Printer Friendly

U.S. district court claims. (Ex-Offenders).

Ramsey v. Schauble, 141 F.Supp.2d 584 (W.D.N.C. 2001). A former detainee whose finger tip as severed after a sheriff's deputy allegedly shut a cell window on it, brought a pro se complaint against the deputy and a sheriff. The district court held that the detainee stated a cognizable civil rights complaint against the sheriff, and the detainee pled a cause of action under a state law that provided that a keeper of a jail must pay treble damages if he/she does any wrong or injury to a detainee, and is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. The court found that jail officials ignored the detainee's cries for help after he was injured by the deputy and displayed deliberate indifference to his need to quick medical attention to preserve the possibility of reattaching the finger. The detainee was released from custody several hours after he was returned from the hospital, but officials refused to give the detainee pain medication prescribed by the hospital, requiring him to return to the jail periodically over the next several days to receive each pill individually. (Watauga County Law Enforcement Center, North Carolina)
COPYRIGHT 2001 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2001, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Aug 1, 2001
Words:193
Previous Article:U.S. district court release. (Ex-Offenders).
Next Article:U.S. district court prisoner on prisoner assault. (Failure to Protect).
Topics:


Related Articles
U.S. District Court: PRISONER ON PRISONER ASSAULT.
U.S. District Court: PROTECTION SEPARATION SUPERVISION.
U.S. District Court: SEPARATION PROTECTION.
U.S. District Court: DELIBERATE INDIFF., FAILURE TO SUPERVISE, INADEQUATE SUPERVISION, STAFFING LEVELS.
U.S. Appeals Court: PAROLE EX POST FACTO.
U.S. appeals court sex offenders. (Ex-Offenders).
U.S. v. Stegman.
U.S. v. Stegman.
Hatton v. Bonner.
Pelland v. Rhode Island.

Terms of use | Copyright © 2017 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters