Printer Friendly

Tyler v. McCaughtry.

U.S. District Court

GOOD-TIME

DUE PROCESS

Tyler v. McCaughtry, 293 F.Supp.2d 920 (E.D.Wis. 2003). A state prisoner filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that his due process rights were violated when a prison disciplinary committee revoked his good time credits. The state moved to dismiss and the district court denied the motion. The court held that the summary judgment was precluded by a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the correctional facility's legal resources were the cause for the petitioner's default of federal claims in state court. (Dodge Correctional Institution, Wisconsin)
COPYRIGHT 2004 CRS, Inc.
No portion of this article can be reproduced without the express written permission from the copyright holder.
Copyright 2004, Gale Group. All rights reserved. Gale Group is a Thomson Corporation Company.

Article Details
Printer friendly Cite/link Email Feedback
Title Annotation:habeas corpus claim
Publication:Corrections Caselaw Quarterly
Article Type:Brief Article
Geographic Code:1U3WI
Date:Nov 1, 2004
Words:102
Previous Article:Sadler v. Young.
Next Article:Brown v. Braxton.
Topics:


Related Articles
U.S. Appeals Court: CLEMENCY CAPITAL PUNISHMENT.
U.S. Appeals Court: DUE PROCESS EVIDENCE.
Rasul v. Bush.
Rasul v. Bush.
Rasul v. Bush.
Tyler v. McCaughtry.
Tyler v. McCaughtry.
Gamble v. Calbone.
Tyler v. McCaughtry.
Thomas v. Barker.

Terms of use | Privacy policy | Copyright © 2019 Farlex, Inc. | Feedback | For webmasters