Printer Friendly

U.S. Appeals Court: PLRA-Prison Litigation Reform Act PARTIAL SUCCESS DETERMINATION.

Montcalm Pub. Corp. v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 199 F.3d 168 (4th Cir. 1999). A publisher who was granted leave to intervene in a suit challenging prison regulations that prevented access to sexually explicit magazines moved to recover attorney fees. The district court granted the fee award, subject to the fee limitations of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). The publisher appealed and the appeals court affirmed in part and reversed and remanded in part. The appeals court held that limits on attorney fees in PLRA govern the fees sought by a non-prisoner who intervenes in a case originally brought by a prisoner. The appeals court also held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in reducing the fee award to reflect lack of success and other factors. (Keen Mountain Correctional Center, Virginia)
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2000, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1USA
Date:May 1, 2000
Previous Article:U.S. District Court: RESTITUTION.
Next Article:U.S. District Court: ATTORNEY FEE.

Related Articles
U.S. District Court: PLRA-Prison Litigation Reform Act, CONSENT DECREE-DETERMINATION.
U.S. District Court: PLRA-Prison Litigation Reform Act.
U.S. Appeals Court: PLRA-Prison Litigation Reform Act Limitation.
U.S. District Court: LIMITATIONS PLRA-Prison Litigation Reform Act.
Access to court.
Attorney Fees.
Carruthers v. Jenne.
Johnson v. Breeden.
Jackson v. State Bd. of Pardons and Paroles.
Attorney fees.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2020 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters