Uscana espinae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in central Mexico: new hosts, host plants, distribution records, and characterization.
To date, research has been conducted on the reproductive and behavioral aspects of some parasitoid species of the genus Uscana, with data on their hosts in order to determine whether they would make good biological control agents of pests of stored seeds. Studies have focused on African species such as U. caryedoni Viggiani (Delobel 1989), and U. lariophaga Steffan (van Alebeek & van Huis 1997), on the European species U. olgae Fursov and U. senex (Grese) (Fursov 1995), and on the Indian species U. mukerjii (Mani) (Sood & Pajni 2006). Regarding U. lariophaga, research has addressed several aspects of its behavior in order to control the bruchid C. maculatus, which feeds on stored Vigna seeds (van Huis et al. 1998, 2002, van Alebeek et al. 2007). Nevertheless, the taxonomy and other aspects of the biology of New World Uscana species are still poorly known.
The importance of studying Uscana wasps in Mexico relates to the possibility of using the genus in biological control of the bean and Mexican bean weevils (Acanthoscelides obtectus Say and Zabrotes subfasciatus Boheman), which cause significant losses to farmers who produce Phaseolus beans (Leroi et al. 1991; Bonet et al. 2000; Alvarez et al. 2005). Of particular concern is finding native biological control agents capable of mitigating the damage done by weevils to Mexico's bean cultivars, especially in the rustic storage facilities of self-sufficient farmers in central Mexico, where weevils damage 20% of all stored dried beans (Bonet et al. 2000). Research has shown that in field conditions, wasps of the genus Uscana parasitize up to 85% of the eggs of bruchids that attack wild bean seed populations (Phaseolus vulgaris var. aborigeneus L.) in Mexico (Perez & Bonet 1984; Delgado et al. 1988; Leroi et al. 1990).
The purposes of this study were to taxonomically identify Uscana species collected from 6 populations in Central Mexico, and provide records of their hosts, host associations with plants, and geographic distribution. The presence of cryptic Uscana species among populations was also investigated using morphological characters, genotype analysis (COI), and intra- and inter-population reproductive crosses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Collection of Insects
The analyzed individuals came from insects that were bred in the laboratory on the bean weevil, Acanthoscelides obtectus. The original stock of weevils had been collected from 5 locations in Central Mexico at altitudes of 697 to 1900 masl.: Pantitlan and Tepoztlan, in the State of Morelos; Rio Ahuehueyo in Puebla; and Estanzuela and El Campanario I and II in Veracruz (Table 1). The initial Uscana individuals used for breeding were collected from 4 bruchid hosts and 3 host plants species (Table 1). During breeding, fecundity remained constant.
Morphological Description of Adults
Male and female Uscana adults were slide-mounted in Canada balsam (Platner et al. 1998). Measurements of the main taxonomic characters used to classify Trichogrammatidae species, especially Uscana, were taken; these include the antennal club and venation of the forewing in males and females, as well as the male genitalia (Table 2). The length of each morphological structure refers to the maximum length in micrometers.
Specimen identification was done by B. Pintureau and A. Bonet using the descriptions and key of Pintureau et al. (1999). Voucher samples on microscope slides were deposited in the IEXA insect collection at Instituto de Ecologia A. C.
Cryptic Species Analysis through Morphological Characters
To determine if the wasp samples collected in the different populations corresponded to one or several species, comparisons of their morphological characters were performed (Pintureau et al. 1999; Pinto 2006). In both males and females, 2 antennal and one forewing measurements were compared, and for males, the aedeagus lengths were also compared (Table 2).
Cryptic Species Analysis through COI Barcode Analysis
The COI barcode technique was used to detect the presence of cryptic Uscana species as well as possible haplotypes (Herbert et al. 2003a, 2003b, 2004; Smith et al. 2005; Ratnasinham & Herbert 2007; Waugh 2007). Barcoding molecular gene analysis was carried out in 4 adult individuals from each of the 6 populations (Tables 1 and 3). DNA was extracted from each ethanol-preserved adult using the DNeasy Tissue Kit (Quiagen, Hilden, Germany). The whole adult body was put in a 180pL ATL buffer with 20pL proteinase K and incubated at 55 [degrees]C for 36 h. After incubation, total genomic DNA was extracted following the manufacturer's instructions. A DNA fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I (COI) gene was amplified using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the primers LCO1490 and HCO2198 (Folmer et al. 1994). The template profile was as follows: 94.0 [degrees]C for 5 min; 35 cycles at 94.0 [degrees]C for 45 s, 48.0 [degrees]C for 45 s, and 72.0 [degrees]C for 90 s; and 72.0 [degrees]C for 8 min. PCR was performed in a reaction volume of 40 [micro]L using 10 x EX Taq Buffer (Takara Bio, Tokyo, Japan), 0.2 mM each dNTP, 0.5 pM each primer, 0.5 U/[micro]l EX Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Bio), and 0.2 [micro]M temperate DNA. The PCR product was purified using Montage PCR (Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts) and served as a template for cycle sequencing reactions with CEQ quick start mix (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, California) following the manufacturer's instructions. After ethanol precipitation, the cycle sequencing products were sequenced using the CEQ8000 Genetic Analysis System (Beckman, Coulter). DNA sequences obtained in both directions were assembled and edited using ATGC version 4.0 (Genetyx, Tokyo, Japan). The assembled sequences were aligned manually and edited using Bioedit version 5.0.9 (Hall 1999). 531 base pairs of COI gene were compared for 4 Uscana individuals from each population in order to discern polymorphisms within them. The DNA sequences determined were deposited in the GenBank under the accession numbers AB600848-AB600921.
Reproductive compatibility was analyzed for the 2 populations that were furthest apart (230 km) (Pantitlan, Morelos and Estanzuela, Veracruz). Crossings between male and female adults were done in group and single-pairs in order to obtain a reproductive compatibility coefficient between them (Pinto et al. 1991; Pintureau 1991; Stouthamer et al. 2000). Group mating provides some choice for mates and therefore would be more likely to reveal reproductive incompatibility; however, single-pair matings provide better quantification, in a 'no-choice' situation, of the level of incompatibility (Liu et al. 2002).
The different levels of reproductive compatibility seen in crosses between different populations help to explain the intra-specific variation observed in the species' geographic distribution (Hopper et al. 1993). A reproductive compatibility under 80% permits the separation of species in Trichogramma (Pinto et al. 1991), and cryptic species are present when heterogamic crosses are < 75% homogamic ones (Stouthamer et al. 2000). Pintureau (1991) and Pinto et al. (1991)'s procedure for crossing males (m) and females (f) was followed, with the reproductive compatibility coefficient of 2 populations (A x B) measured as the average number of female progeny in heterogamic combinations (A m x B f) divided by the mean in each homogamic combination (A m x A f), or (B m x B f), as well as their respective reciprocal crosses.
In the present study, heterogamic crosses were carried out with virgin individuals from each population without a priori knowledge of the sex of the 2 individuals or, for group mating, the sex of all individuals. When female progeny were recorded, they were a posteriori interpreted as resulting of crosses. As the sex of virgin adults could not be determined before each mating, it was assumed that the 35 replicates in both directions that resulted in female progeny included heterogamic crosses.
Two intra-population crosses were done (PA m x PA f) and (ES m x ES f) as homogamic controls, as well as one heterogamic inter-population cross (PA mf x ES mf). The individuals used for these crosses came from laboratory breeding on A. obtectus over 6 and 7 generations of wasp and host, respectively. Intra-population crosses were done under environmental conditions of 23 [+ or -] 2 [degrees]C, with 63 [+ or -] 10 % RH and at 12:12 h L:D. The embryonic development of wasp progeny occurred in a breeding chamber at 25 [+ or -] 1 [degrees]C, with a 55 [+ or -] 5 % RH.
For all crosses, both single-pairs and group, adult virgin males (m) and females (f) born on the same day were left alone with honey so that they would mate. Afterward, each female was isolated in a gelatin capsule with 50 eggs of the host A. obtectus (24 to 48 hours old); the eggs were changed daily, so that oviposition could occur until death of the adult female. For single-pair crosses (N = 35), mating occurred in one-half of a gelatin capsule (2.5 cm long x 0.6 cm diam). In the case of group crosses, adults (N = 80) were placed in a container (4 cm high x 7 cm base diam) for 24 h with honey in order for mating to take place. Afterward, 40 randomly chosen female individuals were isolated in gel capsules with host eggs. Parasitized host eggs were placed in a breeding chamber until progeny emerged. The sex of both adult progenitors and progeny was confirmed after they had died.
For each type of cross, the number of parasitized hosts per wasp female was recorded, as well the number and sex ratio of progeny that emerged and the percentage of survival from egg to adult stage. The reproductive compatibility coefficient was calculated following Pinto et al. (1991). It is estimated as 2 percentages that compare levels of female progeny arising from heterogamic mating versus the homogamic control (Pinto et al. 1991): 100 x mean sex ratio of progeny (= proportion of female progeny) (A m x B f)/mean sex ratio of progeny (A m x A f), with the same calculation done for reciprocal mating.
The morphological characters of individuals from different populations and the results of reproductive crosses between populations were compared with one way ANOVA. When significant differences were found, Tukey's multiple comparisons test was used to detect differences between populations. When ANOVA assumptions were not met, a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance and multiple comparisons using the "Fisher's least significant difference on the ranks" test were used (Conover 1980; Sokal & Rohlf 1995).
The individuals collected from the 6 central Mexican populations belong to the species U. espinae. This is the first Mexican record for U. espinae; and Acanthoscelides obtectus, A. obvelatus Bridwell, A. oblongoguttatus (Fahraeus), and Mimosestes humeralis (Gyllenhal) are new host records; and Phaseolus vulgaris, Acacia pennatula (Schltdl. and Cham.) and A. sphaerocephala Schltdl. and Cham. are new host plants for the wasp (Table 1).
Measurements of the morphological characters (antennae, forewings and aedeagus) of individuals from different populations were similar (Table 2). The only difference was found in Tepoztlan, where the ratio of male fimbria length and anterior wing width was significantly different from the corresponding ratios of all other populations (Table 2).
Molecular Analysis of the COI Gene
In the 6 populations analyzed, 3 haplotypes were found (Table 3). Variation within and among populations was less than 1% for the 531 base pairs of the COI gene. Haplotype 1 was found only at one location, El Campanario I, Veracruz, on Acanthoscelides oblongoguttatus on the plant, Acacia sphaerocephala. Haplotype 2 was found in Pantitlan, Morelos and Estanzuela, Veracruz. Haplotype 3 was found in 4 populations in 3 states (Morelos, Puebla, and Veracruz). The population in Pantitlan was the only one with more than one haplotype (haplotypes 2 and 3) (Table 3).
No reproductive isolation between the 2 populations crossed was found. Adults from these 2 populations (Pantitlan and Estanzuela) had a reproductive compatibility coefficient of 85% for single-pair crosses and 88-92% for group crosses, with no detectable element of reproductive incompatibility (Table 4).
The group cross in the Pantitlan population produced 15 % more parasitoids in its progeny (F = 5.96; df = 2,102; P = 0.0036) than that in the Estanzuela population (Table 4). The sex ratio in progeny of inter-population heterogamic crosses per group was lower (H = 8.81; df = 2,102; P = 0.0122) than those recorded from homogamic crosses in Pantitlan and Estanzuela (Table 4), but this difference did not reach the threshold of 75% used by Stouthamer et al. (2000) as an indication of species separation. Survival percentage of progeny to adulthood did not differ significantly within and among populations in the case of single-pair crosses and group crosses (Table 4).
The search for a biological agent to control A. obtectus and Z. subfasciatus led to the discovery of the endoparasitoid U. espinae, parasitizing weevil eggs in several localities of central Mexico. It was identified on the basis of its morphology, using the species' diagnostic characters, and no cryptic species could be detected. It was determined that all Uscana specimens from Pantitlan, Tepoztlan, Rio Ahuehueyo, Estanzuela, and El Campanario I and II belong to the same species, which appears to be distributed throughout central Mexico. This is a new record for Mexico, with new hosts and host plant associations. Uscana espinae had been recorded only from Chile and Uruguay attacking the eggs of the bruchids Pseudopachymerina spinipes (Erichson 1833), Scutobruchus ceratioborus (Philippi) and Stator furcatus on Acacia caven (Molina) Molina and Prosopis chilensis (Molina) (Pintureau et al. 1999, Rojas-Rousse 2006). Thus, 4 new hosts have been identified (Acanthoscelides obtectus, A. obvelatus, A. oblongoguttatus, and Mimosestes humeralis) as well as 3 new host plants (Phaseolus vulgaris, Acacia pennatula, and A. sphaerocephala).
The COI barcode technique was used to test for the presence of cryptic Uscana species at the different locations. According to Herbert et al. (2003b) and Waugh (2007), if intra-population variation is < 2%, variation can be considered to be intra-specific. The variation recorded in the 6 populations considered was less than 1% for the 531 base pairs of the COI gene analyzed, leading to the conclusion that no cryptic species were present.
Among the 3 different haplotypes identified on the basis of the COI mitochondrial gene, two were found (2 and 3) on the same host plant, P. vulgaris, in Pantitlan. Haplotype 3 was found in individuals from 3 locations, Rio Ahuehueyo, Tepoztlan, and El Campanario II, while haplotype 2 was also present in Estanzuela. This suggests that haplotypes 2 and 3 represent 2 morphs of the same species. Haplotype 1, more differentiated, was only present at location Campanario I where wasp individuals were collected inside A. oblongoguttatus eggs on the plant Acacia sphaerocephala pods.
Reproductive isolation was not found between individuals of Pantitlan and Estanzuela, as reproductive compatibility was 85% for single-pair crosses and 88-92% for group crosses, thus not under the 75% indicated by Stouthamer et al. (2000) to discriminate species. However, some variability was observed among populations in terms of number and sex ratio of progeny.
The use of native biological control agents is indispensable to reduce densities of bruchid beetles by environmentally friendly means. Phylogeographical research is needed throughout the geographic distribution area of U. espinae in order to confirm its native or non-native status in Mexico (e.g., Alvarez et al. 2005), because the species was known only from Chile and Uruguay. Its distribution has now been expanded to include the Mexican states of Morelos, Puebla, and Veracruz. U. espinae populations from central Mexico could be recommended in mass rearing laboratories to be used in an augmentative program to control the common and Mexican bean bruchids (van Huis 1991, Bonet et al. 2005).
We are grateful to Iriana Zuria and John Kingsolver for critical comments on an early manuscript. We thank Gabriela Heredia for permitting us to use her microscopes. Ignacio Castellanos thanks the "Programa de Mejoramiento del Profesorado (SEP), and FOMIX Hidalgo 95828, segunda fase" for their support.
ALVAREZ, N., MCKEY, D, HOSSAERT-MCKEY, M., BORN, C., MERCIER, L., AND BENREY, B. 2005. Ancient and recent evolutionary history of the bruchid beetle, Acanthoscelides obtectus Say, a cosmopolitan pest of beans. Mol. Ecol. 14: 1015-1024.
BONET, A., CARBONELL, J., CRUZ, M., GARCIA, D. MENDEZ, S., AND ROJAS, C. 2000. El Gorgojo: Insecto que Ataca las Semillas del Frijol. Inst. Ecol. A. C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
BONET, A., MORALES, C., LOPEZ, I., CRUZ, M., ROJAS, C., MENDEZ, S., AND GARCIA, D. 2002. Control Biologico de los Gorgojos en Frijol Almacenado. Inst. Ecol. A. C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
BONET, A., MORALES, C. O., AND ROJAS, C. V. 2005. El Control Biologico Con Parasitoides, Una Alternativa para Limitar a los Gorgojos en Frijol Almacenado. Inst. Ecol. A. C., Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico.
CONOVER, W. J. 1980. Practical Nonparametric Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
DELGADO, A., BONET, A., AND GEPTS, P. 1988. The wild relative of Phaseolus vulgaris in Middle America, pp. 163-184 In P. Gepts [ed.], Genetic Resources of Phaseolus Beans. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
DELOBEL, A. 1989. Uscana caryedoni (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae): possibilites d'utilisation en lutte biologique contre la bruche de l'arachide, Caryedon serratus (Col. Bruchidae). Entomophaga 34: 351-363.
FOLMER, O., BLACK, M., HOEH, W., LUTZ, R. A., AND VRIJENHOEK, R. C. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Bio technol. 3: 294-299.
FURSOV, V. 1995. A world review of Uscana species (Hymenoptera, Trichogrammatidae), potential biological control agents of bruchid beetles (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Coll. INRA 73: 15-17.
HALL, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41: 95-98.
HERBERT, P. D. N., CYWINSKA, A., AND BALL, S. L. 2003a. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. London B 270: 313-321.
HERBERT, P. D. N., RATNASINGHAM, S., AND DEWAARD, J. R. 2003b. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergence among closely related species. Proc. R. Soc. London B 270: 1-4.
HEBERT, P. D. N., PENTON, E. H, BURNS, J. M., JANZEN, D. H., AND HALLWACHS, W. 2004. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the Neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101: 14812-14817.
HOPPER, K. R., ROUSH, R. T., AND POWELL, W. 1993. Management of genetics of biological-control introductions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 38: 27-51.
LEROI, B., BONET, A., PICHARD, B., AND BIEMONT, J. C. 1990. Relaciones entre Bruchidae (Coleoptera) y poblaciones silvestres de Phaseolus (Leguminosae: Phaseolinae) en el norte de Morelos, Mexico. Acta Zool. Mexicana 42: 1-28.
LEROI, B., PICHARD, B., BONET, A., AND MONTES, J. 1991. Family stocks of beans in Mexico and control of dried bean beetle, pp. 1639-1647 In F. Fleurat-Lessard and P. Ducom [eds.], Proc. 5th Int. Working Conference on Stored-Product Prot., 9-14 Sep 1990, Bordeaux, France. Imprimerie du Medoc, Bordeaux, France.
LIU, S., GEBREMESKEL, F. B., AND SHI, Z. 2002. Reproductive compatibility and variation in survival and sex ratio between two geographic populations of Diadromus collaris, a pupal parasitoid of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. BioControl 47: 625-643.
OWEN, A. K., GEORGE J., PINTO J. D., AND HERATY, J. M. 2007. A molecular phylogeny of the Trichogrammatidae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea), with an evaluation of the utility of their male genitalia for higher level classification. Syst. Entomol. 32: 227-251.
PEREZ, G., AND BONET, A. 1984. Himenopteros parasitoides de Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) en Tepoztlan, Morelos. Folia Entomol. Mexicana 59: 71-78.
PINTO, J. D. 2006. A Review of the New World Genera of Trichogrammatidae (Hymenoptera). J. Hymenop. Res. 15: 38-16.
PINTO, J. D., STOUTHAMER, R., PLATNER, G. R., AND OATMAN, E. R. 1991. Variation in reproductive compatibility in Trichogramma and its taxonomic significance (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. America 84: 37-46.
PINTUREAU, B. 1991. Indices d'isolement reproductif entre especes proches de Trichogrammes (Hym. Trichogrammatidae). Ann. Soc. Entomol. France 27: 379-392.
PINTUREAU, B., GERDING, M., AND CISTERNAS, E. 1999. Description of three new species of Trichogrammatidae (Hymenoptera) from Chile. Canadian Entomol. 131: 53-63.
PLATNER, G. R., VELTEN, R. K., PLANOUTENE, M., AND PINTO, J. D. 1998. Slide-mounting techniques for Trichogramma (Trichogrammatidae) and other minute parasitic Hymenoptera. Entomol. News 110: 56-54.
RATNASINGHAM, S., AND HEBERT, P. D. N. 2007. BOLD: The barcode of life data system (www.barcodinglife. org). Mol. Ecol. Notes 7: 355-364.
ROJAS-ROUSSE, D. 2006. Persistent pods of the tree Acacia caven: a natural refuge for diverse insects including Bruchid beetles and the parasitoids Trichogrammatidae, Pteromalidae and Eulophidae. J. Insect Sci. 6: 1-9.
SMITH, M. A., WOODLEY, N. E., JANZEN, D. H., HALLWACHS, W., AND HEBERT, P. D. N. 2005. DNA barcodes reveal cryptic host-specificity within the presumed polyphagous members of a genus of parasitoid flies (Dip tera: Tachinidae). Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103: 3657-3662.
SOKAL, R. R., AND ROHLF, F. J. 1995. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research. 3rd edition. W. H. Freeman, New York, NY.
SOOD, S., AND PAJNI, H. R. 2006. Effect of honey feeding on longevity and fecundity of Uscana mukerjii (Mani) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) an egg parasitoid of bruchids attacking stored products (Coleoptera: BruchidaeJ. J. Stored Prod. Res. 42: 438-444.
STOUTHAMER, R., JOCHEMSEN, P., PLATNER, G. R., AND PINTO, J. D. 2000. Crossing incompatibility between Trichogramma minutum and T. platneri and its implications for their application in biological control. Environ. Entomol. 29: 827-837.
VAN ALEBEEK, F. A. N., AND VAN HUIS, A. 1997. Host location in stored cowpea by the egg parasitoid Uscana lariophaga Steffan (Hym., Trichogrammatidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 121: 399-405.
VAN ALEBEEK, F. A. N., ANTWI, K. K., VAN HUIS, A., AND VAN LENTEREN, J. C. 2007. Dispersal and functional response of Uscana lariophaga in two different habitats: stored cowpea pods and seeds. Bull. Insectol. 60: 63-70.
VAN HUIS, A. 1991. Biological methods of bruchid control in the tropics: a review. Insect Sci. Applic. 12: 87-102.
VAN HUIS, A., KAASHOEK, N. K., AND MAES, H. M. 1990. Biological control of bruchids (Col.: Bruchidae) in stored pulses by using egg parasitoids of the genus Uscana (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae): a review, pp. 99-107 In F. Fleurat-Lessard and P. Ducom [eds.], Proc. 5th Int. Working Conference on Stored-Product Prot., 9-14 Sep 1990, Bordeaux, France. Imprimerie du Medoc, Bordeaux, France.
VAN HUIS, A., SCHUTTE, C., AND SAGNIA, S. 1998. The impact of the egg parasitoid Uscana lariophaga on Callosobruchus maculatus populations and the damage to cowpea in a traditional storage system. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 89: 289-295.
VAN HUIS, A., VAN ALEBEEK, F. A. N., VAN ES, M., AND SAGNIA, S. B. 2002. Impact of the egg parasitoid Uscana lariophaga and the larval-pupal parasitoid Dinarmus basalis on Callosobruchus maculatus populations and cowpea losses. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 104: 289-297.
WAUGH, J. 2007. DNA barcoding in animal species: progress, potential and pitfalls. BioEssays 29: 188-197.
AETUEO BONET (1), TOSHIHIDE KATO (2), IGNACIO CASTELLANOS (3), BERNARD PlNTUREAU (4) AND DELIA GARCIA (1)
(1) Multitrophic Interaction Network, Instituto de Ecologia A. C. Carretera antigua a Coatepec 351, El Haya, Apartado Postal 63, 91070, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
(2) Department of General Systems Studies, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan
(3) Biological Research Center, Universidad Autonoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Km. 4.5 carretera Pachuca-Tulancingo S/N, Apartado Postal 69-1, 42184, Pachuca, Hidalgo, Mexico
(4) Biologie Fonctionelle, Insectes et Interactions, UMR INRA/INSA de Lyon, INSA, Batiment L. Pasteur, 09621- Villeurbanne-cedex, France
TABLE 1. RECORDS OF GENE BANK ACCESSION NUMBERS, LOCALITIES, HOSTS, HOST-PLANTS, YEAR OF COLLECTION, GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATION, AND ALTITUDE OF USCANA POPULATIONS ANALYZED. Host GenBank accession No. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) AB600898-AB600901 Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say) and Acanthoscelides obvelatus Bridwell AB600902-AB600905 Mimosestes humeralis (Gyllenhal) AB600906-AB600909 Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say) AB600910-AB600913 Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say) and Acanthoscelides obvelatus Bridwell AB600914-AB600917 Acanthoscelides oblongoguttatus Fahraeus) AB600918-AB600921 Mimosestes humeralis (Gyllenhal) Host plant GenBank accession No. (Leguminosae) AB600898-AB600901 Phaseolus vulgaris L. AB600902-AB600905 Acacia pennatula (Schltdl. & Cham.) Benth. AB600906-AB600909 Phaseolus vulgaris L. AB600910-AB600913 Phaseolus vulgaris L. AB600914-AB600917 Acacia sphaerocephala Schltdl. & Cham. AB600918-AB600921 Acacia pennatula (Schltdl. & Cham.) Benth. Year of GenBank accession No. Locality collection AB600898-AB600901 Rio Ahuehueyo, Puebla 1996 AB600902-AB600905 Estanzuela, Veracruz 2003 AB600906-AB600909 Pantitlan, Morelos 2000 AB600910-AB600913 Tepoztlan, Morelos 2005 AB600914-AB600917 El Campanario I, Veracruz 2006 AB600918-AB600921 El Campanario II, Veracruz 2006 Geographic Altitude GenBank accession No. location (m asl) AB600898-AB600901 18[degrees]37'0.36"N, 1250 98[degrees]33'55.18"W AB600902-AB600905 19[degrees]27'12.8", 1038 96[degrees]51' 47.6"W AB600906-AB600909 18[degrees]55'0.6"N, 1285 98[degrees]59'36.6"W AB600910-AB600913 18[degrees]59'51.9"N, 1900 9[degrees]7'30.4"W AB600914-AB600917 19[degrees]21'49.5", 697 96[degrees]50'44.1" AB600918-AB600921 19[degrees]21'49.5", 697 96[degrees]50'44.1" TABLE 2. MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS (MEAN [+ OR -] SE IN MICRONS) (1) OF ADULT MALES AND FEMALES OF USCANA ESPINAE COLLECTED IN FIVE LOCATIONS IN CENTRAL MEXICO. Adult characters Pantitlan Tepoztlan Males (N) 14 5 Fimbria length/forewing 0.21 [+ or -] 0.19 [+ or -] width 0.00 a 0.00 b H = 13.58; df = 4,48; P = 0.0087 Mean lengths of the 1.01 [+ or -] 1.06 [+ or -] C1/C2 antennal segments 0.03 0.03 F = 0.59; df = 4,47; P = 0.6728 Mean lengths of the C3/C2 1.27 [+ or -] 1.26 [+ or -] antennal segments 0.03 0.06 F = 0.29; df = 4,47; P = 0.8776 aedeagus length 52.37 [+ or -] 56.61 [+ or -] 0.70 1.87 F = 2.28; df = 4,47; P = 0.0769 Females (N) 10 5 Fimbria length/anterior 0.18 [+ or -] 0.18 [+ or -] wing width 0.00 0.00 H = 2.22; df = 4,40; P = 0.6962 Mean lengths of the C1/C2 1.12 [+ or -] 1.10 [+ or -] antennal segments 0.03 0.02 F = 0.22; df = 4,40; P = 0.9231 Mean lengths of the C3/C2 1.34 [+ or -] 1.19 [+ or -] antennal segments 0.04 0.02 F = 1.76; df = 4,42; P = 0.1581 Adult characters Rio Ahuehueyo Estanzuela Males (N) 5 13 Fimbria length/forewing 0.21 [+ or -] 0.22 [+ or -] width 0.01 a 0.00 a Mean lengths of the 1.02 [+ or -] 1.05 [+ or -] C1/C2 antennal segments 0.04 0.02 Mean lengths of the C3/C2 1.10 [+ or -] 1.29 [+ or -] antennal segments 0.03 0.03 aedeagus length 53.44 [+ or -] 53.94 [+ or -] 0.90 0.79 Females (N) 5 14 Fimbria length/anterior 0.18 [+ or -] 0.18 [+ or -] wing width 0.00 0.00 Mean lengths of the C1/C2 1.15 [+ or -] 1.10 [+ or -] antennal segments 0.04 0.04 Mean lengths of the C3/C2 1.34 [+ or -] 1.28 [+ or -] antennal segments 0.04 0.03 Adult characters El Campanario Males (N) 10 Fimbria length/forewing 0.23 [+ or -] width 0.01a Mean lengths of the 1.04 [+ or -] C1/C2 antennal segments 0.03 Mean lengths of the C3/C2 1.25 [+ or -] antennal segments 0.02 aedeagus length 55.02 [+ or -] 1.04 Females (N) 8 Fimbria length/anterior 0.17 [+ or -] wing width 0.01 Mean lengths of the C1/C2 1.12 [+ or -] antennal segments 0.04 Mean lengths of the C3/C2 1.33 [+ or -] antennal segments 0.04 (1) F: F-statistic, H: Kruskal-Wallis test statistic. Means with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05). TABLE 3. CHARACTERIZATION OF USCANA ESPINAE HAPLOTYPES IN CENTRAL MEXICO. POLYMORPHISMS ARE LOCATED ON THE THIRD CODON, AND SYNONYMS. Segregating position on COI fragment Haplotype Populations (specimen #) (1) 121 211 355 Haplotype 1 CA I A C G Haplotype 2 ES, PA (2) A T A Haplotype 3 RA, PA (1, 3, 4), TE, CA II G T A (1) The numbers appearing in brackets correspond to the individual used. Population abbreviations are given in Table 1. TABLE 4. PROGENY (MEAN [+ OR -] SE) (1), SEX RATIO OF PROGENY, PERCENT SURVIVAL FROM EGG TO ADULT, REPRODUCTIVE COMPATIBILITY RESULTING FROM INTRA- AND INTERPOPULATION CROSSES IN USCANA ESPINAE (PAIR AND GROUP MATINGS). MALES (M), FEMALES (F), AND MALE-FEMALE MIXTURE (MF) THAT ORIGINATED FROM PANTITLAN, MORELOS (PA) AND ESTANZUELA, VERACRUZ (ES). Intra-population cross Biological parameters Inter-population cross PA (MF) x ES (MF) PA x PA (M x F) Single-pair matings Number of females 35 35 Proportion of 0.52 [+ or -] 0.62 [+ or -] females in progeny 0.04 0.03 H = 2.74; df = 2,105; P = 0.2541 No. of parasitoids 25.4 [+ or -] 25.37 [+ or -] produced 0.61 1.00 F = 0.14; df = 2,105; P = 0.8689 % of progeny surviving 0.86 [+ or -] 0.85 [+ or -] to adulthood 0.01 0.02 H = 0.52; df = 2,105; P = 0.7714 Reproductive 85 % Compatibility Group matings Number of females 35 35 Proportion of 0.53 [+ or -] 0.61 [+ or -] females in progeny 0.02a 0.03b H = 8.81; df = 2,102; P = 0.0122 No. of parasitoids 28.70 [+ or -] 28.74 [+ or -] produced 0.91a 0.90a F = 5.96; df = 2,102; P = 0.0036 % of progeny surviving 0.81 [+ or -] 0.79 [+ or -] to adulthood 0.02 0.02 F = 0.01; df = 2,105; P = 0.4242 Reproductive 88% Compatibility Intra-population cross Biological parameters ES x ES (M x F) Single-pair matings Number of females 35 Proportion of 0.61 [+ or -] females in progeny 0.02 H = 2.74; df = 2,105; P = 0.2541 No. of parasitoids 25.91 [+ or -] produced 0.79 F = 0.14; df = 2,105; P = 0.8689 H = 0.52; df = 2,105; P = 0.7714 % of progeny surviving 0.84 [+ or -] to adulthood 0.01 Reproductive 85 % Compatibility Group matings Number of females 35 Proportion of 0.58 [+ or -] females in progeny 0.04b H = 8.81; df = 2,102; P = 0.0122 No. of parasitoids 24.62 [+ or -] produced 1.09b F = 5.96; df = 2,102; P = 0.0036 % of progeny surviving 0.80 [+ or -] to adulthood 0.02 F = 0.01; df = 2,105; P = 0.4242 Reproductive 92% Compatibility (1) F: F-statistic, H: Kruskal-Wallis test statistic. Means with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05).
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||Bonet, Aetueo; Kato, Toshihide; Castellanos, Ignacio; Pintureau, Bernard; Garcia, Delia|
|Date:||Mar 1, 2012|
|Previous Article:||Success of the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea (Diptera: Tachinidae) on natural and unnatural cricket hosts.|
|Next Article:||Toxicity of neem (Azadirachta indica) seed cake to larvae of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae), and its...|