Printer Friendly

Upregulation of SIRT1 gene in gastric adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer accounts for approximately 10% of cancers worldwide and its frequency is rare in individuals before the age of 30 years; the frequency increases after the age of 50 years. Gastric cancer occurs more frequently (almost twice) in males compared to females. There are several risk factors associated with gastric cancer; however, no single reason is responsible for the disease development (1).

Sirtuins are a class of proteins with nicotinamide adenine dinucleotidedependent deacetylase and adenosine diphosphate (ADP) ribosyl transferase activity. Seven sirtuins, Sirt (silent information regulator) 1-7, have been identified in mammals. SIRT1 gene overexpression is reportedly associated with cancer development through triggering of DNA repair impairment and cell proliferation (2). Moreover, SIRT1 overexpression has been identified in epithelial cancers, such as cancer of the breast, colon, gastric system, prostate, and ovaries; lymphoma; leukemia; central nervous system tumors; and soft tissue sarcomas (2-10).

Cancer pathogenesis is a multifactorial process, and the etiologic factors may differ according to geographic areas. There is no information about SIRT1 expression levels in gastric cancer in our region. The aim of this study was to investigate SIRT1 expression in patients with gastric cancer in our region and to determine the association between SIRT1 expression and clinicopathological features.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient selection

Overall, 64 patients who underwent gastric biopsy and were diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma and signet ring cell carcinoma between January 2011 and December 2013 were enrolled in the study along with 34 patients with benign gastric biopsy as the control group. An ethical approval was obtained from the Ethical Committee of Mugla Sitki Kocman University (30265539-622.01.00.00.13/196668). Patient records from the pathology department were searched to identify patients who underwent gastric biopsy or surgery between 2011 and 2013. The age of the patients in the control group ranged from 40 to 70 [(mean: 60[+ or -]1) years; 17 males (mean age: 64[+ or -]1 years) and 17 females (mean age: 57[+ or -]1 years)].

The previously obtained gastric tissues (from surgery or biopsy) were collected from the pathology department, and SIRT1 gene expressions were evaluated in the gastric tissues of all patients.

Tissue analysis

Tissue samples were prepared using a microtome from paraffin blocks, with a size of 5-9 u each. RNA easy Mini Kit (QIAGEN Sample & Assay Technologies, Germany) was used to obtain total RNA; after all tissue samples were deparaffinized, cDNA was synthesized from RNA, using RT2 qPCR primary assays (SABiosciences, Frederick, MD). SYBR Green Master Mix (Qiagen) was used to determine SIRT1 gene expression and GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) was used for internal controls. Gene expressions were analyzed using a realtime polymerase chain reaction.

Preparation of primers

SIRT1 primers (Delta Gene Assays, Fluidigm, South San Francisco, Calif., USA) supplied in a lyophilized from were diluted with the required amount of Tris-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid buffer to 100 [micro]M for each primer pair according to the manufacturer's instructions, vortexed, briefly centrifuged, and stored at -20[degrees]C (Gene 6000 Real-Time PCR; table 1).

Regarding pathologic analysis, tumor staging, and histologic type of the tumor were evaluated. Tumor stages were determined according to the tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) classification.

Groups and statistical analysis

Patients were classified according to the age ([less than or equal to]45 years and >45 years), gender (female, male), tumor stage, tumor localization, and histologic type. Firstly, statistical significance of SIRT1 gene expression was investigated between all patients with gastric cancer and the control group (table 2). Secondly, statistical analysis was conducted between gastric cancer subgroups according to the clinicopathological features and the control group (table 3).

