Printer Friendly

Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants.

SALINITY is one of the major abiotic stresses that adversely affect crop productivity and quality. About 20% of irrigated agricultural land is adversely affected by salinity (Flowers and Yeo, 1995). The problem of soil salinity is further increasing because of the use of poor quality water for irrigation and poor drainage. In clay soils, improper management of salinity may lead to soil sodicity whereby sodium binds to negatively charged clay causing clay swelling and dispersal that makes the soil less fit for crop growth. According to the USDA salinity laboratory, saline soil can be defined as soil having an electrical conductivity of the saturated paste extract ([EC.sub.e]) of 4 dS [m.sup.-1] (4 dS [m.sup-1] [approximately equal to] 40 mM NaCl) or more. Most grain crops and vegetables are glycophytes and are highly susceptible to soil salinity even when the soil [EC.sub.e] is <4 dS [m.sup.-1]. Different threshold tolerance [EC.sub.e] and different rate of reduction in yield beyond threshold tolerance [EC.sub.e] indicate variation in mechanisms of salt tolerance among crop species (Table 1).

Soil type and environmental factors, such as vapor pressure deficit, radiation, and temperature may further alter salt tolerance. Adverse effects of salinity on plant growth may be due to ion cytotoxicity (mainly due to [Na.sup.+], [Cl.sup.-] , and [SO.sup.-.sub.4]), and osmotic stress (reviewed by Zhu, 2002). Most crop plants are susceptible to salinity even when ECe is <3.0 dS [m.sup.-1] (Table 1), which in terms of osmotic potential is less than -0.117 MPa (osmotic potential = -0.39 x ECe). At these salinity levels, the predominant cause of crop susceptibility appears to be ton toxicity rather than osmotic stress. Ion cytotoxicity is caused by replacement of [K.sup.+] by [Na.sup.+] in biochemical reactions and conformational changes and loss of function of proteins as [Na.sup.+] and [Cl.sup.-] ions penetrate the hydration shells and interfere with noncovalent interactions between their amino acids. Metabolic imbalances caused by ionic toxicity, osmotic stress, and nutritional deficiency under salinity may also lead to oxidative stress (Zhu, 2002). Hence, engineering crops that are resistant to salinity stress is critical for sustaining food production and achieving future food security. Understanding the molecular basis of salt-stress signaling and tolerance mechanisms is essential for breeding and genetic engineering of salt tolerance in crop plants. Here, we discuss the molecular basis of cellular ion homeostasis, osmotic homeostasis, stress damage control and repair under salt stress, and their exploitation for genetic engineering of salt-tolerant crop plants.

Sensors of Salt Stress

Plants sense salt stress through both ionic ([Na.sup.+]) and osmotic stress signals. Excess [Na.sup.+] can be sensed either on the surface of the plasma membrane by a transmembrane protein or within the cell by membrane proteins or [Na.sup.+] sensitive enzymes (Zhu, 2003). In addition to its role as an antiporter, the plasma membrane [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] antiporter SOS1 (Salt Overly Sensitive 1), having 10 to 12 transmembrane domains and a long cytoplasmic tail, may act as a [Na.sup.+] sensor (Zhu, 2003). This dual role would be analogous to the sugar permease BglF in Escherichia coli and the yeast ammonium transporter Mep2p. When expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes [Na.sup.+]-[K.sup.+] cotransporters from Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. show increased ion uptake under hypoosmotic conditions while, their Arabidopsis homolog do not show this osmosensing capacity (Liu et al., 2001). Entry of [Na.sup.+] through nonspecific ion channels under salinity may cause membrane depolarization that activates [Ca.sup.2+] channels (Sanders et al., 1999), and thus generates [Ca.sup.2+] oscillations, and signals salt stress. Cell volume decreases because of turgor loss under salinity-induced hyperosmotic stress may lead to retraction of the plasma membrane from the cell wall, which is probably sensed by both stretch-activated channels and transmembrane protein kinases, such as two component histidine kinases and wall-associated kinases (Urao et al., 1999; Kreps et al., 2002; Seki et al., 2002). Salinity up-regulates the biosynthesis of the plant stress hormone ABA (Jia et al., 2002; Xiong and Zhu, 2003), and causes accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Smirnoff, 1993; Hernandez et al., 2001). ABA and ROS also regulate ionic and osmotic homeostasis as well as stress damage control and repair processes.

Regulation of [K.sup.+] uptake and/or prevention of [Na.sup.+] entry, efflux of [Na.sup.+] from the cell, and utilization of [Na.sup.+] for osmotic adjustment are strategies commonly used by plants to maintain desirable [K.sup.+]/[Na.sup.+] ratios in the cytosol. Osmotic homeostasis is established either by [Na.sup.+] compartmentation into the vacuole or by biosynthesis and accumulation of compatible solutes. ROS detoxification systems as well as stress proteins belonging to the LEA protein family contribute to prevention of salt-stress damage (Zhu, 2002). In addition to these mechanisms, [Na.sup.+] secretion is a strategy used by some halophytic plants. Thus, precise regulation of ion transport systems is critical for salt tolerance. Important insights into ion homeostasis under salt stress have emerged from the molecular genetic analysis of salt overly sensitive (sos) mutants of Arabidopsis (Fig. 1; Zhu, 2003).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

Sodium Influx and [K.sup.+]/[Na.sup.+] Balance

A high [K.sup.+]/[Na.sup.+] ratio in the cytosol is essential for normal cellular functions of plants. [Na.sup.+] competes with [K.sup.+] uptake through [Na.sup.+]-[K.sup.+] cotransporters, and may also block the [K.sup.+]-specific transporters of root cells under salinity (Zhu, 2003). This results in toxic levels of sodium as well as insufficient [K.sup.+] concentration for enzymatic reactions and osmotic adjustment. Under salinity, sodium gains entry into root cell cytosol through cation channels or transporters (selective and nonselective) or into the root xylem stream via an apoplastic pathway depending on the plant species. In Arabidopsis (Uozumi et al., 2000), Eucalyptus (Liu et al., 2001), and wheat, it has been shown that high affinity [K.sup.+] transporters (HKT) act as low affinity [Na.sup.+] transporters (Rubio et al., 1995; Gorham et al., 1997) under salinity. The HKT transporters of Eucalyptus camaldulensis are more permeable to [Na.sup.+] than they are to [K.sup.+] when extracellular concentrations of [Na.sup.+] and [K.sup.+] are equal (Liu et al., 2001). Hence, under salinity HKT homologs may contribute to [Na.sup.+] influx. However, in rice, sodium influx into the xylem through the apoplastic pathway appears to be more significant (Yadav et al., 1996; Garcia et al., 1997). Silica deposition and polymerization of silicate in the endodermis and rhizodermis blocks [Na.sup.+] influx through the apoplastic pathway in roots of rice (Yeo et al., 1999). Restriction of sodium influx either into the root cells or into the xylem stream is one way of maintaining the optimum cytosolic [K.sup.+]/[Na.sup.+] ratio of plants under salt stress. The hktl mutation suppresses the salt hypersensitivity and [K.sup.+]-deficient phenotype of the Arabidopsis Salt Overly Sensitive 3 (sos3) mutant (Rus et al., 2001a). Antisense expression of wheat HKT1 in transgenic wheat causes significantly less [sup.22]Na uptake and enhances growth under salinity when compared with control plants (Laurie et al., 2002). These results suggest that either inactivation of the low affinity [Na.sup.+] transporter (HKT) activity or suppression of its expression can considerably improve plant salt tolerance.

In saline conditions, cellular potassium levels can be maintained by activity or expression of potassium-specific transporters. In Mesembryanthernum crystallinum L., high affinity [K.sup.+] transporter-[K.sup.+] uptake genes are up-regulated under NaC1 stress (Suet al., 2002). In yeast, HAL1 and HAL3 regulate [K.sup.+] uptake and [Na.sup.+] efflux. Overexpression of the Arabidopsis HAL3a gene enhances salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis (Espinosa-Ruiz et al., 1999). Similarly, transgenic tomato plants overexpressing yeast HAL1 gene show a higher [K.sup.+]/[Na.sup.+] ratio and improved salt tolerance than control plants. Transgenic tomato plants exhibit lower reduction in fruit yield than that of control plants when irrigated with 35 mM NaC1 (Rus et al., 2001b). Signaling events that regulate the potassium-specific transporters under salinity should be understood.

Sodium Efflux

Sodium efflux from root cells prevents accumulation of toxic levels of [Na.sup.+] in the cytosol and transport of [Na.sup.+] to the shoot. Molecular genetic analysis in Arabidopsis sos mutants have led to the identification of a plasma membrane [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] antiporter, SOS1, which plays a crucial role in sodium extrusion from root epidermal cells under salinity. The SOS1 transcript level is upregulated under salt stress. The sos1 mutant plants show hypersensitivity to salt stress (100 mM NaCl), and accumulate more [Na.sup.+] in shoots than wild-type plants. Sodium efflux by SOS1 is also vital for salt tolerance of meristem cells such as growing root-tips and shoot apex as these cells do not have large vacuoles for sodium compartmentation (Shi et al., 2000 & 2002). Isolated plasma membrane vesicles from sos1 mutants show significantly less inherent as well as salt stress-induced [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] antiporter activity than vesicles from wild-type plants (Qiu et al., 2002). The expression of SOS1 is ubiquitous, but stronger in epidermal cells surrounding the root-tip, as well as parenchyma cells bordering the xylem. Thus, SOS1 functions as a [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] antiporter on the plasma membrane and plays a crucial role in sodium efflux from root cells and the long distance [Na.sup.+] transport from root to shoot (Shi et al., 2002). Indeed, transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing SOS1 have lower [Na.sup.+] in the xylem transpirational stream and in shoots compared with wild-type plants. These plants also show enhanced salt tolerance, measured in terms of their growth, ability to bolt and flower at increasing concentrations of salt stress (50-200 mM NaCl); while, control plants became necrotic and have failed to bolt (Shi et al., 2003).

Sodium efflux through SOS1 under salinity is regulated by SOS3-SOS2 kinase complex (Fig. 1). In Arab# dopsis, salt-stress induced calcium signatures are sensed by SOS3, a [Ca.sup.2+] sensor protein with three calcium binding EF hands and an N-myristoylation motif (Liu and Zhu, 1998; Ishitani et al., 2000). Mutations that disrupt either calcium binding (sos3-1) or myristoylation (G2A) of SOS3 cause salt-stress hypersensitivity in Arabidopsis plants (Ishitani et al., 2000). The SOS3 gene product transduces a salt stress-elicited calcium signal by activating SOS2, a ser/thr protein kinase with an N-terminal kinase catalytic domain that is similar to that of yeast SNF1 and animal AMP-activated kinase, and a unique C-terminal regulatory domain. The C-terminal regulatory domain of SOS2 consists of an autoinhibitory FISL motif (Liu et al., 2000), deletion of which results in constitutive activation of SOS2 (Guo et al., 2001). Under salt stress, SOS3 binds to the FISL motif of SOS2 and activates its substrate phosphorylation (protein kinase) activity (Halfter et al., 2000). Activated SOS2 then phosphorylates SOS1, and results in activation of antiporter activity of SOS1. The [Na.sup.+]-[H.sup.+] exchange activity of isolated plasma membranes vesicles from sos3 and sos2 mutants is significantly less than that of wild-type plants. Consistent with this finding, these mutants also accumulate higher levels of [Na.sup.+], similar to those accumulated by the sos1 mutant (Quintero et al., 2002). Overexpression of an active form of SOS2 could overcome the salt hypersensitivity of sos2 and sos3 mutants and enhanced the salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis (Guo et al., 2004). The SOS1 up-regulation under salt stress is also impaired in sos2 and sos3 mutants. Hence, the SOS3-SOS2 signaling pathway positively regulate salt-stress induced SOS1 gene expression and/or transcript stability as well as SOS1 transporter activity (Shi et al., 2003).

In addition to increasing cytosolic calcium, salt-stress induced ABA accumulation also appears to regulate the SOS pathway through the ABA insensitive 2 (ABI2) protein phosphatase 2C. ABI2 interacts with the protein phosphatase interaction (PPI) motif of SOS2. This interaction is abolished by the abi2-1 mutation, which enhances tolerance of seedlings to salt shock (150 mM NaCl) and causes ABA insensitivity. Hence, the wildtype ABI2 may negatively regulate salt tolerance either by inactivating SOS2, or the SOS2 regulated [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] antiporters such as SOS1 or NHX1 (Fig. 1; Ohta et al., 2003).

Sodium Compartmentation

A positive turgor is indispensable for expansion growth of cells and stomatal openings in plants. A decrease in water potential due to soil salinity causes osmotic stress that leads to turgor loss. Plants have evolved an osmotic adjustment (active solute accumulation) mechanism that maintains water uptake and turgor under osmotic stress conditions. For osmotic adjustment, plants use inorganic ions such as [Na.sup.+] and [K.sup.+] and/or synthesize organic compatible solutes such as proline, betaine, polyols, and soluble sugars. Vacuolar sequestration of [Na.sup.+] is an important and cost-effective strategy for osmotic adjustment that also reduces the [Na.sup.+] concentration in the cytosol. [Na.sup.+] sequestration into the vacuole depends on expression and activity of [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] antiporters as well as on V-type [H.sup.+]-ATPase and [H.sup.+]-PPase. These phosphatases generate the necessary proton gradient required for activity of [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] antiporters.

Overexpression of AVP1, a vacuolar [H.sup.+]-pyrophosphatase in Arabidopsis enhanced sequestration of [Na.sup.+] into the vacuole and maintained higher relative water content in leaves. These plants also show higher salt-and drought-stress tolerance than that of wild type (Gaxiola et al., 2001). The tonoplast [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] antiporter NHXI gene is induced by both salinity and ABA in Arabidopsis (Shi and Zhu, 2002) and rice (Fukuda et al., 1999). The AtNHX1 promoter contains putative ABA responsive elements (ABRE) between -736 and -728 from the initiation codon. AtNHX1 expression under salt stress is partially dependent on ABA biosynthesis and ABA signaling through ABI1. Salt-stress induced up-regulation of AtNHX1 expression is lower in ABA deficient mutants (aba2-1 and aba3-1) and in the ABA insensitive mutant, abill-1 (Shi and Zhu, 2002). Comparing tonoplast [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+]-exchange activity (mainly due to AtNHX1) between wild type and mutants (sos1, sos2, and sos3) shows that SOS2 also regulates the tonoplast exchange. The impaired tonoplast [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+]-exchange activity in vitro from isolated sos2 tonoplasts could be restored to levels in wild type by adding activated SOS2 protein. Since the tonoplast [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+]-exchange activity is not affected in the sos3 mutant, the tonoplast [Na.sup.+]/ [H.sup.+]-exchange activity is not regulated by SOS3. SOS2 has been found to interact with plant calcium sensor proteins such as SOS3, SCaBP1 (SOS3-1ike calcium-binding proteins 1), SCaBP3, SCaBP5, and SCaBP6. One of these SCaBPs may signal SOS2 to regulate the tonoplast [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+]-exchange activity (Fig. 1; Qiu et al., 2003).

Transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing AtNHX1 have showed significantly higher salt (200 mM NaCl) tolerance than wild-type plants (Apse et al., 1999). Since tomato is a highly salt-sensitive crop (Table 1), an effort has been made to improve its salt tolerance by overexpressing AtNHX1. These tomato transgenics grow and produce fruits in the presence of very high salt concentrations (200 mM NaCl). Yield and fruit quality of transgenic tomato plants under salinity are equivalent to those of control plants grown under nonstress conditions (Zhang and Blumwald, 2001). Similar results have been reported for transgenic canola (Brassica napus L.) overexpressing AtNHX1 (Zhang et al., 2001).

Compatible Osmolytes

Although use of ions for osmotic adjustment may be energetically more favorable than biosynthesis of organic osmolyte under osmotic stresses, many plants accumulate organic osmolytes to tolerate osmotic stresses. These osmolytes include proline, betaine, polyols, sugar alcohols, and soluble sugars. Glycine betaine and trehalose act as osmoprotectants by stabilizing quaternary structures of proteins and highly ordered states of membranes. Mannitol serves as a free-radical scavenger. Proline serves as a storage sink for carbon and nitrogen and a free-radical scavenger. It also stabilizes subcellular structures (membranes and proteins), and buffers cellular redox potential under stress. Hence, these organic osmolytes are known as osmoprotectants (Bohnert and Jensen, 1996; Chen and Murata, 2000), Genes involved in osmoprotectant biosynthesis are up-regulated under salt stress, and concentrations of accumulated osmoprotectants correlate with osmotic stress tolerance (Zhu, 2002). Analysis of the Arabidopsis t365 mutant supports the involvement of osmoprotectants in salt tolerance. The t365 mutant is impaired in the S-adenosyl-L-methionine phosphoethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEAMT) gene. The PEAMT enzyme catalyzes conversion of phosphoethanolamine to phosphocholine, which is a precursor of glycinebetaine biosynthesis (Mou et al., 2002).

Salt tolerance of transgenic tobacco engineered to over-accumulate mannitol was first demonstrated by Tarczynski et al. (1993). Genetically engineered overproduction of compatible osmolytes in transgenic plants such as Arabidopsis, rice, wheat, and Brassica has also been shown to enhance stress tolerance as measured by germination, seedling growth, survival, recovery, photosystem II yield, and seed production under very high salt and osmotic stresses. The observed salt tolerance was attributed to the osmoprotectant effect of compatible osmolytes rather than their contribution to osmotic adjustment (Table 2). It is interesting to note that glycine betaine- (Kishitani et al., 2000) and trehalose- (Garg et al., 2002) overproducing transgenic rice plants accumulated fewer [Na.sup.+] ions, and maintained [K.sup.+] uptake, Thus, these plants retained optimal [K.sup.+]/[Na.sup.+] ratios necessary for cellular functions. Whether ion homeostasis in these transgenics was either due to direct regulation of ion transporters or to maintenance of cellular integrity by protecting membranes and proteins from oxidative damage was not known and needs to be determined.

Although enhanced synthesis and accumulation of compatible solutes under osmotic stresses are well documented, little is known about the signaling cascades that regulate the compatible solute biosynthesis in higher plants. A signaling cascade similar to that of the yeast Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase-High Osmotic Glycerol 1 (MAPK-HOG1) pathway may regulate osmolyte biosynthesis (Zhu, 2002). A putative osmosensory two-component hybrid histidine kinase, ATHK1, from Arabidopsis is implicated in osmosensing under salt stress based on induced expression and ability to complement the yeast double mutant lacking both osmosensors (sln1[DELTA] sho1[DELTA]). By analogy to SLN1 of yeast, the Arabidopsis ATHK1 is also probably active at low osmolarity. Active ATHK1 may inactivate a response regulator by phosphorylation. Inactivation of ATHK1 under high osmolarity may result in the accumulation of nonphosphorylated active form of the response regulator, which then stimulates osmolyte biosynthesis in plants by activating a MAPK pathway(s) (Urao et al., 1999). Transcriptome analyses also show induction of receptor-like kinase genes in Arabidopsis under salt stress (Kreps et al., 2002; Seki et al., 2002). However, genetic and molecular evidences to support the role of these proteins in osmotic stress sensing and compatible osmolyte biosynthesis are lacking.

ABA may also regulate osmolyte biosynthesis in plants under salt stress. Osmotic stress-induced ABA accumulation has been shown to regulate the P5CS gene involved in proline biosynthesis (Xiong et al., 2001a). Proline induces the expression of salt-stress responsive genes, which have proline responsive elements (PRE, ACTCAT) in their promoters (Satoh et al., 2002; Oono et al., 2003). Better understanding of the salt-stress signaling pathway that regulates compatible osmolyte biosynthesis will help to devise better breeding and genetic engineering strategies.

LEA-Type Proteins

Osmotic stresses induce late-embryogenesis-abundant (LEA) proteins in vegetative tissues, which impart dehydration tolerance to vegetative tissues of plants. These LEA-type proteins are encoded by RD (responsive to dehydration), ERD (early responsive to dehydration), KIN (cold inducible), COR (cold regulated), and RAB (responsive to ABA) genes in different plant species (Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 2000; Zhu, 2002). Accumulation levels of these proteins correlate with stress tolerance in various plant species suggesting protective roles under osmotic stress. Transgenic rice plants engineered to overexpress a barley LEA gene, HVA1, under control of the rice actin 1 promoter exhibit better stress tolerance under 200 mM NaC1 and drought stress than wild-type plants (Xu et al., 1996). Expression of LEA-type genes under osmotic stresses is regulated by both ABA-dependent and independent signaling pathways (Fig. 2). Promoters of LEA-like genes contain dehydration responsive elements/C-Repeat (DRE/CRT), ABA-responsive elements (ABREs), and/or MYB/MYC recognition elements. The DRE/CRT elements regulate gene expression in response to dehydration (salt, drought, and cold stresses); while, ABRE and MYB/MYC elements control gene expression in response to ABA under abiotic stresses (Thomashow, 1999: Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 2000).

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

Genetic analysis of ABA-deficient Arabidopsis mutants, los5 and los6, has revealed that ABA is necessary for the salt-stress induced expression of some Arabidopsis LEA genes (Xiong et al., 2001a; Xiong et al., 2002). [Ca.sup.2+] and/or [H.sub.2][O.sub.2] act as second messengers of ABA induced stomatal closure and gene expression under abiotic stresses (Leung and Giraudat, 1998; Schroeder et al., 2001). Transient expression analysis has revealed that [IP.sub.3] and cADPR-gated calcium channels are involved in ABA induced [Ca.sup.2+] concentration changes, and these [Ca.sup.2+] transients regulate expression of LEA-type genes, such as RD29A and KIN2 (Wu et al., 1997). Genetic evidence from the fryl (fiery 1) mutant, defective in inositol polyphosphate 1-phosphatase, has demonstrated that IP3 metabolism is critical for ABA and abiotic stress signaling (Xiong et al., 2001b). Salt-stress/ ABA induced Ca.sub.2+] signals are at least partially transduced through calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs). Transient expression analyses in maize protoplasts have shown that an increase in cytosolic [Ca.sup. 2+] concentration activates CDPKs, which in turn induce the stress responsive HVA1 promoter. Moreover, expression of CDPKs is under the negative control of ABI1 protein phosphatase 2C (Sheen, 1996). Overexpressing OsCDPK7 in transgenic rice enhances induction of a LEA-type gene (RAB16A) and salt/drought tolerance; while, transgenic suppression of OsCDPK7 causes hypersensitivity to salt/drought stress (Saijo et al., 2000). Signaling components regulating CDPK-activated gene expression are yet to be defined.

ABA-dependent expression of LEA-type genes under osmotic stress is regulated by basic Leucine-Zipper and MYB/MYC type transcription factors that recognize ABRE (Uno et al., 2000) and MYB/MYC recognition sequences (Abe et al., 2003), respectively (Fig. 2). Arabidopsis bZIP transcription factors, ABREB1 (ABA-responsive element binding protein 1 = ABF2) and ABREB2 (= ABF4) genes, are up-regulated by drought, NaC1, and ABA. The induction of the RD29B promoter-GUS by ABREB1 and ABREB2 in Arabidopsis leaf protoplasts under osmotic stress is repressed in aba2 and abil mutants but is enhanced in an eral mutant. ABA is necessary for the activation of ABREB1 and ABREB2 (Uno et al., 2000). Constitutive overexpression of ABF3 and ABREB2 (=ABF4) in Arabidopsis enhance expression levels of target LEA-type genes (RAB18 and RD29B). These transgenic plants are hypersensitive to ABA, sugar, and salt stress during germination but are drought tolerant at the seedling stage (Kang et al., 2002).

Salt stress-inducible basic-helix-loop-helix type transcription factors as well as AtMYC2 (=RD22BP1) and AtMYB2 regulate ABA-responsive gene expression in Arabidopsis. Constitutive overexpression of AtMYC2 and AtMYB2 results in constitutive expression of RD22 and AtADH, and expression levels are further increased following ABA treatment. These transgenic plants are hypersensitive to ABA during germination. In contrast, atmyc2 mutation decreases RD22 and AtADH expression. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing AtMYC2 and AtMYB2 show higher osmotic stress tolerance as measured by electrolyte leakage from cells (Abe et al., 2003), although their salt-stress tolerance is not known. ABA signaling via ABFs and MYC/MYB and their targets must be investigated to better understand sensitivity during germination and tolerance during the vegetative growth in transgenic plants.

ABA-independent regulation of LEA-type genes is mediated by transcription factors that activate DRE/ CRT cis-elements of LEA-type protein encoding genes. These transcription factors are called either C-repeat Binding Proteins (CBFs) or Dehydration Responsive Element Binding Proteins (DREBs). Arabidopsis DREBs are classified into two classes, DREB1 (DREB1A = CBF3, DREB1B = CBF1, and DREB1C = CBF2), and DREB2 (DREB2A and DREB2B). Expression of CBF1, CBF2, and CBF3 is induced by low temperature stress; while, expression of DREB2A and DREB2B is induced by dehydration and salt stresses (Liu et al., 1998; Thomashow, 1999; Shinozaki and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 2000; Fig. 2). Recently, a DREB1 homolog of Arabidopsis CBF4 has been cloned. CBF4 shows ABA-dependent expression under drought stress (Haake et al., 2002). Overexpression of CBF (CBFI-4) genes has resulted in activation of DRE/CRT cis elements leading to expression of LEA-type genes (Jaglo-Ottosen et al., 1998; Liu et al., 1998; Kasuga et al., 1999; Jaglo et al., 2001; Haake et al., 2002). The CBF pathway for expression of LEA-type genes is conserved across plant species such as Arabidopsis, wheat, Brassica napus (Jaglo et al., 2001), tomato (Hsieh et al., 2002a, 2002b), barley, and rice (Dubouzet et al., 2003). Similar to Arabidopsis DREB2, rice OsDREB2A is also induced by dehydration and salt stress (Dubouzet et al., 2003). Recently, we have identified ICE1 (Inducer of CBF Expression 1), a MYC-type basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, as an upstream regulator of these DREB/CBF transcription factors under cold stress (Chinnusamy et al., 2003). Upstream transcription factors that regulate the expression of DREB2/CBF4 transcription factors under osmotic stresses (salt or dehydration) have yet to be identified.

Constitutive overexpression of CBFs strongly activated expression of several LEA-type genes, enhancing freezing and osmotic stress tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis (Jaglo-Ottosen et al., 1998; Liu et al., 1998; Kasuga et al., 1999) and Brassica napus (Jaglo et al., 2001), and chilling and drought tolerance of tomato (Hsieh et al., 2002a, 2002b). However, constitutive overexpression of CBFs resulted in severe growth retardation and reduction in seed production, even under a normal environment (Liu et al., 1998). Transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing CBF3 under the transcriptional control of the stress responsive RD29A promoter showed no growth retardation when compared to control plants. These transgenic Arabidopsis plants showed constitutive low-levels of expression of LEA genes and enhanced expression under cold, dehydration, and salt stresses. Both the RD29A::CBF3 and CaMV35S::CBF3 transgenic plants showed enhanced tolerance to freezing, drought, and salt stresses, but tolerance levels of RD29A::CBF3 transgenics were significantly higher than those of CaMV35S::CBF3 transgenic plants. Recovery and survival of seedlings after soaking in 600 mM NaCl solution for 2 h was 79 and 18% for RD29A::CBF3 transgenic and control plants, respectively (Kasuga et al., 1999). Transgenic wheat plants expressing RD29A:: CBF3 also showed enhanced osmotic stress tolerance (Pellegrineschi et al., 2002). In addition to enhanced expression of LEA-type genes, multiple abiotic stress tolerance of CBF-overexpressing transgenic plants might also be in part due to accumulation of compatible osmolytes (Gilmour et al., 2000) and enhanced oxidative stress tolerance (Hsieh et al., 2002a,2002b). It was not clear how osmolyte biosynthesis and antioxidant defense pathways were activated in CBF-overexpressing plants. Genome-wide expression analysis showed that CBF overexpression also induced transcription factors such as AP2 domain proteins (RAP2.1 and RAP2.6), a putative zinc finger protein and R2R3-MYB73 (Fowler and Thomashow, 2002), that may regulate osmolyte biosynthesis and antioxidant defense genes. Hence, genetic engineering of CBFs and potentially other transcription factors under stress specific promoters in crops appears to be a viable approach for engineering tolerance to multiple stresses, including salt stress.

Tobacco-stress-induced-gene 1 (Tsi1) encoding a DNA-binding protein with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding motif is rapidly induced by salt stress but not by drought or ABA. Overexpression of TSI1 in tobacco enhanced retention of chlorophyll content when leaves were floated on 400 mM NaC1 solution for 48 or 72 h (Park et al., 2001), although the targets of TSI1 are not known.

Oxidative Stress Management

Abiotic stresses including salt-stress induce accumulation of ROS that are detrimental to cells at high concentrations because they cause oxidative damage to membrane lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids (Smirnoff, 1993; Gomez et al., 1999; Hernandez et al., 2001). Plants employ antioxidants (e.g., ascorbate, glutathione, [alpha]-tocopherol, and carotenoids) and detoxifying enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and enzymes of ascorbate-glutathione cycle to combat oxidative stress. The activity and expression levels of the genes encoding detoxifying enzymes are probably enhanced by ROS under abiotic stresses. Transgenic plants overexpressing ROS scavenging enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase (reviewed by Alscher et al., 2002), ascorbate peroxidase (Wang et al., 1999), and glutathione S-transferase/glutathione peroxidase (Roxas et al., 1997, 2000) showed increased tolerance to osmotic, temperature, and oxidative stresses. Overexpression of the tobacco NtGST/ GPX gene (encoding a bifunctional enzyme with both glutathione S-transferase and glutathione peroxidase activity) in transgenic tobacco plants has improved salt-and chilling-stress tolerance because of enhanced ROS scavenging and prevention of membrane damage (Roxas et al., 1997, 2000).

The Arabidopsis pst1 (photoautotrophic salt tolerance 1) mutant is more tolerant to salt stress than-the wild type. The observed salt tolerance was attributed to higher activities of superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase than those in wild-type Arabidopsis (Tsugane et al., 1999). Thus, ROS detoxification is an important part of salt-stress tolerance.

Salt stress (Gomez et al., 1999; Hernandez et al., 2001) and ABA (Guan et al., 2000; Pei et al., 2000) induce enhanced production of [H.sub.2][O.sub.2], which may also act as a second messenger at sublethal concentrations to regulate antioxidant defense genes under abiotic stresses. ABA-dependent ROS production is catalyzed by NADPH oxidase as revealed with analysis of the atrbohD/F double mutant of Arabidopsis, which is impaired in ABA-induced ROS production (Kwak et al., 2003). ABA-elicited [H.sub.2][O.sub.2] production is negatively regulated by the ABI2 protein in guard cells (Murata et al., 2001).

Potential sensors of ROS may include redox sensitive receptors-like kinases and two component histidine kinases that likely activate a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) module. Salt stress triggers activation and enhanced gene expression of a MAPK signaling cascade, some components of which are common for both salt and ROS (for review, Chinnusamy and Zhu, 2003). Salt stress rapidly (within 5-10 min) activates Arabidopsis mitogen activated protein kinase kinase kinase (AT-MEKK1; Ichimura et al., 1998), mitogen activated protein kinase kinase (AtMKK2; Teige et al., 2004), and MAPKs (ATMPK3, ATMPK4 and ATMPK6; Mizoguchi et al., 1996; Ichimura et al., 2000). Activated AtMEKK1 has been shown to activate AtMPK4 and AtMPK6 in vitro and in vivo (Huang et al., 2000; Teige et al., 2004). The MAPK phosphatase 1 (mkp1) mutant of Arabidopsis is more resistant to salinity stress. A yeast two-hybrid screen showed that MKP1 could interact with AtMPK4 (Ulm et al., 2002). Thus, the salt-stress regulated MAPK cascade consisting of AtMEKK1, AtMEK1/AtMKK2, and AtMPK4 is negatively regulated by MKP1.

Salt-stress induced ROS signaling in Arabidopsis may also be transduced by ANP1 (a MAPKKK), AtMPK3, and AtMPK6 along with its positive regulator Nucleoside Diphosphate Kinase 2 (AtNDPK2) (Kovtun et al., 2000; Moon et al., 2003). Transgenic tobacco plants overexpressing a constitutively active tobacco NPK1 (ortholog of ANP1) show enhanced tolerance to salinity and other abiotic stresses (Kovtun et al., 2000). AtNDPK2 interacts with and activates both ATMPK3 and ATMPK6. Transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing AtNDPK2 accumulate lower levels of ROS and show enhanced tolerance to salinity and other abiotic stresses (Moon et al., 2003). In rice, gene expression as well as kinase activity of rice MAPK (OsMAPK5) is regulated by ABA, by biotic, and abiotic stresses including salt, drought, wounding, and cold (Xiong and Yang, 2003). Thus, diverse abiotic stress signals converge at MAPK cascades that appear to regulate antioxidant defense under abiotic stresses in plants.

Transgenic overexpression of NPK1 in tobacco (Kovtun et al., 2000), NDPK2 in Arabidopsis (Moon et al., 2003), and OsMAPK5 in rice (Xiong and Yang, 2003), increased tolerance to several abiotic stresses, including salt stress, probably by enhancing ROS detoxification. Constitutively active NPK1 activated a MAPK cascade that activates promoters of stress-responsive genes, such as Glutathione-S-transferase (GST6) and HSP18.2 but not RD29A (Kovtun et al., 2000). Promoters of genes encoding ROS detoxifying enzymes contain antioxidant responsive elements (ARE), ABA responsive elements (ABRE), heat shock elements (HSE), and redox-regulated transcription factors: nuclear factor kappa-B (NFkB) and the activator protein-1 (AP-1) recognition cis-elements (Vranova et al., 2002). However, transacting factors and their regulators need to be identified.

Genetic Engineering of Salt-Tolerant Crops

Transgenic approaches by manipulation of ion homeostasis, osmoprotectant accumulation, LEA-type proteins, and ROS scavenging capacity have demonstrated the capabilities of engineering salt-tolerant crops. Although abiotic stress tolerance is known to be governed by multiple genes, significant increases in salt tolerance can be achieved by single gene manipulations as revealed by SOSI- (Shi et al., 2003) and NHX1- (Apse et al., 1999; Zhang and Blumwald, 2001; Zhang et al., 2001) overexpressing transgenic plants. These transgenics are capable of growing and producing flowers at salt concentrations of up to 200 mM NaCl (20 dS/m), which is lethal to wild-type plants. Most crop plants are susceptible to this concentration of salinity (Table 1). In addition, these transgenics do not exhibit any obvious growth abnormalities or changes in the quality of the consumable product, similar to results with NHX1 overexpressing transgenic tomato and Brassica plants. Hence genetic engineering for ion homeostasis by tissue specific overexpression of SOS1, NHX1, and their positive regulator, the active form of SOS2, will help in significant improvement in salt tolerance.

Transgenic analysis of osmolyte over-production has shown that osmoprotectants can protect plants against short term and high intensity salt stress (Table 2), but stress tolerance must be evaluated for the entire life period of plants. Polyol over-accumulating transgenic plants show growth abnormalities, including sterility (Karakas et al., 1997; Sheveleva et al., 1998). Further, compartmentation of these osmoprotectants may also be required for enhanced tolerance. For example, rice transgenic plants overexpressing choline oxidase targeted to chloroplasts show better tolerance to photoinhibition under salt- and low-temperature stresses than plants overexpressing choline oxidase targeted to the cytosol (Sakamoto et al., 1998). Hence, the level of expression of transgene, substrate requirement, metabolic flux, and cellular compartmentation of osmoprotectants should be considered for engineering osmoprotectant accumulation. Overexpression of antioxidant systems has been shown to protect transgenic plants from abiotic stresses; however, in some cases, transgenic plants did not show enhanced stress tolerance. Pyramiding of chloroplastic and mitochondrial Mn-superoxide dismutases in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) resulted in lower biomass production as compared with the transgenic plants expressing either one of the Mn-superoxide dismutases (Samis et al., 2002). Engineering for antioxidant systems may alter the pool size of ROS, involved in developmental and stress signaling, and hence their possible effects warrant careful examination.

Overexpression of signaling components and transcription factors lead to expression of their target transcriptome, which consists of multiple genes contributing to stress adaptation. Overexpression of CBF transcription factors from constitutive or stress-inducible promoters has been shown to confer enhanced tolerance in the seedling stage to multiple abiotic stresses. However, constitutive overexpression has led to growth abnormalities. Hence, overexpression of CBF transcription factors/transcriptome engineering under stress-inducible promoters is preferable for genetic engineering of multiple abiotic stress tolerance.

Some developmental phases of plants are more sensitive to salt stress than others. For example, in rice, seedling growth, seedling survival, and fertility are all adversely affected at salinity levels (E[C.sub.c]) higher than 1.9, 3.4, and 4.5 dS [m.sup.-1], respectively (Zeng and Shannon, 2000). Hence, it is imperative to understand the tissue and developmental specificity of salt-stress tolerance. Quantitative trait loci (QTL) can be considered as a cluster of related genes that may be under the transcriptional control of a regulatory gene. Transgenic manipulation of a single regulatory gene may be sufficient to regulate a gene cluster. Genetic and transgenic analyses have clearly demonstrated that manipulation of upstream transcription factor or signaling genes can lead to the activation of multiple target tolerance effector genes, and thus significantly improves abiotic stress tolerance.

Conclusions and Prospects

Only a few facets of myriad salt stress-tolerant traits found in nature have been unraveled today by application of molecular tools such as gene disruption and transgenic approaches. The SOS pathway regulates ion homeostasis under salt stress. An unknown salt-stress sensor induces cytosolic calcium signals, which are transduced by the SOS3-SOS2 kinase complex. Activated SOS2 kinase regulates sodium efflux and sequestration of sodium into the vacuole by activating [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] antiporters of plasma membrane and tonoplast, respectively. Osmotic homeostasis and stress damage control appear to be regulated by salt stress-induced ABA, ROS, a putative osmosensory histidine kinase (AtHK1), and MAPK cascades. However, these signaling pathways are not yet understood in terms of their components and targets. It appears possible to engineer salt-tolerant crops by manipulating [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] antiporters (plasma membrane and tonoplast) and the CBF transcriptome in the near future. Exploitation of other signaling components, osmolyte over-production, and antioxidant defense requires further consideration. In the future, pyramiding regulatory genes controlling various aspects of salt tolerance (i.e., ionic and osmotic homeostasis, and damage control) in a single transgenic plant is expected to yield very high levels of tolerance to salt and other related stresses. Most of the transgenic plants discussed here are model plants, and stress tolerance has been evaluated under controlled growing conditions for short durations. As the rate of transpiration is one of the major determinants of the concentration of salt accumulation in shoots, salt tolerance must be evaluated in the field conditions. The effects of stresses in relation to plant ontogeny should be assessed at realistic stress levels and under various combinations that naturally occur in the field.
Table 1. Many important crops are susceptible to soil
salinity ([dagger]) (Maas, 1990).

Crop                                           Threshold salinity

                                                 dS [m.sup.-1]

Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)                          1.0
Eggplant (Solarium melongena L.)                      1.1
Onion (Allium cepa L.)                                1.2
Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)                           1.5
Corn (Zea mays L.)                                    1.7
Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)                  1.7
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)                         1.7
Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.)          1.8
Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)                2.5
Rice, paddy (Oryza sativa L.)                         3.0
Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)                          3.2
Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]                      5.0
Wheat (Triticunt aestivum L.)                         6.0
Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)                         7.0
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)                        7.7
Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)                           8.0

Crop                                           Decrease in yield

                                                Slope % per dS
                                                  [m.sup.-1]

Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)                          19.0
Eggplant (Solarium melongena L.)                       6.9
Onion (Allium cepa L.)                                16.0
Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)                           14.0
Corn (Zea mays L.)                                    12.0
Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)                   5.9
Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)                         12.0
Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.)           9.7
Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)                 9.9
Rice, paddy (Oryza sativa L.)                         12.0
Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)                          29.0
Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]                      20.0
Wheat (Triticunt aestivum L.)                          7.1
Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)                          5.9
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)                         5.2
Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)                            5.0

([dagger]) Lack of a direct correlation between the threshold salinity
and yield decrease per unit increase in salinity may be attributed to
the differences in salt exclusion, uptake, compartmentation and other
mechanisms of salt tolerance among these crop species.

Table 2. Salt-stress tolerance of transgenic plants over-producing
compatible osmolytes.

Gene and source                            Transgenic plants

                                                Mannitol

E. coli mt1D (mannitol-1-phosphate    tobacco
  dehydrogenase)
E. coli mt1D                          Arabidopsis
E. coli mt1D                          tobacco
E. coli mt1D                          wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

                                               D-Ononitol

IMT1 (myo-inositol O-methyl trans-    tobacco
  ferase) of common ice plant

                                                Sorbitol

Stpd1 (sorbitol-6-phosphate dehy-     Japanese persimmon
  drogenase) of apple, driven by
  CaMV 35S promoter

                                            Glycine betaine

Arthrobacter globiformis CodA         Arabidopsis
  (choline oxidase)
A. globiformis CodA targeted to the   rice
  chloroplasts or cytosol
A. globiformis CodA                   Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj.
E. coli choline dehydrogenase         tobacco
  (betA) and betaine aldehyde
  dehydrogenase (betB) genes
Atripler hortensis betaine aldehyde   wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
  dehydrogenase (BADH) gene
  under maize ubiquitin promoter
Barley peroxisomal BADH gene          rice

                                                Proline

Vigna aconitifolia L. P5CS            tobacco
  ([DELTA].sup.1]-pyrroline-5-
  carboxylate synthetase) gene
Vigna aconitifolia L. P5CS gene       rice
  under barley HVA22 promoter
Mutated gene of Vigna aconitifolia    tobacco
  L. P5CS which encode P5CS enzyme
  that lacks end product (proline)
  inhibition
Antisense proline dehydrogenase       Arabidopsis
  gene

                                               Trehalose

E. coli otsA (Trehalose-6-phosphate   rice
  synthase) and otsB (Trehalose-
  6-phosphate phosphatase) bi-func-
  tional fusion gene (TPSP) under
  the control of ABA responsive
  promoter or Rubisco small subunit
  (rbcS) promoter
E. coli TPSP under maize ubiquitin    rice
  promoter

Gene and source                            Stress tolerant traits

                                                  Mannitol

E. coli mt1D (mannitol-1-phosphate    fresh weight, plant height and
  dehydrogenase)                        flowering under salinity
                                        stress
E. coli mt1D                          germination at 400 mM NaCl
E. coli mt1D                          salt-stress tolerance; mannitol
                                        contributed only to 30-40%
                                        of the osmotic adjustment
E. coli mt1D                          only 8% biomass reduction when
                                        compared to 56% reduction in
                                        control plants in 150 mM NaCl
                                        stress

                                                 D-Ononitol

IMT1 (myo-inositol O-methyl trans-    drought and salinity stress
  ferase) of common ice plant

                                                  Sorbitol

Stpd1 (sorbitol-6-phosphate dehy-     tolerance in Fv/Fm ratio under
  drogenase) of apple, driven by        NaCl stress
  CaMV 35S promoter
                                              Glycine betaine

Arthrobacter globiformis CodA         germination at 300 mM NaCl;
  (choline oxidase)                     seedling growth at 200 mM
                                        NaCl; retention of PSII
                                        activity at 400 mM NaCl
A. globiformis CodA targeted to the   faster recovery after 150 mM
  chloroplasts or cytosol               NaCl stress
A. globiformis CodA                   germination in 100-150 mM NaCl;
                                        seedling growth in 200 mM NaCl
E. coli choline dehydrogenase         biomass production of greenhouse
  (betA) and betaine aldehyde           grown plants under salt
  dehydrogenase (betB) genes            stress; faster recovery from
                                        photo inhibition under high
                                        light, salt stress and cold
                                        stresses
Atripler hortensis betaine aldehyde   seedling growth in 0.7%
  dehydrogenase (BADH) gene             (= 120 mM) NaCl
  under maize ubiquitin promoter
Barley peroxisomal BADH gene          stability in chlorophyll
                                        fluorescence under 100 mM NaCl
                                        stress; accumulates less
                                        [Na.sup.+] and [Cl.sup.-] ions
                                        but maintained [K.sup.+]
                                        uptake

                                                  Proline

Vigna aconitifolia L. P5CS            root growth; flower development
  ([DELTA].sup.1]-pyrroline-5-
  carboxylate synthetase) gene
Vigna aconitifolia L. P5CS gene       faster recovery after a short
  under barley HVA22 promoter           period of salt stress
Mutated gene of Vigna aconitifolia    improved seedlings tolerance and
  L. P5CS which encode P5CS enzyme      low free radical levels at 200
  that lacks end product (proline)      mM NaCl
  inhibition
Antisense proline dehydrogenase       tolerant to high salinity
  gene                                  (600 mM NaCl); constitutive
                                        freezing tolerance
                                        (-7[degrees]C)

                                                 Trehalose

E. coli otsA (Trehalose-6-phosphate   root and shoot growth at 4 wk of
  synthase) and otsB (Trehalose-        100 mM NaCl stress; survival
  6-phosphate phosphatase) bi-func-     under prolonged salt stress;
  tional fusion gene (TPSP) under       maintenance of high [K.sup.+]/
  the control of ABA responsive         [Na.sup.+] ratio; Low
  promoter or Rubisco small subunit     [Na.sup.+] accumulation in the
  (rbcS) promoter                       shoot; maintained high PSII
                                        activity and soluble sugar
                                        levels

E. coli TPSP under maize ubiquitin    better seedling growth and PSII
  promoter                              yield under salt, drought and
                                        cold stresses

Gene and source                              Reference

                                             Mannitol

E. coli mt1D (mannitol-1-phosphate    Tarczynski et al., 1993
  dehydrogenase)
E. coli mt1D                          Thomas et al., 1995
E. coli mt1D                          Karakas et al., 1997
E. coli mt1D                          Abebe et al., 2003

                                            D-Ononitol

IMT1 (myo-inositol O-methyl trans-    Sheveleva et al., 1997
  ferase) of common ice plant

                                             Sorbitol

Stpd1 (sorbitol-6-phosphate dehy-     Gao et al., 2001
  drogenase) of apple, driven by
  CaMV 35S promoter

                                          Glycine betaine

Arthrobacter globiformis CodA         Hayashi et al., 1997
  (choline oxidase)
A. globiformis CodA targeted to the   Sakamoto et al., 1998;
  chloroplasts or cytosol               Mohanty et al., 2002
A. globiformis CodA                   Prasad et al., 2000
E. coli choline dehydrogenase         Holmstrom et al., 2000
  (betA) and betaine aldehyde
  dehydrogenase (betB) genes
Atripler hortensis betaine aldehyde   Guo et al., 2000
  dehydrogenase (BADH) gene
  under maize ubiquitin promoter
Barley peroxisomal BADH gene          Kishitani et al., 2000

                                              Proline

Vigna aconitifolia L. P5CS            Kishor et al., 1995
  ([DELTA].sup.1]-pyrroline-5-
  carboxylate synthetase) gene
Vigna aconitifolia L. P5CS gene       Zhu et al, 1998
  under barley HVA22 promoter
Mutated gene of Vigna aconitifolia    Hong et al, 2000
  L. P5CS which encode P5CS enzyme
  that lacks end product (proline)
  inhibition
Antisense proline dehydrogenase       Nanjo et al., 1999
  gene

                                             Trehalose

E. coli otsA (Trehalose-6-phosphate   Garg et al., 2002
  synthase) and otsB (Trehalose-
  6-phosphate phosphatase) bi-func-
  tional fusion gene (TPSP) under
  the control of ABA responsive
  promoter or Rubisco small subunit
  (rbcS) promoter
E. coli TPSP under maize ubiquitin    Jang et al., 2003
  promoter


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Research in our laboratory is supported by grants from the U.S. National Institutes of Health, the U.S. National Science Foundation, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

REFERENCES

Abe, H., T. Urao, T. Ito, M. Seki, K. Shinozaki, and K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki. 2003. Arabidopsis AtMYC2 (bHLH) and AtMYB2 (MYB) function as transcriptional activators in abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 15:63-78.

Abebe, T., A.C. Guenzi, B. Martin, and J.C. Cushman. 2003. Tolerance of mannitol-accumulating transgenic wheat to water stress and salinity. Plant Physiol. 131:1748-1755.

Alscher, R.G., N. Erturk, and L.S. Heath. 2002. Role of superoxide dismutases in controlling oxidative stress in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 53: 1331-1341.

Apse, M.P., G.S. Aharon, W.S. Snedden, and E. Blumwald. 1999. Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] antiport in Arabidopsis. Science 285:1256-1258.

Bohnert, H.J., and R.G. Jensen. 1996. Strategies for engineering water stress tolerance in plants. Trends Biotechnol. 14:89-97.

Chen, T.H.H., and N. Murata. 2000. Enhancement of tolerance of abiotic stress by metabolic engineering of betaines and other compatible solutes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5:250-257.

Chinnusamy, V., and J.-K. Zhu. 2003. Plant salt tolerance. Topics Curr. Genet. 4:241-270.

Chinnusamy, V., M. Ohta, S. Kanrar, B.-h., Lee, X. Hong, M. Agarwal, and J.-K. Zhu. 2003. ICE1: A regulator of cold-induced transcriptome and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 17: 1043-1054.

Dubouzet, J.G., Y. Sakuma, Y. Ito, M. Kasuga, E.G. Dubouzet, S. Miura, M. Seki, K. Shinozaki, and K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki. 2003. OsDREB genes in rice, Oryza sativa L., encode transcription activators that function in drought-, high-salt- and cold-responsive gene expression. Plant J. 33:751-763.

Espinosa-Ruiz, A., J.M. Belles, R. Serrano, and V. Culianez-Macla. 1999. Arabidopsis thaliana AtriAL3: A flavoprotein related to salt and osmotic tolerance and plant growth. Plant J. 20:529-539.

Flowers, T.J., and A.R. Yeo. 1995. Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plants. Where next? Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 22:875-884.

Fowler, S., and M.F. Thomashow. 2002. Arabidopsis transcriptome profiling indicates that multiple regulatory pathways are activated during cold acclimation in addition to the CBF cold response pathway. Plant Cell 14:1675-1690.

Fukuda, A., A. Nakamura, and Y. Tanaka. 1999. Molecular cloning and expression of the [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] exchanger gene in Orvza sativa. Biochim. Biopbys. Acta 1446:149-155.

Gao, M., R. Tao, K. Miura, A.M. Dandekar, and A. Sugiura. 2001. Transformation of Japanese persimmon (Diospyros kaki Thunb.) with apple cDNA encoding NADP-dependent sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Plant Sci. 160:837-845.

Garcia, A., C.A. Rizzo, J. Ud-Din, S.L. Bartos, D. Senadhira, T.J. Flowers, and A.R. Yeo. 1997. Sodium and potassium transport to the xylem are inherited independently in rice and the mechanism of sodium:potassium selectivity differs from rice and wheat. Plant Cell Environ. 20:1167-1174.

Garg, A.K., J.K. Kim, T.G. Owens, A.P. Ranwala, Y.D. Choi, L.V. Kochian, and R.J. Wu. 2002. Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abiotic stresses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:15898-15903.

Gaxiola, R.A., J. Li, S. Undurraga, V. Dang, G.J. Allen, S.L. Alper, and G.R. Fink. 2001. Drought- and salt-tolerant plants result from overexpression of the AVP1 [H.sup.+]-pump. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:11444-11449.

Gilmour, S.J., A.M. Sebolt, M.P. Salazar, J.D. Everard, and M.F. Thomashow. 2000. Overexpression of the Arabidopsis CBF3 transcriptional activator mimics multiple biochemical changes associated with cold acclimation. Plant Physiol. 124:1854-1865.

Gomez, J.M., J.A. Hernandez, A. Jimenez, L.A. del Rio, and F. Sevilla. 1999. Differential response of antioxidative enzymes of chloroplast and mitochondria to long term NaCl stress of pea plants. Free Radic. Res. 31:S11-S18.

Gortham, J., J. Bridges, J. Dubcovsky, J. Dvorak, P.A. Hollington, M.C. Luo, and J.A. Khan. 1997. Genetic analysis and physiology of a trait for enhanced [K.sup.+]/[Na.sup.+] discrimination in wheat. New Phytol. 137:109-116.

Guan, L.Q.M., J. Zhao, and J.G. Scandalios. 2000. Cis-elements and trans-factors that regulate expression of maize Cat1 antioxidant gene in response to ABA and osmotic stress: [H.sub.2][O.sub.2] is the likely intermediary signaling molecule for the response. Plant J. 22:87-95.

Guo, B.H., Y.M. Zhang, H.J. Li, L.Q. Du, Y.X. Li, J.S. Zhang, S.Y. Chen, and Z.Q. Zhu. 2000. Transformation of wheat with a gene encoding for the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase (BADH). Acta Bot. Sinica 42:279-283.

Guo, Y., U. Halfter, M. Ishitani, and J.-K. Zhu. 2001. Molecular characterization of functional domains in the protein kinase SOS2 that is required for plant salt tolerance. Plant Cell 13:1383-1400.

Guo, Y., Q.S. Qiu, F.J. Quintero, J.M. Pardo, M. Ohta, C. Zhang, K.S. Schumaker, and J.-K. Zhu. 2004. Transgenic evaluation of activated mutant alleles of SOS2 reveals a critical requirement for its kinase activity and C-terminal regulatory domain for salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 16:435-449.

Haake, V., D. Cook, J.S. Riechmann, O. Pineda, M.F. Thomashow, and J.Z. Zhang. 2002. Transcription factor CBF4 is a regulator of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 130:639-648.

Halfter, U., M. Ishitani, and J.-K. Zhu. 2000. The Arabidopsis SOS2 protein kinase physically interacts with and is activated by the calcium-binding protein SOS3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 3735-3740.

Hayashi, H., Alia, L. Mustardy, P. Deshnium, M. Ida, and N. Murata. 1997. Transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana with the cod A gene for choline oxidase; accumulation of glycinebetaine and enhanced tolerance to salt and cold stress. Plant J. 12:133-142.

Hernandez, J.A., M.A. Ferrer, A. Jimenez, A.R. Barcelo, and F. Sevilla. 2001. Antioxidant systems and [O.sup.*-sub.2]/[H.sub.2][O.sub.2] production in the apoplast of pea leaves. Its relation with salt-induced necrotic lesions in minor veins. Plant Physiol. 127:817-831.

Holmstrom, K.O., S. Somersalo, A. Mandal, T.E. Palva, and B. Welin. 2000. Improved tolerance to salinity and low temperature in transgenic tobacco producing glycine betaine. J. Exp. Bot. 51:177-185.

Hong, Z., K. Lakkineni, Z. Zhang, and D.P.S. Verma. 2000. Removal of feedback inhibition of [[DELTA].sup.1.]-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase results in increased proline accumulation and protection of plants from osmotic stress. Plant Physiol. 122:1129-1136.

Hsieh, T.H., J.T. Lee, Y.Y. Charng, and M.T. Chan. 2002a. Tomato plants ectopically expressing Arabidopsis CBF1 show enhanced resistance to water deficit stress. Plant Physiol. 130:618-626.

Hsieh, T.H., L.T. Lee, P.T. Yang, L.H. Chiu, Y.Y. Charng, Y.C. Wang, and M.T. Chan. 2002b. Heterology expression of the Arabidopsis C-Repeat/Dehydration Response Element Binding Factor 1 gene confers elevated tolerance to chilling and oxidative stresses in transgenic tomato. Plant Physiol. 129:1086-1094.

Huang, Y., H. Li, R. Gupta, P.C. Morris, S. Luan, and J.J. Kieber. 2000. ATMPK4, an Arabidopsis homolog of mitogen-activated protein kinase, is activated in vitro by AtMEK1 through threonine phosphorylation. Plant Physiol. 122:1301-1310.

Ichimura, K., T. Mizoguchi, K. Irie, P. Morris, J. Giraudat, K. Matsumoto, and K. Shinozaki. 1998. Isolation of ATMEKK1 (a MAP kinase kinase kinase)-interacting proteins and analysis of a MAP kinase cascade in Arabidopsis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 253:532-543.

Ichimura, K., T. Mizoguchi, R. Yoshida, T. Yuasa, and K. Shinozaki. 2000. Various abiotic stresses rapidly activate Arabidopsis MAP kinases ATMPK4 and ATMPK6. Plant J. 24:655-665.

Ishitani, M., J. Liu, U. Halfter, C.S. Kim, W. Shi, and J.-K. Zhu. 2000. SOS3 function in plant salt tolerance requires N-myristoylation and calcium-binding. Plant Cell 12:1667-1677.

Jaglo, K.R., S. Kleff, K.L. Amundsen, X. Zhang, V. Haake, J.Z. Zhang, T. Deits, and M.F. Thomashow. 2001. Components of the Arabidopsis C-repeat/dehydration-responsive element binding factor cold-response pathway are conserved in Brassica napus and other plant species. Plant Physiol. 127:910-917.

Jaglo-Ottosen, K.R., S.J. Gilmour, D.G. Zarka, O. Schabenberger, and M.F. Thomashow. 1998. Arabidopsis CBFI overexpression induces cor genes and enhances freezing tolerance. Science 280: 104-106.

Jang, I.C., S.J. Oh, J.S. Seo, W.B. Choi, S.I. Song, C.H. Kim, Y.S. Kim, H.S. Seo, Y.D. Choi, B.H. Nahm, and J.K. Kim. 2003. Expression of a bifunctional fusion of the Escherichia coli genes for trehalose-6-phosphate synthase and trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase in transgenic rice plants increases trehalose accumulation and abiotic stress tolerance without stunting growth. Plant Physiol. 131:516-524.

Jia, W., Y. Wang, S. Zhang, and J. Zhang. 2002. Salt-stress-induced ABA accumulation is more sensitively triggered in roots than in shoots. J. Exp. Bot. 53:2201-2206.

Kang, J.Y., H.I. Choi, M.Y. Im, and S.Y. Kim. 2002. Arabidopsis basic leucine zipper proteins that mediate stress-responsive abscisic acid signaling. Plant Cell 14:343-357.

Karakas, B., P. Ozias-Akins, C. Stushnoff, M. Suefferheld and M. Rieger. 1997. Salinity and drought tolerance of mannitol-accumulating transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Environ. 20: 609-616.

Kasuga, M., Q. Liu, S. Miura, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, and K. Shinozaki. 1999. Improving plant drought, salt, and freezing tolerance by gene transfer of a single stress-inducible transcription factor. Nature Biotechnol. 17:287-291.

Kishitani, S., T. Takanami, M. Suzuki, M. Oikawa, S. Yokoi, M. Ishitani, A.M. Alvarez-Nakase, T. Takabe, and T. Takabe. 2000. Compatibility of glycinebetaine in rice plants: Evaluation using transgenic rice plants with a gene for peroxisomal betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase from barley. Plant Cell Environ. 23:107-114.

Kishor, P.B.K., Z. Hong, G.H. Miao, C.A.A. Hu, and D.P.S. Verma. 1995. Overexpression of [delta]-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase increases proline production and confers osmotolerance in transgenic plants. Plant Physiol. 108:1387-1394.

Kovtun, Y., W.-L. Chiu, G. Tena, and J. Sheen. 2000. Functional analysis of oxidative stress-activated mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:2940-2945.

Kreps, J.A., Y. Wu, H.S. Chang, T. Zhu, X. Wang, and J.F. Harper. 2002. Transcriptome changes for Arabidopsis in response to salt, osmotic, and cold stress. Plant Physiol. 130:2129-2141.

Kwak, J.M., I.C. Mori, Z.M. Pei, N. Leonhardt, M.A. Torres, J.L. Dangl, R.E. Bloom, S. Bodde, J.D.G. Jones, and J.I. Schroeder. 2003. NADPH oxidase AtrbohD and AtrbohF genes function in ROS-dependent ABA signaling in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 22: 2623-2633.

Laurie, S., K.A. Feeney, F.J.M. Maathuis, P.J. Heard, S.J. Brown, and R.A. Leigh. 2002. A role for HKT1 in sodium uptake by wheat roots. Plant J. 32:139-149.

Leung, J., and J. Giraudat. 1998. Abscisic acid signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 49:199-222.

Liu, J., and J.-K. Zhu. 1998. A calcium sensor homolog required for plant salt tolerance. Science 280:1943-1945.

Liu, J., M. Ishitani, U. Halfter, C.S. Kim, and J.-K. Zhu. 2000. The Arabidopsis thaliana SOS2 gene encodes a protein kinase that is required for salt tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:3730-3734.

Liu, Q., Y. Sakuma, H. Abe, M. Kasuga, S. Miura, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, and K. Shinozaki. 1998. Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain, separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought- and low temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 10:1391-1406.

Liu, W., D.J. Fairbairn, R.J. Reid, and D.P. Schachtman. 2001. Characterization of two HKT1 homologues from Eucalyptus camaldulensis that display intrinsic osmosensing capability. Plant Physiol. 127: 283-294.

Maas, E.V. 1990. Crop salt tolerance. Chapter 13, p. 262-304. In K.K. Tanji (ed.) Agricultural salinity assessment and management. ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering No. 71, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.

Mizoguchi, T., K. Irie, T. Hirayama, N. Hayashida, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Matsumoto, and K. Shinozaki. 1996. A gene encoding a mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase is induced simultaneously with genes for a mitogen-activated protein kinase and an $6 ribosomal protein kinase by touch, cold, and water stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:765-769.

Mohanty, A., H. Kathuria, A. Ferjani, A. Sakamoto, P. Mohanty, N. Murata, and A. Tyagi. 2002. Transgenics of an elite indica rice variety Pusa Basmati 1 harbouring the codA gene are highly tolerant to salt stress. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106:51-57.

Moon, H., B. Lee, G. Choi, D. Shin, D.T. Prasad, O. Lee, S.S. Kwak, D.H. Kim, J. Nam, J. Bahk, J.C. Hong, S.Y. Lee, M.J. Cho, C.O. Lim, and D.J. Yun. 2003. NDP kinase 2 interacts with two oxidative stress-activated MAPKs to regulate cellular redox state and enhances multiple stress tolerance in transgenic plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:358-363.

Mou, Z., X. Wang, Z. Fu, Y. Dai, C. Han, J. Ouyang, F. Bao, Y. Hu, and J. Li. 2002. Silencing of phosphoethanolamine N-methyltransferase results in temperature-sensitive male sterility and salt hypersensitivity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 14:2031-2043.

Murata, Y., Z.M. Pei, I.C. Mori, and J. Schroeder. 2001. Abscisic acid activation of plasma membrane [Ca.sup.2+] channels in guard cells requires cytosolic NAD(P)H and is differentially disrupted upstream and downstream of reactive oxygen species production in abil-1 and abi2-1 protein phosphatase 2C mutants. Plant Cell 12: 2513-2523.

Nanjo, T., T.M. Kobayashi, Y. Yoshida, Y. Kakubari, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, and K. Shinozaki. 1999. Antisense suppression of proline degradation improves tolerance to freezing and salinity in Arab# dopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 461:205-210.

Ohta, M., Y. Guo, U. Halfter, and J.-K. Zhu. 2003. A novel domain in the protein kinase SOS2 mediates interaction with the protein phosphatase 2C ABI2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:11771-11776.

Oono, Y., M. Seki, T. Nanjo, M. Narusaka, M. Fujita, R. Satoh, M. Satou, T. Sakurai, J. Ishida, K. Akiyama, K. Iida, K. Maruyama, S. Satoh, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, and K. Shinozaki. 2003. Monitoring expression profiles of Arabidopsis gene expression during rehydration process after dehydration using ca. 7000 full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J. 34:868-887.

Park, J.M., C.J. Park, S.B. Lee, B.K. Ham, R. Shin, and K.H. Paek. 2001. Overexpression of the tobacco Tsil gene encoding an EREBP/ AP2-type transcription factor enhances resistance against pathogen attack and osmotic stress in tobacco. Plant Cell 13:1035-1046.

Pei, Z.M., Y. Murata, G. Benning, S. Thomine, B. Klusener, G.J. Allen, E. Grill, and J.l. Schroeder. 2000. Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signaling in guard cells. Nature 406:731 734.

Pellegrineschi, A., J.-M. Ribaut, R. Trethowan, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, and D. Hoisington. 2002. Progress in the genetic engineering of wheat for waterlimited conditions. JIRCAS Working Report: 55-60.

Prasad, K.V.S.K, P. Sharmila, P.A. Kumar, and P.P. Saradhi. 2000. Transformation of Brassica juncea (L.) Czern with bacterial codA gene enhances its tolerance to salt stress. Mol. Breed. 6:489-499.

Qiu, Q.S., Y. Guo, F.J. Quintero, J.M. Pardo, K.S. Schumaker, and J.-K. Zhu. 2003. Regulation of vacuolar [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] exchange in Arab# dopsis thaliana by the SOS pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 279:207-215.

Qiu, Q.S., Y. Guo, M.A. Dietrich, K.S. Schumaker, and J.-K. Zhu. 2002. Regulation of SOS1, a plasma membrane [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] exchanger in Arabidopsis thaliana, by SOS2 and SOS3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:8436-8441.

Quintero, F.J., M. Ohta, H. Shi, J.-K. Zhu, and J.M. Pardo. 2002. Reconstitution in yeast of the Arabidopsis SOS signaling pathway for [Na.sup.+] homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:9061-9066.

Roxas, V.P., Jr., R.K. Smith, E.R. Allen, and R.D. Allen. 1997. Overexpression of glutathione S-transferase/glutathione peroxidase enhances the growth of transgenic tobacco seedlings during stress. Nature Biotechnol. 15:988-991.

Roxas, V.P., S.A. Lodhi, D.K. Garrett, J.R. Mahan, and R.D. Allen. 2000. Stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco seedlings that overexpress glutathione S-transferase/glutathione peroxidase. Plant Cell Physiol. 41:1229-1234.

Rubio, F., W. Gassmann, and J.I. Schroeder. 1995. Sodium driven potassium uptake by the plant potassium transporter HKT1 and mutations conferring salt tolerance. Science 270:1660-1663.

Rus, A., S. Yokoi, A. Sharkhuu, M. Reddy, B.-H. Lee, T.K. Matsumoto, H. Koiwa, J.-K. Zhu, R.A. Bressan, and P.M. Hasegawa. 2001a. AtHKT1 is a salt tolerance determinant that controls [Na.sup.(+)] entry into plant roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:14150-14155.

Rus, A.M., M.T. Estan, C. Gisbert, B. Garcia-Sogo, R. Serrano, M. Caro, V. Moreno, and M.C. Bolarin. 2001b. Expressing the yeast HAL1 gene in tomato increases fruit yield and enhances [K.sup.+]/[Na.sup.+] selectivity under salt stress. Plant Cell Environ. 24:875 880.

Saijo, Y., S. Hata, J. Kyozuka, K. Shimamoto, and K. Izui. 2000. Overexpression of a single [Ca.sup.2+] dependent protein kinase confers both cold and salt/drought tolerance on rice plants. Plant J. 23:319-327.

Sakamoto, A., H. Alia, and N. Murata. 1998. Metabolic engineering of rice leading to biosynthesis of glycinebetaine and tolerance to salt and cold. Plant Mol. Biol. 38:1011-1019.

Samis, K., S. Bowley, and B. McKersie. 2002. Pyramiding Mn-superoxide dismutase transgenes to improve persistence and biomass production in alfalfa. J. Exp. Bot. 53:1343-1350.

Sanders, D., C. Brownlee, and J.F. Harper. 1999. Communicating with calcium. Plant Cell 11:691-706.

Satoh, R., K. Nakashima, M. Scki, K. Shinozaki, and K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki. 2002. ACTCAT, a novel cis-acting element for proline-and hypoosmolarity-responsive expression of the ProDH gene encoding proline dehydrogenase in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 130: 709-719.

Schroeder, J.l., G.J. Allen, V. Hugouvieux, J.M. Kwak, and D. Waner. 2001. Guard cell signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 52:627-658.

Seki, M., M. Narusaka, J. Ishida, T. Nanjo, M. Fujita, Y. Oono, A. Kamiya, M. Nakajima, A. Enju, T. Sakurai, M. Satou, K. Akiyama, T. Taji, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, P. Carninci, J. Kawai, Y. Hayashizaki, and K. Shinozaki. 2002. Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J. 31:279-292.

Sheen, J. 1996. [Ca.sup.2+]-dependent protein kinases and stress signal transduction in plants. Science 274:1900-1902.

Sheveleva, E., W. Chmara, H.J. Bohnert, and R.G. Jensen. 1997. Increased salt and drought tolerance by D-ononitol production in transgenic Nicotiana tabacum L. Plant Physiol. 115:1211-1219.

Sheveleva, E.V., S. Marquez, W. Chmara, A. Zegeer, R.G. Jenscn, and H.J. Bohnert. 1998. Sorbitol-6-phosphate dehydrogenase expression in transgenic tobacco. High amounts of sorbitol lead to necrotic lesions. Plant Physiol. 117:831-839.

Shi, H., and J.-K. Zhu. 2002. Regulation of expression of the vacuolar [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] antiporter gene AtNHX1 by salt stress and ABA. Plant Mol. Biol. 50:543 550.

Shi, H., B.-H. Lee, S.-J. Wu, and J.-K. Zhu. 2003. Overexpression of a plasma membrane [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] antiporter improves salt tolerance in Arabidopsis. Nature Biotechnol. 21:81-85.

Shi, H., F.J. Quintero, J.M. Pardo, and J.-K. Zhu. 2002. The putative plasma membrane [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] antiporter SOS1 controls long-distance [Na.sup.+] transport in plants. Plant Cell 14:465-477.

Shi, H., M. Ishitani, C.S. Kim, and J.-K. Zhu. 2000. The Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance gene SOS1 encodes a putative [Na.sup.+]/[H.sup.+] antiporter. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6896-6901.

Shinozaki, K., and K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki. 2000. Molecular response to dehydration and low temperature: Differences and cross-talk between two stress signaling pathways. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3:217-223.

Smirnoff, N. 1993. The role of active oxygen in the response of plants to water deficit and desiccation. New Phytol. 125:27-58.

Su, H., D. Golldack, C. Zhao, and H.J. Bohnert. 2002. The expression of HAK-type [K.sup.+] transporters is regulated in response to salinity stress in common ice plant. Plant Physiol. 129:1482-1493.

Tarczynski, M.C., R.G. Jensen, and H.J. Bohnert. 1993. Stress protection of transgenic tobacco by production of the osmolyte mannitol. Science 259:508-510.

Teige, M., E. Scheikl, T. Eulgem, R. Doczi, K. Ichimura, K. Shinozaki, J.L. Dangl, and H. Hirt. 2004. The MKK2 pathway mediates cold and salt stress signaling in Arabidopsis. Mol. Cell 15:141-152.

Thomas, J.C., M. Sepahi, B. Arendall, and H.J. Bohnert. 1995. Enhancement of seed germination in high salinity by engineering mannitol expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 18:801-806.

Thomashow, M.F. 1999. Plant cold acclimation: Freezing tolerance genes and regulatory mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50:571-599.

Tsugane, K., K. Kobayashi, Y. Niwa, Y. Ohba, K. Wada, and H. Kobayashi. 1999. A recessive Arabidopsis mutant that grows photoautotrophically under salt stress shows enhanced active oxygen detoxification. Plant Cell 11:1195-1206.

Ulm, R., K. Ichimura, T. Mizoguchi, S.C. Peck, T. Zhu, X. Wang, K. Shinozaki, and J. Paszkowski. 2002. Distinct regulation of salinity and genotoxic stress responses by Arabidopsis MAP kinase phosphatase 1. EMBO J. 21:6483-6493.

Uno, Y., T. Furihata, H. Abe, R. Yoshida, K. Shinozaki, and K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki. 2000. Novel Arabidopsis bZIP transcription factors involved in an abscisic-acid-dependent signal transduction pathway under drought and high salinity conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:11632-11637.

Uozumi, N., E.J. Kim, F. Rubio, T. Yamaguchi, S. Muto, A. Tsuboi, E.P. Bakker, T. Nakamura, and J.I. Schroeder. 2000. The Arabidopsis HKT1 gene homolog mediates inward [Na.sup.+] currents in Xenopus laevis oocytes and [Na.sup.+] uptake in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Plant Physiol. 122:1249-1259.

Urao, T., B. Yakubov, R. Satoh, K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, M. Seki, T. Hirayama, and K. Shinozaki. 1999. A transmembrane hybridtype histidine kinase in Arabidopsis functions as an osmosensor. Plant Cell 11:1743-1754.

Vranova, E., D. Inze, and F. Van Breusegem. 2002. Signal transduction during oxidative stress. J. Exp. Bot. 53:1227-1236.

Wang, J., H. Zhang, and R.D. Alien. 1999. Overexpression of an Arabidopsis peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase gene in tobacco increases protection against oxidative stress. Plant Cell Physiol. 40: 725-732.

Wu, Y., J. Kuzma, E. Marechal, R. Graeff, H.C. Lee, R. Foster, and N.H. Chua. 1997. Abscisic acid signaling through cyclic ADP-ribose in plants. Science 278:2126-2130.

Xiong, L., and J.-K. Zhu. 2003. Regulation of abscisic acid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 133:29-36.

Xiong, L., and Y. Yang. 2003. Disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance in rice are inversely modulated by an abscisic acid-inducible mitogen-activated protein kinase. Plant Cell 15:745-759.

Xiong, L., B.-H. Lee, M. Ishitani, H. Lee, C. Zhang, and J.-K. Zhu. 2001b. FIERY1 encoding an inositol polyphosphate 1-phosphatase is a negative regulator of abscisic acid and stress signaling in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 15:1971-1984.

Xiong, L., H. Lee, M. Ishitani, and J.-K. Zhu. 2002. Regulation of osmotic stress responsive gene expression by LOS6/ABA1 locus in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 277:8588-8596.

Xiong, L., M. Ishitani, H. Lee, and J.-K. Zhu. 2001a. The Arabidopsis LOS5/ABA3 locus encodes a molybdenum cofactor sulfurase and modulates cold stress- and osmotic stress-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell 13:2063-2083.

Xu, D., X. Duan, B. Wang, B. Hong, T.D. Ho, and R. Wu. 1996. Expression of a late embryogenesis abundant protein gene, HVA1, from barley confers tolerance to water deficit and salt stress in transgenic rice. Plant Physiol. 110:249-257.

Yadav, R., T.J. Flowers, and A.R. Yeo. 1996. The involvement of the transpirational bypass flow in sodium uptake by high- and low-sodium-transporting lines of rice developed through intravarietal selection. Plant Cell Environ. 22:329-336.

Yeo, A.R., S.A. Flowers, G. Rao, K. Welfare, N. Senanayake, and T.J. Flowers. 1999. Silicon reduces sodium uptake in rice (Orvza sativa L.) in saline conditions and this is accounted for by a reduction in the transpirational bypass flow. Plant Cell Environ. 22: 559-565.

Zeng, L., and M.C. Shannon. 2000. Salinity effects on seedling growth and yield components of rice. Crop Sci. 40:996-1003.

Zhang, H.X., and E. Blumwald. 2001. Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nature Biotechnol. 19:765-768.

Zhang, H.X., J.N. Hodson, J.P. Williams, and E. Blumwald. 2001. Engineering salt-tolerant Brassica plants: Characterization of yield and seed oil quality in transgenic plants with increased vacuolar sodium accumulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:12832-12836.

Zhu, B., J. Su, M.C. Chang, D.P.S. Verma, Y.L. Fan, and R. Wu. 1998. Overexpression of a pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase gene and analysis of tolerance to water and salt stress in transgenic rice. Plant Sci. 139:41-48.

Zhu, J.-K. 2002. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 53:247-273.

Zhu, J.-K. 2003. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress. Curt. Opin. Plant Biol. 6:441-445.

Viswanathan Chinnusamy, Andre Jagendorf, and Jian-Kang Zhu *

Viswanathan Chinnusamy, Water Technology Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India; Andre Jagendorf, Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY14853; Jian-Kang Zhu, Institute for Integrative Genome Biology and Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521. Received 3 Dec. 2003. Symposia. * Corresponding author (jian-kang.zhu@ucr.edu).
COPYRIGHT 2005 Crop Science Society of America
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2005 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Symposium
Author:Chinnusamy, Viswanathan; Jagendorf, Andre; Zhu, Jian-Kang
Publication:Crop Science
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Mar 1, 2005
Words:11438
Previous Article:Genetic and metabolic engineering for value-added traits.
Next Article:Folate synthesis and metabolism in plants and prospects for biofortification.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2021 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters |