UNERASABLE: "Those who would destroy monument after monument to rid the nation of a subset of ugly parts of history do us all a grave disservice. They ignore the truths contained in the closing admonition in [Pres. Abraham] Lincoln's second Inaugural Address.".
The institution of slavery is a horrendous evil, inconsistent with our founding principles and humanity. To own a person, to force a person to perform labor against his or her will, and to subject a person to life dictated in every respect by another is an abomination, a robbery of the very reason for existence, of very nearly a person's soul. Slavery is so fundamental an offense that it defies credulity to distinguish between bondage and perpetual imprisonment and torture.
Although contrary to the Lockean principles so beautifully expressed in the Declaration of Independence, and although controversial even among the families of those individuals who vehemently defended the institution preceding the Civil War, the peculiar institution of slavery grew in the U.S. like a cancer, at first thought benign and likely to disappear without need for abolition but, by 1840, becoming a malignancy in the South, which Southerners dared not discontinue volitionally. Yet, while the institution of slavery is abhorrent, as was the Confederate States of America, which intended to preserve it, individuals such as Robert E. Lee, Thomas Jonathan "Stonewall" Jackson, and Jubal Anderson Early--who believed their duties to their states first and foremost--ought not be condemned with a broad brush stroke that aims to remove any mention of them from history or any image of them from the public square. Those men helped define military tactics of the age and were possessed of many personal attributes that define greatness. To be sure, few of those who we revere in the world can be held to a standard of perfection. Indeed, it was Jesus Christ who reminded us of the folly associated with self-righteous indignation that would justify condemnation of the whole person for the sake of a single sin: "He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone."
The same folly preoccupies those whose political correctness drives them to expunge from history and the public square every artifact or reference to the support for or the defense of the institution of slavery. There is much to be learned from many of the great generals of the Civil War who fought on the side of the Confederacy, not least of which is their deft strategic use of troops to enable a force outnumbered and ill-equipped to defeat a Union foe repeatedly.
We justly may abhor slavery, but we should not erase history in the process. We need to understand slavery and, to understand it, we not only must discover what life was like under the institution of slavery, but what caused those who participated in it, defended it, and condoned it to do so. The search for knowledge and truth depends on the discovery of ignorance and falsehood. We learn from our mistakes, and we are bound to commit them again if we suppress the evidence of those mistakes.
The statues of Confederate soldiers and generals are monuments to individuals who share the complexities of us all. Those people are multifaceted, with lives defined by a loyalty to their states, torn apart by the conflict between Union and states, driven to defend their families, and distinguished by their conflicting beliefs (passionately committed to individual rights yet apologists for slavery; exceedingly faithful yet willing to defend man's inhumanity to man).
With hindsight, we may see all too clearly the fallacy that is the institution of slavery--the repugnance of the notion that one people of one race should have a legal right to control the lives of another people of another race--but, for many who fought for the Confederacy (the vast majority of whom never owned slaves; less than two percent of the Southern population were slave owners), the cause was just because they conceived the war to be against their states, families, and way of life.
The American Civil War defines the nation precisely because it was a war of brother against brother, a Cain-versus-Abel struggle, a conflict that we should endeavor to understand rather than write out of existence. It is instructive to reflect upon the mighty rhetoric in Pres. Abraham Lincoln's second Inaugural Address. A spirit of charity rises above the base fight of good versus evil and enables us to view the past with maturity--without the need to suppress the historical record.
Having lived the equivalent of more than a single lifetime in his struggle to preserve the Union and end the institution of slavery, Lincoln had what many viewed as just cause to obliterate the South. The victors had righteousness on their side and the sweep of abolitionism could have violently punished the former slaveholders, but Lincoln had no such intention because his was a commitment to charity; he offered grace instead of destruction.
Lincoln, like Lee, viewed slavery in biblical terms. The Lord would abolish it from the face of the Earth when the Lord was ready. If the Union won the war, it was due in no small measure to a Divine Providence that intended for the institution of slavery to be eradicated from the South but, while Lincoln meant for slavery to end, he did not view those responsible for the institution as worthy of total condemnation. Rather, he understood that, as for their actions to sustain slavery, they would be appropriately judged by God and should not be judged by Lincoln. It was for the Union to end slavery but to forgive the sinner, to welcome back into the Union those whose sin it was to subject others to bondage.
Lincoln spoke of the illegitimacy of slavery, but did not translate that view into a condemnation of those who enslaved others and of those who fought for a Confederacy dedicated to perpetuate slavery. "It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged."
For Lincoln, slavery was an offense that the Union fought to end, but whether the Union would be allowed to bring it to an end ultimately was a matter for God. "If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away...."
If he could end the scourge of slavery throughout the U.S., Lincoln was, in that, contented. He did not want more destruction but, instead, wanted healing once the sin was removed. "With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations."
Those who would destroy monument after monument to rid the nation of a subset of ugly parts of history do us all a grave disservice. They ignore the truths contained in the closing admonition in Lincoln's second Inaugural Address. They lack the maturity and wisdom that enables a person to deplore some aspects of an individual's life while simultaneously admiring other aspects--or to recognize an individual's historic significance without having to agree with that person's political philosophy.
It is that same lack of maturity and wisdom that leads youth on college campuses to rant and rave during a speaker's presentation because the speaker does not hold views identical to their own. In truth, these destructive and speech suppressive actions are the real scourge that burdens our nation today, certainly not the presence of inanimate statues that remind us of that great test of national endurance, the Civil War.
BY JONATHAN W. EMORD
Jonathan W. Emord is an attorney and the principal of Emord and Associates, Clifton, Va., and the author of several books, including Restore the Republic--How the American People Can Once Again Be Free and Prosperous.
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||NATIONAL AFFAIRS|
|Author:||Emord, Jonathan W.|
|Publication:||USA Today (Magazine)|
|Date:||Nov 1, 2017|
|Previous Article:||Woe Is the Therapeutic Culture.|
|Next Article:||FREE SPEECH IS NOT FREE REIGN.|