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 12.0 software program (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA). The Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed for statistical analysis using the SPSS software. The results were showed as mean[+ or -]standard deviation. A p value <0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. To understand homogeneity in the distribution of the groups, a variance analysis was used. Data analysis was performed using [RT.sup.2] Profiler Data Analysis Software-Qiagen and 2' Average delta CT values, and standard deviation was used. For relative gene expression, 2' Average delta CT method and standard deviation was used.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were included in the study. Twenty-five patients were females (39.06%), whereas 39 were males (60.94%). Nine patients were under the age of 45 (14.06%) years. Regarding tumor stages, 12 patients were in stage II, 11 in stage IIIa, 13 in stage IIIb, and 28 in stage IV. Eleven patients had signet ring cell carcinoma. The mean age of the patients was 62[+ or -]1 (range: 33-88) years. The mean age of the female and male patients was 65[+ or -]1 (range: 33-88) years and 66[+ or -]1 (range: 31-88) years, respectively. SIRT1 gene 2' Average delta CT values were 0.102 in the control group and 0.292 in the patients with gastric cancer (relative risk: 2.86; p=0.014; fold change value 2.858 was calculated; p<0.05; table 2).

SIRT1 gene 2' Average delta CT values were statistically higher in the adenocarcinoma group (p<0.05) for all stages except stage 1 (p<0.05), tumor localization in the corpus group (p<0.01), tumor localization in the cardia group (p<0.05), female group (p<0.05), and under 45 years age group (p<0.05; table 3).

SIRT1 gene 2' Average values were not statistically significant in the antrum group, signet ring group, male group, and over 45 years age group (p>0.05; table 3).

DISCUSSION

With the aim to investigate the expression of SIRT1 genes in patients with gastric cancer and its relation to the clinicopathological features, we found that SIRT1 gene is significantly over expressed in gastric carcinoma compared to control patients. We found that SIRT1 gene was up-regulated in all tumor stages (Stage II-IV, except stage I) compared to the control group. Overexpression of SIRT1 was also detected in antral and cardiac tumors compared to corpus, in adenocarcinoma compared to signet ring cell carcinoma, in females compared to males, and in patients who were aged <45 years compared to those aged >45 years.

Gastric cancer is one of the most challenging cancers in the world. According to National Cancer Institute of the United States of America, almost 0.9% of population have a lifetime risk for gastric carcinoma. Although it is treated with surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy together, the 5-year survival is around 29.3%. Gastric cancer comprises 1.8% of all cancer deaths (11). A majority of the gastric cancers are sporadic; however, familial and hereditary factors have also been determined. Different mutations and impaired DNA repair mechanisms have been determined in hereditary syndromes, such as CDH1 heterozygous germ line mutation, MSH-2 or MLH-1, and mutations in TP53, STK11, and APC. Moreover, environmental factors also influence pathogenesis of gastric carcinoma (12).

SIRT1 and deleted in breast cancer 1 (DBC-1) genes play an antagonistic role on p53 tumor suppressor gene. SIRT1 deacetylates p53 gene, decreases the activity of p53, and increases carcinogenesis. However, the activity of SIRT1 is controlled by DBC-1 (13,14). In contrast, some studies have reported that SIRT1 prevents [beta] catenin pathway and acts as a tumor suppressor gene (15,16). However, our study results suggest that SIRT1 acts as a tumor promoter gene. Moreover, Feng et al. (17) evaluated the tissue microarray technique and immunohistochemical expression of SIRT1, p53, and Ki-67 in 176 gastric cardiac carcinoma tissues and 32 normal gastric cardiac region tissues and found that SIRT1 overexpression was also significantly associated with lymphatic metastasis, TNM stage, proliferative status, and prognosis, consistent with our results.

Kang et al. (13) also investigated the association between immunohistochemical expression of SIRT1, DBC-1, p53, and p-catenin and various clinicopathological characteristics in 452 gastric carcinoma patients who underwent gastrectomy and found that SIRT1 and DBC-1 can be considered good prognostic factors in gastric adenocarcinoma. The correlation between SIRT1 and DBC-1 expression was investigated in 177 patients with gastric cancer. Immunohistochemical expression of SIRT1, DBC-1, and p53 was evaluated, and SIRT1 overexpression was found to be associated with shorter overall and relapse-free survival in univariate analyses. Zhang et al. (18) also suggested that SIRT1 and STAT3 mRNA expression indicate poor prognosis in gastric cancer, suggesting the use of SIRT1 in diagnosis and follow-up (18). However, Yang et al. (19) reported that SIRT1 is downregulated in gastric cancer, and SIRT1 activators can be used therapeutically. However, in this study, we found that the SIRT1 gene is upregulated in gastric cancer. The study of Qui et al. (20) showed that the expression of Beclin-1 and SIRT1 were shared independently or together with poor prognosis in gastric cancer. Yan et al. (21), in the case of Yes-associated protein and gastric cancer, found an inverse correlation between SIRT1 and wap and showed that the reduction in WAP concentration resulted in poor prognostic outcome in stomach cancer with activation in SIRT1 expression and inhibitory effect on Mfn2-mediated mitophagy. Jiang et al. (22) reported that SIRT1 expression is associated with poor prognosis in stomach cancer patients over a short period of time (3 years) and that patient age, tumor stage, and differentiation are associated with SIRT1 expression in the systematic metaanalysis.

It has recently been published that there is a relationship between SIRT1 and treatment resistance. Chen et al. (23) reported an inverse correlation between tNOX and SIRT1 and oxalplatin-induced apoptosis in their study of gastric cancer cell line (AGS cell line) cultures. Zhank et al. (24) showed that upregulation of miR-132 in Lgr5+ gastric cancer stem cell-like cells leads to cisplatin resistance through the SIRT1/CREB/ABCG2 signaling pathway.

In conclusion, we think that most of the gastric adenocarcinomas are with overexpression of SIRT1, and this overexpression may be associated with unfavorable gastric adenocarcinoma characteristics and poor prognosis. As a conclusion, SIRT1 gene expression is associated with clinicopathological features in gastric adenocarcinoma. The significant SIRT1 upregulation in females, corpus localized tumors, and in patients who are under the age of 45 years suggest that it is a poor prognostic factor. Although the role of SIRT1 in gastric tumorigenesis is still unclear, our results suggest that their expression is a clinically significant prognostic indicator for gastric carcinoma. In addition to being a prognostic marker, SIRT1 may also serve as a therapeutic target in gastric cancer.

Several limitations can be considered in our study. This study was conducted as a cross-sectional study for not including stage 1 gastric cancer tumor samples due to the disease rarity. Moreover, a survival analysis was not performed to determine gene's prognostic profile because no follow-up data were available.

Ethics Committee Approval: This study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Mugla Sitki Kocman University (30265539-622.01.00.00.13/196668).

Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from the patients who participated in this study

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Author Contributions: Concept - O.O.; Design - E.S.Q., M.K.; Supervision - A.K.B., M.P.; Resources - S.I.K., C.D.; Materials - O.i.C.; Data Collection and/or Processing - O.i.C.; Analysis and/or Interpretation - M.K.; Literature Search - O.O.; Writing Manuscript - O.O.; Critical Review -A.K.B., M.P.

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.

REFERENCES

(1.) Brenner H, Rothenbacher D, Arndt V. Epidemiology of stomach cancer. Methods Mol Biol 2009; 467-77. [CrossRef]

(2.) Yuan H, Su L, Chen WY. The emerging and diverse roles of sirtuins in cancer: a clinical perspective. Onco Targets Ther 2013; 6: 1399.

(3.) Hiraike H, Wada-Hiraike O, Nakagawa S, et al. Expression of DBC-1 is associated with nuclear grade and HER2 expression in breast cancer. Exp Ther Med 2011; 2:1105-9. [CrossRef]

(4.) Wang F, Chan CH, Chen K, et al. Deacetylation of FOXO3 by Sirt1 or SIRT2 leads to Skp2-mediated FOX03 ubiquitination and degradation. Oncogene 2012; 31:1546-57. [CrossRef]

(5.) Noh S J, Baek HA, Park HS, et al. Expression of Sirt1 and cortactin is associated with progression of non-small cell lung cancer. Pathol Res Pract 2013; 209: 365-70. [CrossRef]

(6.) Menssen A, Hydbring P, Kapelle K, et al. The c-MYC oncoprotein, the NAMPT enzyme, the Sirt1-inhibitor DBC-1, and the Sirt1 deacetylase form a positive feedback loop. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012; 109: 187-96. [CrossRef]

(7.) Allison SJ, Jiang M, Milner J. Oncogenic viral protein HPV E7 up-regulates the Sirt1 longevity protein in human cervical cancer cells. Aging 2009; 1: 316. [CrossRef]

(8.) Marshall GM, Liu PY, Gherardi S, et al. Sirt1 promotes N-Myc oncogenesis through a positive feedback loop involving the effects of MKP3 and ERK on N-Myc protein stability. PLoS Genet 2011; 7: e1002135. [CrossRef]

(9.) Kozako T, Aikawa A, Shoji T et al. High expression of the longevity gene product Sirt1 and apoptosis induction by sirtinol in adult T-cell leukemia cells. Int J Cancer 2012; 131:2044-55. [CrossRef]

(10.) Dickson BC, Riddle ND, Brooks JS, et al. "Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1): a potential immunohistochemical marker and therapeutic target in soft tissue neoplasms with myoid differentiation." Human Pathol 2013; 44:1125-30. [CrossRef]

(11.) Ries LAG, Reichman ME, Lewis DR, et al. Cancer survival and incidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. Oncologist 2003; 8: 541-52. [CrossRef]

(12.) McLean MH, El-Omar EM. Genetics of gastric cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 11: 664-74. [CrossRef]

(13.) Kang Y, Jung WY, Lee H, et al. Expression of Sirt1 and DBC-1 in Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Korean J Pathol 2012; 46: 523. [CrossRef]

(14.) Vaziri H, Dessain SK, Eaton EN, et al. hSIR2(Sirt1) functions as an NAD-dependent p53 deacetylase. Cell 2001; 107: 149-59. [CrossRef]

(15.) Somasundaram K, El-Deiry WS. Tumor suppressor p53: regulation and function. Front Biosci 2000; 5: 424-37. [CrossRef]

(16.) Firestein R, Blander G, Michan S, et al. The Sirt1 deacetylase suppresses intestinal tumorigenesis and colon cancer growth. PloS one 2008; 3: 2020. [CrossRef]

(17.) Feng AN, Zhang LH, Fan XS, et al. Expression of Sirt1 in gastric cardiac cancer and its clinicopathologic significance. Int J Surg Pathol 2011; 19: 743-50. [CrossRef]

(18.) Zhang S, Huang S, Deng C, etal. Co-ordinated overexpression of Sirt1 and STAT3 is associated with poor survival outcome in gastric cancer patients. Oncotarget 2017; 8:18848. [CrossRef]

(19.) Yang Q, Wang B, Gao W, et al. Sirt1 Is Downregulated in Gastric Cancer and Leads to G 1-phase Arrest via NF-[kappa]B/Cyclin D1 Signaling. Mol Cancer Res 2013; 11:1497-507. [CrossRef]

(20.) Qiu G, Li X, Wei C, et al. The prognostic role of Sirt1-autophagy axis in gastric cancer. Dis Markers 2016; 2016: 6869415. [CrossRef]

(21.) Yan H, Qiu C, Sun W, Gu M, et al. Yap regulates gastric cancer survival and migration via Sirt1/Mfn2/mitophagy. Oncology Rep 2018; 39: 1671-81. [CrossRef]

(22.) Jiang B, Chen JH, Yuan WZ, et al. Prognostic and clinical value of Sirt1 expression in gastric cancer: A systematic meta-analysis. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 2016; 36: 278-84. [CrossRef]

(23.) Chen HY, Cheng HL, Lee YH, et al. Tumor-associated NADH oxidase (tNOX)-NAD+-sirtuin 1 axis contributes to oxaliplatin-induced apoptosis of gastric cancer cells. Oncotarget 2017; 8: 15338. [CrossRef]

(24.) Zhang L, Guo X, Zhang D, et al. Upregulated miR-132 in Lgr5+ gastric cancer stem cell-like cells contributes to cisplatin-resistance via Sirt1/CREB/ABCG2 signaling pathway. Mol Carcinog 2017; 56: 2022-34. [CrossRef]

Onder Ozcan (1) [iD], Ahmet Korkut Belli (1) [iD], Esin Sakalli Cetin (2) [iD], Murat Kara (3) [iD], Ozgur Ilhan Celik (4) [iD], Mehmet Kaplan (5) [iD], Selami Ilgaz Kayilioglu (1) [iD], Cem Donmez (1) [iD], Murat Polat (1) [iD]

(1) Department of General Surgery, Mugla Sitki Kocman University School of Medicine, Mugla, Turkey

(2) Department of Medical Biology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University School of Medicine, Mugla, Turkey

(3) Department of Medical Genetics, Mugla Sitki Kocman University School of Medicine, Mugla, Turkey

(4) Department of Pathology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University School of Medicine, Mugla, Turkey

(5) Department of General Surgery, NCR International Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey

Corresponding Author: Onder Ozcan; onderozcan@mu.edu.tr

Received: July 17, 2018 Accepted: September 17, 2018 Available online date: February 14, 2019

DOI:10.5152/tjg.2019.18550
Table 1. Preparation of primers SIRT1 primers (Delta Gene Assays,
Fluidigm, South San Francisco, CA, USA)

Target  Assay ID     Assay Name      FP             RP

SIRT1   GEA00013147  SIRT1_13147_i5  ACAAAGTTGACT-  GTTCATCAGCTGG-
                                     GTGAAGCTGTAC   GCACCTA

                                       Gene Full
Target  Design RefSeq  Blast Hits      Name

SIRT1   NM_012238.4    NM_001142498.1  sirtuin 1
                       NM_012238.4

Table 2. SIRT-1 gene expression in gastric cancer patients and control
group

        Control       Gastric
        Group         Cancer
        2[and](-Avg.  2[and](-Avg.
        (Delta(Ct))   (Delta(Ct))   Fold Change  P

SIRT-1  0.102         0.292         2.858[and]   0.014

Table 3. SIRT gene expression according to the clinicopathologic
features

                    2 ([and])(-Avg.
Variables           (Delta(Ct))      Fold Change     P

Stage
Stage-I             -                -             -
Stage-II            0.546             5.338 (^)    0.008 (*)
Stage-IIIa          0.631             6.166 (^)    0.0001 (*)
Stage-IIIb          0.404             3.954 (^)    0.004 (*)
Stage-IV            0.344             3.3623 (^)   0.004
Tumor Localization
Antrum              0.234            23.920 (^)    0.062
Corpus              0.401             3.920 (^)    0.001 (*)
Cardia              0.227             2.221 (^)    0.043 (*)
Histologic type
Adeno Ca            0.307             3.000 (^)    0.009 (*)
Signet Ring
Cell Carcinoma      0.225             2.200 (^)    0.115
Gender
Female              0.307             3.000 (^)    0.009 (*)
Male                0.225             2.300 (^)    0.115
Age
<45                 0.321             3.145 (^)    0.008 (*)
>45                 0.206             2.018 (^)    0.071
Control g.          0.102

(^) up-regulation; (*) significantly p value
COPYRIGHT 2019 AVES
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2019 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Author:Ozcan, Onder; Belli, Ahmet Korkut; Cetin, Esin Sakalli; Kara, Murat; Celik, Ozgur Ilhan; Kaplan, Meh
Publication:The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology
Article Type:Report
Date:Apr 1, 2019
Words:2924
Previous Article:HLA-DQ2/DQ8 frequency in adult patients with celiac disease, their first-degree relatives, and normal population in Turkey.
Next Article:Real-life results of treatment with ombitasvir, paritaprevir, dasabuvir, and ritonavir combination in patients with chronic renal failure infected...
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters