Printer Friendly

Understanding and choosing optics Part II: how to weed out or accept the undesirable traits.

In Part 1 of Understanding and Choosing Optics, we talked about resolution, contrast, the importance of exit pupil and the difference between Porro prism and roof prism binoculars. We also included a Zeiss test chart and showed you how to evaluate an optic for resolution and contrast. We only scratched the surface.

The Zeiss test chart allows us to test image quality and resolution and contrast are easily. The various blocks on the test chart decrease in size, allowing us to test the resolving power of the optic in a standardized way. Contrast can be gauged by how black the black is and how white the white is as opposed to the whites appearing gray and the blacks not being sharply black.

While this can be accomplished using the print on a newspaper, the Zeiss test chart is precisely made and lets you know the resolving power in a standardized and measurable way you can express to others including an optical scientist. Also, the slant of some of the bars is not duplicated in newspaper print. If you tried to do the same using a newspaper, you'd have to send that same newspaper to all whom you wished to impart the information along with the comparison of another optic of similar attributes. Even so, determining the exact resolving power and the presence of astigmatism, for example, would be difficult. There are other more comprehensive charts available, and you can obtain them online. For now, however, let us climb a few foothills before tackling the mountain.



The chart allows us to test various aberrations found in optics in a predetermined manner. Let's start with astigmatism. Astigmatism is an extremely important matter in an optic. If the binocular, riflescope, or spotting scope has astigmatism, the image quality will be poor and will lead to eyestrain. To evaluate a binocular, for example, place the chart 15' away in good light, farther for more powerful optics. Put the binocular on a tripod and look at the chart. Focus the binocular the best you can on the vertical bars, then on the horizontal bars, then the diagonal bars. If you cannot focus them all at the same time, the optic has astigmatism. Astigmatism is not always seen when viewing common objects like a mountainside or the walls and shelves in your local sporting goods store. Although we may not be conscious of this aberration, it will frustrate you wondering why things don't seem quite right, and your eyes always seem to be strained. Resolution is never as good as it should be, and you will wonder why.

Even if you take the Zeiss chart to your favorite sporting goods store along with your tripod, many local sporting goods stores do not carry some of the better optics. When you begin testing them, you may become frustrated if the less expensive brands will not meet these tests. Amazingly, some in the $200 to $400 range nowadays will. Apart from that, you will have to rely on the opinions of writers and other resources. A Web site called "Better View Desired" evaluates binoculars and spotting scopes for bird watchers and does an excellent job. The site does so for hunting and competition shooters. And then of course, we do our best here.

Remember: Evaluate optics with like powers and objective lens diameters. Don't evaluate an 8x32mm binocular against a 10x50mm, for example.

Spherical aberration and curvature of field are two other things to look for you can find using the Zeiss test chart. Curvature of field causes the image formation plane to become curved like the inside of a shallow bowl, preventing the lens from producing a flat image of a flat subject. When the center of the image is in focus, the periphery is out of focus, and when the periphery is in focus, the center is out of focus. The degree of curvature of field is largely affected by the method used for correcting astigmatism. Good correction of astigmatism usually results in small curvature of field. If the center of the field is excellent, as many are, the optic is not always bad. However, I prefer to look at all the field in the image without having to move every object viewed to the center of the lens.

Spherical aberration causes parallel light rays passing through the edge of a lens to converge at a focal point closer to the lens than light rays passing through the center of the lens. There is a limit to the degree of correction possible using spherical lenses. With large aperture lenses, the only effective way to thoroughly compensate spherical aberration is to use an aspherical lens element.



The lack of distortion is another trademark of a good optic. One of the requirements of an ideal lens is that "the image formed by the lens has the same shape as the subject." Distortion is a type of aberration causing straight lines to become curved (distorted) in the image, thus preventing this ideal condition from being fulfilled. Distortion stretching the shape in the diagonal direction is called pincushion distortion, and that which compresses the shape in the diagonal direction is called barrel distortion.

Distortion is small in lenses with constructions symmetrically configured on both sides of the aperture diaphragm, but is likely to occur in lenses having asymmetrical configurations. Zoom lenses tend to produce barrel distortion at wide-angle positions and pincushion distortion at telephoto positions (due to slight changes in distortion characteristics during zooming). With zoom lenses incorporating one or more aspherical lens elements, however, this distortion is well corrected due to the compensating effect of the aspherical lens.


Since this type of aberration is caused by refraction abnormalities of the principal light rays passing through the center of the lens, its effect cannot be reduced by stopping down the lens.

Judging Distortion

These types of distortion can be most easily recognized by looking at something like a telephone pole and then moving the optic from side to side. If the vertical object, in this case the telephone pole, tends to bend, the optic has distortion.

Rolling distortion can be visualized by moving the optic along a row of cars, for example. If the car coming into view at the edge of the image appears to grow as it approaches the center of the image and then shrinks again as it moves to the opposite edge, the optic has rolling distortion.

There is one last thing I would like to touch--clarity. You often hear people say, "My binocular or spotting scope is clear." You have a vague understanding of what they mean, associating it with good resolution and the transmission of light, something we will get into in future articles. However, "clear" is a term used in optics to denote certain problems such as smokiness, off color, or a film that appears somewhat grimy like dirty glasses.

We have touched on some of the most important aspects of poor vs. good optics. The tests to determine them are relatively easy. In the future, we will be evaluating the image quality of optics and giving you the results using these tests and terms and the Zeiss chart. The results will also be compared to standards I believe represent some of the finest optics in each group. Along the way, we will look at other aspects of optics to include coatings, armor, light transmission, exit pupil, twilight factor, reliability, and durability, to mention a few, giving you an overall indication of the value of an optic vs. its price and use. Without these tests and comparisons, I don't believe you can truly fit an optic to your needs. These evaluations will include binoculars, spotting scopes, riflescopes, reticle design, rangefinders, and more.
COPYRIGHT 2008 Publishers' Development Corporation
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2008 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:OPTICS
Author:Gottfredson, Jacob
Publication:Guns Magazine
Date:May 1, 2008
Previous Article:Squounds and Crak-Rs: you read right. Read on.
Next Article:All for 231: and 231 for all.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters