United Nations: Civil Society Snubbed at Final Preparatory Meetings on AIDS.
The preparation process uses the well-known "single text" method of negotiation. A document is drafted, put out for comment, and then changed periodically in the attempt to reach agreement. The second version of this document (May 28, 2001) is now being circulated; it is on the UNAIDS Web site, at http://unaids.org
The email discussion list is working well. Readers may want to subscribe by sending email to: firstname.lastname@example.org
The first session set up for meetings between official United Nations delegates and civil society also went very well, although perhaps by accident. Due to glitches in the agenda, there were entirely unexpected opportunities for official delegates and civil society members to meet and discuss AIDS.
The May 21-25 preparatory session was different. According to a May 24 press release by 12 organizations from the U.S., Canada, Venezuela, Ukraine, Brazil, UK, India, and Norway:
"Many NGOs [non-governmental organizations, usually called nonprofits in the U.S.] traveled to New York from around the world, responding to the invitation of the President of the General Assembly, but found themselves unable to participate meaningfully or share their expertise with delegates, contrary to the General Assembly's own resolution which called for involvement of civil society in the development of a Declaration of Commitment to be signed by all 189 UN member states in June. While a handful of countries strongly supported civil society's contributions, two brief "dialogue" sessions - scheduled during the lunch and evening hours - went unattended by the majority of countries. Anand Grover from the Lawyers Collective HIV/AIDS Unit, Mumbai, India, said 'I am very disappointed at the absence of the delegates from countries who are most affected, their short attention span, and the lack of meaningful government participation.'
"Yesterday the United States went so far as to ask all NGO representatives to leave the room, including those with ECOSOC accreditation who are normally entitled to observe country delegation negotiations. Since the US made a formal complaint, the Chair was forced to take the action, although he was perfectly willing to have the NGOs stay in room. 'This is a very bad precedent for the future and makes NGOs worry as to what will happen at the General Assembly itself,' said Carol Lubin, one of those who was ejected."
The NGOs called on the United Nations to encourage member nations to include civil society and especially people with HIV or AIDS in their delegations, encourage member states to attend sessions they set up for dialog with civil society, and otherwise ensure that civil society can participate meaningfully in the process of developing worldwide programs for controlling AIDS.
There is particular concern that some countries want to roll back human rights in general, and some do not want to acknowledge or even name vulnerable groups (such as men who have sex with men, injecting drug users, transgenered individuals, and sex workers) because of prevailing attitudes.
The fundamental problem, we suspect, is that any successful global AIDS program is likely to threaten powerful interests: big pharmaceutical companies (fearful about patent rights), some conservative religions (threatened by sex), and even part of "AIDS Inc." (concerned that momentum for other AIDS programs might damage theirs). We suspect that political problems like these are what has kept the world from dealing successfully with AIDS so far. It will be hard to negotiate among all the special interests that hold some degree of veto power over global progress against disease.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Author:||James, John S.|
|Publication:||AIDS Treatment News|
|Date:||May 25, 2001|
|Previous Article:||June 23: New York March and Rally Before United Nations AIDS Session.|
|Next Article:||Global AIDS: Back to the Past?|