-13.01

     Swimmer            []      [[tau]]
                     (mL x [kg.sup.-1]         (s)
                      x [min.sup.-1])

        #1                 54.4               62.22
        #2                 41.2               49.38
        #3                 41.5               55.14
        #4                 54.8               73.13
        #5                 50.1               94.04
        #6                 49.3               84.36
        #7                 42.2               73.90
        #8                 62.3               86.23

Mean ([+ or -] SD)      49.5 (7.56)       72.30(15.75)
     CV mean              15.27%             21.78%
     CI mean             43.2-55.8         59.13-85.46

[200.sub.speed] = mean swimming speed of the 200-m; V[O.sub.2peak] =
peak oxygen uptake; [A.sub.on] = amplitude of the fast component in
the 200-m maximal effort; [TD.sub.on] = time of the onset of the fast
component in the 200-m maximal effort; [[tau].sub.on] = time constant
of the fast component in the 200-m maximal effort; [] =
amplitude of the fast component in the 200-m recovery period;
[[tau]] = time constant of the fast component in the 200-m
recovery period; CV = coefficient of variation; CI = confidence
COPYRIGHT 2011 Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2011 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Research article
Author:Sousa, Ana; Figueiredo, Pedro; Keskinen, Kari L.; Rodriguez, Ferran A.; Machado, Leandro; Vilas-Boas
Publication:Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Article Type:Report
Geographic Code:4EUSP
Date:Sep 1, 2011
Previous Article:Physiological responses to on-court vs running interval training in competitive tennis players.
Next Article:Attitudes of medical students, clinicians and sports scientists towards exercise counselling.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2018 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters