Printer Friendly

UNDERWATER ROBOTIC VEHICLES: LATEST DEVELOPMENT TRENDS AND POTENTIAL CHALLENGES.

Byline: Ahmad Mahmood Tahir and Jamshed Iqbal

ABSTRACT " The treacherous underwater working environment demands state of the art operational technology. Innovation in these technologies has been driven by the need to have a reliable flexible productive and reconfigurable machine termed as Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) that can work in ever-increasing depths following an optimized strategy. In addition to basic equipment e.g. video camera(s) light sources water samplers etc ROVs may be equipped with one or more accessories such as a manipulator arm SONARs magnetometers and other instruments for measuring temperature light and water parameters. Their tasks include operations in sub-sea for structure inspection repair and placement of underwater manifolds and other applications under the water. This paper is an intensive study of hightech ROV systems and supporting tools for this technology. This review is

potentially useful to assess the role of ROV as ocean vehicles and can serve as a guide for scientists and engineers working in the area of underwater technologies.

I. INTRODUCTION

Recent era witnessed ever expanding applications of robots. Robots are being used actively in rehabilitation [1-5] motion assistance [6-9] cognition [10 11] haptics/VR [12] and target detection and tracking [13 14] nuclear plants [15] Space [16 17] and numerous other industrial [18-20] and educational [21-29] applications. One important application of robotics lie beneath the ground. Under-water vehicles were initially taken into operation for military applications. Dated back to 1950s the Royal Navy of Great Britain employed a submersible for recovering torpedoes and removal of undersea mines. In 1960s a Cable-Controlled Underwater Recovery Vehicle (CURV) intended for rescue and recovery operations in a deep-sea was realized by US Navy that were succeeded by CURV II and CURV III recovery vehicles in early 1970s. With the development and growth of offshore industry in

1980's and 90's that initial trend of military Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) shifted towards the oil and gas education and ocean science research. A typical ROV implementation showing CURV III in operation is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Today ROVs are considered amongst the most expensive categories of professional service robots. According to International Federation of Robotics (IFR) the unit price for an underwater system was about US$850000 in 2010. Such systems have seventh highest unit sales in 2010 subsequent to medical logistic construction mobile platforms cleaning and inspection service robots. Underwater vehicles can be classified as manned and unmanned vehicles. Unmanned vehicles are either tethered which are called ROVs or untethered which are known as Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs). ROVs are further classified as observation-class working-class and special use vehicles [30]. ROVs can also be classified depending upon their size weight operating depth and operating power.

This paper presents significant early developments of ROVs and in-depth reviews the state of-the-art. Their imperative role has been discussed by highlighting the importance of these vehicles. Based on different performance metrics (e.g. operational depth max. velocity manipulation capacity sensing and auto-pilot capabilities maneuvering weight application areas etc) ROVs reported in the literature have been appraised. The paper is arranged as follows: Section II sheds light on ROV from historical point of view. Section III lists popular ROVs reported in the literature. Section IV discusses system simulators and professional bodies about ROV. Finally Section V comments on conclusion and highlights the key challenges and future directions.

II. ROVS HUMAN'S HISTORICAL OCEANIC DELEGATE

ROV has substantial occupation in service to the human beings for exploring oceanic world and dealing with underwater deployments. Scientific literature does not pin point the first ROV developed historically. The CUTLET ROV (illustrated in Fig. 2) has been categorically highlighted as a pioneer remotely operated oceanic fellow that was developed and introduced by the Royal Navy in 1950's to recover practice torpedoes [31]. The ROV was designed to work at the depth of the seabed. Main frame of the CUTLET was of aluminum equipped with lights and camera. An electric motor was used for its manipulation. To grip the target objects a metal claw was mounted on the arms attached to the main frame. This vehicle was remained operational till 1980s.

Later on in 1953 a Frenchman Dimitri Rebikoff conceived RP-32 Poodle [32]. XN-3 underwater vehicle of US Navy is also considered amongst the early developments which were further modified in 1960s as CURV a work class ROV shown in Fig. 3. It was first time that ROVs gained significant recognition [32] which was due to role of CURV in recovery operations in Mediterranean Sea [31]. In 1966 a B-52 bomber collided with a tanker aircraft during refueling and both were crashed into waters near Polamares in southern Spain. US deployed CURV to recover a hydrogen bomb at the depth of 2850ft. For this CURV was modified to work at a depth which was beyond its designed operational capability. Later the CURV was tailored to develop CURV II (Fig. 4) and a series of advanced ROVs including CURV II-B CURV II-C and CURV III.

CURV III (Fig. 5) was the most sophisticated ROV of CURV series. It was designed to operate at 6000 feet underwater with a weight of 5.85 tons employing fiber-optic tether. The vehicle was facilitated with onboard hydraulic power system generator operations and maintenance van and acoustic tracking system for navigation. Electrical power for the system was provided through a diesel generator or through compatible auxiliary power sources. The vehicle offered remote maneuvering with six Degrees Of Freedom (DOF) for depth altitude and heading using altimeter and depth-meter sensors. To interact with the target spots it was equipped with Continuous Transmission Frequency Modulated (CTFM) sonar sensors TV cameras digital cameras and two manipulators. It was primarily used in a major overhaul activity in Azores Fixed Acoustic Range (AFAR) at the depth of 7000 feet with sonar system CCTV and

documentary camera systems undersea lighting system electro-hydraulic manipulation system and other application specific tools. The most prominent operation conducted by CURV III was retrieval of a manned underwater vehicle from Irish sea near Cork in 1973 saving the pilots of Pisces [32].

In offshore oil and gas industry first ROV for a well operation was the Manipulator Operated roBOT (MOBOT) developed by H. L. Shatto and Shell in 1962. MOBOT was a modified version of a ground vehicle [31]. The opening of research in ROVs in education and science which was actually shift from military to commercial ROVs evolved in 1980's and progressed onwards due to the potential commercial benefits in oil and gas and sea exploration industry. The second annual conference and exhibition on ROVs in 1984 held in San Diego US witnessed demonstration of more than 400 vehicles most of which were intended for oil rig services. At that time the ROV technology made it possible for human beings to explore the oceans at the depth of 8000feet with a prospect to discover 98% oceanic world in the subsequent years.

III. ROVS AN EXCLUSIVE APPRAISAL

ResearchinROVtechnologytriggeredextensive developments in allied technologies like stereo vision sonar and acoustic systems tether systems navigation and positioning tools pipelines and structures inspection techniques robotics and automatic control systems. Such developments resulted in realization of many ROVs. Some popular systems are presented below:

A. TIBURON MBARI developed its first ROV Ventana with an operational depth of 1850m in 1991 to capture underwater photographs and to collect data samples at Monterey Bay. Tiburon (Fig. 6) an ocean science research ROV was the modified and extended version of Ventana. First prototype of Tiburon was developed and tested in 1993-94. It was launched in 1997 to explore the undersea world to its designed depth of 4000m. The vehicle was provided with 1600V and 400Hz three phase AC power through a 17.3mm

steel tether. Six thruster motors of 5HP were installed for vehicle movements. The vehicle was equipped with four toolsleds for underwater investigation including Mid-water toolsled for fauna observation with lights and imaging capability Benthic sampling toolsled for sample collections Geotechnical toolsled equipped with tools for drilling and sensors (temperature and resistivity) and the Survey toolsled equipped with stereo video and side-scan sonar for imaging and 3D data representation. The vehicle was able to move at 23.4m/minute in forward direction with full system deployed. Neglecting tether drag the lateral velocity was 24.6m/minute and the vertical natural buoyant speed was 30.48m/minute. GUI for remote control was on HP Unix workstation with a joystick support. Customized software for manipulation velocity control and power management was employed. Payload capacity of the vehicle was around 340Kg with 68Kg variable buoyancy capability. The vehicle was used for collecting animals and species for Monterey bay aquarium and science research analysis of deep water sequestering CO2 effects and residue carriage and erosion in submarine canyons identification of lava flows installation of the seafloor cables and spectrometer and biological research in the Monterey bay area.

B. SEAPUP

Sealion is a series of ROVs developed by Techno-Transfer Industries. Seaup a work class ROV is one of the Sealion family members developed in 1997-98 with 95% electronics compatibility within the Sealion family making it low cost in the ROV market. Seaup was designed for a depth of 600m with five thrusters providing 20HP for forward lateral and vertical movements. The vehicle was capable of auto heading (1.5 degree) auto depth (100mm) auto altitude (100mm) and auto turn (.1turn) controlled by vehicle control unit using a microprocessor based SCADA system. It was equipped with a compass depth sensor echo sounder 3 cameras with pan tilt and focus functions variable intensity light one 3function manipulator and support for sonar. All of this equipment was manipulated through vehicle control unit. Surface control unit was a Windows based PC which was linked with the vehicle control unit through a telemetry system.

C. VICTOR 6000

French research organization IFREMER developed Victor 6000 a member of Nautile SAR and Cyana ROVs. The project was started in 1992 and accomplished in 1997. As the name indicates the ROV (Fig. 7) was a 6000m underwater vehicle with 0.77m/s speed. It was a 4ton vehicle with six thrusters and 8000m tether with 6 optical fiber cables. Real time system was employed for the vehicle control system with 2 VEM computers one each in the vehicle and on the surface unit. Vehicle was equipped with 2 pilot cameras 3CCD camera Sonar altitude and pressure depth sensors a 7-function arm for manipulation with a 5-function arm for grasping applications. Its modular design allowed carrying application specific toolsled. Major operations involved German icebreaking research vessel polarstern investigating significant reasons for functional benthic biodiversity in polar deep sea geological

optical and mid ocean rift survey West African continental margin ecosystems hydro-thermal vents inspection and local ar a investigation.

D. PEMEX's ROV

Forvisualanalysisofunderwaterstructuresan observation class ROV design was proposed in 2010. The system (Fig. 8) was devised for Federal Mexican Oil Company to inspect pipelines oil production units and other structures in deep waters [33]. The proposed system consisted of surface unit launching unit tether management unit and the vehicle. The vehicle was designed to operate at the depth of 2000m with six thrusters 5-function hydraulic manipulator and a 3-phase power supply for 440VAC. The manipulator was operated from the surface unit using a joystick. The vehicle was equipped with depth sensor compass altimeter rate gyros sonar 3 cameras and 4 lights. The velocity of the vehicle was 0.55m/s vertically 1.25m/s in forward and 1m/s in reverse direction. Additionally the sensory system consisted of sensors for measuring internal temperature and humidity voltage and current.

E. Human-Sized ROV with Dual-Arm

As the name suggested this ROV is capable of working like a diver by performing its tasks with two hands. It has been tested at the depth of 10-20meters in Biwa Lake Japan [34]. Key features of this design are dual manipulator system (Fig. 9) and the attitude control system which makes it capable of controlling the attitude angle and keeping the vehicle in horizontal plane. With 56Kg weight the ROV has six thrusters for driving force. It has been equipped with a camera light pressure sensor accelerometer and angle rate gyro and magnetometer sensors. Each of the manipulator with 3.6Kg weight underwater has 5 DOF four for the arm joints and a gripper hand. Harmonic motors have been used for these joints motions. To control the multi-DOF of this vehicle a purposedesigned master-slave control system has been implemented. To control the vehicle movements

two joysticks have been mounted on the controller each of which has push button for pitch angle control. The system offers an operator the control over vehicle attitude and dual manipulator. F. The Eyeball ROV To get the required video image in a narrow workspace like pipelines with requisite capability of camera orientation a small spherical ROV design illustrated in Fig. 10 has been proposed by researchers at MIT [35]. The ROV can revolve and reorient itself like an eyeball without altering the position acquired by the ROV body. The vehicle can execute this motion using the gimbal mechanism employing a pair of thrusters with non-holonomic constraints. Gimbaled mechanism is being employed for the first time in underwater vehicles. eyeball designed motion. Yaw motion is especially complex to execute and control using the moments about roll and pitch axes. An array of two thrusters has been employed to create a moment combined with that of eccentric mass to control the three required motions. The eyeball ROV design offers passive collision avoidance with its spherical shape increased robustness due to less number of actuators and application specific scalable structure.

G. HYBRID-ROV

Marine Environmental Sciences MARUM (University of Bremen Germany) is working on a design ROV/Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) for high-risk zones like under-ice operations hydrothermal vents and harsh topography near the seabed. The proposed system is aimed at reaching and balancing itself at the depth of 4000m with and/or without the tether [36]. The designed ROV (Fig.11) has large front size and appropriate distance between centers of buoyancy and mass which makes it slow and stable with an additional support from tether. In contrast to this AUV with torpedo shape will make it faster and less stable at low speeds. The design has 7 thrusters: two tunnel thrusters for yaw and hovering three thrusters for vertical axis and two ring-thrusters for forward speed. Digital Telemetry Subsea nodes are to be used for power transmission information routing and signal transmission. The vehicle is planned to be furnished with general ROV equipment like cameras lights pan tilt unit drawer box and the manipulator. The intended tether is re-enforced fibers of 2mm dia with an operational range of 4 to 5Km. The vehicle will work as an AUV to perform the required tasks in case the tether is snapped or detached.

IV. ROVS SIMULATORS AND PROFESSIONAL BODIES

Scientific literature reports simulators for facilitating understanding of ROVs functionality and various related professional bodies. A. ROV System Simulators

SeaMaster is a purpose-designed simulation platform for education and training of ROV manipulator's tele-operations [37]. The simulator regulates the actual arm through a GUI employing a master control arm. Surrounding environment is simulated in a 3D view. Both Manipulator and ROV can be controlled using additional devices connected to the computer. Block diagram of SeaMaster simulator is illustrated in Fig. 12.

The simulator offered three control modes which include rate-mode for joint manipulation master-slave for coordinated operations and data-driven for repetitive tasks. It also offered manipulator operations in fixed-base or movingbase modes employing underwater dynamics.

Another platform Micro ROV Simulator has been designed for micro ROVs using modular approach to accommodate additional functions. The simulator [38] offered environment to develop 3D view of the ROV and its manipulator. Additional functions include camera manipulation gripper management and factual lightening. Two user interfaces have been provided. The control user interface (Fig. 13a) offered joystick console for axes control gripper control light control and zooming capability while the visual user interface (Fig. 13b) provided information about the position and orientation of the ROV its velocity depth and the compass value. Office of naval research USA sponsored virtual environment training for the ROV pilots under the

program of Training for Remote Sensing and Manipulation (TRANSoM) [39]. The vehicle simulations were generated in the simulator employing virtual environment technology. For trainee guidance especially in case of critical tasks Intelligent Tutoring System (ITS) has been built in the simulator. Employing ITS users were able to interact with sensory data virtual environment and virtual vehicle through a tracking display and interface box. System components of TRANSoM are shown in Fig. 14.

B. Professional ROV Organizations and Societies

A number of diversified specialized societies exist dealing with various aspects of ROV. These organizations either offer direct assistance or provide collaboration in research and development education and training scholarship awards international and national competitions and conferences and database services. To name active organizations: Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Marine Technology Society National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration USA National Oceanography Centre Southampton Marine Advanced Technology Education Centre Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International NPS Submerged Resource Center Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Institute of Ocean Science Canada IFREMER France Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering Association of Diving Contractors International etc.

V. CONCLUSION

Exploration of undersea natural world and human deployments in a safe and productive manner can be considered as the key challenge in developing ROVs. Another vital concern is to provide cost effective and less expensive ROV solutions for educational and training purposes. These rationales present a whole range of dares and defies such as the development of cheap yet high quality underwater imaging technology better power management techniques improved tethering techniques for power supply and signal transformation etc.

With the increase in the cost effectiveness of these vehicles the application intensity and areas will definitely expand replacing the human divers and manned vehicles. A near future direction that is to develop hybrid underwater vehicles has already been taken up by MARUM Germany. The difficulty for hybrid structures is to ensure robustness and stability at the same time. A far future move is to transfer from ROVs to AUGs. The most prominent advantage of this independent thus making them more dynamic. In that case with more dynamic capability improved communication techniques and underwater technologies would be required. Additionally the other aspect of this future direction would be to design more stable structures for AUVs which can hover themselves at a required sea depth to accomplish a task.

Keeping man in the loop major applications of ROVs include activities like rescue and recovery operations science research operations for undersea world technology testing engagements etc. Improvement in the quality of associated technologies and their readily availability will further widen their application domains.

REFERENCES

[1] J. Iqbal A.H. Khan N.G. Tsagarakis and D.G. Caldwell A novel exoskeleton robotic system for hand rehabilitation Conceptualization to prototyping" Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering 34(2):7989 2014.

[2] J. Iqbal O.Ahmad and A. Malik HEXOSYS II Towards realization of light mass robotics for the hand" 15th IEEE International Multitopic Conference (INMIC) Karachi Pakistan pp. 115-119 2011.

[3] J. Iqbal N.G. Tsagarakis A.E. Fiorilla and D.G. Caldwell A portable rehabilitation device for the hand" 32nd annual IEEE international conference of Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS) Buenos Aires Argentina pp. 3694-3697 2010.

[4] J. Iqbal N.G. Tsagarakis and D.G. Caldwell A human hand compatible optimised exoskeleton system" IEEE international conference on RObotics and BIOmimetics (ROBIO) China pp. 685-690 2010.

[5] J. Iqbal N.G. Tsagarakis and D.G. Caldwell Design optimization of a hand exoskeleton rehabilitation device" Proceedings of RSS workshop on understanding the human hand for advancing robotic manipulation Seattle US pp. 44-45 2009.

[6] J. Iqbal N.G. Tsagarakis and D.G. Caldwell Human hand compatible underactuated exoskeleton robotic system" IET Electronic Letters 50(7):494-496 2014.

[7] A.A. Khan S. Riaz and J. Iqbal Surface estimation of a pedestrian walk for outdoor use of power wheelchair based robot" Life Sci J -Acta Zhengzhou University Overseas Edition; 10(3): 1697-1704 2013.

[8] J. Iqbal N.G. Tsagarakis and D.G. Caldwell A multiDOF robotic exoskeleton interface for hand motion assistance" 33rd annual IEEE international conference of Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS) Boston US pp. 1575-1678 2011.

[9] J. Iqbal N.G. Tsagarakis A.E. Fiorilla and D.G. Caldwell Design requirements of a hand exoskeleton robotic device" 14th IASTED International Conference on Robotics and Applications (RA) Massachusetts US pp. 44-51 2009.

[10] K. Naveed J. Iqbal and H. ur Rahman Brain controlled human robot interface" IEEE International Conference Islamabad Pakistan pp. 55-60 2012.

[11] M. M. Azeem J. Iqbal P. Toivanen and A. Samad Emotions in robots" Emerging Trends and Applications in Information Communication Technologies Communications in Computer and Information Science (CCIS) Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg vol. 281 pp. 144153 2012.

[12] J. Iqbal N. G. Tsagarakis and D.G. Caldwell Design of a wearable direct-driven optimized hand exoskeleton device" 4th International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions (ACHI) France pp. 142146 2011.

[13] J. Iqbal M. Pasha S. Riaz H. Khan and J. Iqbal Realtime target detection and tracking: A comparative indepth review of strategies" Life Sci J Acta Zhengzhou University Overseas Edition 10(3): 804-8132013.

[14] J. Iqbal S.M. Pasha B. Khelifa A.A. Khan and J. Iqbal Computer vision inspired real-time autonomous moving target detection tracking and locking" Life Sci J Acta Zhengzhou University Overseas Edition 10(4): 33383345 2013.

[15] J. Iqbal A. Tahir R. U. Islam and R.un Nabi Robotics for nuclear power plants Challenges and future perspectives" IEEE International Conference on Applied Robotics for the Power Industry (CARPI) Zurich Switzerland pp. 151-156 2012.

[16] J. Iqbal S. Heikkila and A. Halme Tether tracking and control of ROSA robotic rover" 10th IEEE International Conference on Control Automation Robotics and Vision (ICARCV) Vietnam pp. 689 693 2009.

[17] J. Iqbal M. R. Saad A. M. Tahir and A. Malik State estimation technique for a planetary robotic rover" Revista Facultad de Ingenieria-Universidad de Antioquia (In Press) 2014.

[18] R. U. Islam J. Iqbal S. Manzoor A. Khalid and S. Khan An autonomous image-guided robotic system simulating industrial applications" 7th IEEE International Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SoSE) Italy pp. 344-349 2012.

[19] K. Baizid R. Chellali A. Yousnadj A. Meddahi J. Iqbal and T. Bentaleb Modelling of robotized site and simulation of robots optimum placement and orientation zone" 21st IASTED International Conference on Modelling and Simulation (MS) Canada pp. 9-16 2010.[20] A. Meddahi K. Baizid A. Yousnadj and J. Iqbal API based graphical simulation of robotized sites" 14th IASTED International Conference on Robotics and Applications (RA) Massachusetts US pp. 485-492 2009.

[21] S. Manzoor R.U. Islam A. Khalid A. Samad and J. Iqbal An open-source multi-DOF articulated robotic educational platform for autonomous object manipulation" Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing 30(3): 351-3622014.

[22] U. Iqbal A. Samad Z. Nissa and J. Iqbal Embedded control system for AUTAREP A novel AUTonomous Articulated Robotic Educational Platform" Tehnicki Vjesnik-Technical Gazette 21(6) (In Press) 2014.

[23] J. Iqbal S. Riaz A. Khan and H. Khan A novel trackdrive mobile robotic framework for conducting projects on robotics and control systems" Life Sci J Acta Zhengzhou University Overseas Edition 10(3):130-137 2013.

[24] O. Ahmad I. Ullah and J. Iqbal A multi-robot educational and research framework" International Journal of Academic Research (IJAR) Part A ISSN: 2075-4124 (print) 2075-7107 (online) 6(2):217-222 2014.

[25] R. U. Islam J. Iqbal and Q. Khan Design and comparison of two control strategies for multi-DOF articulated robotic arm manipulator" Control Engineering and Applied Informatics (CEAI) 16(2):2839 2014.

[26] M. F. Khan R. U. Islam and J. Iqbal Control strategies for robotic manipulators" IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Artificial Intelligence (ICRAI) Islamabad Pakistan pp. 26-33 2012.

[27] M. Zohaib S.M. Pasha N. Javaid A. Salaam and J. Iqbal An improved algorithm for collision avoidance in environments having U and H shaped obstacles" Studies in Informatics and Control (SIC) ISSN: 1220-1766 23(1): 97-106 2014.

[28] S.R. Jafri J. Iqbal H. Khan and R. Chellali A unified SLAM solution using partial 3D structure" Elektronika Ir Elektrotechnika (Journal of Electronics and Electrical Engineering) ISSN 1392-1215 (In Press)

[29] M. Zohaib S.M. Pasha H. Bushra K. Hassan and J. Iqbal Addressing collision avoidance and nonholonomic constraints of a wheeled robot: Modeling and simulation" IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Emerging Allied Technologies in Engineering (iCREATE) pp. 306-311 2014. [30] R. W. Christ and R. L. Wernli The ROV Manual: A User Guide to Observation-class Remotely Operated Vehicles (1st ed.) Burlington B.H. Elsevier 2007[31] G. I. Matsumoto and T. A. Potts Two ways of researching the underwater world" Brooks/Cole Enrichment Module. pp. 26 2011

[32] T. Murphree D. Michel D. Sullivan and J. Zande Remotely operated vehicles" Knowledge and skill guidelines for marine science and technology Volume 3 Marine advanced technology center 2011

[33] T. S. Jimenez J.L.G. Lopez L.F.M. Soto E. Lopez P.A.R. Gonzalez and M.B. Sanchez Deep water ROV design for the Mexican oil industry" IEEE Oceans Conference pp. 1-6 2010

[34] N. Sakagami M. Shibata H. Hashizume Y. Hagiwara K. Ishimaru T. Inoue H. Onishi and S. Murakami Development of a human-sized ROV with dual-arm" IEEE Oceans Conference pp. 1-6 2010

[35] I. C. Rust and H.H. Asada The Eyeball ROV: Design and control of a spherical underwater vehicle steered by an internal eccentric mass" IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) China pp. 5855 5862 2011

[36] G. Meinecke V. Ratmeyer and J. Renken HybridROVDevelopment of a new underwater vehicle for high-risk areas" IEEE Oceans Conference pp. 1-6 2011

[37] E. I. Agba SeaMaster: An ROVmanipulator system simulator" IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications pp. 24-31 1995

[38] Z. Fabekovi Z. Eskinja and Z. Vuki Micro ROV Simulator" 49th IEEE International Symposium ELMAR Croatia pp. 97-101 2007

[39] B. Fletcher ROV simulation validation and verification" MTS/IEEE Oceans Conference pp. 10641069 1997
COPYRIGHT 2014 Asianet-Pakistan
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2014 Gale, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Science International
Article Type:Report
Date:Sep 30, 2014
Words:4342
Previous Article:CRUDE OIL LAYER SORPTION FROM SALINE WATER SURFACE BY RAW AND ACETYLATED SUGARCANE BAGASSE.
Next Article:INVESTIGATION OF GENERATION AND LOAD UNCERTAINTIES ON ELECTRICITY MARKETS.
Topics:

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters