Printer Friendly

US said to misread Saddam on weapons.

By Walter Pincus WASHINGTON--US intelligence agencies misinterpreted Saddam Hussein's directions that his military do away with weapons of mass destruction or their elements, believing incorrectly the orders were a ruse meant to hide evidence of such weapons from United Nations inspectors, according to an article in Foreign Affairs magazine that includes excerpts of a recently declassified report by the Pentagon's Joint Forces Command. In 2002, when US intelligence intercepted an internal message between two Iraqi commanders talking about removing the words "nerve agents" from "wireless instructions," the analysts "had no way of knowing that this time the information reflected the regime's attempt to ensure it was in compliance with UN resolutions," according to the Pentagon report. The same situation existed when US intelligence learned of instructions to the Iraqi military to search "for any chemical agents" in order to "make sure the area is free of chemical containers, and write a report on it," the article says. The United States "viewed this information through the prism of a decade of prior deceit" and did not believe it, the article claimed. The Foreign Affairs article was written by three defense analysts who helped draft the Pentagon report: Kevin Woods, an analyst in Washington; James Lacey, a military analyst for the US Joint Forces Command; and Williamson Murray, a history professor at the US Naval Academy. The intelligence analyses became part of then-Secretary of State Colin L. Powell's Feb. 5, 2003 briefing of the UN Security Council, in which the United States attempted to justify military action against Iraq based on Saddam's failure to disclose his weapons of mass destruction. Piece by piece, the intelligence presented that day by Powell has been shown to have been wrong, and the newly released Joint Forces Command report of lessons learned from the Iraq war, completed in late 2003, adds to that embarrassing record. Ali Hassan Al-Majeed, now on trial with Saddam in Baghdad for his use of chemical bombs against Kurds, told US interrogators that at some point before the US-led invasion Saddam told his Revolutionary Command Council that Iraq did not have prohibited weapons of mass destruction, but Saddam refused to tell the world that. He "flatly rejected a suggestion that the regime remove all doubts to the contrary, going on to explain that such a declaration might encourage the Israelis to attack," according to the report. The Foreign Affairs article, originally scheduled to be published in May, was released at the same time the New York Times on Sunday and Monday published excerpts of a book written jointly by its military reporter, Michael Gordon, and retired-Marine Lt. Gen. Bernard Trainor, which was published this week and is based partly on the Joint Forces Command report. Joint Forces Command personnel interviewed more than 100 Iraqi military officers and officials, and read through captured documents. Their book-length classified report focused primarily on the military details of the invasion and the rush to take Baghdad, as seen from both the US and Iraqi sides. David Kay, the first head of the Iraqi Survey Group that searched for Iraq's unconventional weapons after the March 2003 invasion, said Monday he had read parts of the classified report in late 2003 and thought it was quite good. A 1996 memo from the Iraqi Intelligence Service directing subordinates to "insure" there were not items related to prohibited weapons at their sites was the result of the earlier defection of Saddam's two sons-in-law, who told UN inspectors and US intelligence personnel that chemical, biological and nuclear weapons had all been destroyed. "Some stuff was still around because the sons-in-law, before defecting, had not carried out earlier instructions to destroy everything," Kay said. By late 2002, with UN inspectors back in Iraq and the United States building up its invasion force, Saddam decided to try to convince the world that he had in fact given up his prohibited weapons programs. Saddam "was insistent that Iraq would give full access to UN inspectors 'in order not to give President Bush any excuses to start a war'," said the article, quoting the Pentagon report. LATWP News ServiceUS said to misread Saddam on weapons

2003 Jordan Press & publishing Co. All rights reserved.

Provided by Syndigate.info an Albawaba.com company
COPYRIGHT 2006 Al Bawaba (Middle East) Ltd.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2006 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:The Star (Amman, Jordan)
Date:Mar 18, 2006
Words:706
Previous Article:Berlusconi remains in hunt for re-election.
Next Article:Slobodan Milosevic.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters