Printer Friendly

Use of the Hamilton anxiety scale to assess mothers of pediatric patients on mechanical ventilation.

INTRODUCTION

Intensive care units (ICUs) are medical settings in which patients whose vital signs are under threat due to one or more organ failures receive care and treatment in a multidisciplinary approach. Patients in pediatric ICUs (PICUs) vary in terms of age and diagnosis. These patients generally require close monitoring and invasive catheterization, are administered sedatives and analgesics, and require intensive supportive care such as mechanical ventilation (MV). The primary goals of MV are to ensure efficient gas exchange, optimize the respiratory parameters of the patient, and minimize pulmonary damage associated with ventilator use. (1)

The problems experienced during the disease and treatment process are a significant source of stress to both the children and their parents. (2-4) 'Medical traumatic stress' is defined as a range of psychological and physiological responses resulting from invasive medical procedures and treatments applied in cases of disease that cause pain, injury, or severe problems. Traumatic stress response occurs according to the individual's subjective perception of the event, regardless of the real problem. What the individual feels is generally irrelevant to an objective prognosis. (2,3,5-8) The severity of the disease, being frightening or life-threatening, sudden onset, severe pain, difficult treatment, etc. make the stress traumatic. (2,5,6)

Admission to PICUs has been associated with traumatic stress in children and their parents. (9,10,11) It increases the risk of exposure to factors that cause trauma. If not addressed and treated, parental stress can cause a loss of confidence in healthcare providers, difficulty in complying with hospital rules and decisions, feeling of anger and rage, and complaints / quarrels. (12) Severe anxiety in mothers might prevent them from correctly understanding the explanations about their children, interpreting events in a realistic manner, making the right decisions, contributing to the care of children, and remembering and applying the proper coping methods. (13,14)

Based on this information, identification of anxiety levels in a parent whose child is in a PICU and identifying the factors that affect these anxiety levels would be beneficial for eliminating the adverse results described above. The present study assessed the anxiety levels of parents whose children had been admitted to the PICU, and in the families of patients on MV, and the factors that might affect these anxiety levels.

METHODOLOGY

We enrolled mothers of the patients admitted to the PICU of Health Sciences University, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital between November 2017 and February 2018. We used Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) to record the level of the anxiety. (15,16)

Face-to-face interviews were conducted with the mothers of patients in the first 24-48 hours after their children's admission to the PICU. HAM-A forms were completed by a single experienced physician within the standard periods. Information including the mother's age, educational background, number of children, whether they had any relative whose child was in the ICU or on MV, and time their child was connected to the mechanical ventilator, was obtained and recorded in forms.

Mothers whose children were in the PICU and on MV comprised the patient group, while mothers whose children were in the PICU but not on MV comprised the control group.

Approval for this study was obtained from the Hospital Clinical Trials Ethics Committee on 06/02/2018 (decision number 828) and the study was, therefore, performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Inclusion Criteria were consenting mothers of pediatric patients aged 1-18 years, without a disease that might affect their mental and emotional state. The mothers, who were a family member of a patient who was previously hospitalized in the PICU, who were unable to complete the standard HAM-A, were excluded. Basic demographic data were collected for the children involved.

Statistical analysis: The data obtained in the study were evaluated using SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 17.0 and MedCalc. For the study data, charts showing the absolute numbers and percentages were prepared and the arithmetic means and median values were calculated. Chi-square, independent sample Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and correlation tests were used for statistical analyses as appropriate. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The study enrolled a total of 128 patients; 64 each with and without MV (patient and control groups, respectively) and their mothers. Among these 128 patients, 65 were male (50.8%) and 63 were female (49.2%). No significant difference was found between the patient and control groups in terms of the distribution of female and male patients (p = 0.112).

The mean ages of the children in patient and control groups were 73.9 [+ or -] 38.4 and 75.7 [+ or -] 48.6 months, respectively. No significant difference was found between the patient and control groups in terms of their mean ages (p = 0.815).

The mean age of the mothers in the patient group (n = 64) was 29.2 [+ or -] 5.4 y, higher than the mean age of 32.5 [+ or -] 5.7 y of the mothers in the control group (n = 64) (p = 0.001). The educational levels of mothers in the patient and control groups were similar (p = 0.990).

In the patient group, MV was started 1.3 [+ or -] 0.8 days after admission to the PICU (median = 1; range: 1-4 days). The mean total period of connection to a mechanical ventilator was 15.1 [+ or -] 16.2 days (median = 9; range: 2-81 days).

Six patients in the patient group and three patients in the control group discontinued the treatment due to rejection of the medical procedure or referral and were excluded; thus, the progress of a total of 119 patients was assessed. A statistically significant difference was observed against the patient group in terms of the exit rates between the patient and control groups (p = 0.003) (Table 1).

The mean HAM-A was significantly higher among mothers of children in the patient group than that among mothers with children in the control group (23.7 [+ or -] 2.2 vs. 7.9 [+ or -] 1.8 points, p = 0.001). The anxiety levels were classified according to these results (Table 2).

Correlations between the age of mothers and the scale points were assessed in the patient and control groups. No correlation was found between the age of the mothers and the HAM-A points either in the patient or control groups (p = 0.517, r = -0.082 and p = 0.037, r = 0.216). There was also no co-relation to educational levels in the patient and control groups (p = 0.389 and 0.136, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Anxiety is a vague internal emotional state with an unknown cause and is accompanied by fear, concern, distress, and the worry that something bad is going to happen. (17) The signs of anxiety might occur in the parent of a child with a medical problem due to not knowing what the child's medical condition is related to or how serious is the medical condition. Anxiety that occurs in a parent due to such a medical condition is consistent with the 'acute stress disorder' and 'generalized anxiety disorder' subtypes. Such anxiety might arise in a parent whose child is admitted to ICU due to poor general condition of the child and the risk of a severe life-threatening condition. In our study, anxiety was present in both groups.

In a study by Smith L and colleagues parents of children who were diagnosed with an acute medical condition and those who were hospitalized, felt detached from the outside world at and after the 48th hours of hospitalization. (18) Similarly, in an assessment by Seliner and colleagues, the time when a parent's view started to change due to their physical location in the hospital was the 48th hour after hospitalization. (19) Based on this, we conducted our assessments in the first 24-48 hours to evaluate the responses of the attending mothers to their current situation in the early period and to prevent our assessment from being affected from the physical distress of the locations.

As a patient's physical health and psychological state deteriorate, the quality of life of their relatives is affected accordingly. Maxwell mentioned Leske's dimensions (assurance, proximity, information, comfort, and support) that correspond to the expectations of family members whose relatives are hospitalized. The lack of one of these dimensions leads to anxiety. (20) In a study conducted by Bagbakkal et al. in Turkey, the hospitalization of a child increased the anxiety level of the mother; training of mothers on behavioral changes that could be observed in children after hospitalization was not effective in decreasing their anxiety, and informing mothers about the clinic reduced their anxiety. (21)

Tiedeman et al. examined the anxiety levels of the families of 52 children aged between 5 and 11 y who were admitted to ICU, reporting that the anxiety level of the parents peaked during the first admission to the ICU. (22) Although this study did not have a separate control group with which to compare the patient group (e.g., patients admitted to the unit), the results of the present study indicate that the mothers in both the control and patient groups had increased levels of anxiety. In other words, although severe anxiety was not detected in any parent, mild-to-moderate anxiety was observed in most of them in the patient group.

Carter et al. reported that many stress factors in ICU affected the parents. For instance, prevention of the parents' role as caregiver and behavioral changes in children cause stress in families. (23) Moreover, Turner et al. pointed out that anxiety due to the uncertain condition of a child in the ICU adversely affected communication between the parent and the child, which could increase anxiety in the family. (24) As a general note, it is plausible that parents with children who are connected to mechanical ventilators in PICUs are at a higher risk for increased anxiety. Our study observed that the mortality risks of patients on MV was significantly higher than that in those who were not on MV. Therefore, as the general condition of the patients on MV are perceived to be worse, it is expected that the anxiety levels of families in such situations would be higher compared to the levels in other parents. Our study's results confirm this hypothesis.

Youngblut and Shiao reported no positive correlation between the mortality risk of a child and the anxiety of their parent. (25) Similarly, Doering et al. reported no relationship between a parent's stress and the severity of their child's disease. (26) Although, we did not obtain results to directly correlate the mortality risk of a child and the anxiety of their parent, our observation that being connected to a mechanical ventilator is a factor that increases the anxiety of mothers and the fact that patients on MV had higher mortality rates, the poor general condition of a child at the time of the first admission to the PICU, and resulting worries indicate a potential correlation between the mortality risk and parent anxiety.

