Printer Friendly

U.S. EPA to require monitoring for Unregulated Contaminants.

www.epa.gov/safewater/ucmr

Approximately 4,000 public water systems will monitor drinking water for up to 25 unregulated chemicals to inform the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) about the frequency and levels at which these contaminants are found in drinking-water systems across the United States. The information will help determine whether regulations are needed to protect public health. This review is the second one scheduled under the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR 2).

U.S. EPA currently has regulations for more than 90 contaminants. The Safe Drinking Water Act requires the agency to identify up to 30 contaminants for monitoring every five years. The first review, UCMR 1, was published in 1999 and covered 25 chemicals and one microorganism. The new rule requires systems to monitor for contaminants that are not regulated under existing law.

For more information on UCMR 2 and U.S. EPA's Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Program, please visit the site listed above.
COPYRIGHT 2007 National Environmental Health Association
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2007, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:Environmental Health-'Net; Environmental Protection Agency
Publication:Journal of Environmental Health
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Apr 1, 2007
Words:160
Previous Article:CDC's Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases.
Next Article:NEHA's latest continuing-education opportunities.
Topics:


Related Articles
Water contents hard to swallow?
Risk communication: health risks associated with environmentally contaminated private wells versus chloroform in a public water supply.
Dairy Feedlot Contributions to Groundwater Contamination - A Preliminary Study in New Mexico.
Cleaner Air May Equal More Contaminated Water.
Shifting the experiment to the lab: does EPA have a mandatory duty to require chemical testing for endocrine disruption effects under the Toxic...
Environmental Statistics Center.
Using Biodegradation as a Remediation Tool.
Managing electronic waste: the California approach.
An assessment of drinking-water supplies on the Hanford Site: an evaluation conducted at a federal nuclear facility in southeastern Washington State.
The New Jersey residential well-testing program--a case study: Randolph Township.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters