# Unconditional Stability of a Numerical Method for the Dual-Phase-Lag Equation.

1. IntroductionNon-Fourier heat conduction models have been increasingly used in recent years to model a variety of engineering and biological heat transfer problems (see, e.g., [1-3] and references therein). The dual-phase-lag model (DPL) proposed by Tzou [4,5] considers two phase-lags, [[tau].sub.q], corresponding to the heat flux vector q, and [[tau].sub.T], corresponding to the temperature gradient [nabla]T, resulting in the non-Fourier heat conduction law

q (r, t + [[tau].sub.q]) = -k[nabla]T (r, t + [[tau].sub.T]), (1)

where t and r are the time and spatial coordinates and k is the thermal conductivity.

Considering first-order approximations in the phase-lags in (1), in the absence of heat sources and in one dimension (1D), the combination of (1) with the conservation of energy principle leads to the DPL equation

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (2)

where [alpha] is the thermal diffusivity and [DELTA] is the Laplace operator.

Analytical and numerical solutions for the DPL equation and other related DPL models derived from (1) for different specific problems and domains have been developed (e.g., [6-15]; see also references in [2, 3, 16]).

As pointed out in [17], in the case of numerical finite difference methods conditions on the stability of the proposed methods are not always completely established. McDonough et al. [18] proposed a numerical solution procedure for the DPL equation that could provide the base for an efficient numerical solver for 3D problems. However, only a partial analysis of the stability of the method was provided. As indicated by the authors, a von Neumann analysis had been conducted, though not reported in their paper, but it only provided necessary, but not sufficient, criteria for stability. Also, the authors reported that no stability problems were observed in a wide set of numerical experiments, but, as they acknowledged, the unconditional stability of their method was only suggested, but not established.

The aim of this note was to prove the unconditional stability of the finite difference method proposed in [18], which will be accomplished by analyzing its amplification matrix (e.g., [19,20]). This type of von Neumann or Fourier stability analysis is directly valid for pure initial-value problems and for initial-boundary-value problems with periodic boundary conditions, and it can also be applied to general Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions by using appropriate periodic extensions, provided that consistent discretizations are used for the boundary conditions [21, Ch. 3].

In the next section we recall the method proposed in [18] and write the scheme in a form suitable for the posterior stability analysis, in the case where [[tau].sub.q] [not equal to] 0, letting the case [[tau].sub.q] = 0 for a particular simplified analysis. Next, we will obtain the amplification matrix corresponding to the scheme, showing that their powers are uniformly bounded, thus establishing the unconditional stability of the method. Finally, the main conclusions are summarized.

2. Finite Difference Scheme

The numerical solution procedure for the DPL equation proposed by McDonough et al. [18] consists in applying first trapezoidal integration to (2) and then using the following finite difference approximations:

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (3)

where k - [DELTA]t >0 and considering the spatial domain x [member of] [a, b], with [N.sub.x] uniformly spaced grid points, so that [DELTA]x = h - (b - a)/([N.sub.x] - 1) and m--1, 2, ..., [N.sub.x], and superscripts indicate time levels.

The resulting finite difference scheme is globally first-order accurate in time and second-order accurate in space. Assuming [[tau].sub.T] [not equal to] 0, the scheme can be written in the form

[mathematical expression not reproducible] (4)

where r = k/[h.sup.2]. The case [[tau].sub.q] = 0 will be examined apart.

3. Unconditional Stability

[L.sub.2] stability of the three-level scheme (4) follows from the uniform boundedness in [xi], for every 0< k < [delta] for a fixed [delta], of the powers of the amplification matrix [??]([xi]) ([19, p. 69], [20, p. 65]):

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (5)

where

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (6)

For scheme (4), the coefficients [b.sub.i] and [a.sub.i] are as follows:

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (7)

Therefore,

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (8)

Introducing the parameter [beta] = cos [xi] - 1, (8) take the form

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (9)

Thus, writing

d = 2 [alpha]r[[tau].sub.T]/ [[tau].sub.q] [beta] - (1 - [alpha]r[beta]) k/[[tau].sub.q] (10)

one gets

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (11)

Finally, writing

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (12)

the amplification matrix [??]([xi]) can be written in the simple form

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (13)

We note the following bounds, which will be of use to obtain bounds on the eigenvalues of the amplification matrix. Since -1 [less than or equal to] cos [xi] [less than or equal to] 1, it follows that -2 [less than or equal to] [beta] [less than or equal to] 0. Also, from (10), it follows that

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (14)

and, hence,

1-d [less than or equal to] 1 + (1- [alpha]r[beta]) k/[[tau].sub.q] < 1, (15)

Therefore, the following bounds for the parameters defined in (12) hold:

0 < a < 1, b < 0. (16)

Also, since b = 0(k), there is a fixed [delta] > 0 such that 1 + a + b > 0 for every 0 < k < [delta].

Next we compute the eigenvalues of the amplification matrix, as written in (13), whose characteristic equation is

[[mu].sup.2] - (1 + a + b) [mu] + a = 0. (17)

Thus, the eigenvalues of [??]([xi]) are given by

1/2 (1+ a + b [+ or -] [square root of [(1 + a + b).sup.2] - 4a]), (18)

writing [[mu].sub.1] for + sign and [[mu].sub.2] for - sign. In the case where there are two complex conjugate eigenvalues and also when there is a double root, from (17) one has that [[mu].sub.1] [[mu].sub.2] = a < 1, and, therefore,

[absolute value of [[mu].sub.1]] = [[mu].sub.2]] < 1. (19)

When there are two real different eigenvalues, that is, when [(1 + a + b).sup.2] -4a > 0, one has [[mu].sub.1] > [[mu].sub.2] > 0, and also it follows that [[mu].sub.1] [less than or equal to] 1, since b < 0 and

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (20)

Therefore, the following bound on the spectral radius of the amplification matrix holds:

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (21)

which shows that the scheme satisfies the von Neumann necessary condition for stability, as stated in [18]. Moreover, it also holds that [[mu].sub.1] [[mu].sub.2] has at least one eigenvalue with modulus strictly lower than 1, which will be the complementary result used to prove the unconditional stability of the scheme.

We will next follow similar arguments to those used in [20, pp. 66-68]. First we note that the sum of the absolute values of the elements of the amplification matrix is bounded:

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (22)

Then, since [??]([xi]) is a (2 x 2) matrix, there is a unitary matrix U such that [mathematical expression not reproducible] is the triangular matrix

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (23)

where

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (24)

Hence, [L.sub.2] stability of scheme (4) is equivalent to the uniform boundedness of the powers of the triangular matrix T:

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (25)

where

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (26)

Since max ([absolute value of [[mu].sub.1]] [absolute value of [[mu].sub.2]] [less than or equal to] 1, it is only necessary to prove the boundedness of [m.sub.n] ([mu.sub.1], [mu.sub.2]). When the eigenvalues are complex conjugate or real double, there is [gamma] < 1 such that [absolute value of [[mu].sub.1]] = [absolute value of [[mu].sub.2]]] [less than or equal to] < [gamma], so that

[absolute value of [m.sub.n]] ([mu.sub.1], [mu.sub.2])| [less than or equal to] mn [[gamma].sup.n-1] [less than or equal to] C [xi] [member of] R. (27)

Also, when there are two different real eigenvalues, it holds that [absolute value of [absolute value of [[mu].sub.1]] [less than or equal to] 1, and there is [gamma] < 1 such that [absolute value of [[mu].sub.2]] < [gamma], so that

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (28)

As a consequence, the unconditional [L.sub.2] stability of the scheme is proved.

Remark 1. There are two especial cases of the DPL model that could be singled out. When [[tau].sub.T] = 0, the DPL model reduces to the single-phase-lag (SPL) model [2, 22], and (2) reduces to the Cattaneo-Vernotte (CV) model [23, 24]. In the case where the two phase-lags are exactly the same, [[tau].sub.q] = [[tau].sub.T], there would bean instantaneous response between the temperature gradient and the heat flux, and (1) would be equivalent to the classical Fourier law, except for a shift in time. However, we note that, regarding the numerical scheme (4) and its stability properties, both especial cases are included in the general stability analysis presented above.

3.1. Particular Case [[tau].sub.q] = 0. In this special case the method is a two-level scheme:

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (29)

so that the amplification matrix reduces to the amplification factor:

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (30)

where

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (31)

with

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (32)

Thus, introducing the parameter [beta] = 1 - cos [xi] [greater than or equal to] 0, it is not difficult to get to the expressions

[mathematical expression not reproducible], (33)

and from this

[mathematical expression not reproducible]. (34)

Therefore, the unconditional [L.sub.2] stability of the scheme in this special case is also proved.

4. Conclusions

The use of non-Fourier models of heat conduction in engineering problems requires the use of efficient methods to compute numerical solutions, and a basic condition for these numerical methods to be reliably employed is to be confident that they present good stability properties.

The numerical solution procedure for the DPL equation proposed by McDonough et al. [18] provided the base for an efficient numerical solver for higher dimension problems, but its stability properties were not firmly established.

In this note, by analyzing the amplification matrix of the scheme, we have provided a detailed proof showing that the method is indeed unconditionally stable, including its possible application to the particular case when [[tau].sub.q] = 0.

As stressed in [3], the use of appropriate boundary conditions is a key issue in the modelling of non-Fourier heat conduction problems. The type of stability analysis presented in this work is valid for different type of boundary conditions, when they are consistently incorporated into the numerical scheme, and it can also provide correct results in a wide range of situations for nonperiodic boundary conditions [25, Ch. 10]. In micro- and nanoscale problems, mixed-type Robin boundary conditions are needed to account for temperature jump on boundaries [26, 27], and the incorporation of these types of boundary conditions might require a particular or complementary stability analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1650380

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by Grant GRE12-08 from University of Alicante.

References

[1] D. Y. Tzou, "Lagging behavior in biological systems," Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 134, no. 5, Article ID 051006, 2012.

[2] D. Y. Tzou, Macro- to Microscale Heat Transfer: The Lagging Behavior, John Wiley & Sons, 2nd edition, 2014.

[3] J. Ghazanfarian, Z. Shomali, and A. Abbassi, "Macro- to nanoscale heat and mass transfer: the lagging behavior," International Journal of Thermophysics, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1416-1467, 2015.

[4] D. Y. Tzou, "The generalized lagging response in small-scale and high-rate heating," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 38, no. 17, pp. 3231-3240, 1995.

[5] D. Y. Tzou, "Unified field approach for heat conduction from macro- to micro-scales," Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 8-16, 1995.

[6] W. Dai and R. Nassar, "A finite difference scheme for solving the heat transport equation at the microscale," Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 697-708, 1999.

[7] W. Dai and R. Nassar, "An unconditionally stable finite difference scheme for solving a 3D heat transport equation in a sub-microscale thin film," Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 247-260, 2002.

[8] H. Wang, W. Dai, R. Nassar, and R. Melnik, "A finite difference method for studying thermal deformation in a thin film exposed to ultrashort-pulsed lasers," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 49, no. 15-16, pp. 2712-2723, 2006.

[9] K.-C. Tseng and J.-R. Tsai, "Numerical solver for an ultrafast laser heating on different 3-D microscale metallic films," Numerical Heat Transfer; Part A: Applications, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 726-748, 2008.

[10] J. Escolano, F. Rodriguez, M. A. Castro, F. Vives, and J. A. Martin, "Exact and analytic-numerical solutions of bidimensional lagging models of heat conduction," Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 54, no. 7-8, pp. 1841-1845, 2011.

[11] J. Cabrera, M. A. Castro, F. Rodriguez, and J. A. Martin, "Difference schemes for numerical solutions of lagging models of heat conduction," Mathematical and Computer Modelling, vol. 57, no. 7-8, pp. 1625-1632, 2013.

[12] M. A. Castro, F. Rodriguez, J. Escolano, and J. A. Martin, "Exact and analytic-numerical solutions of lagging models of heat transfer in a semi-infinite medium," Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol. 2013, Article ID 397053, 6 pages, 2013.

[13] I. H. El-Sirafy, M. A. Abdou, and E. Awad, "Generalized lagging response of thermoelastic beams," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2014, Article ID 780679, 2014.

[14] E. Majchrzak, L. Turchan, and J. Dziatkiewicz, "Modeling of skin tissue heating using the generalized dual phase-lag equation," Polish Academy of Sciences, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 417-437, 2015.

[15] B. Mochnacki and E. Majchrzak, "Numerical model of thermal interactions between cylindrical cryoprobe and biological tissue using the dual-phase lag equation," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 108, pp. 1-10, 2017

[16] L. Wang, X. Zhou, and X. Wei, Heat Conduction: Mathematical Models and Analytical Solutions, Springer, 2008.

[17] E. Majchrzak and B. Mochnacki, "Dual-phase lag equation. Stability conditions of a numerical algorithm based on the explicit scheme of the finite difference method," Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computational Mechanics, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 89-96, 2016.

[18] J. M. McDonough, I. Kunadian, R. R. Kumar, and T. Yang, "An alternative discretization and solution procedure for the dual phase-lag equation," Journal ofComputational Physics, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 163-171, 2006.

[19] R. D. Richtmyer and K. W. Morton, Difference Methods for Initial-Value Problems, Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics, No. 4, Interscience Publishers, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1967

[20] V. Thomee, Finite Difference Methods for Linear Parabolic Equations, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland), 1990.

[21] J. W. Thomas, Numerical Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods, vol. 22 of Texts in Applied Mathematics, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1995.

[22] D. Y. Tzou, "On the thermal shock wave induced by moving heat source," Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 232-238, 1989.

[23] C. Cattaneo, "Sur une forme de l'equation de la chaleur eliminant le paradoxe d'une propagation instantanee," Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, vol. 247, pp. 431-433, 1958.

[24] P. Vernotte, "Les paradoxes de la theorie continue de l'equation de la chaleur," Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, vol. 246, pp. 3154-3155, 1958.

[25] C. Hirsch, Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. Volume 1: Fundamentals of Numerical Discretization, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1988.

[26] J. Ghazanfarian and A. Abbassi, "Effect of boundary phonon scattering on Dual-Phase-Lag model to simulate micro- and nano-scale heat conduction," International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 52, no. 15-16, pp. 3706-3711, 2009.

[27] J. Ghazanfarian and A. Abbassi, "Investigation of 2D transient heat transfer under the effect of dual-phase-lag model in a nanoscale geometry," International Journal of Thermophysics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 552-566, 2012.

M. A. Castro, J. A. Martin, and F. Rodriguez

Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Alicante, Apdo. 99, 03080 Alicante, Spain

Correspondence should be addressed to F. Rodriguez; f.rodriguez@ua.es

Received 1 February 2017; Accepted 26 March 2017; Published 30 March 2017

Academic Editor: Filippo de Monte

Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback | |

Title Annotation: | Research Article |
---|---|

Author: | Castro, M.A.; Martin, J.A.; Rodriguez, F. |

Publication: | Mathematical Problems in Engineering |

Date: | Jan 1, 2017 |

Words: | 2702 |

Previous Article: | Deformable Models for Segmentation Based on Local Analysis. |

Next Article: | Study on Mechanical Characteristics of Fully Grouted Rock Bolts for Underground Caverns under Seismic Loads. |

Topics: |