Printer Friendly

United Nations: Special AIDS Session Next Week.

On June 25-27 the entire United Nations General Assembly will focus on AIDS. The goal is worldwide commitment and consensus on dealing with the epidemic. The negotiations leading up to this Special Session have been contentious, even more so than most diplomatic meetings.

No matter what the outcome, this meeting will be historic and will be a major focus of world attention. Here is some background, and resources that you can use as a starting point for finding information.

Official Web Page

The Web page for the United Nations General Assembly Special Session on HIV/AIDS (often called UNGASS) is Here are some of the important documents available there before the meeting:

* Under the heading "A call to action" are several recent statements by United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan, who has provided exceptional leadership on this issue in advance of the United Nations special session;

* The "Documents" section includes the "Revised Draft Declaration of Commitment on HIV/AIDS" -- a single-text statement that is being negotiated in order to reach as much agreement as possible. (At this time, June 16, the current draft is the 2nd published version, dated May 11.)

* The "Bulletin" is an electronic news bulletin to keep participants informed. At this date (June 21) only one issue has been published, with general background such as AIDS statistics, overview of the meeting, and media accreditation. Two more issues are planned by June 25.

* A "calendar" of dozens of official UN and unofficial events around the time of the session.

* Other sections on background information, NGOs and civil society, and media.

From the official media advisory:

Governments Will Convene to Plan Intensified Action to Combat the Global Epidemic

The United Nations will hold a Special Session on HIV/AIDS to galvanize leadership at the highest levels, intensify international action and mobilize the resources needed to combat the epidemic. The Special Session, to take place from 25 to 27 June 2001 at UN Headquarters in New York, will be the first ever to address a public health issue.

UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and high-level government delegations will address:

* The importance of political leadership in developing effective responses and decreasing the stigma associated with HIV/AIDS

* Encouraging all sectors of society to play a major role

* Increasing resources for treatment, prevention, and care

* Preventing new infections and alleviating the social and economic impact of the epidemic

* Access to care and the development of new technologies and treatments that are both effective and affordable

Governments are expected to adopt a Declaration of Commitment setting targets and timetables. In addition to statements in the Plenary, four interactive round tables will discuss human rights, international funding and cooperation, prevention and care, and the socioeconomic impact of HIV/AIDS. These will involve participants from NGOs, the private sector and other civil society groups. A full programme of press conferences and special events will provide additional media opportunities.

Live Webcast, Plus Archive and Transcript, a service of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, is webcasting the entire UN Special Session on HIV/AIDS, June 25-27. Anyone around the world can watch it for free.

An archive and transcript will also be available, a few days after the session.

For more information, or to watch the webcast, visit

Areas of Agreement

On June 16 the Background section of the official Web site includes a one-paragraph summary under "What Will the Outcome Be?" It summarizes some of the major areas of at least nominal agreement:

Given the urgency of the epidemic, at the special session governments are expected to agree on a Declaration of Commitment that will outline priority areas where stronger action must be taken. These are likely to include prevention, improved access to care and treatment, care of children orphaned by AIDS, expanded public/private sector partnerships, the need for an accelerated multisectoral response to the epidemic and for resources commensurate with the crisis.


Some of the major areas of disagreement are:

* Whether to name vulnerable groups, such as men who have sex with men, in the Declaration of Commitment. The current draft includes the following section, which some countries object to:

By 2003, develop national strategies, policies and programmes, through a participatory approach, to promote and protect the health of those most vulnerable to, and at greatest risk of HIV infection, such as: children in especially difficult circumstances, men who have sex with men, sex workers and their clients, injecting drug users and their sexual partners, persons confined in institutions and prison populations, refugees and internally displaced persons and people separated from their families due to work or conflict;

According to a June 15 Associated Press story, an Egyptian diplomat commented, "Does it have to be so explicit? This is shocking for my society." He proposed "irresponsible sexual behavior" instead. And the Iranian Ambassador said negotiations should "not be considered as an opportunity by certain quarters in the Western world to push the envelope on areas where there is cultural sensitivity, ideological sensitivity, ethical sensitivity" (from same Associated Press story).

Apparently the U.S. wants to use general language such as "vulnerable individuals" instead of naming the groups.

Many AIDS professionals and activists consider the issue important because they want to use the document that emerges to pressure their governments to focus prevention resources where the epidemic is spreading fastest. Many countries, including the U.S., have targeted prevention resources irrationally because of a population's disadvantaged or unpopular political position, or minority status.

* Human rights. Here is the current text, which some countries want changed, although as of today (June 21) there seems to have been progress toward narrowing the areas of controversy:


Respect for human rights reduces vulnerability to HIV/AIDS

Respect for the rights of people living with HIV/AIDS drives an effective response

By 2003, complete policy reviews of existing non-discrimination legislation and protective laws, drawing as appropriate on the United Nations Guidelines on HIV/AIDS and Human Rights, in order to adopt new or strengthen existing legislation to protect the human rights of people living with HIV/AIDS, eliminate discrimination and ensure their equal rights in education, employment and services;

By 2005, ensure that national legislation is in place to promote, protect and respect the rights of people living with HIV/AIDS to information, quality care, support, confidentiality and privacy;

By 2005, develop and implement national strategies that: assist women to exercise control over and make their own decisions relating to their sexuality in order to protect themselves from HIV infection; and promote shared responsibility of men and women to ensure safe sex and prevent HIV infection;

By 2005, implement measures to increase capacities of women and young girls to protect themselves from risk of infection, principally through gender-sensitive prevention education and the provision of reproductive health services;

By 2005, develop and begin to implement national strategies to promote women's full enjoyment of all human rights and reduce their vulnerability to HIV/AIDS through the elimination of all forms of violence against women and girls, including harmful traditional and customary practices, abuse and rape, battering, and trafficking in women and girls;

Apparently the U.S. does not want any movement toward health care as a human right. And some countries do not like the idea of human rights and are reluctant to see it extended.

* Treatment Access vs. Prevention and/or Intellectual Property

The current draft focuses on prevention and only two paragraphs on treatment and care. But pharmaceutical companies -- and therefore the U.S. and some other delegates -- have problems with the following paragraph, apparently because they do not want any language suggesting collective action toward differential pricing or other ways of making medications affordable:

By 2003, ensure that national strategies are developed in close collaboration with the international community, civil society and the business sector to increase substantially the availability of antiretroviral drugs and of essential drugs, for the treatment of HIV infection and opportunistic infections, by addressing factors affecting the provision of these drugs, including technical and system capacity, pricing, including differential pricing and by examining alternatives for increasing access and affordability of HIV/AIDS related drugs.

There is also controversy over whether to provide antiretroviral treatment in Africa and other poor regions, vs. focusing on prevention and limiting treatment to low-cost, unpatented antibiotics, and only using antiretrovirals for prevention of mother-to-infant transmission.

Recently two U.S. officials created a firestorm of controversy by suggesting that Africans could not take their medicines on time -- first an unnamed senior Treasury Dept. official in late April, then over a month later, Andrew Natsios, the new director of the U.S. Agency for International Development -- leading to calls for the latter's resignation, including an op ed in The Washington Post, June 15, and a student campaign to send him watches. Some observers are less concerned about the unfortunate remarks themselves than by what they may reveal about moves toward a U.S. policy of writing off tens of millions of people already infected in poor countries -- whether to defend prevention program funding, to save money, or to avoid intellectual-property challenges resulting from raised expectations and efforts to obtain access to patented antiretrovirals.

One code word to watch is "care." Often it means hospice care or other inexpensive treatment -- not including antiretrovirals to address the central cause of the illness.
COPYRIGHT 2001 John S. James
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:James, John S.
Publication:AIDS Treatment News
Geographic Code:0JINT
Date:Jun 23, 2001
Previous Article:Global AIDS: Back to the Past?
Next Article:Drug Patents and Developing Countries: New Proposal.

Related Articles
Politics, science, people ... and AIDS.
United Nations AIDS Session: Email Input Sought.
June 23: New York March and Rally Before United Nations AIDS Session.
United Nations: Civil Society Snubbed at Final Preparatory Meetings on AIDS.
United Nations AIDS Meeting.
YouthLens: youth-adult partnerships show promise.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters