Printer Friendly

Utah court upholds atheist's prayer before council meetings. (Around the States).

The Utah Supreme Court ruled in early April that a city council violated the state's constitution when it prevented an atheist's invocation before one of its meetings.

The struggle between Murray, a suburb of Salt Lake City, and Tom Snyder erupted in 1994, when Snyder sought to offer a prayer to "Our MOTHER, who art in heaven (if, indeed there is a heaven and if there is a god that takes a woman's form)."

The city council derided Snyder's offer, saying it was not a prayer. A state district judge agreed and dismissed Snyder's suit. The Utah Supreme Court, however, ruled that Snyder's offering was indeed a prayer that had been rejected by the council solely because of its content.

Citing state legal precedent, Utah's high court wrote that the council's practice of permitting prayers before their meetings could only survive a constitutional challenge if that practice was done on a nondiscriminatory basis and "equally accessible to all."

The court ruled 4-1 that the Murray City Council's practice of allowing prayer before its meetings was carried out in a discriminatory manner, especially in Snyder's case.

"If Murray City chooses to continue to open its city council meetings with prayer, it must strictly adhere to the neutrality requirements ...," the court concluded. "Under those neutrality requirements, Snyder should be allowed to offer his prayer."

In late March, a similar dispute erupted surrounding an atheist's invocation before a Charleston, S.C., city council meeting.

Seven of the 12-member council walked out of a meeting when local college professor Herb Silverman arose to give a secular invocation. Wendell Gilliard, one of the council members, defended his action, telling the Charleston Post and Courier that, "He can worship a chicken if he wants to, but I'm not going to be around when he does it."

Responded Silverman, "Discrimination against nonbelievers is the last civil rights struggle in which blatant discrimination is viewed as acceptable behavior. We should be judged more by our behavior than our professed religious beliefs."
COPYRIGHT 2003 Americans United for Separation of Church and State
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2003, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Church & State
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2003
Words:333
Previous Article:Court upholds voucher aid to 'faith-based' group. (Around the States).
Next Article:Paige's religious preference: education secretary's promotion of christian schooling gets bad grades from civil liberties boosters.
Topics:


Related Articles
Atheist Club At Mich. High School Gets OK With AU Help.
Council prayers can't be sectarian, California court rules. (Around The States).
The McConnell nomination: who's the real extremist? (Editorials).
One nation, under controversy: courts, congress, citizens battle over reference to God in Pledge of Allegiance.
Dispute over sectarian city council prayers sparks debate in Calif. (People & Events).
'Under God' at the high court: pledge plaintiff Newdow argues well, but the justices seem unreceptive.
Appeals court rules against sectarian prayers before council meetings.
Council prayer ruling in South Carolina stands.
Appeals court upholds 'Judeo-Christian' prayer policy.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters