Printer Friendly

U.S. District Court: MARRIAGE FAMILY.

Gerber v. Hickman 103 F.Supp.2d 1214 (E.D.Cal. 2000). A state prisoner serving 100 years to life brought a [sections]1983 action against a warden, alleging violation of his constitutional right to procreate by refusing to allow him to artificially inseminate his wife. The district court dismissed the case. The court held that the prisoner did not have a right to procreate through artificial insemination while incarcerated, nor to have conjugal visits. The court found that male inmates were not similarly situated to female inmates with respect to the decision to terminate a pregnancy and therefore the warden's refusal to allow male inmates to engage in artificial insemination while not requiring female inmates to terminate their pregnancies did not violate equal protection. (Mule Creek State Prison, California)
COPYRIGHT 2000 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:prisoners and prisons
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:Nov 1, 2000
Words:130
Previous Article:U.S. District Court: LITERATURE PUBLICATIONS.
Next Article:U.S. Appeals Court: NAME.
Topics:


Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: PRISONER ACCOUNTS.
Access to court.
Classification and separation.
Cruel and unusual punishment.
Discipline.
Good time.
Conditions of confinement.
Failure to protect.
Medical care.
7. Civil rights.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters