UAE - Pax Americana Is Changing - Part 19E - Dubai's P&O Acquisition.
Michael Seymour, president of P&O's North American arm, was on Feb. 21 quoted as saying the company's lawyers would have to examine the lawsuit before he could comment on it. He said his company "is itself a foreign-owned terminal operator that has long worked with US government officials in charge of security at the ports to meet all US government standards, as do other foreign companies that currently operate ports in the United States".
"We are confident", Seymour added, "that the DP World purchase [of P&O] will ensure that our operations continue to meet all relevant standards in the US through ongoing collaboration between the port operators and American, British, Australian and port security officials throughout the world".
US Treasury Secretary John Snow on Feb. 22 said a rejection by US lawmakers of DPW's acquisition would send a signal that foreign investments "from certain parts of the world aren't welcome". The remarks underscored tensions between the White House and US congressional lawmakers across the political spectrum who have condemned on the grounds of national security the Bush administration's decision to approve DPW's takeover of P&O.
Washington insiders were left to guess whether the White House or some of the most prominent lawmakers in Congress, including top Republicans in the House and Senate, would be the first to compromise on the issue after President George W. Bush warned on Feb. 21 that he would veto any legislative effort to block the acquisition deal.
Dubai has launched a lobbying campaign on Capitol Hill amid fears the backlash could undermine discussions about a free trade agreement. Reem al-Hashimy, the UAE's commercial attache in Washington who is handling the free trade talks, admitted surprise at some of the allegations against the UAE.
DPW had been buying shares in P&O heavily as a show of confidence that the deal will not be derailed despite problems in Washington and the strong likelihood that the deal will face a series of local battles with port authorities. An agreement to complete the transaction was due to be approved by a London court on Feb. 27.
The looming showdown in Washington prompted some business lobbyists to voice support for Bush's stance on the issue, emphasising that the US policy on foreign investments should not be politicised and that Congress's backlash against the deal was ultimately grounded in prejudice against Arab companies.
The White House has admitted to some mis-steps in its handling of the deal. But it has continued to defend it. Several US senators have threatened to propose legislation to block the transaction.
Some experts say that, despite the tough rhetoric, the White House might reach a compromise which would allow both sides to claim victory. The Financial Times on Feb. 24 quoted "David Marchick, an attorney who is an expert on US reviews of foreign deals", as saying: "I think the tide is turning on the deal. My sense is that they will be able to figure something out before Wednesday (March 1) that allows the deal to go forward without legislation that will satisfy Congress".
In its editorial on Feb. 16, The New York Times called on the Bush administration to reverse its approval of DPW's acquisition, arguing: "National security experts [in the US} have long warned that the [American] ports are a key point of vulnerability. One of the worst fears about terrorism is that a nuclear device might be shipped from overseas and set off when it arrived in a port in a large city. The federal government should be doing everything it can to ensure that port security is as rigorous as possible, including keeping port management in trusted hands".
|Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback|
|Title Annotation:||United Arab Emirates; Dubai Ports World acquires Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co.|
|Publication:||APS Diplomat Fate of the Arabian Peninsula|
|Date:||Feb 27, 2006|
|Previous Article:||UAE - Shaikh Sultan bin Muhammad al-Qassimi.|
|Next Article:||UAE - Islamophobia.|