Some studies have reported anxiety levels to be higher in mothers with low educational level than those in mothers with higher education level. (27) This might result from the possibility that mothers with lower educational levels cannot sufficiently learn how to make use of coping strategies and support systems or cannot quickly understand the causes of changes in the condition of their children. However, our study did not find a correlation between the educational level of the mother and anxiety level in either the patient or control groups.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the anxiety levels of mothers whose children were admitted to the PICU were higher at the time of their admission, their anxiety levels further increased if their children were connected to mechanical ventilators, and were further increased in the mothers of patients with a higher mortality risk and a poor overall condition at the time of admission. Therefore, it is essential that healthcare providers in intensive care units and hospitals have the behavioral and communication skills to approach families that might be under stress.

Conflict of interest: None declared by the authors

Authors' contribution:

MNY: Concept, literature search, manuscript writing

HD: Literature search, manuscript writing

YK: Statistical analysis, literature search

ET: Manuscript editing, review

REFERENCES

(1.) Lands LC. Applying physiology to conventional mechanical ventilation. Pediatr Respir Rev. 2006;7:33-36. [Pubmed]

(2.) Miles MS, Mathes M. Preparation of parents for the ICU experience: what are we missing? Child Health Care. 1991;20 (3):132-137. [Pubmed]

(3.) Balluffi A, Kassam-Adams N, Kazak A, Tucker M, Dominguez T, Helfaer M. Traumatic stress in parents of children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004;5(6):547-53. [Pubmed]

(4.) Cavusoglu H. Hastaneye yatmanin cocuk ve aile uzerindeki etkileri, Yasami tehdit edici hastaligi olan cocuk. Cocuk Sagligi Hemsireligi, Cilt 1, Genisletilmis 8. Baski, Ankara:2004 Sistem ofset Basimevi;51-70, 91-106.

(5.) Freund PJ, Harriet A, Boone HA, Jane H, Barlow JH, Lim CI. Healthcare and early intervention collaborative supports for families and young children. Infants & Young Children. 2005;18(1):25-36.

(6.) Andrews P Azoulay E, Antonelli M, Brochard L, Brun-Buisson C, Dobb G, et al. Year in review in intensive care medicine, 2004. III. Outcome, ICU organisation, scoring, quality of life, ethics, psychological problems and communication in the ICU, immunity and hemodynamics during sepsis, pediatric and neonatal critical care, experimental studies. Intensive Care Med. 2005;31(3):356-32. [Pubmed]

(7.) Baker C. Preventing ICU syndrome in children. Paediatr Nurs. 2005;16 (10):32-5. [Pubmed]

(8.) Wong DL. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Nursing Care of Infants and Children. Mosby, Inc. 1999:877-8.

(9.) Tanimoto S, Takayanagi K, Yokota H, Yamamoto Y. The psychological and physiological effects of intensivecare unit environment on healthy individuals. Clin Perform Qual Health Care. 1999;7(2):77-82. [Pubmed]

(10.) Melnyk BM, Alpert-Gillis L, Feinstein NF, Crean HF, Johnson J, Fairbanks E. et al. Creating opportunities for parent empowerment: program effects on the mental health/coping outcomes of critically ill young children and their mothers. Pediatrics. 2005;113(6):597-607. [Pubmed] [Free Full Text]

(11.) Ward-Begnoche W. Posttraumatic stress symptoms in the pediatric intensive care unit. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2007;12(2):84-92. [Pubmed]

(12.) Patricia Lange M. Family stress in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2001;29(10): 2025-6. [Pubmed]

(13.) Byrn C, Hunsberger M. Concepts of Illness: Stress, Crises and Coping, Family-Centered Nursing Care of Children. (Ed): RL foster, MM Hunsberger, JJT Anderson. Philadelphia, 1999: Toronto, W.B. Saunders Company Harcourt Brace Jovanovich;703-24.

(14.) Hunsberger M. Impact of acute illness, Family- Centered Nursing Care of Children.RL Foster, MM Hunsberger, JJT Anderson (Ed); Philadelphia, London, W.B. Saunders Company Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1999;725-35.

(15.) Hamilton M. The assessment of anxiety states by rating. Br J Med Psychol. 1959;32:50-5. [Pubmed]

(16.) Akdemir A, Orsel S, Dag i, Turkcapar H, iscan N, Ozbay H. Hamilton Depresyon Derecelendirme Olcegi (HDDO)'nin gecerligi, guvenirligi ve klinikte kullanimi. Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi. 1996;4:251-259.

(17.) Sadock BJ, Sadock VA. Kaplan and Saddock's Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry Ceviri Editorleri: Aydin H, Bozkurt A. Sekizinci Baski Gunes Kitabevleri istanbul:1559-1800.

(18.) Smith L, Daughtrey H. Weaving the seamless web of care: an analysis of parents' perceptions of their needs following discharge of their child from hospital. J Adv Nurs. 2000;31:812-20. [Pubmed]

(19.) Seliner B, Wattinger A, Spirig R. Experiences and needs of parents of hospitalised children with disabilities and the health professionals responsible for the child's healthcare-A systematic review. Pflege. 2015Oct;28(5):263-76. [Pubmed] doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000446.

(20.) Maxwell KE, Stuenkel D, Saylor C. Needs of family members of critically ill patients: a comparison of nurse and family perceptions. Heart Lung. 2007;36(5):367-76. [Pubmed]

(21.) Basbakkal Z, Sonmez S, Sen N, Esenay F 3-6 yas grubu cocuklarin hastaneye yatisa karsi davranissal tepkileri konusunda verilen egitimin annelerin anksiyete duzeyi uzerine etkisinin incelenmesi. Ataturk Universitesi Hemsirelik Yuksekokulu Dergisi. 2009;12:4:59-65.

(22.) Tiedeman ME. Anxiety responses of parents during and after the hospitalization of their 5 to 11 y old children. J Pediatr Nurs. 1997;12(2):110-19.[Pubmed]

(23.) Carter MC, Miles MS. The parental stressor scale: pediatric intensive care unit. Matern Child Nurs J. 1989;18(3):87-98. [Pubmed]

(24.) Turner MA, Tomlinson PS, Harbaugh BL. Parental uncertainty in critical care hospitalization of children. Matern Child Nurs J. 1990;19(1):45-62. [Pubmed]

(25.) Youngblut JM, Shiao SY Characteristics of a child's critical illness and parents' reactions: preliminary report of a pilot study. Am J Crit Care. 1992;1(3):804. [Pubmed]

(26.) Doering LV, Moser DK, Dracup K. Correlates of anxiety, hostility, depression, and psychosocial adjustment in parents of NICU infants. Neonatal Netw. 2000;19(5):15-23. [Pubmed]

(27.) Richtsmeier AJ, Hatcher JW. Parental anxiety and minor illness. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1994 Feb;15(1):14-9. [Pubmed]

Muhammed Nurullah Yakut, Huseyin Dag, Yakup Karakurt, Emine Turkkan

Muhammed Nurullah Yakut

[drmnyakut@wlndowsllve.com]

{ORCID:0000000211136144}

Huseyin Dag

[huseyindag2003@gmail.com]

{ORCID:0000000175967687}

Yakup Karakurt [ykp_bjk@hotmail.com]

{ORCID:0000000294178656}

Emine Turkkan

[emineturkkan@yahoo.com]

{ORCID:0000000251267843}

Department of pediatrics, Training and Research

Hospital, University of Health

Sciences Okmeydani, (Turkey).

Correspondence: Huseyin

Dag, Department of Pediatrics,

Training and Research Hospital,

University of Health Sciences Okmeydani, (Turkey);

Phone: 5533933498;

Mobile: 90 5533933498; E-mail: huseyindag2003@gmail.com

Received: 10 December 2018;

Reviewed: 25 December 2018, 18 February 2019;

Corrected: 12 February 2019;

Accepted: 20 February 2019
Table 1: Rates of exitus in the patient and control groups

Group         Recovery      Exitus      p-value

Patient          50           8          0.003
Control          61           0

Table 2: Comparative Hamilton Scale scores

Anxiety level (HAM-A score)    Patient Group

Mild anxiety (<17 points)            0
Mild to moderate anxiety             40
  (18-24 points)
Moderate to severe anxiety           24
  (25-30 points)
Severe anxiety (>30 points)          0

Anxiety level (HAM-A score)    Control Group    p-value

Mild anxiety (<17 points)            64
Mild to moderate anxiety             0           0.001
  (18-24 points)
Moderate to severe anxiety           0
  (25-30 points)
Severe anxiety (>30 points)          0
COPYRIGHT 2019 Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2021 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Author:Yakut, Muhammed Nurullah; Dag, Huseyin; Karakurt, Yakup; Turkkan, Emine
Publication:Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care
Date:Jan 1, 2019
Words:3173
Previous Article:Investigation of the effects of different doses of sugammadex on kidney histopathology in rabbits with acute renal failure.
Next Article:Outcome of pretreatment regimens on hemodynamic parameters and emergence during electroconvulsive therapy-a study on dexmedetomidine and esmolol.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |