Printer Friendly

Unfair food: obesity litigation twist.

OBESE PEOPLE who blame restaurant chains or other food sellers for making them fat face a daunting obstacle when they try to recover damages in court: They have to show that a particular company is responsible for their obesity. But Richard Daynard, a Northeastern University law professor who runs the Obesity and Law Project at the Public Health Advocacy Institute, thinks he has found a solution: suing food companies under state consumer protection laws, which "avoids complicated causation issues."

In the January issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Daynard and a co-author note that most of these statutes "do not require a showing that the defendant's misbehavior caused a specific illness." Indeed, "many state consumer protection statutes do not require a showing that individual plaintiffs relied on the [defendant's] misrepresentations."

Shortly after the article appeared, the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) took Daynard's advice and ran with it, announcing a lawsuit against Kellogg, maker of sugary breakfast cereals and other products the center thinks kids should not be eating, and Viacom, owner of TV channels and cartoon characters used to market "nutritionally poor" food to children. Joined by the Boston-based Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood and two parents, CSPI said it planned to seek billions of dollars in damages under a Massachusetts law prohibiting "unfair or deceptive acts or practices."

The lawsuit argues that children "are intrinsically deceived and abused by encouragement to eat unhealthy junk foods" and are therefore injured every time they see an ad for Apple Jacks on Nickelodeon or a box of Sponge-Bob SquarePants Pop-Tarts in the supermarket. By CSPI's reckoning, each such exposure is worth at least $25 in statutory damages, whether or not parents actually buy the food.
COPYRIGHT 2006 Reason Foundation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Citings
Author:Sullum, Jacob
Publication:Reason
Article Type:Brief article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2006
Words:289
Previous Article:In the last two years, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power has spent $1 million trying to convince residents their tap water is not only...
Next Article:Accidental drug war: Medicare benefits that bankrupt.
Topics:


Related Articles
A time to sue? (On the web: www.cspinet.org).
Food fright: potentially faced with a high tab for fast-food lawsuits, insurers crave information about current litigation. (Commercial...
Blinded by science: The National Heart Foundation of Australia's position statement on dietary fat and overweight/obesity.
Food advertising and broadcasting legislation--a case of system failure?
The brain link: researchers have discovered an amazing connection between how the brain is involved in obesity and drug addiction.
Eating troubles.
The obesity challenge: in the elderly, weight gain isn't always a good thing.
Caring for obese patients in a culturally safe way: obesity is a culturally constructed concept and nurses need to be culturally safe in their...

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |