Printer Friendly

Understanding multiferroic hexagonal manganites by static and ultrafast optical spectroscopy.

1. Introduction

Multiferroic materials [1-4] with the coexistence of various ferroic order (ferromagnetic, ferroelectric, or ferroelastic) have attracted great attention in condensed matter research due to their great potential for applications in the fields of oxide electronics, spintronics, and even the green energy devices for reducing the power consumption. With multiferroic oxides (in single phase), the coupling interaction among various order parameters causes the so-called magnetoelectric effect [5-10]. In this, a polarization can be induced by applying a magnetic field or a magnetization can be induced by applying an electric field. Although the properties of electricity and magnetism were combined into one common discipline by the Maxwell equations, the electric and magnetic orderings in solid-state materials are always considered separately. This is because that the electric charges of electrons and ions are responsible for the charge effects, whereas the electron spins govern the magnetic properties.

Prellier et al. [11] classified the characteristics of multiferroic materials into three categories. The first is Bi-based compounds, such as BiMn[O.sub.3] and BiFe[O.sub.3]. The second is perovskites and related ReMn[O.sub.3] compounds (Re = Y, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, and Lu). The third is ReM[n.sub.2][O.sub.5] (Re is rare earth element). Additionally, Cheong and Mostovoy [12] summarized the classification of ferroelectrics into "proper" and "improper" according to their mechanisms of inversion symmetry breaking. In proper ferroelectrics, the main driving force toward the polar state was associated with the electronic pairing. On the other hand, the induced polarization in improper ferroelectrics involves a more complex lattice distortion or other accidental orderings. For example, the hexagonal manganite ReMn[O.sub.3] compounds show a lattice distortion to enlarge their unit cell, which is the so-called geometric ferroelectricity [13-15].

The aim of this paper is to understand the multiferroic hexagonal manganites studied by some optical techniques. In Section 2, the over all features of manganites are introduced. The structure of rare earth manganite is strongly depending on the size of rare earth and also temperature. The environment of Mn ions significantly affects its electronic structure which was investigated by static linear and nonlinear spectra in Section 3. Section 4 is the main part of this paper. The ultrafast spectroscopies demonstrate the interaction between electron, phonon, and spin systems on multiferroic hexagonal manganites. Finally, the summary and future outlook will be given in Section 5.

2. The Characteristics of Multiferroic Manganites ReMn[O.sub.3]

Recently, multiferroic rare earth manganites (ReMn[O.sub.3]) have attracted a great deal of attention due to their manifestations of intriguing and significant couplings between the magnetic and electric order parameters. Generally, ReMn[O.sub.3] has two kinds of multi ferroic structures, that is, hexagonal and orthorhombic. The rare earth ([Re.sup.3+]) ionicsize shrinks from 1.11 [Angstrom] to 0.94 [Angstrom] with decreasing the atomic number and reducing the electrons residing in the 4f orbit, called the lanthanum contraction effect. The rare earth ions ([Re.sup.3+]) have closely chemical properties because the same electronic configurations of 5[s.sup.2]5[p.sup.6] for outermost electrons. The coexistence of ferroic orders in ReMn[O.sub.3] with hexagonal (smaller ionic radius of rare earth Re = Sc, Y, and from Ho to Lu) or orthorhombic (larger ionic radius of rare earth Re = La to Dy) (shown in Figure 1) structure yields complex physics in the intimate interactions among charge, orbital, lattice, and spin degrees of freedom. It also has fascinating physical properties which might lead to promising applications. The orthorhombic structure with a Pnma space group forms the stable crystal structure of ReMn[O.sub.3] perovskite oxides with Re = La to Dy, which belongs to the magnetic ferroelectrics induced by magnetic ordering [8,16]. Furthermore, another family of compounds with smaller ionic size (for Re = Y, Ho, Er, Yb, Lu, etc.) forms the stable hexagonal structure with [P6.sub.3]cm space group. The critical point of the structure transition is located near YMn[O.sub.3] ([Y.sup.3+] = 1.06 [Angstrom]) and HoMn[O.sub.3] ([Ho.sup.3+] = 1.05 A). Consequently, the crystal structures of these two families have been transformed from hexagonal to orthorhombic (or vice versa) by many experimental techniques, for example, high-temperature and high-pressure processes [17, 18], chemical solution deposition (CSD) [19], the metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) [20], molecular beam epitaxy (MBE)[21], sputtering [22], and pulsed laser deposition (PLD) [16, 23].

In the following, we are going to focus on recent studies on the multiferroic hexagonal manganites (ReMn[O.sub.3], Re= rare earth) which have properties similar to various rare-earth elements, both electric transportation or magnetic behaviors. For example, the hexagonal HoMn[O.sub.3] has ferroelectric ordering at Curie temperature Tc = 875 K, the anti ferroic magnetic (AFM) [Mn.sup.3+] ordering at Neel temperature [T.sub.N] = 76 K, and the magnetic [Ho.sup.3+] ordering at [T.sub.Ho] = 4.6 K, in which the magnetically active ions are the high spin [Mn.sup.3+] (3[d.sup.4], S = 2) and [Ho.sup.3+] (4[f.sup.10])[5, 14, 33, 40-45]. The ferroelectricity in magnetoelectric ReMn[O.sub.3] is caused by a buckling of the layered Mn[O.sub.5] polyhedral and is accompanied by displacements of the Re ions, which lead to a net electric polarization. In 2004, through X-ray diffraction and first principle density functional calculations, Van Aken et al. [14] demonstrated the previous scenario in the hexagonal manganite YMn[O.sub.3], as shown in Figure 2 which presents the "geometric" generation of polarization and describes the tilting of a rigid Mn[O.sub.5] block with a magnetic Mn atom at the center. The magnetic structure has been studied by various experimental methods, such as neutron diffraction [45, 46] or second harmonic generation (SHG) [33, 47]. In [P6.sub.3]cm hexagonal manganites, each [Mn.sup.3+] ion is surrounded by five [O.sub.2-] ions, forming triangular planar sublattices in thebasal plane (a-b plane). The magnetic order of [Mn.sup.3+] is mainly dominated by AFM in-plane Mn-O-Mn super exchange interaction. Therefore, the triangular lattice of the Mn atoms exhibits strong geometrical frustration effect [48]. Furthermore, when the temperature cools to near [T.sub.N], the strong super exchange leads to a 120[degrees] arrangement between neighboring [Mn.sup.3+] spins in the basal plane which breaks the triangular frustration. In addition, the spins of Mn rotate with an angle of 90[degrees] at [T.sub.SR] (e.g., for h-HoMn[O.sub.3], [T.sub.SR] ~ 33 K) due to the onset of the AFM order of the Re moments, indicating the interaction between [Re.sup.3+] and [Mn.sup.3+] spins. Another magnetic transition at [T.sub.Re] involves the complete magnetic order of the [Re.sup.3+] ions (e.g., for h-HoMn[O.sub.3], [T.sub.Ho] ~ 5 K).

In addition, there are many studies showing the anomaly around [T.sub.N], such as the dielectric constant [49], specific heat measurements [50], and the lattice constant measurements [51], which are attributed to the indirect coupling via lattice strain (spin-lattice coupling). Recently, Lee et al. [52] observed the giant magnetoelastic effect in hexagonal YMn[O.sub.3] and LuMn[O.sup.3] by using the high-resolution neutron and synchrotron powder diffraction experiments. They further claimed that the magnetoelectric (ME) coupling can be interpreted by the giant magnetoelastic effect very well in ReMn[O.sub.3], that is, the magnetic long-range ordering induced the very large displacements of all atoms at [T.sub.N]. In other words, the magnetoelastic coupling allowed the atoms to undergo an isostructural transition, which has been regarded as the primary source of the magnetoelectric phenomena. In hexagonal ReMn[O.sub.3], this magneto elastic effect is two orders of magnitude larger than those appearing in other magnetic materials. Therefore, the gigantic magnetoelastic coupling plays a crucial role in dominating many physical properties in hexagonal ReMn[O.sub.3].

Femtosecond pump-probe spectroscopy has been established as a protocol for studying the interactions between electrons, phonons, and magnons [35,53-59] and is therefore employed with these multiferroic ReMn[O.sub.3] materials to gain insight into the magnetoelastic effect. By measuring the transient reflectivity ([DELTA]R/R) or transmittance ([DELTA]T/T), we can observe the intricate correlation processes among the charge, lattice, and spin degrees of freedom, which are explicitly recognized in different characteristic time scales. Thus, the microscopic mechanism of the magnetoelectric coupling or magnetoelastic behavior in this kind of strongly correlated materials can be revealed.

3. Electronic Structure Revealed by Optical Spectroscopy

To understand the extensive physical properties in multiferroic ReMn[O.sub.3] materials, it is crucial to realize the electronic band structure. With respect to the crystal structure of hexagonal ReMn[O.sub.3] manganites with Mn[O.sub.5] bipyramids, in contrast with the Mn[O.sub.6] octahedron of orthorhombic structure which split to [t.sub.2g] and [e.sub.g], the crystal field symmetry leads the quintet d levels of [Mn.sup.3+] ion splits into two low lying doublets of [e.sub.2g] and [e.sub.1g] [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] states and one singlet [a.sub.1g] [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] state. In general, optical spectroscopy is one of the powerful tools for investigating the electronic band structure in materials. Therefore, this structural difference between the hexagonal and orthorhombic phases could be disclosed by the optical spectra [60, 61].

3.1. Linear Optical Absorption Spectra. The first optical measurements in hexagonal YMn[O.sub.3] were performed by Kritayakirana et al. in 1969 [62], who observed that a near infrared absorption edge moves to higher energy with lowering temperature. For the case of hexagonal ScMn[O.sub.3] and ErMn[O.sub.3], the spectra of the real and imaginary parts of the dielectric function were also measured by Kalashnikova and Pisarev [63]. An abnormally drastic absorption peak in the region of 1.57-1.59 eV is the most pronounced feature in the dielectric spectra. This peak exhibits asymmetry and can be decomposed into two components by peak fitting with the Gaussian functions. Furthermore, the absorption intensity in the region above 2.2-2.4 eV increases with photon energy. In addition, hexagonal HoMn[O.sub.3] [64]and LuMn[O.sub.3] [31] also exhibit similar results. It is noteworthy that the near infrared absorption peak exhibits a substantial blueshift of ~0.16 eV from 300 K to 10 K as shown in Figure 3.Recently, Choi et al. [32] reported a systematic study on the hexagonal ReMn[O.sub.3] (R = Gd, Tb, Dy, and Ho), and the overall features in the spectra are similar to previous results. The most surprising part of those results is that the temperature dependent absorption peak at ~1.7 eV shows an unexpectedly large blueshift near [T.sub.N] among the rare-earth ions of Re = Lu, Gd, Tb, Dy, and Ho, as shown in Figure 4(a).

The assignment of the optical absorption peak at ~1.7 eV has also been an issue. One interpretation is that it comes from the charge transfer transition from the O 2p to the Mn 3d states [30, 63, 65, 66]. The photoemission spectroscopy (PES) study proposed that the O 2p is the highest occupied state, while the Mn [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] state is mostly unoccupied. Other occupied Mn 3d states [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] lie deep below [E.sub.F] [65]. The result of the first-principle electronic structure calculations also suggested that the top of the valence band is mainly determined by the O 2p states, and the lowest unoccupied band is formed by the [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] of Mn [30, 66]. The other interpretation, which is also an extensively convincing explanation, is that it comes from on-site d-d transition between the Mn 3d levels [31, 34, 64, 67]. The transition was attributed to the d-d transition between occupied [e.sub.2g] and [e.sub.1g] [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] orbitals and the unoccupied [a.sub.1g] [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] orbit, as shown in Figure 4(b). Because of the selection rule, transitions between d orbitals are forbidden. However, the selection rule is relaxed through the strong hybridization between the O 2p bands and transition metal d bands, which was observed in the hexagonal phase but not in the orthorhombic phase [60]. Furthermore, the strong peak at -5eV is attributed to the charge transfer transition from the hybridized O 2p level to the Mn [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] level.

The other feature of the near infrared absorption peak is that it shows the blueshift as decreasing temperatures accompanying the dramatic changes near [T.sub.N], which indicates the effective coupling between the electronic structure and the magnetic ordering. Souchkov et al. [31] attributed this temperature-dependent blueshift to the effects of exchange interactions between the [Mn.sup.3+] ions. The superexchange between [Mn.sup.3+] neighbors leads to lower [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] levels, whereas the [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] level is rarely affected (see Figure 4(b)). Moreover, together with the temperature-dependent and magnetic-dependent results [32] further implies that the magnetic ordering seriously influences the electronic structure.

3.2. Second Harmonic Generation Spectra. From the linear absorption spectra, the strong absorption caused by the d-d transition from [e.sub.2g] to [a.sub.1g] was clearly observed in hexagonal manganites. But the transition from [e.sub.1g] to [a.sub.1g] is another question. Recently, the second harmonic generation (SHG) was successfully used to explore the hidden localized d-d transitions, even those embedded in the much stronger absorption peaks [68]. The nonlinear polarization induced by optical waves is given by

[P.sub.i] (2[omega]) = [[epsilon].sub.0] ([[chi].sup.(i).sub.ijk] + [[chi].sup.(c).sub.ijk]) [E.sub.j] ([omega]) [E.sub.k] ([omega]), (1)

where [P.sub.i] (2[omega]) is the nonlinear polarization induced in a medium. [E.sub.j] ([omega]) and [E.sub.k] ([omega]) are the electric field components of the fundamental light. [[chi].sup.(i).sub.ijk] and [[chi].sup.(c).sub.ijk] are the second-order nonlinear susceptibility tensor which are uniquely defined by the crystalline and magnetic structure of the crystal, respectively. The subscripts i, j, and k correspond to the Cartesian coordinate axes x, y, and z. i is the direction of the nonlinear polarization generated; j and k are the directions of applied optical field.

There are two types of optical SHG in multiferroic hexagonal manganites. One is caused by the noncentrosymmetric ferroelectric ordering of charges and the nonlinear susceptibility is time invariant (i-type). The other is due to the centrosymmetric antiferromagnetic ordering of spins and the susceptibility is time noninvariant (c-type) [34]. Table 1 lists the allowed susceptibility tensor components in i-type and c-type. Thus, the SHG contribution from ferroelectric and antiferromagnetic can be distinguished easily. Figure 5 summarizes the magnetic symmetries of all the hexagonal ReMn[O.sub.3] compounds as derived from the SHG experiments [33].

The polarization [P.sup.FE] (2[omega]) with the space group [P6.sub.3]cm below the Curie temperature [T.sub.C] is


The contribution from antiferromagnetic [P.sup.AFM] (2[omega]) below [T.sub.N] for the space group P[[].sub.3]c[] (e.g., YMn[O.sub.3] [68, 69]) is


Figure 6(a) exhibits the SHG spectra of zxx component in YMn[O.sub.3] at 6K [34]. The strong peak is centered at 2.7 eV, which could be assigned to [sup.5][T.sub.2]([sup.5][T.sub.6]) [right arrow] [T.sub.1] ([sup.5][T.sub.1]) (corresponds to [e.sub.1g] [right arrow] [a.sub.1g]) transition. Figure 6(b) right panel shows the spectrum of [[chi].sub.yyy]. Peaks at 2.46 eV represent the [sup.5][T.sub.1]([sup.5][T.sub.6]) [right arrow] [sup.5][T.sub.1]([sup.5][T.sub.l]) (corresponds to [e.sub.1g] [right arrow] [a.sub.1g]) transition. These assignments have been proved by several studies [47, 68, 69]. In the inset of Figure 6(b),the temperature-dependent intensity of 2.46 eV disappears once the temperature is higher than [T.sub.N], which strongly indicates the closed correlation between the antiferromagnetic order parameter and SHG.

Consequently, the electronic structure of hexagonal manganites has been clearly depicted by linear and nonlinear optical spectroscopy, which further provides the basis for the excitation and relaxation of electrons in pump-probe spectroscopy.

4. Ultrafast Pump-Probe Spectroscopy

Ultrafast optical pump-probe spectroscopy has proven to be a powerful tool to investigate the dynamics of electron-electron interaction, electron-phonon interaction, and electron-spin interaction in various materials (see, e.g., [70-72]). To understand the underlying mechanisms in strongly correlated materials, the interactions between these order parameters should be derived first. Because of the different characteristic time scales and characteristic behavior for various degrees of freedom existing in these complex materials, ultrafast spectroscopy can determine the coupling between each order of parameters.

As shown in Figure 7, the general idea of the pump-probe technique is that changes of a sample induced by a pump pulse are obtained by detecting the change in the reflectivity ([DELTA]R) or transmissivity ([DELTA]T) of probe pulses as a function of probe delay time. The femtosecond time evolutions are derived by delaying the relative arrival time between the pump and probe pulses using a mechanical delay line. The fluence of a probe pulse is usually much weaker than that of a pump pulse in order to avoid second excitation in the samples. he polarizations of pump and probe pulses are set perpendicular to avoid interference between pump and probe beams [73].

Generally, this pump-probe spectroscopy composes two kinds of signals of the decay background and the oscillation, which relates to the relaxation of carriers and the dynamics of phonons or spins, respectively. By the Fourier transform, the frequency of phonon modes can be doubly obtained from the oscillation signals in pump-probe spectroscopy. Moreover, the phonon dynamics, that is, the time-evolution of oscillation signals, can be revealed by short-time Fourier transform (STFT), which cannot be reached by common Raman spectroscopy. Thus, the pump-probe spectroscopy is a powerful tool to provide the information in time-and frequency-domain simultaneously.

4.1. Spin-Charge Coupling. Since the magnetic ordering and the electronic structure of manganites are strongly correlated, as found in temperature-dependent absorption spectra, there is a strong coupling between charge and spin, which can be revealed by the time-resolved femtosecond spectroscopy [72]. Shih et al. observed the spin-charge coupling by various photon energy excitations on hexagonal HoMn[O.sub.3] single crystals [35]. As shown in Figure 8(a),the AR/R amplitude as a function of temperature shows a significant drop to cross zero amplitude line to become negative at some characteristic temperatures. The excitation photon energy used in the experiment changes from 1.52 to 1.68 eV, which is exactly the range covering the d-d transition energy [E.sub.dd] (transition from [e.sub.2g] to [a.sub.1g]) in the hexagonal ReMn[O.sub.3]. When the photon energy is larger than [E.sub.dd], the electrons in the [e.sub.2g] orbit can transfer to the unoccupied [a.sub.1g] orbital by absorbing pumping photons. Conversely, this onsite transition would be completely blocked when the transition energy [E.sub.dd] becomes larger than the pumping photon energy. Thus, the [DELTA]R/R amplitude vanishes at a certain temperature [T.sub.0], which drops with increasing photon energy, indicating the blueshift of [E.sub.dd]. Furthermore, Shih et al. found that the optical pump-probe measurement is sensitive to short-range magnetic order. In Figure 8(b),the [E.sub.dd] as a function of [T.sub.0] demonstrates a gradual increase in the extent of antiferromagnetic (AFM) ordering. Moreover, this ordering starts to deviate from linearity around [T.sub.N] (~76 K), suggesting the prevalence of global long-range AFM ordering. The AFM correlation evolves with temperature as it is close to [T.sub.N], shown as d[([DELTA]R/R).sub.p]/dT in Figure 8(c).Later, Wu et al. obtained similar results for hexagonal YMn[O.sub.3] thin films [74]. Furthermore, they found that the strain-induced changes of [T.sub.N], which are difficult to be observed by the temperature-dependent magnetization measurements, can be clearly revealed by the shift of d[([DELTA]R/R).sub.p]/dT.

As a result, the amplitude of the initial rising component of [DELTA]R/R corresponding to the [Mn.sup.3+] d-d transition is caused by strong coupling between the electronic structure and magnetic ordering. Moreover, the emergence of long-range and short-range magnetic orders can be clearly observed by optical pump-probe spectroscopy.

4.2. Spin-Lattice Coupling. Optically induced lattice vibration can be observed through optical pump-probe spectroscopy through a periodic oscillation. This periodic oscillation in reflectivity (or transmissivity), so-called coherent acoustic phonons, is caused by interference between the reflected probe beams from sample surface and the wave front of the propagating strain pulse generated upon the pump pulse [75, 76]. On the other hand, vibration with frequencies corresponding to optical phonon modes in various materials has been observed by pump-probe spectroscopy. A number of mechanisms have been proposed to explain these oscillations, for example, the displacive excitation of coherent phonons (DECP) [77] and the impulsive stimulated Raman scattering (ISRS) [78,79]. The simplest idea is that a pump pulse creates a standing wave which was generated by the coherent ionic motion. Then a following probe pulse senses the changes of refractive index which is modulated by the standing wave. In general, the reflectivity (or transmissivity) oscillation observed in pump-probe spectroscopy always corresponds to the optical phonon modes observed in Raman spectroscopy. In conclusion, the measurements of coherent acoustic or optical phonons dynamics at various temperatures are useful to study the spin-lattice coupling in multiferroic materials.

4.2.1. Coherent Optical Phonons. Figure 9 shows the reflectivity oscillation of ~3.6 THz (~120 [cm.sup.-1]) in LuMn[O.sub.3] [36, 37]. According to Raman studies, this vibration mode can be attributed to optical phonon of [A.sub.1] symmetry [80-82]. This fully symmetric mode corresponds to the Lu1 and Lu2 atomic motions in opposite directions a long the c-axis, as depicted in Figure 9(d) [36]. In temperature-dependent measurements, the optical phonon almost disappears below [T.sub.N], as shown in Figures 9(e) and 9(f) [37]. Additionally, the structural change from highly symmetry space group [P6.sub.3]/mmc to the tilted and distorted P[6.sub.3]cm ferroelectric structure [14]in hexagonal manganites (see Figure 1) takes place at the Curie temperature ([T.sub.C]), which is much higher than [T.sub.N]. Since there is no structural transition near [T.sub.N], the atomic motions of the optical phonon mode would be affected by the appearance of magnetic ordering. In other words, the disappearance of optical phonon mode might be attributed to the magnetoelastic coupling. In temperature-dependent Raman studies, the lowest frequency [A.sub.1] mode also shows anomaly at [T.sub.N] in YMn[O.sub.3] [82], ErMn[O.sub.3] [83], and LuMn[O.sup.3] [80, 82]which support close relation between phonon and spin systems.

4.2.2. Coherent Acoustic Phonons. Coherent acoustic phonons have been observed in many kinds of hexagonal manganites such as LuMn[O.sup.3] [37, 84], YMn[O.sub.3] [39], and HoMn[O.sub.3] [38]. The damped oscillation behavior in reflectivity changes with time delay t could be described as follows [76]:


where [lambda] is the wavelength of the probe pulses, n is the refraction index of samples without strain, [v.sub.s] is the strained layer propagating sound speed, and [xi] is the penetration depth of probe pulses. The frequency of the oscillation is given as [omega] = 4[pi]n[v.sub.s]/[lambda] and the dephasing time is [xi]/[v.sub.s].

According to (4), the dephasing time is proportional to the penetration depth of probe pulses t] and the inverse sound velocity 1/[v.sub.s]. However, the skin depth is much shorter than the propagating length of the strain pulse. Therefore, the dephasing time is dominated by the finite penetration depth [xi] of the probe [84]. The dephasing time of acoustic phonons shows strong temperature dependence (Figure 10), and the anomalous increase of the dephasing time near [T.sub.N] might be because of the photon energy being close to the edge of d-d transition. In other words, the penetration depth increases and the absorption of probe photons for the d-d transition decreases (due to the blueshift of [E.sub.dd] as mentioned in Section 3.1) as the temperature decreases.

The amplitude and period of the oscillation component in [DELTA]R/R show strong temperature dependence as shown in Figure 11. Both of these parameters are clearly anomalous near the magnetic ordering temperature [T.sub.N]. The amplitude of the oscillation component in [DELTA]R/R gradually increases with decreasing temperature and reaches the maximum near a characteristic temperature (~190 K for YMn[O.sub.3] [39] and ~200 K for LuMn[O.sub.3] [37]). Then it decreases when the temperature approaches [T.sub.N], as shown in Figure 11(a).This may imply the appearance of AFM short-range ordering, as mentioned in [35]. On the other hand, the period of the oscillation component in [DELTA]R/R also slightly shrinks with decreasing temperature. Surprisingly, it dramatically shrinks around [T.sub.N] as shown in Figure 11(b).This strongly indicates the close correlation between AFM ordering and the propagation of thermal stress along c-axis, which is consistent with the results in heat capacity measurements [13,85]. In addition, the ferroelectric polarization along the c-axis caused by polyhedron tilting of Mn[O.sub.5] and distortion of the rare-earth ions [14] is well known. Thus, the propagation of a strain pulse with the modulation of dielectric constant (or ferroelectric polarization) along c-axis is indeed affected by the appearance of AFM ordering. Neutron diffraction experiments also have demonstrated the extra displacement of the rare-earth and oxygen atoms along c-axis at [T.sub.N] [52]. Finally, these results in amplitude and period of the oscillation component in [DELTA]R/R provide evidence for magnetoelastic coupling in these intriguing materials.

5. Summary and Outlook

In this paper, the recent developments on the electronic structures and ultrafast dynamics of hexagonal manganites have been reviewed. The electronic structure can be clearly revealed by the static linear optical absorption spectra and nonlinear second harmonic generation spectra. The temperature-dependent d-d transition energy exhibits an unexpected change near the spin ordering temperature [T.sub.N]. This strongly indicates the coupling between electronic structure and antiferromagnetism in hexagonal manganites. Fortunately, the photon energy of the pulse laser used in pump-probe spectroscopy accidentally fits well the d-d transition (from [e.sub.2g] to [a.sub.1g]) energy. Therefore, the pump-probe measurements can reveal the ultrafast dynamics through the spin-charge coupling and spin-phonon coupling.

However, those ultrafast dynamic experiments only present the charge dynamics between [e.sub.2g] and [a.sub.1g]. If the laser spectrum could cover the whole range of d-d transition, that is, containing the transition from [e.sub.1g] to [a.sub.1g] and [e.sub.2g] to [a.sub.1g], it could disclose all of the charge dynamics in these strongly magnetic influenced d orbitals. The optical parametric amplifier (OPA) is a suitable light source for this kind of study. Consequently, if all of the charge dynamics in the d orbitals could be completely revealed, it would shed light on the microscopic mechanism of the magnetoelectric coupling or magnetoelastic effect in this kind of strongly correlated material.


This work was supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan, under Grants nos. NSC98-2112-M-009-008-MY3, NSC101-2112-M-009-016-MY2 and by the MOEATU Program at NCTU of Taiwan, Taiwan.


[1] M. Fiebig, "Revival of the magnetoelectric effect," Journal of Physics D, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. R123-R152, 2005.

[2] D. I. Khomskii, "Multiferroics: different ways to combine magnetism and ferroelectricity," Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 306, no. 1, pp. 1-8, 2006.

[3] W. Eerenstein, N. D. Mathur, and J. F. Scott, "Multiferroic and magnetoelectric materials," Nature, vol. 442, no. 7104, pp. 759765, 2006.

[4] C.W. Nan, M. I. Bichurin, S. Dong, D. Viehland, and G. Srinivasan, "Multiferroic magnetoelectric composites: historical perspective, status, and future directions," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 103, no. 3, Article ID 031101, 2008.

[5] T. Lottermoser, T. Lonkai, U. Amann, D. Hohlwein, J. Ihringer, and M. Fiebig, "Magneticphase control by an electric field," Nature, vol. 430, no. 6999, pp. 541-544, 2004.

[6] B. Lorenz, Y. Q. Wang, and C. W. Chu, "Ferroelectricity in perovskite HoMn[O.sub.3] and YMn[O.sub.3]," Physical Review B, vol. 76, no. 10, Article ID 104405, 2007.

[7] B. Lorenz, Y. Q. Wang, Y. Y. Sun, and C. W. Chu, "Large magneto dielectric effects in orthorhombic HoMn[O.sub.3] and YMn[O.sub.3]," Physical Review B, vol. 70, no. 21, Article ID 212412, 2004.

[8] T. Kimura, T. Goto, H. Shintani, K. Ishizaka, T. Arima, and Y. Tokura, "Magnetic control of ferroelectric polarization," Nature, vol. 426, no. 6962, pp. 55-58, 2003.

[9] M. Fiebig, T. Lottermoser, D. Frohlich, A. V. Goltsev, and R. V. Pisarev, "Observation of coupled magnetic and electric domains," Nature, vol. 419,no. 6909, pp. 818-820, 2002.

[10] N. Hur, S. Park, P. A. Sharma, J. S. Ahn, S. Guha, and S. W. Cheong, "Electric polarization reversal and memory in a multiferroic material induced by magnetic fields," Nature, vol. 429,no. 6990, pp. 392-395, 2004.

[11] W. Prellier, M. P. Singh, and P. Murugavel, "The single-phase multiferroic oxides: from bulk to thin film," Journal of Physics, vol. 17, no. 30, pp. R803-R832, 2005.

[12] S. W. Cheong and M. Mostovoy, "Multiferroics: a magnetic twist for ferroelectricity," Nature Materials, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 13-20, 2007.

[13] T. Katsufuji, S. Mori, M. Masaki, Y. Moritomo, N. Yamamoto, and H. Takagi, "Dielectric and magnetic anomalies and spin frustration in hexagonal RMn[O.sub.3] (R = Y, Yb, and Lu)," Physical Review B, vol. 64, no. 10, Article ID 104419, 2001.

[14] B. B. Van Aken, T. T. M. Palstra, A. Filippetti, and N. A. Spaldin, "The origin of ferroelectricity in magnetoelectric YMn[O.sub.3]" Nature Materials, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 164-170, 2004.

[15] C. J. Fennie and K. M. Rabe, "Ferroelectric transition in YMn[O.sub.3] from first principles," Physical Review B, vol. 72, no. 10, Article ID 100103, 2005.

[16] T. H. Lin, C. C. Hsieh, H. C. Shih et al., "Anomalous magnetic ordering in b-axis-oriented orthorhombic HoMn[O.sub.3] thin films," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 92, no. 13, Article ID 132503, 2008.

[17] M. N. Iliev, M. V. Abrashev, H. G. Lee et al., "Raman spectroscopy of orthorhombic perovskitelike YMn[O.sub.3] and LaMn[O.sub.3]" Physical Review B, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 2872-2877, 1998.

[18] J. S. Zhou and J. B. Goodenough, "Unusual evolution of the magnetic interactions versus structural distortions in RMn[O.sub.3] perovskites," Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, no. 24, Article ID 247202, 2006.

[19] W. C. Yi, C. S. Seo, S. I. Kwun, and J. G. Yoon, "Temperature dependence of capacitance/current-voltage characteristics of highly (0001)-oriented YMn[O.sub.3] thin films on Si," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 1044-1046, 2000.

[20] H. N. Lee, Y. T. Kim, and S. H. Choh, "Comparison of memory effect between YMn[O.sub.3] and Sr[Bi.sub.2][Ta.sub.2][O.sub.9] ferroelectric thin films deposited on Si substrates," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 76, no. 8, pp. 1066-1068, 2000.

[21] S. Imada, T. Kuraoka, E. Tokumitsu, and H. Ishiwara, "Ferroelectricity of YMn[O.sub.3] thin films on Pt(111)/[Al.sub.2][O.sub.3] (0001) and Pt(111)/[Y.sub.2][O.sub.3](111)/Si(111) structures grown by molecular beam epitaxy," Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 40, no. 2A, pp. 666-671, 2001.

[22] Y. T. Kim, I. S. Kim, S. I. Kim, D. C. Yoo, and J. Y. Lee, "Atomic structure of random and c-axis oriented YMn[O.sub.3] thin films deposited on Si and [Y.sub.2][O.sub.3]/Si substrates," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 4859-4862, 2003.

[23] T. Yoshimura, N. Fujimura, and T. Ito, "Ferroelectric properties of c-oriented YMn[O.sub.3] films deposited on Si substrates," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 414-416, 1998.

[24] T. Lonkai, D. G. Tomuta, U. Amann et al., "Development of the high-temperature phase of hexagonal manganites," Physical Review B, vol. 69, no. 13, Article ID 134108, 2004.

[25] N. Fujimura, T. Ishida, T. Yoshimura, and T. Ito, "Epitaxially grown YMn[O.sup.3] film: new candidate for nonvolatile memory devices," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 69, no. 7, pp. 1011-1013, 1996.

[26] T. Kimura, S. Ishihara, H. Shintani et al., "Distorted perovskite with eg1 configuration as a frustrated spin system," Physical Review B, vol. 68, no. 6, Article ID 060403, 2003.

[27] T. Goto, T. Kimura, G. Lawes, A. P. Ramirez, and Y. Tokura, "Ferroelectricity and giant magnetocapacitance in perovskite rare-earth manganites," Physical Review Letters, vol. 92, no. 25, Article ID 257201, 2004.

[28] M. Tachibana, T. Shimoyama, H. Kawaji, T. Atake, and E. Takayama-Muromachi, "Jahn-Teller distortion and magnetic transitions in perovskite RMn[O.sub.3](R = Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, and Lu)," Physical Review B, vol. 75, no. 14, Article ID 14425, 2007.

[29] N. Iwata and K. Kohn, "Dielectric anomalies at magnetic transitions of hexagonal rare earth manganese oxides RMn[O.sub.3]," Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 3318-3319, 1998.

[30] J. E. Medvedeva, V. I. Anisimov, M. A. Korotin, O. N. Mryasov, and A. J. Freeman, "Effect of Coulomb correlation and magnetic ordering on the electronic structure of two hexagonal phases of ferroelectromagnetic YMn[O.sub.3]" Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, vol. 12, no. 23, pp. 4947-4958, 2000.

[31] A. B. Souchkov, J. R. Simpson, M. Quijada et al., "Exchange interaction effects on the optical properties of LuMn[O.sub.3]" Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 2, Article ID 027203, 2003.

[32] W. S. Choi, S. J. Moon, S. S. A. Seoet al., "Optical spectroscopic investigation on the coupling of electronic and magnetic structure in multiferroic hexagonal RMn[O.sub.3] (R = Gd, Tb, Dy, and Ho) thin films," Physical Review B, vol. 78, no. 5, Article ID 054440, 2008.

[33] M. Fiebig, D. Frohlich, K. Kohn et al., "Determination of the magnetic symmetry of hexagonal manganites by second harmonic generation," Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, no. 24, pp. 5620-5623, 2000.

[34] D. Froohlich, S. Leute, V. V. Pavlov, and R. V. Pisarev, "Nonlinear optical spectroscopy of the two-order-parameter compound YMn[O.sub.3]," Physical Review Letters, vol. 81, no. 15, pp. 3239-3242, 1998.

[35] H. C. Shih, T. H. Lin, C. W. Luo et al., "Magnetization dynamics and the [Mn.sup.3+] d-d excitation of hexagonal HoMn[O.sub.3] single crystals using wavelength-tunable time-resolved femtosecond spectroscopy," Physical Review B, vol. 80, no. 2, Article ID 024427, 2009.

[36] S. T. Lou, F. M. Zimmermann, R. A. Bartynski, N. Hur, and S. W. Cheong, "Femtosecond laser excitation of coherent optical phonons in ferroelectric LuMn[O.sup.3]," Physical Review B, vol. 79, no. 21, Article ID 214301, 2009.

[37] K. J. Jang, J. Lim, J. Ahn et al., "Ultrafast IR spectroscopic study of coherent phonons and dynamic spin-lattice coupling in multiferroic LuMn[O.sup.3]," New Journal of Physics, vol. 12, no. 2, Article ID 023017, 2010.

[38] H. C. Shih, L. Y. Chen, C. W. Luo et al., "Ultrafast thermoelastic dynamics of HoMn[O.sub.3] single crystals derived from femtosecond optical pump-probe spectroscopy," New Journal of Physics, vol. 13, no 5, Article ID 053003, 2011

[39] K. J. Jang, H. G. Lee, S. Lee et al., "Strong spin-lattice coupling in multiferroic hexagonal manganite YMn[O.sub.3] probed by ultrafast optical spectroscopy," Applied Physics Letters, vol. 97, no. 3, Article ID 031914, 2010.

[40] B. G. Ueland, J. W. Lynn, M. Laver, Y. J. Choi, and S. W. Cheong, "Origin of electric-field-induced magnetization in multiferroic HoMn[O.sub.3]" Physical Review Letters, vol. 104, no. 14, Article ID 147204, 2010.

[41] M. Fiebig, C. Degenhardt, and R. V. Pisarev, "Interaction of frustrated magnetic sublattices in ErMn[O.sub.3]" Physical Review Letters, vol. 88, no. 2, Article ID 027203, 2002.

[42] O. P. Vajk, M. Kenzelmann, J. W. Lynn, S. B. Kim, and S. W. Cheong, "Magnetic order and spin dynamics in ferroelectric HoMn[O.sub.3], " Physical Review Letters, vol. 94, no. 8, Article ID 087601, 2005.

[43] H. Lueken, "A magnetoelectric effect in YMn[O.sub.3] and HoMn[O.sub.3]" Angewandte Chemie, vol. 47, no. 45, pp. 8562-8564, 2008.

[44] D. Khomskii, "Classifying multiferroics: mechanisms and effects," Physics, vol. 2, article 20, 2009.

[45] A. Munoz, J. A. Alonso, M. J. Martinez-Lope, M. T. Casais, J. L. Martinez, and M. T. Fernandez-Diaz, "Magnetic structure of hexagonal RMn[O.sub.3] (R = Y, Sc): thermal evolution from neutron powder diffraction data," Physical Review B, vol. 62, no. 14, pp. 9498-9510, 2000.

[46] A. Munoz, J. A. Alonso, M. J. Martinez-Lope, M. T. Casais, J. L. Martinez, and M. T. Fernandez-Diaz, "Evolution of the magnetic structure of hexagonal HoMn[O.sub.3] from neutron powder diffraction data," Chemistry of Materials, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1497-1505, 2001.

[47] M. Fiebig, C. Degenhardt, and R. V. Pisarev, "Magnetic phase diagram of HoMn[O.sub.3]," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 91, no. 10, pp. 8867-8869, 2002.

[48] T. Lonkai, D. G. Tomuta, J. U. Hoffmann, R. Schneider, D. Hohlwein, and J. Ihringer, "Magnetic two-dimensional short-range order in hexagonal manganites," Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 93, no. 10, pp. 8191-8193, 2003.

[49] Z. J. Huang, Y. Cao, Y. Y. Sun, Y. Y. Xue, and C. W. Chu, "Coupling between the ferroelectric and antiferromagnetic orders in YMn[O.sub.3]" Physical Review B, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 2623-2626, 1997.

[50] D. G. Tomuta, S. Ramakrishnan, G. J. Niewenhuys, and J. A. Mydosh, "The magnetic susceptibility, specific heat and dielectric constant of hexagonal YMn[O.sub.3], LuMn[O.sup.3] and ScMn[O.sub.3]," Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, vol. 13, no. 20, pp. 4543 4552, 2001.

[51] C. Dela Cruz, F. Yen, B. Lorenz et al., "Strong spin-lattice coupling in multiferroic HoMn[O.sub.3]: thermal expansion anomalies and pressure effect," Physical Review B, vol. 71, no. 6, Article ID 060407(R), 2005.

[52] S. Lee, A. Pirogov, M. Kang et al., "Giant magneto-elastic coupling in multiferroic hexagonal manganites," Nature, vol. 451, no. 7180, pp. 805-809, 2008.

[53] D. Y. Cho, J. Y. Kim, B. G. Park et al., "Ferroelectricity driven by y d0-ness with rehybridization in YMn[O.sub.3]," Physical Review Letters, vol. 98, no. 21, Article ID 217601, 2007.

[54] D. Talbayev, S. A. Trugman, A. V. Balatsky, T. Kimura, A. J. Taylor, and R. D. Averitt, "Detection of coherent magnons via ultrafast pump-probe reflectance spectroscopy in multiferroic [Ba.sub.0.6][Sr.sub.1.4][Zn.sub.2][Fe.sub.12][O.sub.22]," Physical Review Letters, vol. 101, no. 9, Article ID 097603, 2008.

[55] A. V. Kimel, B. A. Ivanov, R. V. Pisarev, P. A. Usachev, A. Kirilyuk, and T. Rasing, "Inertia-driven spin switching in antiferromagnets," Nature Physics, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 727-731, 2009.

[56] C. W. Luo, I. H. Wu, P. C. Cheng et al., "Quasiparticle dynamics and phonon softening in FeSe superconductors," Physical Review Letters, vol. 108, no. 25, Article ID 257006, 2012.

[57] C. W. Luo, I. H. Wu, P. C. Cheng et al., "Ultrafast dynamics and phonon softening in [Fe.sub.1+y][Se.sub.1-x][Te.sub.x] single crystals," New Journal of Physics, vol. 14, no. 10, Article ID 103053, 2012.

[58] A. V. Kimel, R. V. Pisarev, F. Bentivegna, and T. Rasing, "Time-resolved nonlinear optical spectroscopy of [Mn.sup.3+] ions in rare-earth hexagonal manganites RMn[O.sub.3] (R = Sc, Y, Er)," Physical Review B, vol. 64, no. 20, Article ID 201103(R), 2001.

[59] A. V. Kimel, R. V. Pisarev, F. Bentivegna, and Th. Rasing, "Ultrafast optical spectroscopy of hexagonal manganites RMn[O.sub.3] (R = Y, Er, Sc)," Ferroelectrics, vol. 279, no. 1, pp. 135-176, 2002.

[60] W. C. Yi, S. I. Kwun, and J. G. Yoon, "Study on the electronic structure of hexagonal and orthorhombic YMn[O.sub.3]" Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 2706-2707, 2000.

[61] A. Filippetti and N. A. Hill, "Coexistence of magnetism and ferroelectricity in perovskites," Physical Review B, vol. 65, no. 19, Article ID 195120, 2002.

[62] K. Kritayakirana, P. Berger, and R. V. Jones, "Optical spectra of ferroelectric-antiferromagnetic rare earth manganates," Optics Communications, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 95-98,1969.

[63] A. M. Kalashnikova and R. V. Pisarev, "Electronic structure of hexagonal rare-earth manganites RMn[O.sub.3]" JETP Letters, vol. 78, no.3,pp.143-147,2003.

[64] R. C. Rai, J. Cao, J. L. Musfeldt, S. B. Kim, S. W. Cheong, and X. Wei, "Spin-charge coupling and the high-energy magnetodi-electric effect in hexagonal HoMn[O.sub.3]," Physical Review B, vol. 75, no. 18, Article ID 184414, 2007.

[65] J. S. Kang, S. W. Han, J. G. Parket al., "Photoemission and x-ray absorption of the electronic structure of multifferroic RMn[O.sub.3] (R = Y, Er),"Physical Review B, vol. 71, no. 9, Article ID 092405, 2005.

[66] M. Qian, J. Dong, and D. Y. Xing, "Optical properties of the ferroelectromagnet YMn[O.sub.3] studied from first principles," Physical Review B, vol. 63, no. 15, Article ID 155101, 2001.

[67] W. S. Choi, D. G. Kim, S. S. A. Seo et al., "Electronic structures of hexagonal RMn[O.sub.3] (R = Gd, Tb, Dy, and Ho) thin films: optical spectroscopy and first-principles calculations," Physical Review B, vol. 77, no. 4, Article ID 045137, 2008.

[68] M. Fiebig, V. V. Pavlov, and R. V. Pisarev, "Second-harmonic generation as a tool for studying electronic and magnetic structures of crystals: review," Journal of the Optical Society of America B, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 96-118, 2005.

[69] C. Degenhardt, M. Fiebig, D. Frohlich, T. Lottermoser, and R. V. Pisarev, "Nonlinear optical spectroscopy of electronic transitions in hexagonal manganites," Applied Physics B, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 139-144, 2001.

[70] V. M. Axt and T. Kuhn, "Femtosecond spectroscopy in semiconductors: a key to coherences, correlations and quantum kinetics," Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 433-512, 2004.

[71] S. K. Sundaram and E. Mazur, "Inducing and probing non-thermal transitions in semiconductors using femtosecond laser pulses," Nature Materials, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 217-224, 2002.

[72] R. D. Averitt and A. J. Taylor, "Ultrafast optical and far-infrared quasiparticle dynamics in correlated electron materials," Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, vol. 14, no. 50, pp. R1357-R1390, 2002.

[73] C. W. Luo, Y. T. Wang, F. W. Chen et al., "Eliminate coherence spike in reflection-type pump-probe measurements," Optics Express, vol. 17, no. 14, pp. 11321-11327, 2009.

[74] K. H. Wu, H. J. Chen, Y. T. Chen et al., "Marked enhancement of Neel temperature in strained YMn[O.sub.3] thin films probed by femtosecond spectroscopy," Europhysics Letters, vol. 94, no. 2, Article ID 27006, 2011.

[75] C. Thomsen, J. Strait, Z. Vardeny, H. J. Maris, J. Tauc, and J. J. Hauser, "Coherent phonon generation and detection by picosecond light pulses," Physical Review Letters, vol. 53, no. 10, pp. 989-992, 1984.

[76] C. Thomsen, H. T. Grahn, H. J. Maris, and J. Tauc, "Surface generation and detection of phonons by picosecond light pulses," Physical Review B, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 4129-4138, 1986.

[77] H. J. Zeiger, J. Vidal, T. K. Cheng, E. P. Ippen, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, "Theory for displacive excitation of coherent phonons," Physical Review B, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 768 778, 1992.

[78] R. Merlin, "Generating coherent THz phonons with light pulses," Solid State Communications, vol. 102, no. 2-3, pp. 207 220, 1997.

[79] G. A. Garrett, T. F. Albrecht, J. F. Whitaker, and R. Merlin, "Coherent THz phonons driven by light pulses and the Sb problem: what is the mechanism?" Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no 17, pp 3661-3664, 1996

[80] A. Ghosh, J. R. Sahu, S. V. Bhat, and C. N. R. Rao, "A Raman study of multiferroic LuMn[O.sup.3]," Solid State Sciences, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1639-1642, 2009.

[81] A. P. Litvinchuk, M. N. Iliev, V. N. Popov, and M. M. Gospodinov, "Raman and infrared-active phonons in hexagonal HoMn[O.sub.3] single crystals: magnetic ordering effects," Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 809-819, 2004.

[82] J. Vermette, S. Jandl, A. A. Mukhin et al., "Raman study of the antiferromagnetic phase transitions in hexagonal YMn[O.sub.3] and LuMn[O.sup.3]" Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, vol. 22, no. 35, Article ID 356002, 2010.

[83] J. Vermette, S. Jandl, and M. M. Gospodinov, "Raman study of spin-phonon coupling in ErMn[O.sub.3]" Journal of Physics, vol. 20, no. 42, Article ID 425219, 2008.

[84] D. Lim, R. D. Averitt, J. Demsar, A. J. Taylor, N. Hur, and S.W. Cheong, "Coherent acoustic phonons in hexagonal manganite LuMn[O.sup.3], " Applied Physics Letters, vol. 83, no. 23, pp. 4800-4802, 2003.

[85] P. A. Sharma, J. S. Ahn, N. Hur et al., "Thermal conductivity of geometrically frustrated, ferroelectric YMn[O.sub.3]: extraordinary spin-phonon interactions," Physical Review Letters, vol. 93, no. 17, Article ID 177202, p. 1, 2004.

Yu Ting Wang, (1) Chih Wei Luo, (1) and Takayoshi Kobayashi (1,2)

(1) Department of Electrophysics, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan

(2) Advanced Ultrafast Laser Research Center, University of Electro-Communications, Chofugaoka 1-5-1, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan

Correspondence should be addressed to Chih Wei Luo;

Received 25 June 2012; Revised 19 January 2013; Accepted 28 January 2013

Academic Editor: R. N. P. Choudhary

TABLE 1: Nonvanished susceptibility tensor
components for hexagonal ReMn[O.sub.3] with
antiparallel coupling of corresponding
[Mn.sup.3+] spins along the z-axis.

                 Space group     Tensor components

Nonmagnetic Sh   P[6.sub.3]cm   xxz = xzx = yyyz = yzy
(i-type)                           zxx = zyy, zzz

Magnetic SH       P[[]     yxx = xyx = xxy = -yyy
(c-type)          .sub.3]c      xyy = yxy = yyx = -xxx
                   []      sum of P[[].sub.3]
                  P[[]     c[] and P[[bar.6]
                  .sub.3]c         .sub.3]c[]
COPYRIGHT 2013 Hindawi Limited
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2013 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Author:Wang, Yu Ting; Luo, Chih Wei; Kobayashi, Takayoshi
Publication:Advances in Condensed Matter Physics
Date:Jan 1, 2013
Previous Article:Electrodynamics of metallic superconductors.
Next Article:Catalytic mechanism of Pd adsorption on S-Terminated GaAs(001)-(2 x 6) surface.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2022 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |